From Catalonia to Kurdistan to Scotland, referendums have increasingly become popular strategies of self-rule movements. Despite this, many referendums are considered failures by the movements (revealing a dearth of support), some are marred by violence, and few garner external backing. Given this, when are they likely to be employed? We argue that internal competition serves as one driving force for actors to use referendums as a way to gain or uphold status within the movement. Using novel data and two case studies, we highlight the ways these movements arrive at a vote for self-rule, underscoring the role of internal competition.
AbdullahFHHamaHH (2020) The nature of the political system in the Kurdistan region of Iraq.Asian Journal of Comparative Politics5(3): 300–315.
2.
ArvesSCunninghamKGMcCullochC (2019) Rebel tactics and external public opinion.Research & Politics6(3): 205316801987703. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019877032.
3.
AubertNGermannMMendezF (2015) Contested Sovereignty: A Global Compilation of Sovereignty Referendums (1776–2012). Codebook v.1.0. Zurich, Switzerland: University of Zurich.
4.
BakkeKMCunninghamKGSeymourLJM (2012) A plague of initials: Fragmentation, cohesion, and infighting in civil wars.Perspectives on Politics10(2): 265–283.
5.
BalcellsLDanielsL-AKuoA (2023) The ‘weight’ of territorial issues: Evidence from Catalonia, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.Comparative Politics56(1): 1–22.
6.
BalcellsLDorseySTellezJF (2021) Repression and dissent in contemporary Catalonia.British Journal of Political Science51(4): 1742–1750.
7.
BobC (2005) The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrancatiD (2006) Decentralization: Fueling the fire or dampening the flames of ethnic conflict and secessionism?International Organization60(3): 651–685.
9.
CaspersenN (2015) Degrees of legitimacy: Ensuring internal and external support in the absence of recognition.Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences66(November): 184–192.
CollinK (2020) Peacemaking referendums: The use of direct democracy in peace processes.Democratization27(5): 717–736.
14.
ColomerJM (2017) The venturous bid for the independence of Catalonia.Nationalities Papers45(5): 950–967.
15.
CornwellR (1998) Anjouan: A spat in the Indian ocean.African Security Review7(3): 51–61.
16.
Cortés RiveraJJ (2020) Creating new states: The strategic use of referendums in secession movements.Territory, Politics, Governance0(0): 1–18. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1837223.
17.
CunninghamKGDahlMFrugéA (2020) Introducing the strategies of resistance data project.Journal of Peace Research57(3): 482–491.
18.
CunninghamKGHuangRSawyerKM (2021) Voting for militants: Rebel elections in civil war.Journal of Conflict Resolution65(1): 81–107.
19.
CunninghamKGSawyerK (2017) Is self-determination contagious? A spatial analysis of the spread of self-determination claims.International Organization71(3): 585–604.
20.
DobbinsJMillerLEPezardS, et al. (2013) Overcoming obstacles to peace: Local factors in nation-building, 354.
FarleyLT (2020) Plebiscites and Sovereignty: The Crisis of Political Illegitimacy. New York: Routledge.
23.
GermannM (2022) Pax Populi? An analysis of the conflict resolution potential of referendums on self-determination.European Political Science Review14(3): 403–423.
24.
GerschewskiJ (2013) The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes.Democratization20(1): 13–38.
GriffithsRD (2021) Secession and the Sovereignty Game: Strategy and Tactics for Aspiring Nations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
GriffithsRDMuroD (eds) (2020) Strategies of Secession and Counter-Secession. London: ECPR Press.
28.
GriffithsRDWasserLM (2019) Does violent secessionism work?Journal of Conflict Resolution63(5): 1310–1336.
29.
HamaHH (2020) Iraqi Kurdistan’s 2017 independence referendum: The KDP’s public and private motives.Asian Affairs51(1): 109–125.
30.
HierroMJQueraltD (2021) The divide over independence: Explaining preferences for secession in an advanced open economy.American Journal of Political Science65(2): 422–442.
31.
JeffreyAMcConnellFWilsonA (2015) Understanding legitimacy: Perspectives from anomalous geopolitical spaces.Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences66(November): 177–183.
32.
KaplanML (2019) Foreign support, miscalculation, and conflict escalation: Iraqi Kurdish self-determination in perspective.Ethnopolitics18(1): 29–45.
LeDucL (2003) The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Peterborough, Ontario/Orchard Park, NY: University of Toronto Press, Higher Education Division.
38.
LeeSYMac GintyR (2012) Context and postconflict referendums.Nationalism and Ethnic Politics18(1): 43–64.
39.
Mac GintyR (2003) Constitutional referendums and ethnonational conflict: The case of northern Ireland.Nationalism and Ethnic Politics9(2): 1–22.
40.
MagaloniB (2008) Credible power-sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule.Comparative Political Studies41(4–5): 715–741.
41.
MampillyZ (2011) Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life during War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
MargalitARazJ (1990) National selfdetermination. Journal of Philosphy87(9): 439–461.
43.
MendezFGermannM (2018) Contested sovereignty: Mapping referendums on sovereignty over time and space.British Journal of Political Science48(1): 141–165.
44.
NataliD (2015) The kurdish quasi-state: Leveraging political limbo.The Washington Quarterly38(2): 145–164.
45.
NaylerM (2020) There’s a solution to Catalonia’s crisis. Spain’s King is standing in the way. Foreign Policy, February 25, 2020.
46.
NorrisP (ed) (1999) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, 1st ednOxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
O’DriscollDBaserB (2019) Independence referendums and nationalist rhetoric: The Kurdistan region of Iraq.Third World Quarterly40(11): 2016–2034.
48.
PalermoF (2019) Towards a comparative constitutional law of secession? In: The Canadian Contribution to a Comparative Law of Secession. New York: Springer International, pp. 265–282.
49.
ParkBJongerdenJOwtramF, et al. (2017) On the independence referendum in the Kurdistan region of Iraq and disputed territories in 2017.Kurdish Studies5(2): 199–214.
50.
PeggSKolstøP (2015) Somaliland: Dynamics of internal legitimacy and (lack of) external sovereignty.Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences66: 193–202.
51.
PischeddaC (2020) Ethnic conflict and the limits of nonviolent resistance.Security Studies29(2): 362–391.
52.
PhilpottD (1995) In defense of self-determination. Ethics105(2): 352–385.
53.
PonsatíC (2022) Molts i Ningú. Embastat de Memòries i Altres Històries [Many and Nobody. A Collection of Memories and Other Stories]. Barcelona: La Campana.
54.
QvortrupM (2014) Referendums and Ethnic Conflict. Referendums and Ethnic Conflict. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Available at:https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812209327.
55.
QvortrupM (2020) Breaking up is hard to do: The Neil Sedaka theory of independence referendums.International Political Science Review41(5): 638–651.
56.
RocherF (2014) Self-determination and the use of referendums: The case of Quebec.International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society27(1): 25–45.
Sanjaume-CalvetM (2021) Plebiscitarianism revisited: A typology of independence referendums.Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique54(3): 593–614.
59.
Sanjaume CalvetMHarguindéguyJ-BSánchez SánchezA (2024) Self-determination vs. state sovereignty. What are the determinants of agreed-upon independence referendums in liberal democracies?Democratization: 1–25. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2331709.
60.
SarigilZKarakocE (2016) Who supports secession? The determinants of secessionist attitudes among Turkey’s Kurds.Nations and Nationalism22(2): 325–346.
61.
TanriseverOF, 2002. The Politics of Tatar Nationalism and Russian Federalism: 1992–1999. Doctoral dissertation, University College London. Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10108833/.
62.
WalkerM (2003) The Strategic Use of Referendums: Power, Legitimacy, and Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
