There is increasing evidence that territorial conflict is associated with centralized and nondemocratic regimes. We explore whether this relationship is due to the facility of democratic regimes to settle their international borders. Using Owsiak’s data set on border settlement processes, we find little evidence that democratic regimes are more likely than other types of regimes to settle their borders. In fact, joint democracy rarely precedes the first border agreement or full settlement of the border, and there is almost no qualitative evidence suggesting a link between democracy and border settlement in the rare instances of successful agreements. Democracies are also not more likely to keep their borders settled or even to be more peaceful during settled-border years. Overall, our findings suggest that border settlements lead to peace in the dyad and affirm a clear temporal sequence of border settlement, then peace and democracy for neighboring dyads.
BeardsleyKyle. 2011. The Mediation Dilemma. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
2.
BigerGideon. 1995. The Encyclopedia of International Boundaries. New York: Facts on File.
3.
Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.JonesBradford S.. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BremerStuart A.1992. “Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816–1965.” Journal of Conflict Resolution36 (2): 309–41.
5.
BrochmannMaritHenselPaul R.. 2011. “The Effectiveness of Negotiations over International River Claims.” International Studies Quarterly55 (3): 859–82.
6.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceMorrowJames D.SiversonRandolph M.SmithAlastair. 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review93 (4): 791–807.
7.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSiversonRandolph M.. 1995. “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability.” American Political Science Review89 (4): 841–55.
8.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSiversonRandolph M.WollerGary. 1992. “War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review86 (3): 638–46.
9.
Bueno de MesquitaBruceSmithAlastairSiversonRandolph M.MorrowJames D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
BuhaugHalvard. 2005. “Dangerous Dyads Revisited: Democracies May Not Be That Peaceful after All.” Conflict Management and Peace Science22 (2): 95–111.
11.
ChanSteve. 2010. “Progress in the Democratic Peace Research Agenda.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia (ISE), edited by DenemarkRobert A., 151–70. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
12.
ClareJoe. 2014. “Hawks, Doves, and International Cooperation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution58 (7): 1311–37.
13.
ClayChad K.OwsiakAndrew P.. 2016. “The Spatial Diffusion of International Border Agreements.” Journal of Politics78 (2): 427–42.
14.
DixonWilliam J.1993. “Democracy and the Management of International Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution37 (1): 42–68.
15.
DixonWilliam J.1994. “Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict.” American Political Science Review88 (1): 14–32.
16.
FearonJames D.1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review88 (3): 577–92.
17.
GentStephen E.ShannonMegan. 2011. “Decision Control and the Pursuit of Binding Conflict Management: Choosing the Ties That Bind.” Journal of Conflict Resolution55 (2): 710–34.
18.
GhosnFaten. 2010. “Getting to the Table and Getting to Yes: An Analysis of International Negotiations.” International Studies Quarterly54 (4): 1055–72.
19.
GiblerDouglas M.2007. “Bordering on Peace: Democracy, Territorial Issues, and Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly51 (3): 509–32.
20.
GiblerDouglas M.2009. International Military Alliances, 1648–2008. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
21.
GiblerDouglas M.2010. “Outside-in: The Effects of External Threat on State Centralization.” Journal of Conflict Resolution54 (4): 519–42.
22.
GiblerDouglas M.2012. The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development, and International Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
23.
GiblerDouglas M.BraithwaiteAlex. 2013. “Dangerous Neighbours, Regional Territorial Conflict, and the Democratic Peace.” British Journal of Political Science43 (4): 877–87.
24.
GiblerDouglas M.HutchisonMarc L.MillerSteven V.. 2012. “Individual Identity Attachments and International Conflict: The Importance of Territorial Threat.” Comparative Political Studies45 (12): 1655–83.
25.
GiblerDouglas M.MillerSteven V.. 2013. “Quick Victories? Territory, Democracies, and Their Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution57 (2): 258–84.
26.
GiblerDouglas M.MillerSteven V.. 2014. “External Territorial Threat, State Capacity, and Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research50 (5): 634–46. doi:10.1177/0022343314531003.
27.
GiblerDouglas M.TirJaroslav. 2010. “Settled Borders and Regime Type: Democratic Transitions as Consequences of Peaceful Territorial Transfers.” American Journal of Political Science54 (4): 951–68.
28.
GiblerDouglas M.TirJaroslav. 2014. “Territorial Peace and Democratic Clustering.” The Journal of Politics76 (1): 27–40.
29.
GoldsteinErik. 1991. Winning the Peace: British Diplomatic Strategy, Peace Planning, and the Paris Peace Conference, 1916–1920. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30.
HenselPaul R.2000. “Territory: Theory and Evidence on Geography and Conflict.” In What Do We Know about War?, edited by VasquezJohn A., 57–84. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
31.
HenselPaul R.MitchellSara McLaughlinSowersThomas E.ThyneClayton L.. 2008. “Bones of Contention: Comparing Territorial, Maritime, and River Issues.” Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (1): 117–43.
32.
HutchisonMarc L.GiblerDouglas M.. 2007. “Political Tolerance and Territorial Threat: A Cross-national Study.” Journal of Politics69 (1): 128–42.
33.
HuthPaul K.1998. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
34.
HuthPaul K.AlleeTodd L.. 2002. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
KantImmanuel. 1796. Project for a Perpetual Peace: A Philosphical Essay. London, UK: Vernor and Hood.
37.
KocsStephen A.1995. “Territorial Disputes and Interstate War, 1945–1987.” Journal of Politics57 (1): 159–75.
38.
LeedsBrett Ashley. 1999. “Domestic Political Institutions, Credible Commitments, and International Cooperation.” American Journal of Political Science43 (4): 979–1002.
39.
MansbachR. W.VasquezJ. A.. 1981. In Search of Theory: A New Paradigm for Global Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
40.
MaozZeevRussettBruce. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.” The American Political Science Review87 (3): 624–38.
41.
MarshallMonty G.JaggersKeith. 2002. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–1999.” University of Maryland, Center for International Development and Conflict Management, College Park, MD.
42.
MartinLisa L.2000. Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
MattesMichaela. 2008. “The Effect of Changing Conditions and Agreement Provisions on Conflict and Renegotiation between States with Competing Claims.” International Studies Quarterly52 (2): 315–34.
44.
MitchellSara McLaughlin. 2002. “A Kantian System: Democracy and Third-party Conflict Resolution.” American Journal of Political Science46 (4): 749–59.
45.
MitchellSara McLaughlin. 2012. “Norms and the Democratic Peace.” In What Do We Know about War?, edited by VasquezJohn A., 167–88. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
46.
MitchellSara McLaughlinPrinsBrandon C.. 1999. “Beyond Territorial Contiguity: Issues at Stake in Democratic Militarized Interstate Disputes.” International Studies Quarterly43 (1): 169–83.
47.
MorrowJames D.MesquitaBruce Bueno deSiversonRandolph M.SmithAlastair. 2006. “Selection Institutions and War.” Economics and Governance7 (1): 31–52.
48.
OwsiakAndrew. 2012. “Signing Up for Peace: International Boundary Agreements, Democracy, and Militarized Interstate Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly56 (1): 51–66.
49.
OwsiakAndrew P.2013. “Democratization and International Border Agreements.” The Journal of Politics75 (3): 717–29.
50.
OwsiakAndrew P.2016. “Foundations for Integrating the Democratic and Territorial Peace Arguments.” Conflict Management and Peace Science. E pub ahead of print 16 June 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0738894216650635.
51.
OwsiakAndrew P.CuttnerAllisonBuckBrent. 2016. “The International Border Agreements Dataset, 1816–2001.” Conflict Management and Peace Science.
52.
OwsiakAndrew P.DiehlPaul F.GoertzGary. 2016. “Border Settlement and the Movement toward and from Negative Peace.” Conflict Management and Peace Science34 (2): 176–93.
53.
OwsiakAndrew P.VasquezJohn A.. 2016. “The Cart and the Horse Redux: The Timing of Border Settlement and Joint Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science. E pub ahead of print 19 December 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000533.
ReiterDanStamAllan C.. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
RiderToby J.OwsiakAndrew P.. 2015. “Border Settlement, Commitment Problems, and the Causes of Contiguous Rivalry.” Journal of Peace Research52 (4): 508–21.
57.
RussettBruce M.OnealJohn R.. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: W. W. Norton.
58.
SchultzKenneth A.1999. “Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War.” International Organization53 (2): 233–66.
59.
SchultzKenneth A.2001. “Looking for Audience Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (1): 32–60.
60.
SenesePaul D.1997. “Between Dispute and War: The Effects of Joint Democracy on Interstate Conflict Escalation.” Journal of Politics59 (1): 1–27.
61.
SingerJ. DavidBremerStuart A.StuckeyJohn. 1972. “Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965.” In Peace, War and Numbers, edited by RussettBruce, 19–48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
62.
StinnettDouglas M.TirJaroslavSchaferPhilipDiehlPaul F.GochmanCharles. 2002. “The Correlates of War Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3.” Conflict Management and Peace Science19 (2): 58–66.
63.
TirJ.SchaferP.DiehlP. F.GoertzG.. 1998. “Territorial Changes, 1816–1996: Procedures and Data.” Conflict Management and Peace Science16 (1): 89.
64.
TsebelisGeorge. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
VasquezJohn A.2009. The War Puzzle Revisited. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
