We use this article to introduce the Militarized Interstate Events (MIE) dataset, a new dataset for international conflict with a host of innovative features. The MIE data offers dyadic, event-level information for all militarized interstate confrontations from 1816 to 2014, including major wars as well as all threats, displays, and uses of force between two or more states. The data come with major innovations, including dyadic fatality estimates at the event level and recorded events for general conflicts alongside the battles of the wars of the last two centuries. We discuss how to use these conflict data and provide a replication that demonstrates the dataset's usefulness.
AlkerHRShermanFL (1986) International Conflict Episodes, 1945–1979. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. Data file and codebook.
2.
BabstDV (1964) Elected governments: A force for peace. The Wisconsin Sociologist2: 9–14.
3.
BrecherMWilkenfeldJ (2000) A Study of Crisis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
4.
Bueno de Mesquita B, Koch MT and Siverson R (2004) Testing competing institutional explanations of the democratic peace: The case of dispute duration. Conflict Management and Peace Science 21(4): 255–267.
5.
CohenJ (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement20(1): 37–46.
6.
Crisman-Cox C and Gibilisco M (2018) Audience costs and the dynamics of war and peace. American Journal of Political Science 62(3): 566–580
7.
DiehlPF (2006) Just a phase?: Integrating conflict dynamics over time. Conflict Management and Peace Science23(3): 199–210.
8.
DixonWJ (1994) Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review88(1): 14–32.
9.
EnterlineAJ (2010) Introduction to CMPS special issue: Diversionary theory. Conflict Management and Peace Science27(5): 411–416.
10.
EyermanJHart, JrRA (1996) An empirical test of the audience cost proposition. Journal of Conflict Resolution40(4): 597–616.
11.
FearonJD (1994) Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review88(3): 577–592.
12.
FearonJD (1995) Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49(3): 379–414.
13.
GhosnFPalmerGBremerSA (2004) The MID3 data set, 1993–2001: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science21(2): 133–154.
14.
GiblerDM (2012) The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development, and International Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
GiblerDM (2017) What they fight for: Specific territorial issues in militarized interstate disputes, 1816–2001. Conflict Management and Peace Science34(2): 194–211.
16.
GiblerDMHutchisonML (2013) Territorial issues, audience costs, and the democratic peace: The importance of issue salience. Journal of Politics75(4): 879–893.
17.
GiblerDMLittleEK (2017) Heterogeneity in the militarized interstate disputes (MIDs), 1816–2001: What fatal MIDs cannot fix. Political Science Research and Methods5(1): 189–199.
18.
GiblerDMMillerSV (Forthcoming) The Militarized Interstate Confrontation (MIC) Dataset, 1816–2010. Journal of Conflict Resolution.
19.
GiblerDMMillerSVLittleEK (2016) An analysis of the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) dataset, 1816–2001. International Studies Quarterly60(4): 719–730.
20.
GleditschNPWallensteenPErikssonM, et al. (2002) Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research39(5): 615–637.
21.
GochmanCSMaozZ (1984) Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1976: Procedures, patterns, and insights. Journal of Conflict Resolution28(4): 585–616.
22.
HägeF (2011) Choice or circumstance? Adjusting measures of foreign policy similarity for chance agreement. Political Analysis19(3): 287–305.
23.
JacksonJOwsiakAPGoertzG, et al. (2022) Getting to the root of the issue(s): Expanding the study of issues in MIDs. Journal of Conflict Resolution 66(7-8): 1514–1542.
24.
JamesP (1987) Conflict and cohesion: A review of the literature and recommendations for future research. Cooperation and Conflict22(1): 21–33.
25.
JonesDMBremerSASingerJD (1996) Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science15(2): 163–213.
26.
MaozZRussettB (1993) Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review87(3): 624–638.
27.
MarshallMGGurrTRJaggersK (2017) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2016. University of Maryland, Center for International Development and Conflict Management.
28.
PalmerGD’OrazioVKenwickM, et al. (2015) The MID4 dataset, 2002–2010: Procedures, coding rules and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science32(2): 222–242.
29.
PalmerGD'OrazioVKenwickMR, et al. (2020a) The militarized interstate dispute dataset: Putting things in perspective. Internatioanl Studies Quartely64(2): 480–481.
30.
PalmerGD'OrazioVKenwickMR, et al. (2020b) Updating the militarized interstate dispute data: A response to Gibler, Miller, and Little. International Studies Quarterly64(2): 469–475.
31.
RubinDB (1987) Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.
32.
SchultzKA (2001) Looking for audience costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution45(1): 32–60.
33.
SchultzKA (2012) Why we needed audience costs and what we need now. Security Studies21(3): 369–375.
34.
SenesePDVasquezJA (2008) The Steps to War: An Empirical Study. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
ShermanFL (1994) SHERFACS: A cross-paradigm, hierarchical and contextually sensitive conflict management data set. International Interactions20(1–2): 79–100.
36.
SingerJDBremerSAStuckeyJ (1972) Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965. In B. Russett (ed.) Peace, War and Numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
SmallMSingerJD (1976) The war-proneness of democratic regimes, 1816–1965. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations1(4): 50–69.
38.
StinnettDMTirJSchaferP, et al. (2002) The Correlates of War project direct contiguity data, version 3. Conflict Management and Peace Science19(2): 58–66.
39.
ThompsonWRDreyerDR (2012) Handbook of International Rivalries, 1494–2010. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
40.
TomzM (2007) Domestic audience costs in international relations: An experimental approach. International Organization61(4): 821–840.
41.
VasquezJA (1993) The War Puzzle. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
VasquezJA (2009) The War Puzzle Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
WeeksJL (2008) Autocratic audience costs: Regime type and signaling resolve. International Organization62(1): 35–64.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
