Although research on conflict has tended to separately study interstate conflict and civil war, states experiencing civil wars are substantially more likely to become involved in militarized disputes with other states. Scholars have typically focused on opportunistic attacks or diversionary wars to explain this domestic–international conflict nexus. The authors argue that international disputes that coincide with civil wars are more often directly tied to the issues surrounding the civil war and emphasize intervention, externalization, and unintended spillover effects from internal conflict as important sources of international friction. They empirically demonstrate that civil wars substantially increase the probability of disputes between states. An analysis of conflict narratives shows that the increased risk of interstate conflict associated with civil wars is primarily driven by states' efforts to affect the outcome of the civil war through strategies of intervention and externalization and not by an increase in conflicts over unrelated issues.
Amnesty International.1999. Ethiopia and Eritrea: Human rights issues in a year of armed conflict (AFR 04/03/99). London: Amnesty International .
2.
Atzili, Boaz.2006-2007. When good fences make bad neighbors: Fixed borders, state weakness, and international conflict. International Security31 (3): 139-73.
3.
Beck, Nathaniel L., and Jonathan N. Katz .2001. Throwing out the baby with the bath water: A comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon. International Organization55 (2): 487-95.
4.
Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard M. Tucker .1998. Taking time seriously: Time-series cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science42 (4): 1260-88.
5.
Beck, Nathaniel, Gary King, and Langche Zeng.2000. Improving quantitative studies of international conflict: A conjecture. American Political Science Review94 (1): 21-36.
6.
Bennett, D. Scott, and Allan Stam.2000. EUGene: A conceptual manual. International Interactions26:179-204. http://eugenesoftware.org.
7.
Blechman, Barry M.1972. The impact of Israel's reprisals on behavior of the bordering Arab nations directed at Israel. Journal of Conflict Resolution16 (2): 155-81.
8.
Boehmer, Charles, Erik Gartzke, and Timothy Nordstrom .2004. Do intergovernmental organizations promote peace? World Politics57 (1): 1-38.
9.
Bremer, Stuart A.1992. Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution36 (2): 309-41.
10.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, James D. Morrow, Randolph Siverson, and Alastair Smith.1999. An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review93 (4): 791-808.
11.
Carment, David, and Patrick James.1995. International constraints and interstate ethnic conflict: Toward a crisis-based assessment of irredentism. Journal of Conflict Resolution39 (1): 82-109.
12.
Cave, Damien.2007. Turkey and Kurdish rebels trade attacks. New York Times. November 14.
13.
Chiozza, Giacomo, Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, and Hein E. Goemans .2006. Civil war, interstate conflict, and tenure. Paper presented at the Polarization and Conflict Workshop, Nicosia, Cyprus.
14.
Chiozza, Giacomo, and Hein E. Goemans .2003. Peace through insecurity: Tenure and international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution47 (4): 443-67.
15.
Davies, Graeme A. M.2002. Domestic strife and the initiation of international conflicts: A directed dyad analysis, 1950-1982. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (5): 672-92.
16.
Davis, David R., and Will H. Moore .1997. Ethnicity matters: Transnational ethnic alliances and foreign policy behavior. International Studies Quarterly41 (1): 171-84.
17.
Diehl, Paul F.1992. What are they fighting for? The importance of issues in international conflict research. Journal of Peace Research29 (3): 333-44.
18.
Doyle, Michael W.1986. Liberalism and world politics. American Political Science Review80 (4): 1151-69.
19.
Elbadawi, Ibrahim, and Nicholas Sambanis .2000. External interventions and the duration of civil wars. Policy Research Working Paper Series 2433. Washington, DC: World Bank.
20.
Enterline, Andrew J., and Kristian S. Gleditsch .2000. Threats, opportunity, and force: Externalization of domestic pressure, 1946-82. International Interactions26 (1): 21-53.
21.
Fearon, James D., and David D. Laitin .2003. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97 (1): 75-90.
22.
Gartzke, Erik, Quan Li, and Charles Boehmer .2001. Investing in the peace: Economic interdependence and international conflict. International Organization55 (2): 391-438.
23.
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede.2002. Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (2): 712-24.
24.
---. 2004. A revised list of wars between and within independent states, 1816-2002. International Interactions30 (4): 231-62.
25.
---. 2007. Transnational dimensions of civil war. Journal of Peace Research44 (3): 293-309.
26.
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Kyle Beardsley.2004. Nosy neighbors: Third-party actors in Central American conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution48 (3): 379-402.
27.
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Idean Salehyan.2007. Civil war and interstate disputes. In Resources, governance and civil conflict, ed. Kaare Strøm and Magnus Öberg , 58-76: London: Routledge.
28.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Peter Wallensteen, Mikael Eriksson, Margareta Sollenberg, and Håvard Strand.2002. Armed conflict 1946-2001: A new dataset . Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615-37.
29.
Goldstein, Judith, Doug Rivers, and Michael Tomz.2007. Institutions and international relations: Understanding the effects of the GATT and the WTO on world trade. International Organization61 (1): 37-67.
30.
Greene, William H.1997. Econometric analysis. New York : Prentice Hall.
31.
Hegre, Håvard, Tanja Ellingsen, Scott Gates, and Nils Petter Gleditsch .2001. Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816-1992. American Political Science Review95 (1): 33-48.
32.
Hensel, Paul.2001. Contentious issues and world politics: The management of territorial claims in the Americas, 1816-1992. International Studies Quarterly45 (1): 81-109.
33.
Hensel, Paul R., Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, and Thomas E. Sowers II.2006. Conflict management of riparian disputes: A regional comparison of dispute resolution. Political Geography25 (4): 383-411.
34.
Human Rights Watch.2006. Violence beyond borders: The human rights crisis in eastern Chad. New York: Human Rights Watch.
35.
Huth, Paul.1998. Standing your ground: Territorial disputes and international conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36.
Jones, Daniel M., Stuart A. Bremer, and J. David Singer .1996. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical applications. Conflict Management and Peace Science15 (2): 163-213.
37.
Kugler, Jacek, and Douglas Lemke.1996. Parity and war: Evaluations and extensions of the war ledger. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
38.
Lemke, Douglas, and Suzanne Werner.1996. Power parity, commitment to change, and war. International Studies Quarterly40 (2): 235-60.
39.
Mansfield, Edward, and Jack Snyder.1995. Democratization and the danger of war . International Security20 (1): 5-38.
40.
---. 2005. Electing to fight: Why emerging democracies go to war . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
Maoz, Zeev.2005. Dyadic MID dataset. Version 2.0. http://psfaculty.ucdavis.edu/zmaoz/dyadmid.html.
42.
Marshall, Monty G., and Keith Jaggers.2005. Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2004, dataset users' manual. Arlington, VA: George Mason University, Center for Global Policy.
43.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin.2006. Introduction to special issue: Conflict and cooperation over international rivers. Political Geography25 (4): 357-60.
44.
Moore, Will H.1995. Action-reaction or rational expectations? Reciprocity and the domestic-international conflict nexus during the ``Rhodesia Problem.'Journal of Conflict Resolution39: 129-67.
45.
Most, Benjamin and Harvey Starr.1989. Inquiry, Logic, and international politics . Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
46.
Oneal, John, and Bruce M. Russett .2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York : Norton.
47.
Pevehouse, Jon, Timothy Nordstrom, and Kevin Warnke.2006. Intergovernmental organizations, 1815-2000: New Correlates of War data set. Conflict Management and Peace Science21 (2): 101-19.
48.
Regan, Patrick M.2000. Civil wars and foreign powers: Interventions and intrastate conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
49.
---. 2002. Third-party interventions and the duration of intrastate conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution46: 55-73.
50.
Russett, Bruce M., and John R. Oneal .2001. Triangulating peace. New York: Norton.
51.
Saideman, Stephen M.2001. The ties that divide: Ethnic politics, foreign policy, and international conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
52.
Saideman, Stephen, and R. William Ayres .2000. Determining the causes of irredentism: Logit analyses of minorities at risk data from the 1980s and 1990s. Journal of Politics62 (4) : 1126-44.
53.
Salehyan, Idean.2007. Transnational rebels: Neighboring states as sanctuary for rebel groups. World Politics59 (2): 217-42.
54.
---. 2008. No shelter here: Rebel sanctuaries and international conflict . Journal of Politics70 (1): 54-66.
55.
Salehyan, Idean, and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch.2006. Refugees and the spread of civil war. International Organization60 (2): 335-66.
56.
Sambanis, Nicholas.2004. What is a civil war? Conceptual and empirical complexities of an operational definition. Journal of Conflict Resolution48: 814-58.
57.
Schneider, Gerald, Katherine Barbieri, and Nils Petter Gleditsch, eds. 2003. Globalization and armed conflict. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
58.
Schultz, Kenneth A.1999. Do democratic institutions constrain or inform? Contrasting institutional perspectives on democracy and war. International Organization53 (2): 233-66.
59.
---. 2007. The enforcement problem in coercive bargaining: Interstate conflict over rebel support in civil wars. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
60.
Signorino, Curtis, and Jeffrey M. Ritter .1999. Tau-b or not tau-b: Measuring alliance portfolio similarity. International Studies Quarterly43 (1): 115-44.
61.
Small, Melvin, and J. David Singer .1982. Resort to arms: International and civil wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
62.
Starr, Harvey, and Benjamin Most.1976. The substance and study of borders in international relations research. International Studies Quarterly20 (4): 581-620.
63.
Stinnett, Douglas M., Jaroslav Tir, Philip Schafer, Paul F. Diehl, and Charles Gochman .2002. The Correlates of War project direct contiguity data, version 3. Conflict Management and Peace Science19 (2): 58-66.
64.
Trumbore, Peter F.2003. Victims or aggressors? Ethno-political rebellion and use of force in militarized interstate disputes. International Studies Quarterly47 (2): 183-201.
65.
Vasquez, John.1995. Why do neighbors fight? Proximity, interaction, or territoriality . Journal of Peace Research32 (3): 277-93.
66.
Vasquez, John, and Marie Henehan.2001. Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816-1992. Journal of Peace Research38 (2): 123-38.
67.
Walt, Stephen.1996. Revolution and war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
68.
Woodwell, Douglas.2004. Unwelcome neighbors: Shared ethnicity and international conflict during the cold war. International Studies Quarterly48 (1): 197-223.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
