We examine whether bargaining behavior alters the initially expected effects of exogenous factors, such as power balance, issues, and domestic regimes, influencing crisis outcomes. Our argument is that, instead of weakening threat credibility as assumed in the traditional advocacy for firmness, mixing coercion with accommodation optimally allows states to reach an outcome within the bargaining range shaped by exogenous factors. After establishing causal mechanisms, we test our hypotheses over the 1918−2015 period. The findings validate our expectations that intransigence exacerbates crisis stability even under favorable exogenous conditions whereas mixed bargaining mitigates the effects of unfavorable ones.
AxelrodR (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
2.
AxelrodRKeohaneRO (1985) Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. World Politics38(1): 226–254.
3.
BaldwinDA (1971) The power of positive sanctions. World Politics24(1): 19–38.
4.
BlaineyG (1988) The Causes of War. New York: Free Press.
5.
BoltJJan Van ZandenL (2020) Maddison Style Estimates of the Evolution of the World Economy, a New 2020 Update. Maddison-Project Working Paper WP-15. Maddison Project Database, version 2020.
6.
BrecherM (1999) International studies in the twentieth century and beyond: Flawed dichotomies, synthesis, cumulation. International Studies Quarterly43(2): 213–264.
7.
BrecherMWilkenfeldJ (2000) A Study of Crisis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Bueno de MesquitaBMorrowJDSiversonRM, et al. (1999) An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review93(4): 791–807.
10.
ChanS (2017) Progress in the democratic deace research agenda. In: Marlin-BennetR (ed.) Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. New York: Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.280
11.
DanilovicV (2002). When the Stakes are High: Deterrence and Conflict Among Major Powers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
12.
DanilovicVClareJ (2017) Deterrence and crisis bargaining. In: Marlin-BennetR (ed.) Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. New York: Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.78
13.
DanilovicVClareJ (2021) Flexibility and firmness in crisis bargaining. Journal of Conflict Resolution65(6): 1039–1066.
14.
DiehlPF (1992). What are they fighting for? The importance of issues in international conflict research. Journal of Peace Research29(3): 333–344.
15.
DiehlPFGoertzGGallegosY (2021) Peace data: Concept, measurement, patterns, and research agenda. Conflict Management and Peace Science38(5): 605–624.
16.
FearonJD (1994) Domestic political sudiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review88(3): 577–592.
17.
FearonJD (1995) Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49(3): 379–414.
18.
GelpiC (1997) Crime and punishment: The role of norms in crisis bargaining. American Political Science Review9 (2): 339–360.
19.
GilpinR (1981) War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HenselPR (1996) Charting a course to conflict: Territorial issues and interstate conflict, 1816–1992. Conflict Management and Peace Science15(1): 43–73.
21.
HenselPR (2017) Territory, contentious issues, and international relations. In: ThompsonWR (ed.) Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. New York: Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.565
22.
HuthP (1988) Extended Deterrence and the Prevention of War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
JamesP (2019) What do we know about crisis, escalation and war? A visual assessment of the international crisis behavior project. Conflict Management and Peace Science36(1): 3–19.
24.
JervisR (1970) The Logic of Images in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
KuglerJZagareFC (1990) The long-term stability of deterrence. International Interactions15(3–4): 255–278.
26.
KurizakiS (2007) Efficient secrecy: Public versus private threats in crisis diplomacy. American Political Science Review101(3): 543–558.
27.
LeedsBARitterJMMcLaughlin MitchellS, et al. (2002) Alliance treaty obligations and provisions, 1815–1944. International Interactions28(3): 237–260.
28.
LemkeDWernerS (1996) Power parity, commitment to change, and war. International Studies Quarterly40(2): 235–260.
29.
LengRJ (1993) Reciprocating influence strategies in interstate crisis bargaining. Journal of Conflict Resolution37(1): 3–41.
30.
MarshallMGGurrTR (2020) Polity5: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2020. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
31.
MillerSVTirJVasquezJA (2020) Geography, territory, and conflict. In: SandalN (ed) Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. New York: Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.320
32.
MoreyDSKaderaKM (2021) Dyadic power distributions and war. In: McLaughlin MitchellSVasquezJA (eds) What Do We Know About War?, 3rd ed. Lanham, MF: Rowman & Littlefield, 23–40.
33.
MorganTC (1990) Issue linkages in international crisis bargaining. American Journal of Political Science34(2): 311–333.
34.
MorgenthauHJ (1948) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf.
35.
MorrowJD (1994) Modeling the forms of international cooperation: Distribution versus information. International Organization48(3): 387–423.
36.
OrganskiAFKKuglerJ (1980) The War Ledger. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
QuackenbushSLZagareFC (2016) Modern deterrence theory: Research trends, policy debates, and methodological controversies. In: KingD (ed) Oxford Handbooks Online. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
ReiterD (2003) Exploring the bargaining model of war. Perspectives on Politics1(1): 27–43.
39.
SartoriAE (2005) Deterrence by Diplomacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
SchellingTC (1960) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
SchellingTC (1966) Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
SenesePDVasquezJA (2008) The Steps to War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
SingerJD (1988) Reconstructing the correlates of war dataset on material capabilities of states, 1816–1985. International Interactions14(2): 115–132.
44.
SnyderGHDiesingP (1977) Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
SteinAA (1980) The politics of linkage. World Politics33(1): 62–81.
46.
StinnettDMTirJSchaferP, et al. (2002) The Correlates of War project direct contiguity data, version 3. Conflict Management and Peace Science19(2): 58–66.
TragerRF (2011) Multidimensional diplomacy. International Organization65 (3):469–506.
49.
TragerRF (2017) Diplomacy: Communication and the Origins of International Order. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
VasquezJA (1993) The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
WaltzKN (1979) Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
52.
ZagareFCKilgourDM (2000) Perfect Deterrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
