Why do some civil wars turn into interstate wars? I analyze an asymmetric information model of civil war onset, rebel-sided intervention, and interstate retaliation with endogenous stakes. Interstate war occurs when rebels believe that the threat of intervention will compel the government to acquiesce, the third party believes that the government will tolerate an intervention, but they both underestimate the government's resolve. The model also has implications for civil wars. Retaliation can deter intervention and rebellion, but intervention can compel the government to give up power, so predicting civil war requires accounting for this triadic interaction.
AndrewCMMitrokhinV (2005) The Mitrokhin Archive II : The KGB and the World. London: Allen Lane.
2.
AydinA (2012) Foreign Powers and Intervention in Armed Conflicts. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
Balch-LindsayDEnterlineAJ (2000) Killing time: The world politics of civil war duration, 1820–1992. International Studies Quarterly44(4): 615–642.
4.
BapatNA (2012) Understanding state sponsorship of militant groups. British Journal of Political Science42(1): 1–29.
5.
BourneK (1961) British preparations for war with the north, 1861–1862. The English Historical Review76(301): 600–632.
6.
CarrollFM (2012) The American civil war and British intervention: The threat of Anglo-American conflict. Canadian Journal of History47(1): 87–116.
7.
CetinyanR (2002) Ethnic bargaining in the shadow of third-party intervention. International Organization56(3): 645–677.
8.
ChoiS-W (2013) What determines us humanitarian intervention?Conflict Management and Peace Science30(2): 121–139.
9.
ClarkeKAPrimoDM (2012) A Model Discipline: Political Science and the Logic of Representations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
CollS (2004) Ghost Wars : The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001. New York: Penguin Press.
11.
CordovezDHarrisonSS (1995) Out of Afghanistan : The Inside Story of the Soviet Withdrawal. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
CrileG (2003) Charlie Wilson’s War. New York, NY: Grove Press.
13.
CunninghamDE (2010) Blocking resolution: How external states can prolong civil wars. Journal of Peace Research47(2): 115–127.
14.
CunninghamDE (2016). Preventing civil war: How the potential for international intervention can deter conflict onset. World Politics68(2): 307–340.
15.
FavrettoK (2009) Should peacemakers take sides? Major power mediation, coercion, and bias. American Political Science Review103(2): 248–263.
16.
FearonJD (1997) Signaling foreign policy interests: Tying hands versus sinking costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution41(1): 68–90.
FindleyMGTeoTK (2006) Rethinking third-party interventions into civil wars: An actor-centric approach. Journal of Politics68(4): 828–837.
19.
GallopM (2017) More dangerous than dyads: How a third party enables rationalist explanations for war. Journal of Theoretical Politics29(3): 353–381.
20.
GartnerSSSiversonRM (1996) War expansion and war outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution40(1): 4–15.
21.
GentSE (2008) Going in when it counts: Military intervention and the outcome of civil conflicts. International Studies Quarterly52(4): 713–735.
22.
GleditschKS (2007) Transnational dimensions of civil war. Journal of Peace Research44(3): 293–309.
23.
GleditschKSSalehyanISchultzK (2008) Fighting at home, fighting abroad: How civil wars lead to international disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution52(4): 479–506.
24.
GoemansHSpanielW (2016) Multimethod research: A case for formal theory. Security Studies25(1): 25–33.
25.
GoertzG (2017) Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies: An Integrated Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
GunitskyS (2019) Rival visions of parsimony. International Studies Quarterly63(3): 707–716.
27.
JonesH (2010) Blue and Gray Diplomacy: A History of Union and Confederate Foreign Relations. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
28.
KupermanAJ (1999) The stinger missile and US intervention in Afghanistan. Political Science Quarterly114(2): 219–263.
29.
KupermanAJ (2008) The moral hazard of humanitarian intervention: Lessons from the balkans. International Studies Quarterly52(1): 49–80.
30.
KurizakiS (2007) Efficient secrecy: Public versus private threats in crisis diplomacy. American Political Science Review101(3): 543–558.
31.
KuxD (2001) The United States and Pakistan, 1947–2000 : Disenchanted Allies. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
32.
KyddAHStrausS (2013) The road to hell? Third-party intentions to prevent atrocities. American Journal of Political Science57(3): 673–684.
33.
LundbergK (2009). The politics of a covert action: The United States, the Mujahideen, and the stinger missile. In Living the Policy Process. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 22–51.
34.
MaozZSan-AkcaB (2012) Rivalry and state support of non-state armed groups (NAGs), 1946–2001. International Studies Quarterly56(4): 720–734.
35.
MinterW (1994) Apartheid’s Contras: An Inquiry into the Roots of War in Angola and Mozambique. London: Zed Books/Witwatersrand University Press.
36.
PetterssonT (2011) Pillars of Strength: External Support to Warring Parties.
37.
PlattSR.2012. Autumn in the Heavenly Kingdom: China, the West, and the Epic Story of the Taiping Civil War. New York, NY: Alfred A Knopf Incorporated.
38.
PoastP (2015) Lincoln’s gamble: Fear of intervention and the onset of the American civil war. Security Studies24(3): 502–527.
39.
PowellR (1999) In the Shadow of Power: States and Strategies in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
RamsayKW (2004) Politics at the water’s edge: Crisis bargaining and electoral competition. Journal of Conflict Resolution48(4): 459–486.
41.
ReganPM (1996) Conditions of successful third-party intervention in intrastate conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution40(2): 336–359.
42.
RubinBR (2002) The Fragmentation of Afghanistan: State Formation and Collapse in the International System. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
SalehyanI (2010) The delegation of war to rebel organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution54(3): 493–515.
44.
SalehyanIGleditschKS (2006) Refugees and the spread of civil war. International Organization60(2): 335.
45.
SalehyanIGleditschKSCunninghamDE (2011) Explaining external support for insurgent groups. International Organization65(4): 709–744.
46.
SartoriAE (2002) The might of the pen: A reputational theory of communication in international disputes. International Organization56(1): 121–149.
47.
SchultzKA (1998) Domestic opposition and signaling in international crises. American Political Science Review92(4): 829–844.
48.
SchultzKA (2001) Democracies and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
SchultzKA (2010) The enforcement problem in coercive bargaining: Interstate conflict over rebel support in civil wars. International Organization64(2): 281–312.
50.
SlantchevBL (2011) Military Threats: The Costs of Coercion and the Price of Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
SmithA (1996) To intervene or not to intervene. Journal of Conflict Resolution40(1): 16–40.
52.
SpanielW (2018) Only here to help? Bargaining and the perverse incentives of international institutions. International Studies Quarterly62(1): 14–22.
53.
HögbladhSPetterssonTThemnérL (2011) External Support in Armed Conflict 1975-2009 -presenting new data. Unpublished manuscript presented at the International Studies Association Convention in Montreal2011.
54.
ThyneCL (2006) Cheap signals with costly consequences the effect of interstate relations on civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(6): 937–961.
55.
WernerS (2000) Deterring intervention: The stakes of war and third-party involvement. American Journal of Political Science44(4): 720–732.
56.
WolfordS (2014) Power, preferences, and balancing: The durability of coalitions and the expansion of conflict. International Studies Quarterly58(1): 146–157.
57.
WolfordS (2020) War and diplomacy on the world stage: Crisis bargaining before third parties. Journal of Theoretical Politics32(2): 235–261.
58.
YousafMAdkinM (2001) Afghanistan—The Bear Trap : The Defeat of a Superpower. PA: Casemate: Havertown.
59.
YuenA (2009) Target concessions in the shadow of intervention. Journal of Conflict Resolution53(5): 745–773.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
