While sprawling growth patterns have become a major issue for planners and environmental managers, little empirical research has been conducted on the adoption of sprawl-reduction policies in local plans. The authors systematically evaluate the comprehensive plans of fortysix local jurisdictions in southern Florida for the presence of five sprawl-reduction planning policies (SRPPs) using planevaluation techniques. Results indicate a clear statistical and spatial pattern of SRPPs across the study area and show that specific socioeconomic and demographic characteristics influence the adoption of SRPPs in comprehensive plans.
Arendt, Randall. 1997. Basing cluster technique on development densities appropriate to the area. Journal of the American Planning Association63 (1): 137-145.
2.
Arnold, Chester L., and James C. Gibbons. 1996. Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association62 (2): 243-258.
3.
Audirac, I., and A. Shermyen. 1990. Ideal urban form and visions of the good life. Journal of the American Planning Association56 (4): 470-483.
4.
Bank of America. 1995. Beyond sprawl: New patterns of growth to fit the new California. San Francisco: Greenbelt Alliance, California Resources Agency, and Low Income Housing Fund.
5.
Beatley, Timothy. 2000. Preserving biodiversity: Challenges for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association66 (1): 5-20.
6.
Beatley, Timothy, and Kristy Manning. 1997. Ecology of place: Planning for environment, economy and community. Washington, DC: Island Press.
7.
Benfield, F. Kaid, Matthew D. Raimi, and Donald D. T. Chen. 1999. Once there were greenfields: How urban sprawl is undermining America's environment, economy and social fabric. New York: Natural Defense Resource Council and Surface Transportation Policy Project.
8.
Bengston, David N., Jennifer O. Fletcher, and Kristen C. Nelson. 2004. Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning69:271-286.
9.
Berke, Phillip R., J. Crawford, J. Dixon, and N. Erickson. 1998. Do co-operative environmental management mandates produce good plans? The New Zealand experience. Chapel Hill, NC: Department of City and Regional Planning.
10.
Berke, Philip, and Steven French. 1994. The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research13 (4): 237-250.
11.
Berke, Philip R., Dale J. Roegnik, Edward R. Kaiser, and Raymond Burby. 1996. Enhancing plan quality: Evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management39 (1): 79-96.
12.
Berry-Cullen, Julie, and Stephen D. Levitt. 1999. Crime, urban flight, and the consequences for cities. Review of Economic and Statistics81 (2): 159-169.
13.
Boyd, James R., and David Simpson. 1999. Economics and biodiversity conservation options: An argument for continued experimentation and measured expectations. The Science of the Total Environment240:91-105.
14.
Brody, Samuel D.2003a. Examining the effects of biodiversity on the ability of local plans to manage ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management46 (6): 817-837.
15.
Brody, Samuel D.2003b. Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management. Journal of Planning Education and Research22 (4): 107-119.
16.
Brody, Samuel D.2003c. Implementing the principles of ecosystem management through local land use planning. Population and Environment24 (6): 511-540.
17.
Brody, Samuel D., Virginia Carrasco, and Wes Highfield. 2004. Measuring the collective planning capabilities of local jurisdictions to manage ecological systems in southern Florida. Landscape and Urban Planning69:33-50.
18.
Brody, Samuel D., David R. Godschalk, and Raymond J. Burby. 2003. Mandating citizen participation in plan making: Six strategic planning choices. Journal of American Planning Association69 (3): 245-264.
19.
Brody, Samuel D., and Wesley E. Highfield. 2005. Does planning work? Testing the implementation of local environmental planning in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association71 (2): 159-175.
20.
Bullard, Robert D., Glenn S. Johnson, and Angel O. Torres. 2000. Sprawl city: Race, politics and planning in Atlanta. Washington, DC: Island Press.
21.
Burby, Raymond, and Linda Dalton. 1994. Plans can matter! The role of land use plans and state planning mandates in limiting the development of hazardous areas. Public Administration Review54 (3): 229-238.
22.
Burby, Raymond J., and Steven P. French. 1981. Coping with floods: The land use management paradox. Journal of the American Planning Association47 (3): 289-300.
23.
Burby, Raymond, and Peter May. 1998. Intergovernmental environmental planning: Addressing the commitment conundrum. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management41 (1): 95-110.
24.
Burchell, R. W., N. A. Shad, D. Listokin, H. Phillips, A. Downs, S. Seskin, J. S. Davis, T. Moore, D. Helton, and M. Gall. 1998. The costs of sprawl—revisited.Report 39. Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
25.
Carruthers, John I., and Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson. 2003. Urban sprawl and the cost of public services. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30:503-522.
26.
Catlin, Robert. 1997. Land use planning, environmental protection, and growth management: The Florida experience. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Press.
27.
Cieslewicz, David J.2002. The environmental impacts of sprawl. In Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences and Policy Responses, edited by Gregory D. Squires, 23-38. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
28.
Costonis, John. 1974. Space adrift: Landmark preservation and the marketplace.Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
29.
Cox, James, Randy Kautz, Maureen MacLaughlin, and Terry Gilbert. 1994. Closing the gaps in Florida's wildlife habitat conservation system. Tallahassee: Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission.
30.
Dalton, Linda, and Raymond Burby. 1994. Mandates, plans and planners: Building local commitment to development management. Journal of the American Planning Association60 (4): 444-461.
31.
Downs, Anthony. 2003. Why Florida's concurrency principles (for controlling new development by regulating road construction) do not—and cannot—work effectively. Transportation Quarterly57 (1): 13-18.
32.
Dramstead, Wenche E., James D. Olson, and Richard T. T. Forman. 1996. Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning. Washington, DC: Harvard Graduate School of Design, Island Press.
33.
Duany, Andres, Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, and Jeff Speck. 2000. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press.
34.
Duerksen, Christopher J., Donald L. Elliot, N. Thompson Hobbs, Erin Johnson, and James R. Miller. 1997. Habitat protection planning: Where the wild things are. APA Planning Advisory Report No. 470/471.
35.
Dunphy, Robert T., Deborah L. Brett, Sandra Rosenbloom, and Andre Bald. 1997. Moving beyond gridlock: Traffic and development. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
36.
Dwyer, John F., and Gina M. Childs. 2004. Movement of people across the landscape: A blurring of distinctions between areas, interests, and issues affecting natural resource management. Landscape and Urban Planning69:153-164.
37.
Ewing, Reid. 1997. Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?Journal of the American Planning Association63 (1): 107-126.
38.
Ewing, Reid, Tom Schmid, Richard Killingsworth, Amy Zlot, and Stephen Raudenbush. 2003. Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. American Journal of Health Promotion18 (1): 47-57.
39.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 2002. The post: The latest news from the Department of Environmental Protection, vol. 2, no. 7, March 29, 2002, http://www.dep.state.fl.us/secretary/Post/2002/mar2902.htm (accessed May 5, 2004).
40.
Forman, Richard T. T.1995. Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Fransson, Niklas, and Tommy Garling. 1999. Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurements, methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology19:369-382.
42.
Freilich, Robert H., and Bruce G. Peshoff. 1997. The social costs of sprawl. The Urban Lawyer29 (2): 183-198.
43.
Fulton, W., R. Pendall, M. Nguyen, and A. Harrison. 2001. Who sprawls the most? How growth patterns differ across the U.S. Washington, DC: Bookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, available at http://www.brookings.edu/es/urban/urban.htm.
44.
Galster, George, Royce Hanson, Martin Ratcliffe, Hal Wolman, Stephen Coleman, and Jason Freihage. 2001. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate12:681-717.
45.
Gillham, Oliver. 2002. The limitless city: A primer on the urban sprawl debate. Washington, DC: Island Press.
46.
Godschalk, David, Samuel D. Brody, and Raymond Burby. 2003. Public participation in natural hazard mitigation policy formation: Challenges for comprehensive planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management46 (5): 733-754.
47.
Gustanski, Julie Ann, and Roderick H. Squires. 2000. Protecting the land: Conservation easements past, present, and future. Washington, DC: Island Press.
48.
Hasse, John, and Richard G. Lathorp. 2003. Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl. Applied Geography23:159-175.
49.
Heimlich, Ralph E., and William D. Anderson. 2001. Developing the urban fringe and beyond: Impacts on agriculture and rural land. Report Number 803. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service, available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer803/.
50.
Hess, George R., Salinda S. Daley, Becky K. Dennison, Sharon R. Lubkin, Robert P. McGuinn, Vanessa Z. Morin, Kevin M. Potter, Rick E. Savage, Wade G. Shelton, Chris M. Snow, and Beth M. Wrege. 2001. Just what is sprawl, anyway?Carolina Planning: Journal of the University of North Carolina Department of City and Regional Planning26 (2): 11-26.
51.
Hirschhorn, Joel S.2001. Environment, quality of life, and urban growth in the new economy. Environmental Quality Management10 (3): 1-8.
52.
Hoehna, John P., Frank Lupia, and Michael D. Kaplowitzb. 2003. Untying a Lancastrian bundle: Valuing ecosystems and ecosystem services for wetland mitigation. Journal of Environmental Management68 (3): 263-272.
53.
Kahn, Matthew E.2000. The environmental impact of suburbanization. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management19 (4): 569-586.
54.
Kahn, Matthew E.2001. City quality of life dynamics: Measuring the costs of growth. Journal of Real Estate and Finance22:339-352.
55.
Kaiser, Edward J., David R. Godschalk, and F. Stuart Chapin. 1995. Urban land use planning. 4th ed.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
56.
Kenworthy, Jeffrey R., and Felix B. Laube. 1999. Patterns of automobile dependence in cities: An international overview of key physical and economic dimensions with some implications for urban policy. Transportation Research Part A33:691-723.
57.
Knaap, G., and E. Talen. 2005. New urbanism and smart growth: A few words from the academy. International Regional Science Review28 (2): 107-118.
58.
Lang, Robert. 2003. Beyond Edge City: Office sprawl in South Florida. The Brookings Institution—Survey Series Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, http://www.brookings.edu/es/urban/publications/langmiami.htm (accessed May 20, 2004).
59.
Leinberger, Christopher. 2000. The connection between sustainability and economic development. In The practice of sustainable development, edited by Douglas R. Porter, 53-66. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
60.
Marsh, Lindell L., Douglas R. Porter, David A. Salveson, and David Salvesen. 1996. Mitigation banking: Theory and practice. Washington, DC: Island Press.
61.
Mieszkowski, Peter, and Edwin S. Mills. 1993. The causes of metropolitan suburbanization. Journal of Economic Perspectives7 (3): 135-147.
62.
Miles, Matthew B., and Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods, 2nd ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
63.
Noss, Reed. 1991. Landscape connectivity: Different functions at different scales. In Landscape linkages and biodiversity, edited by Wendy E. Hudson, 91-104. Washington, DC: Island Press.
64.
Noss, Reed, and Allen Cooperrider. 1994. Saving nature's legacy: Protecting and restoring biodiversity. Washington, DC: Island Press.
65.
Openlands Project. 1998. Losing ground: Land consumption in the Chicago region, 1990-1998.Chicago: Author.
66.
Peck, Sheila. 1998. Planning for biodiversity: Issues and examples. Washington, DC: Island Press.
67.
Pendall, Rolf. 1990. Do land-use controls cause sprawl?Environment and Planning B26:555-571.
68.
Porter, Douglas R.1997. Managing growth in America's communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
69.
Porter, Douglas R.2000. The practice of sustainable development. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
70.
Putnam, Robert D.2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
71.
Salvesen, David. 1990. Wetlands: Mitigating and regulating development impacts. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
72.
Scott, D., and Fern K. Willets. 1994. Environmental attitudes and behavior. Environment and Behavior26 (2): 239-261.
73.
Seyfried, Warren R.1991. Measuring the feasibility of a zoning bonus. Journal of the American Planning Association57 (3): 348-356.
74.
Southeastern Regional Planning and Economic Development District. 1999. Southeastern Mass: Vision 2020 an agenda for the future. Taunton, MA: Southeastern Regional Planning and Economic Development District.
75.
Squires, Gregory D.2002. Urban sprawl and uneven development of metropolitan America. In Urban sprawl: Causes, consequences and policy responses, edited by Gregory D. Squires, 1-22. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
76.
Steiner, R.2001. Florida's transportation concurrency: Are the current tools adequate to meet the need for coordinated land use and transportation planning?University of Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy2 (Spring): 269-297.
77.
Strong, Ann L.1983. Easements as a development control in the United States. Landscape Planning10:43-64.
78.
Strong, Ann L.1987. The Pinelands—America's largest “transfer of development rights” programme?Habitat International11 (1): 63-71.
79.
USDA Economic Research Service. 2005. Natural amenities scale. http://ers.esda.gov/data/naturalamenities.
80.
van Lier, Hubert N., and Edward A. Cook. 1994. Ecological networks: A conspectus. In Landscape planning and ecological networks, edited by Edward A. Cook and Hubert N. van Lier, 327-346. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Health Sciences.
81.
Van Liere, Kent D., and Riley E. Dunlap. 1980. The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly44 (2): 181-197.
82.
Weems, W. A., and Larry Canter. 1995. Planning and operational guidelines for mitigation banking for wetland impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review15:197-218.
83.
Wiewel, Wim, and Kimberly Schaffer. 2001. Learning to think as a region: Connecting suburban sprawl and city poverty. European Planning Studies9 (5): 593-611.
84.
Wright, John B.1993. Conservation easements: An analysis of donated development rights. Journal of the American Planning Association59 (4): 487-493.
85.
Ye, Lin, S. Mandpes, and P. Meyer. 2005. What is “smart growth”— really?Journal of Planning Literature19 (3): 301-315.
86.
Zedler, J. B.1991. The challenge of protecting endangered species habitat along the Southern California coast. Coastal Management19:35-53.
