This paper analyses the relationship between nationalism and cross-border shopping behaviour of households in a region with a history of bi-communal conflict. Traditional economic theories predict that households optimize their well-being, so patriotic feelings should be irrelevant in their consumption decisions. However, the theory of economic nationalism would predict lower cross-border activities in regions with high levels of nationalism. We test these opposing hypotheses using monthly data on gasoline sales, relative prices and the total number of border crossings on the island of Cyprus. Our results indicate that individual economic incentives prevail over nationalism. The cheaper the price of gasoline is on the ‘other’ side of the island relative to their own side, the higher the number of Greek Cypriots who cross borders. This result does not imply that those who cross are less nationalist but suggests that economic incentives might motivate a willingness to interact even with those whose nationalistic feelings would normally preclude it. According to contact theory, these economic interactions – especially when supported by political and social reconciliation efforts – have the potential to foster more peaceful relations.
AlesinaALa FerraraE (2000) Participation in heterogeneous communities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics115(3): 847–904.
2.
AllportGW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
3.
AndertonCHCarterJR (2001) The impact of war on trade: An interrupted time-series study. Journal of Peace Research38(4): 445–457.
4.
BarbieriK (2002) The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace?Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
5.
BarbieriKLevyJS (1999) Sleeping with the enemy: The impact of war on trade. Journal of Peace Research36(4): 463–479.
6.
BesimMMullenF (2009) Peace Economics and the Greek-Turkish Conflict. PRIO Cyprus, Nicosia: Cyprus.
7.
BinderJZagefkaHBrownR, et al. (2009) Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96(4): 843–856.
8.
BornsteinRF (1989) Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin106(2): 263–289.
9.
BygvråS (2009) Distance and cross-border shopping for alcohol: Evidence from Danes’ cross-border shopping 1986–2003. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs26(2): 141–163.
10.
CastellóEMiheljS (2018) Selling and consuming the nation: Understanding consumer nationalism. Journal of Consumer Culture18(4): 558–576.
11.
ChatterjeeA (1991) Cross-border shopping: Searching for a solution. Canadian Business Review18(4): 26–29.
12.
ChoucriNNorthRC (1989) Lateral pressure in international relations: Concept and theory. In: MidlarskyMI (eds) Handbook of War Studies. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman, 289–326.
13.
ChristOHewstoneMTroppLR, et al. (2012) Special section: Dynamic processes in intergroup contact. British Journal of Social Psychology51(2): 219–329.
14.
ChristOWagnerU (2013) Methodological issues in the study of intergroup contact. In: HodsonGHewstoneM (eds) Advances in Intergroup Contact. London: Psychology Press, 233–261.
15.
ChristouG (2010) The European union, borders, and conflict transformation: The case of Cyprus. European Journal of International Relations16(3): 391–412.
16.
Council of the European Union (2004) Council Regulation (EC) No. 866/2004 of 29 April 2004 on a regime under Article 2 of Protocol No. 10 to the Act of Accession (Green Line Regulation). Official Journal of the European UnionL 161: 128–142. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32004R0866.
17.
DaviesKTroppLRAronA, et al. (2011) Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review15(4): 332–351.
18.
DemetriouO (2004) EU and the Cyprus Conflict: Perceptions of the Border and Europe in the Cyprus Conflict. EUBORDERCONF Working Paper Series, No. 18.
19.
DemetriouO (2007) To cross or not to cross? Subjectivization and the absent state in Cyprus. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute13(4): 987–1006.
20.
DeutschM (1949) A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations2(2): 129–152.
21.
DmitrovicTVidaI (2007) An examination of cross-border shopping behaviour in south-east Europe. European Journal of Marketing41(3/4): 382–395.
22.
DonnoDPsaltisCZarpliO (2021) Extended intergroup contact in frozen conflicts: Experimental evidence from Cyprus. Conflict Management and Peace Science38(4): 411–433.
23.
EllerALAbramsD (2003) ‘Gringos’ in Mexico: Cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of language school-promoted contact on intergroup bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations6(1): 55–75.
24.
EllerALAbramsD (2004) Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew’s reformulated intergroup contact model and the common Ingroup Model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts European. Journal of Social Psychology34(3): 229–256.
25.
GlickRTaylorAM (2008) Collateral damage: Trade disruption and the economic impact of war. Review of Economics and Statistics92(1): 102–127.
26.
GökçekuşÖHensonJNottebaumD, et al. (2012) Impediments to trade across the Green Line in Cyprus: Classic barriers and mistrust. Journal of Peace Research49(6): 863–872.
27.
GoodLKHuddlestonP (1995) Ethnocentrism of Polish and Russian consumers: Are feelings and intentions related?International Marketing Review12(5): 35–48.
28.
GranzinKLOlsenJE (1998) Americans’ choice of domestic over foreign products: A matter of helping behavior?Journal of Business Research43(1): 39–54.
29.
GrinbergM (2021) Wartime commercial policy and trade between enemies. International Security46(1): 166–202.
30.
HanJ (2025) How reciprocal cooperation between international rivals shapes threat perceptions: Evidence from inter-Korean rapprochement in 2018. Conflict Management and Peace Science07388942251395480.
31.
Harmon-JonesEAllenJJB (2001) The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from physiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(7): 889–898.
32.
HatayMKalimeriJMullenF (2008) Intra-island trade in Cyprus: Obstacles, oppositions and psychological barriers. PRIO Cyprus Centre Paper. Nicosia: PRIO Cyprus Centre.
33.
HeilmannK (2016) Does political conflict hurt trade? Evidence from consumer boycotts. Journal of International Economics99: 179–191.
34.
HelleinerEPickelA (2005) Economic Nationalism in a Globalizing World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
InglehartRHaerpferCMorenoA, et al. (eds.) (2022) World Values Survey: All Rounds – Country-pooled Datafile. Madrid: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. Dataset Version 3.0.0. doi:10.14281/18241.17.
36.
KeshkOMReuvenyRPollinsBM (2010) Trade and conflict: Proximity, country size, and measures. Conflict Management and Peace Science27(1): 3–27.
KleinJG (2002) Us versus them, or us versus everyone? Delineating consumer aversion to foreign goods. Journal of International Business Studies33(2): 354–363.
39.
KleinJGEttensonR (1999) Consumer animosity and consumer ethnocentrism: An analysis of unique antecedents. Journal of International Consumer Marketing11(4): 5–24.
40.
KripfganzSSchneiderDC (2018) Ardl: Estimating autoregressive distributed lag and equilibrium correction models. The Stata Journal23(4): 983–1019.
41.
KuncharinWMohamedB (2013) Cross-border shopping motivation, behaviours and ethnocentrism of Malaysian in Hatyai, Thailand. International Journal of Social, Human Science and Engineering7(4): 291–301.
42.
LavikRNordlundS (2009) Norway at the border of EU–cross-border shopping and its implications. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs26(2): 205–231.
43.
LeeAY (2001) The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(10): 1255–1266.
44.
LekakisEJ (2017) Economic nationalism and the cultural politics of consumption under austerity: The rise of ethnocentric consumption in Greece. Journal of Consumer Culture17(2): 286–302.
45.
LevinSvan LaarCSidaniusJ (2003) The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendships on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations6(1): 76–92.
46.
Lopez AlvarezSBarrios SabogalLCWolffJ (2025) Sharing community life after a civil war: Intergroup contact and social distance. Conflict Management and Peace Science07388942251382732.
47.
LukiTBubalo-ŽivkovićMDerčanB, et al. (2014) Population growth in the border villages of Srem, Serbia. Acta Geographica Slovenica54(1): 51–65.
48.
McKeownSPsaltisC (2017) Intergroup contact and the mediating role of intergroup trust on outgroup evaluation and future contact intentions in Cyprus and Northern Ireland. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology23(4): 392.
49.
MearsheimerJ (1992) Disorder restored. In: AllisonGTreventonG (eds) Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to World Order. New York: Norton.
50.
MeierS (2006) A survey of economic theories and field evidence on pro-social behavior. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper 06-6.
51.
NguyenNHDaoTKDuongTT, et al. (2023) Role of consumer ethnocentrism on purchase intention toward foreign products: Evidence from data of Vietnamese consumers with Chinese products. Heliyon9(2): 1–11.
52.
OnealJRRussettB (1997) The classical liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950–1985. International Studies Quarterly41(2): 267–294.
53.
OstromE (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PapadopoulosNG (1980) Consumer out-shopping research: Review and extension. Journal of Retailing56(4): 41–58.
56.
PesaranHShinYSmithRJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics16(3): 289–326.
57.
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90: 751–783.
58.
PironF (2002) International outshopping and ethnocentrism. European Journal of Marketing36(1/2): 189–210.
59.
PolachekSW (1980) Conflict and trade. Journal of Conflict Resolution24(1): 55–78.
60.
PowersTLHopkinsRA (2006) Altruism and consumer purchase behavior. Journal of International Consumer Marketing19(1): 107–130.
61.
PsaltisC (2012) Intergroup Trust and Contact in Transition: A Social Representations Perspective on the Cyprus Conflict. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
62.
PsaltisCWagonerB (eds) (2025)Conflict and Change: Integrating Social and Developmental Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
RosecranceR (1986) The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and conquest in the Modern World. New York: Basic Books.
64.
RussettBMOnealJR (2001) Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: W.W. Norton.
65.
SherifM (1958) Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology63(4): 349–356.
66.
ShimpTASharmaS (1987) Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research24(3): 280–289.
67.
SiamagkaNTBalabanisG (2015) Revisiting consumer ethnocentrism: Review, reconceptualization, and empirical testing. Journal of International Marketing23(3): 66–86.
68.
SullivanPMKangJ (1997) Information sources and motivational attributes of Canadian cross-border shoppers: A pilot study. International Journal of Commerce and Management7(1): 88–107.
69.
SwartHHewstoneMChristO, et al. (2011) Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology101(6): 1221–1238.
70.
TalmonS (2001) The Cyprus question before the European Court of Justice. European Journal of International Law12(4): 727–750.
71.
ThibautJWKelleyHH (1959) The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.
72.
TurnerRNCrispRJ (2010) Imagined intergroup contact: Theory, paradigm, and practice. Social and Personality Psychology Compass4(2): 118–134.
73.
Van LaarCLevinSSinclairS, et al. (2005) The effect of university roommate contact on ethnic attitudes and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology41(4): 329–345.
74.
WangJ (2005) Consumer nationalism and corporate reputation management in the global era. Corporate Communications: An International Journal10(3): 223–239.
75.
WrightSCAronAMcLaughlin-VolpeT, et al. (1997) The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology73(1): 73–90.
76.
YucelDPsaltisC (2020a) Intergroup contact and willingness for renewed cohabitation in Cyprus: Exploring the mediating and moderating mechanisms. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations23(4): 578–597.
77.
YucelDPsaltisC (2020b) The effects of direct and indirect contact on prejudice: 2007 and 2017 results among Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots. European Societies22(5): 610–635.
78.
ŽeželjILIoannouMFrancR, et al. (2017) The role of inter-ethnic online friendships in prejudice reduction in post-conflict societies: Evidence from Serbia, Croatia and Cyprus. Computers in Human Behavior76: 386–395.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
