This article presents an analysis of the similarities and differences between feminist and new urbanist critical approaches to planning suburbs. Empirical results from a case study and survey of women residents of a Canadian new urbanist community are used to examine whether such communities can uphold feminist planning concerns and whether residents have views that are comparable to those presented in the two literatures. The results suggest that many of the assumptions in new urbanist literature are not being addressed in practice. Furthermore, and from a feminist planning perspective, the opportunities for new urbanist planning to uphold feminist planning principles may be limited.
Andrew, C.1992. The feminist city. In Political arrangements: Power and the city, ed. H. Lustiger-Thaler. Montreal, Canada: Black Rose.
2.
Audirac, I.1999. Stated preference for pedestrian proximity: An assessment of new urbanist sense of community. Journal of Planning Education and Research19:53-66.
3.
Audirac, I., and A. Shermyen. 1994. An evaluation of neotraditional design’s social prescription: Postmodern placebo or remedy for suburban malaise?Journal of Planning Education and Research13:161-173.
4.
Beall, J.1997. Participation in the city: A gender perspective. In A city for all: Valuing difference and working with diversity. London: Zed Books.
5.
Beauregard, R.2002. New urbanism: Ambiguous certainties. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research19 (3): 181-194.
6.
Blumenberg, E.2004. En-gendering effective planning: Spatial mismatch, low-income women and transportation policy. Journal of the American Planning Association70 (3): 269-281.
7.
Bressi, T.1994. Planning the American dream. In The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community, ed. P. Katz. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Brown, B., and V. Cropper. 2001. New urban and standard suburban subdivisions: Evaluating psychological and social goals. Journal of the American Planning Association67 (4): 402-419.
9.
Burton, E.2000. The compact city: Just or just compact? A preliminary analysis. Urban Studies37 (11): 1969-2006.
10.
Bushby, A.1996. Intensified communities meet women’s needs. Women and Environments39-40:28-30.
11.
Chambers, D.1997. A stake in the country: Women’s experiences of suburban development. In Visions of suburbia, ed. R. Silverstone. London: Routledge.
12.
Cohen, L., and L. Manion. 2000. Research methods in education. Routledge: London.
13.
Congress for the New Urbanism. 1996. Congress for the New Urbanism CNU IV: CNU charter. San Francisco: Congress for the New Urbanism.
14.
Congress for the New Urbanism. 2000. Charter of the new urbanism. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
Cook, C.1988. Components of neighbourhood satisfaction: Responses from urban and suburban single-parent women. Environment and Behaviour20 (2): 115-149.
16.
Day, K.2003. New urbanism and the challenges of designing for diversity. Journal of Planning Education and Research20 (3): 83-95.
17.
De Vaus, D. A.1995. Surveys in social research. London: UCL Press.
18.
Domosh, M., and J. Seager. 2002. Putting women in place: Feminist geographers make sense of the world. London: Guildford.
19.
Dowling, R.1998. Suburban stories, gendered lives: Thinking through difference. In Cities of difference, ed. R. Fincher and J. M. Jacobs. London: Guildford.
20.
Duany, A., E. Plater-Zyberk, and J. Speck. 2000. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press.
21.
Dyck, I.1989. Integrating home and wage workplace: Women’s daily lives in a Canadian suburb. Canadian Geographer33 (4): 329-341.
22.
Dyck, I.1996. Mother or worker? Women’s support networks, local knowledge and informal child care strategies. In Who will mind the baby? Geographies of child care and working mothers, ed. K. England. London: Routledge.
23.
Eichler, M., ed. 1995. Change of plans: Towards a non-sexist sustainable city. Toronto, Canada: Garamond.
24.
England, K.1993a. Changing suburbs, changing women: Geographic perspectives on suburban women and suburbanization. Frontiers14 (1): 24-43.
25.
England, K.1993b. Suburban pink collar ghettos: The spatial entrapment of women?Annals of the Association of American Geographers83 (2): 225-242.
26.
———., ed. 1996. Who will mind the baby? Geographies of child care and working mothers. London: Routledge.
27.
Fainstein, S.2000. New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review35 (4): 451-478.
28.
Falconer Al-Hindi, K.2001. The new urbanism: Where and for whom? Investigation of an emergent paradigm. Urban Geography22 (3): 202-219.
29.
Ford, L.2001. Alleys and urban form: Testing the tenets of new urbanism. Urban Geography22 (3): 268-286.
30.
Franck, K.1985. Social construction of the physical environment: The case of gender. Sociological Focus18 (2): 143-160.
31.
Franck, K.1994. Questioning the American dream: Recent housing innovations in the United States. In Housing women, ed. R. Gilroy and R. Woods. London: Routledge.
32.
Grant, J.2002. Mixed use in theory and practice: Canadian experience with implementing a planning principle. Journal of the American Planning Association68 (1): 71-84.
33.
Grant, J.2003. Exploring the influence of new urbanism in community planning practice. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research20 (3): 234-253.
34.
Greed, C.1994. Women and planning: Creating gendered realities. London: Routledge.
35.
Halloran, S.1999. NU makes progress in Canada. New Urban News4 (2): 1, 5-9.
36.
Hamilton, K., and L. Jenkins. 2000. A gender audit for public transport: A new policy tool in the tackling of social exclusion. Urban Studies37 (10): 1793-1800.
37.
Hayden, D.2002. Redesigning the American dream: Gender, housing and family life. New York: Norton.
38.
Hayden, D.2003. Building suburbia. Green fields and urban growth, 1820-2000. New York: Vintage Books.
39.
Langdon, P.1994. A better place to live: Reshaping the American suburb. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
40.
Lennertz, W.1991. Town making fundamentals: The codes and the traditional neighbourhood development ordinance. In Towns and town making principles, ed. A. Duany and E. Plater-Zyberk. New York: Rizzoli.
41.
Lund, H.2003. Testing the claims of new urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel, and neighboring behaviors. Journal of the American Planning Association69 (4): 414-429.
42.
MacGregor, S.1995. Deconstructing the man made city: Feminist critiques of planning thought and action. In Change of plans: Towards a non-sexist sustainable city, ed. M. Eichler. Toronto, Canada: Garamond.
43.
Michelson, W.1985. From sun to sun: Daily obligations and community structure in the lives of employed women and their families. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
44.
Michelson, W.1994. Measuring new objectives in suburban housing. Research in Community Sociology4:253-269.
45.
Milroy, B.1991. Taking stock of planning, space and gender. Journal of Planning Literature6 (1): 3-15.
46.
Preston, V., and S. McLafferty. 1993. Gender differences in commuting at suburban and central locations. Canadian Journal of Regional Science15 (2): 237-259.
47.
The Province. 1957. Suburbia’s “little hells” cheating our families. October 2.
48.
Rahder, B., and C. Altilia. 2004. Where is feminism in planning going? Appropriation or transformation?Planning Theory3:107-116.
49.
Ritzdorf, M.1985. Zoning barriers to housing innovations. Journal of Planning Education and Research4 (3): 177-184.
50.
Ritzdorf, M.1986. Women and the city: Land use and zoning issues. Journal of Urban Resources3 (2): 23-27.
51.
Ritzdorf, M.1994. A feminist analysis of gender and residential zoning in the United States. In Women and the environment, ed. I. Altman and A. Churchman. New York: Plenum.
52.
Ritzdorf, M.1997a. Family values, municipal zoning, and African American family life. In Urban planning and the African American community: In the shadows, ed. T. J. Manning and M. Ritzdorf. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Ritzdorf, M.1997b. Locked out of paradise: Contemporary exclusionary zoning, the Supreme Court, and African Americans, 1970 to the present. In Urban planning and the African American community: In the shadows, ed. T. J. Manning and M. Ritzdorf. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
Ritzdorf, M.2000. Sex, lies and urban life: How municipal planning marginalizes African American women and their families. In Gendering the city: Women, boundaries and visions of urban life, ed. K. Miranne and A. Young. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
55.
Saegert, S.1980. Masculine cities and feminine suburbs: Polarized ideas, contradictory realities. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society5 (3): 96-111.
56.
Southworth, M.1997. Walkable suburbs? An evaluation of neotraditional communities at the urban edge. Journal of the American Planning Association63 (1): 28-44.
57.
Spain, D.1992. Gendered spaces. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
58.
Statistics Canada. 2004. 2001 community profile—Markham. http://www12.statcan.ca/english/profil01/Details/details1.cfm?SEARCH=BEGINS&ID=6810&PSGC=35&SGC=3519036&DataType=1&LANG=E&Province=35&PlaceName=Markham&CMA=&CSDNAME=Markham&A= (accessed April 5, 2005).
59.
Stevenson, D.1999. Community views: Women and the politics of neighbourhood in an Australian suburb. Journal of Sociology35 (2): 213-227.
60.
Strong-Boag, V.1995. Their side of the story: Women’s voices from Ontario suburbs, 1945-60. In A diversity of women: Ontario, 1945-1980, ed. J. Parr. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
61.
Strong-Boag, V., I. Dyck, K. England, and L. Johnson. 1999. What women’s spaces? Women in Australian, British, Canadian and US suburbs. In Changing suburbs: Foundation, form and function, ed. R. Harris and P. Larkham. London: Taylor and Francis.
62.
Talen, E.2001. Traditional urbanism meets residential affluence: An analysis of the variability of suburban preference. Journal of the American Planning Association67 (2): 199-216.
63.
Torre, S.1999. Expanding the urban design agenda: A critique of the new urbanism. In Design and feminism: Re-visioning spaces, places and everyday things, ed. J. Rothschild. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
64.
Weisman, L.1992. Discrimination by design: A feminist critique of the man-made environment. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
65.
Wekerle, G.1985. From refuge to service center: Neighbourhoods that support women. Sociological Focus18 (2): 79-95.
66.
Wekerle, G., and B. Rutherford. 1987. Employed women in the suburbs: Transportation disadvantage in a car-centred environment. Alternatives14 (3): 49-54.
67.
Yin, R.2003. Case study research: Design and methods. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
Zielinski, S.1995. Access over excess: Transcending captivity and transportation disadvantage. In Change of plans: Towards a nonsexist sustainable city, ed. M. Eichler. Toronto, Canada: Garamond.
