This article explores how well community participation explains variations in the performance of sanitation projects in Brazilian cities. Case studies of condominial sewers in Recife and Natal, Brazil, reveal a variety of activities that we categorize into four forms of participation: mobilizing, decision making, construction, and maintenance. Mobilizing and decision making were associated with performance in the cases we examined. Our results suggest that participation form as well as community influence are important. The hypothesis that increased participation enhances performance is an oversimplification for condominial sewers.
Arnstein, Sherry R.1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners35 (4): 216-24.
2.
Bakalian, Alexander, and N. Vijay Jagannathan .1991. Institutional aspects of the condominial sewer system. In Water and Sanitation. No. SW-6: World Bank Infrastructure Notes.
3.
Brudney, J.L., and R.E. England.1983. Toward a definition of the co-production concept. Public Administration Review43 (1): 59-65.
4.
Bryant, Coralie, and Louise G. White .1982. Managing development in the Third World. Boulder, CO: Westview .
5.
Cabrera, Ricardo.1995. Review of “Rural water and sanitation project” evaluations in Latin America. Report to CARE.
6.
Collier, David, and James Mahoney.1996. Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics49 (1): 56-91.
7.
Cooke, Bill, and Uma Kothari , eds. 2001. Participation: The new tyranny? London and New York: Zed Books.
8.
Finsterbusch, Kurt, and Warren A. Van Wicklin .1987. The contribution of beneficiary participation to development project effectiveness. Public Administration and Development7:1-23.
9.
George, A., and A. Bennett.2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss .1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
11.
Hochstetler, Kathryn.2000. Democratizing pressures from below? Social movements in the new Brazilian democracy. In DemocraticBrazil: Actors, institutions, and processes, edited by Peter R. Kingstone and Timothy J. Power, 162-82. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
12.
Isham, Jonathan, and Satu Kahkonen.1999. What determines the effectiveness of community-based water projects? Evidence from Central Java, Indonesia on demand, responsiveness, service rules, and social capital. Social capital initiative working paper no. 14. Washington, DC: World Bank.
13.
Isham, Jonathan, Deepa Narayan, and Lant Pritchett.1995. Does participation improve performance? Establishing causality with subjective data. World Bank Economic Review9 (2): 175-200.
14.
Joshi, Anuradha, and MickMoore. 2004. Institutionalized coproduction: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. Journal of Development Studies40 (4): 31-49.
15.
Khwaja, Asim I.2002. Can good projects succeed in bad communities? Collective action in public good provision. John F. Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Papers, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
16.
———. 2004. Is increasing community participation always a good thing?Journal of the European Economic Association2 (2-3): 427-36.
17.
Korten, David C.1980. Community organization and rural development: A learning process approach. Public Administration Review40:480-511.
18.
Korten, David C., and Felipe B. Alfonso .1985. Bureaucracy and the poor: Closing the gap. West Hartford: Kumarian.
19.
Levine, C.H.1984. Citizenship and service delivery: The promise of co-production . Public Administration Review44:178-87.
20.
Mainwaring, Scott.1989. Grassroots popular movements and the struggle for democracy: Nova Iguacu. In DemocratizingBrazil: Problems of transition and consolidation, edited by Alfred Stepan, 168-204. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
———. 1999. Rethinking party systems in the third wave of democratization: The case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Menendez, Aurelio.1991. Access to basic infrastructure by the urban poor. Economic development institute policy seminar report no. 28. Washington, DC: World Bank.
24.
Mill, John Stuart. [1843] 1967. A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
25.
Nance, Earthea B.2004. Putting participation in context: An evaluation of urban sanitation in Brazil. PhD diss., Stanford University , California.
26.
———. 2005. Multistakeholder evaluation of condominial sewer services . American Journal of Evaluation26 (4): 480-500.
27.
———. 2006. Brazil's transition to participatory sanitation, 1980-1995 . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, San Juan, Puerto Rico .
28.
Narayan, Deepa.1995. The contribution of people's participation: Evidence from 121 rural water supply projects. Environmentally sustainable development occasional paper series no. 1. Washington, DC: World Bank.
29.
Ostrom, Elinor.1992. Crafting institutions for self-governing irrigation systems . San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
30.
———. 1996. Crossing the great divide: Co-production, synergy, and development. World Development24 (6):1073-88
31.
Ostrom, Elinor, Roger B. Parks, and Gordon Whitaker.1978. Patterns of metropolitan policing. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
32.
Ostrom, Elinor, Larry Schroeder, and Susan Wynne.1993. Institutional incentives and sustainable development: Infrastructure policies in perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview .
33.
Parks, Roger, Paula Baker, Larry Kiser, Ronald Oakerson, Elinor Ostrom, Vincent Ostrom, Stephen Percy, Martha Vandivort, Gordon Whitaker, and Rick Wilson.1982. Co-production of public services. In Analyzing urban service distributions, edited by Richard C. Rich, 185-99. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
34.
Patton, Michael Quinn.2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Paul, Samuel.1987. Community participation in development projects: The World Bank experience. In World bank discussion paper no. 6. Washington, DC: World Bank.
36.
Percy, S.L.1984. Citizen participation in the co-production of urban services . Urban Affairs Review19 (4): 431-46.
37.
Prokopy, Linda S.2002. The relationship between participation and project outcomes: A study of rural drinking water projects in India. PhD diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill .
38.
———. 2005. The relationship between participation and project outcomes: Evidence from rural water supply projects in India. World Development33 (11): 1801-19.
39.
Ragin, Charles C.1997. Turning the tables: How case-oriented research challenges variable-oriented research. Comparative Social Research16:27-42.
40.
———. 2000. Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
41.
Rich, R.C.1981. Municipal service and the interaction of the voluntary and governmental sectors. Administration and Society13 (1): 59-76.
42.
Sara, Jennifer, and Travis Katz.1997. Making rural water supply sustainable: Report on the impact of project rules. UNDP-World Bank Water and Sanitation Program.
43.
Schubeler, Peter.1993, March. Participative strategies for improving urban infrastructure and services in developing countries. Draft. In Workshop for Architecture and Planning, Ltd., UNCHS Habitat. Nairobi, Kenya.
44.
Sinnatamby, Gehan S.1983. Low cost sanitation systems for urban peripheral areas in northeast Brazil. PhD dissertation, University of Leeds , UK.
45.
Sundeen, R.A.1985. Co-production and communities: Implications for local administrators. Administration and Society16 (4): 387-402.
46.
Wade, R.1988. The management of irrigation systems: How to evoke trust and avoid the prisoners' dilemma. World Development16 (4): 489-500.
47.
Watson, Gabrielle.1995. Good sewers cheap? Agency-customer interactions in low-cost urban sanitation in Brazil. World Bank Water and Sanitation Division . Washington, DC: World Bank.
48.
Watson, Gabrielle, and N. Vijay Jagannathan .1995. Participation in water and sanitation. Environment Department papers: Participation series, paper no. ENV-002. Washington, DC: World Bank .
49.
Whitaker, Gordon P., 1980. Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery . Public Administration Review40 (3): 240-46.
50.
World Bank.1994. World development report 1994: Infrastructure for development. New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
———. 2004. World development report 2004: Making services work for poor people. New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
Wright, Albert M.1997, November. Toward a strategic sanitation approach: Improving the sustainability of urban sanitation in developing countries. In UNDP-World Bank Water and Sanitation Program (internal working document). Washington, DC : World Bank.
53.
Yin, Robert K.1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
