How does diffusion of civil war battles influence conflict termination? Recent advances in civil war literature have found that battle dynamics shape conflict termination by affecting the intra-conflict bargaining between disputants. This article extends the theoretical perspective and argues that how battles diffuse matters in determining conflict termination. While battlefield dynamics should in principle reveal previously unavailable private information, the relevance of information-revealing effect depends on the diffusion patterns of battles. The persistent, and possibly battle-exacerbated, commitment problem can also alter the prospects of conflict termination. We test the argument by distinguishing two distinct diffusion patterns of battles: distant and proximate. The empirical results reveal that distant diffusion, but not proximate diffusion, of battles makes civil conflicts less likely to terminate. The analysis also demonstrates that incorporating diffusion dynamics significantly improves our ability to predict conflict termination.
AltonjiJoseph G.ElderTodd E.TaberChristopher R.. 2005. “Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools.” Journal of Political Economy113 (1): 151–84.
2.
Arreguín-ToftIvan. 2001. “How the Weak Win Wars.” International Security26 (1): 93–128.
3.
BalcellsLaiaKalyvasStathis N.. 2014. “Does Warfare Matter? Severity, Duration, and Out-Comes of Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution58 (8): 1390–418.
4.
BaudainsPeterJohnsonShane D.BraithwaiteAlex M.. 2013. “Geographic Patterns of Diffusion in the 2011 London Riots.” Applied Geography45: 211–19.
5.
BeardsleyKyleGleditschKristian S.. 2015. “Peacekeeping as Conflict Containment.” International Studies Review17 (1): 67–89.
6.
BeardsleyKyleGleditschKristian S.LoNigel. 2015. “Roving Bandits? The Geographical Evolution of African Armed Conflicts.” International Studies Quarterly59 (3): 503–516.
7.
BeckNathanielKatzJonathan N.. 2001. “Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon.” International Organization55 (2): 487–95.
8.
BeckNathanielKatzJonathan N.TuckerRichard. 1998. “Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science42 (4): 1260–288.
9.
BellowsJohnMiguelEdward. 2009. “War and Local Collective Action in Sierra Leone.” Journal of Public Economics93 (11-12): 1144–157.
10.
BirchColin P. D.OomSander P.BeechamJonathan A.. 2007. “Rectangular and Hexagonal Grids Used for Observation, Experiment and Simulation in Ecology.” Ecological Modelling206 (3-4): 347–59.
11.
BlaineyGeoffrey. 1988. The Causes of War Volume, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.
12.
BlairRobert A.BlattmanChristopherHartmanAlexandra. 2017. “Predicting Local Violence: Evidence from a Panel Survey in Liberia.” Journal of Peace Research54 (2): 298–312.
13.
BuhaugHalvardGatesScott. 2002. “The Geography of Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research39 (4): 417–33.
14.
BuhaugHalvardGatesScottLujalaPäivi. 2009. “Geography, Rebel Capability, and the Duration of Civil Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (4): 544–69.
15.
CarterDavid B.SignorinoCurtis S.. 2010. “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.” Political Analysis18 (3): 271–92.
16.
CohenJacquelineTitaGeorge. 1999. “Diffusion in Homicide: Exploring a General Method for Detecting Spatial Diffusion Processes.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology15 (4): 451–93.
17.
CollierPaulHoefflerAnkeSöderbomMåns. 2004. “On the Duration of Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research41 (3): 253–73.
18.
CunninghamDavid E.GleditschKristian S.SalehyanIdean. 2013. “Non-state Actors in Civil Wars: A New Dataset.” Conflict Management and Peace Science30 (5): 516–31.
19.
DebrayRegis. 1967. Revolution in the Revolution? Armed Struggle and Political Struggle in Latin America. New York: Penguin Books.
20.
Defense Mapping Agency. 1992. Development of the Digital Chart of the World. New York: Environment Systems Research Institute.
21.
FearonJames D.1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization49 (3): 379–414.
22.
FearonJames D.2004. “Why Do Some Civil Wars Last So Much Longer Than Others?” Journal of Peace Research41 (3): 275–301.
23.
FinneganWilliam. 1992. A Complicated War: The Harrowing of Mozambique. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
FortnaVirginia P.2015. “Do Terrorists Win? Rebels’ Use of Terrorism and Civil War Outcomes.” International Organization69 (3): 519–56.
25.
GelmanAndrew. 2008. “Scaling Regression Inputs by Dividing by Two Standard Deviations.” Statistics in Medicine27 (15): 2865–873.
26.
GleditschKristian S.2002. “Expanded Trade and GDP Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (5): 712–24.
27.
GleditschNils P.WallensteenPeterErikssonMikaelSollenbergMargaretaStrandHåvard. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615–37.
28.
GouldPeter R.1969. Spatial Diffusion. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
29.
GreigJ. M.2015. “Rebels at the Gates: Civil War Battle Locations, Movement, and Openings for Diplomacy.” International Studies Quarterly59 (4): 680–93.
30.
GreigJ. M.MasonT. D.HamnerJesse. 2018. “Win, Lose, or Draw in the Fog of Civil War.” Conflict Management and Peace Science35 (5): 523–543.
31.
HiroseKentaroImaiKosukeLyallJason. 2017. “Can Civilian Attitudes Predict Insurgent Violence? Ideology and Insurgent Tactical Choice in Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research54 (1): 47–63.
32.
JelinskiDennis E.WuJianguo. 1996. “The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem and Implications for Landscape Ecology.” Landscape Ecology11 (3): 129–40.
33.
KertzerJoshua D.2017. “Microfoundations in International Relations.” Conflict Management and Peace Science34 (1): 81–97.
34.
KingGaryTomzMichaelWittenbergJason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 347–61.
35.
KreutzJoakim. 2010. “How and When Armed Conflicts End: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research47 (2): 243–50.
36.
LaFreeGaryDuganLauraXieMinSinghPiyusha. 2012. “Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Terrorist Attacks by ETA 1970 to 2007.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology28 (1): 7–29.
37.
LeventogluBaharSlantchevBranislav L.. 2007. “The Armed Peace: A Punctuated Equilibrium Theory of War.” American Journal of Political Science51 (4): 755–71.
38.
LujalaPäivi. 2010. “The Spoils of Nature: Armed Civil Conflict and Rebel Access to Natural Resources.” Journal of Peace Research47 (1): 15–28.
39.
LujalaPäiviRødJan K.ThiemeNadja. 2007. “Fighting Over Oil: Introducing a New Dataset.” Conflict Management and Peace Science24 (3): 239–56.
40.
MarshallMonty G.GurrTed R.JaggersKeith. 2014. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2013 Dataset Users’ Manual. http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html.
41.
MasonT. D.FettPatrick J.. 1996. “How Civil Wars End: A Rational Choice Approach.” Journal of Conflict Resolution40 (4): 546–68.
42.
O’LoughlinJohnWitmerFrank D. W.. 2012. “The Diffusion of Violence in the North Caucasus of Russia, 1999–2010.” Environment and Planning A44 (10): 2379–396.
43.
OpenshawStan. 1983. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. Norwick, UK: Geo Books.
44.
OpenshawStanTaylorPeter J.. 1979. “A Million or So Correlated Coefficients: Three Experiments on the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem.” In Statistical Applications in the Spatial Sciences, edited by WrigleyN., 127–44. London, UK: Pion.
PickeringSteve. 2016. “Introducing SpatialGridBuilder: A New System for Creating Geo-Coded Datasets.” Conflict Management and Peace Science33 (4): 423–47.
47.
PowellRobert. 2004. “Bargaining and Learning While Fighting.” American Journal of Political Science48 (2): 344–61.
48.
PowellRobert. 2006. “War as a Commitment Problem.” International Organization60 (1): 169–203.
49.
PowellRobert. 2012. “Persistent Fighting and Shifting Power.” American Journal of Political Science56 (3): 620–37.
50.
RamsayKristopher W.2008. “Settling It on the Field: Battlefield Events and War Termination.” Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (6): 850–79.
51.
ReiterDan. 2009. How Wars End. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
RuheConstantin. 2015. “Anticipating Mediated Talks: Predicting the Timing of Mediation with Disaggregated Conflict Dynamics.” Journal of Peace Research52 (2): 243–57.
53.
SchutteSebastianWeidmannNils B.. 2011. “Diffusion Patterns of Violence in Civil Wars.” Political Geography30 (3): 143–52.
54.
SlantchevBranislav L.2003a. “The Power to Hurt: Costly Conflict with Completely Informed States.” American Political Science Review97 (1): 123–33.
55.
SlantchevBranislav L.2003b. “The Principle of Convergence in Wartime Negotiations.” American Political Science Review97 (4): 621–32.
56.
SmithAlastairStamAllan C.. 2004. “Bargaining and the Nature of War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution48 (6): 783–813.
57.
StusterJ. D.2015. “No Negotiations Until Houthis Surrender, Yemeni Government Says.” Foreign Policy, August 28.
58.
SundbergRalphMelanderErik. 2013. “Introducing the UCDP Georeferenced Event Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research50 (4): 523–32.
59.
ThomasJakana L.2014. “Rewarding Bad Behavior: How Governments Respond to Terrorism in Civil War.” American Journal of Political Science58 (4): 804–818.
60.
WagnerR. H.2000. “Bargaining and War.” American Journal of Political Science44 (3): 469–84.
61.
WalterBarbara F.1997. “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement.” International Organization51 (3): 335–64.
62.
WalterBarbara F.2002. Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
WalterBarbara F.2009. “Bargaining Failures and Civil War.” Annual Review of Political Science12 (1): 243–61.
64.
WardMichael D.GreenhillBrian D.BakkeKristin M.. 2010. “The Perils of Policy by p-value: Predicting Civil Conflicts.” Journal of Peace Research47 (4): 363–75.
65.
WeidmannNils B.KuseDoreenGleditschKristian S.. 2010. “The Geography of the International System: The CShapes Dataset.” International Interactions36 (1): 86–106.
66.
WeinsteinJeremyFranciscoLaudemiro. 2005. “The Civil War in Mozambique: The Balance between Internal and External Influences.” In Understanding Civil War: Africa, edited by CollierPaulSambanisNicholas, ch. 6. Washington, DC: World Bank.
67.
WeisigerAlex. 2016. “Learning from the Battlefield: Information, Domestic Politics, and Inter-state War Duration.” International Organization70 (2): 347–75.
68.
WoodReed MKathmanJacob D.. 2014. “Too Much of a Bad Thing? Civilian Victimization and Bargaining in Civil War.” British Journal of Political Science44 (3): 685–706.
69.
WucherpfennigJulianMetternichNils W.CedermanLars-ErickGleditschKristian S.. 2012. “Ethnicity, the State, and the Duration of Civil War.” World Politics64 (1): 79–115.
70.
ZartmanI. W.2001. “The Timing of Peace Initiatives: Hurting Stalemates and Ripe Moments.” Global Review of Ethnopolitics1 (1): 8–18.
71.
ZhukovYuri M.2012. “Roads and the Diffusion of Insurgent Violence.” Political Geography31 (3): 144–56.
72.
ZiemkeJen. 2012. “Turn and Burn: Loss Dynamics and Civilian Targeting in the Angolan War.” Journal of Economics and Politics20 (1): 18–36.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
