Why do some international crises escalate into violence while others do not? I argue that an understanding of crisis behavior necessitates awareness of the processes preceding a crisis and propose two mechanisms that link precrisis hostility with crisis violence. The population fatigue mechanism suggests that precrisis hostility interrupts the everyday life of a population, strengthening its demand for a harsher response. If leaders behave with restraint during a crisis and after the crisis hostilities resume, leaders risk facing greater dissatisfaction from their now even more fatigued population. The baseline for resolve mechanism suggests that if states are actively hostile before a crisis, they must maintain hostility during a crisis to credibly demonstrate resolve. Findings on international crises between 1918 and 2010 support the interphase relationship: a crisis escalation is significantly more likely after a hostile precrisis period. The behavior of opponents can indicate how crises might unfold even before they begin.
AbramsonSFCarterDB (2016) The historical origins of territorial disputes. American Political Science Review110(4): 675–698.
2.
AdamsP (2003) War rhetoric escalates across tense Mideast lines: Sharon vows to hit enemies in “any place,” as Syria warns that it is “not a weak state”. Globe and Mail (Toronto), A1.
3.
Andersen-RodgersDR (2015) No table necessary? Foreign policy crisis management techniques in non-state actor-triggered crises. Conflict Management and Peace Science32(2): 200–221.
4.
AsalVBeardsleyKC (2007) Proliferation and international crisis behavior. Journal of Peace Research44(2): 139–155.
5.
Ben-YehudaHLevin-BanchikL (2010) The dangers of terror in world politics: International terror crises, 1918–2006. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism34(1): 31–46.
6.
Ben-YehudaHLevin-BanchikL (2014) Regime and power in international terror crises: Strong democracies fight back hard. Terrorism and Political Violence26(3): 504–522.
7.
BraithwaiteALemkeD (2011) Unpacking escalation. Conflict Management and Peace Science28(2): 111–123.
8.
BrecherM (2008) International Political Earthquakes. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
9.
BrecherMWilkenfeldJ (2000) A Study of Crisis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
10.
CanettiD (2017) Emotional distress, conflict ideology, and radicalization. PS: Political Science & Politics50(4): 940–943.
11.
CanettiDElad-StrengerJLaviIGuyDBar-TalD (2017) Exposure to violence, ethos of conflict, and support for compromise: Surveys in Israel, East Jerusalem, West Bank, and Gaza. Journal of Conflict Resolution61(1): 84–113.
12.
ChongJIHallTH (2017) One thing leads to another: Making sense of East Asia’s repeated tensions. Asian Security13(1): 20–40.
13.
ColaresiM (2004) When doves cry: International rivalry, unreciprocated cooperation, and leadership turnover. American Journal of Political Science48(3): 555–570.
14.
ColaresiMPThompsonWR (2002) Strategic rivalries, protracted conflict, and crisis escalation. Journal of Peace Research39(3): 263–287.
15.
ColaresiMPRaslerKThompsonWR (2008) Strategic Rivalries in World Politics: Position, Space and Conflict Escalation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
CrescenziMJCKathmanJDLongSB (2007) Reputation, history, and war. Journal of Peace Research44(6): 651–667.
17.
DaviesGAMJohnsR (2016) The domestic consequences of international over-cooperation: An experimental study of microfoundations. Conflict Management and Peace Science33(4): 343–360.
18.
DebsAWeissJC (2014) Circumstances, domestic audiences, and reputational incentives in international crisis bargaining. Journal of Conflict Resolution60(3): 403–433.
19.
DiehlPF (2006) Just a phase? Integrating conflict dynamics over time. Conflict Management and Peace Science23(3): 199–210.
20.
DiehlPFGoertzG (2000) War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
21.
FearonJD (1994) Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review88(3): 577–592.
22.
FortnaVP (2003) Scraps of paper? Agreements and the durability of peace. International Organization57(2): 337–372.
23.
GiblerDMOwsiakAP (2018) Democracy and the settlement of international borders, 1919 to 2001. Journal of Conflict Resolution62(9): 1847–1875.
24.
GoertzGDiehlPF (1993) Enduring rivalries: Theoretical constructs and empirical patterns. International Studies Quarterly37(2): 147–171.
25.
GoertzGDiehlPF (2000) (Enduring) rivalry. In: MidlarskyMI (ed.) Handbook of War Studies II. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press (pp. 129–163).
26.
GoertzGDiehlPFBalasA (2016) The Puzzle of Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
HenselPR (1994) One thing leads to another: Recurrent militarized disputes in Latin America, 1816–1986. Journal of Peace Research31(3): 281–297.
28.
HewittJJ (2003) Dyadic processes and international crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution47(5): 669–692.
29.
HewittJJGoertzG (2005) Conceptualizing interstate conflict: How do concept-building strategies relate to selection effects?International Interactions31(2): 163–182.
30.
IakhnisEJamesP (2019) Near crises in world politics: A new data set. Conflict Management and Peace Science. First published online: doi.org/0738894219855610.
31.
JamesP (2019) What do we know about crisis, escalation, and war? A visual assessment of the International Crisis Behavior Project. Conflict Management and Peace Science36(1): 3–19.
LektzianDSouvaM (2009) A comparative theory test of democratic peace arguments, 1946–2000. Journal of Peace Research46(1): 17–37.
34.
LengRJ (1983) When will they ever learn? Coercive bargaining in recurrent crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution27(3): 379–419.
35.
LengRJ (2004) Escalation: Competing perspectives and empirical evidence. International Studies Review6(4): 51–64.
36.
Levin-BanchikL (2018) Assessing knowledge retention, with and without simulations. Journal of Political Science Education14(3): 341–359.
37.
LuptonDL (2018a) Signaling resolve: Leaders, reputations, and the importance of early interactions. International Interactions44(1): 59–87.
38.
LuptonDL (2018b) Reexamining reputation for resolve: Leaders, states, and the onset of international crises. Journal of Global Security Studies3(2): 198–216.
39.
MaozZ (1998) Realist and cultural critiques of the democratic peace: A theoretical and empirical re-assessment. International Interactions24(1): 3–89.
40.
MaozZMorBD (2002) Bound by Struggle: The Strategic Evolution of Enduring International Rivalries. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
41.
MaozZSan-AkcaB (2012) Rivalry and state support of non-state armed groups (NAGs), 1946–2001. International Studies Quarterly56(4): 720–734.
42.
MaozZJohnsonPLKaplanJOgunkoyaFShreveA (2019) The Dyadic Militarized Interstate Disputes (MIDs) Dataset version 3.0: Logic, characteristics, and comparisons to alternative datasets. Journal of Conflict Resolution63(3): 811–835.
NomikosWGSambanisN (2019) What is the mechanism underlying audience costs? Incompetence, belligerence, and inconsistency. Journal of Peace Research, published online 11 June. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319839456.
50.
Peace Index (2006) July. Peace Index Project, directed by Ephraim Yaar and Tamar Hermann. Tel Aviv: Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research and Evens Program in Mediation and Conflict Resolution of Tel Aviv University. Available from: http://www.peaceindex.org/indexMonthEng.aspx?num=33&monthname=July.
51.
PeffleyMHutchisonMLShamirM (2015) The impact of persistent terrorism on political tolerance: Israel, 1980 to 2011. American Political Science Review109(4): 817–832.
52.
PressDG (2005) Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
53.
PutnamRD (1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization42(3): 427–460.
54.
ReedW (2000) A unified statistical model of conflict onset and escalation. American Journal of Political Science44(1): 84–93.
55.
SchellingTC (2008) Arms and Influence: With a New Preface and Afterword. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56.
SenesePDQuackenbushSL (2003) Sowing the seeds of conflict: The effect of dispute settlements on durations of peace. The Journal of Politics65(3): 696–717.
57.
SenesePDVasquezJA (2008) The Steps to War: An Empirical Study. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
VasquezJA (2009) The War Puzzle Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
WiegandKE (2011) Militarized territorial disputes: States’ attempts to transfer reputation for resolve. Journal of Peace Research48(1): 101–113.
63.
WilkenfeldJ (1991) Trigger–response transitions in foreign policy crises, 1929–1985. Journal of Conflict Resolution35(1): 143–169.
64.
WolfordS (2007) The turnover trap: New leaders, reputation, and international conflict. American Journal of Political Science51(4): 772–788.
65.
WolfordS (2012) Incumbents, successors, and crisis bargaining: Leadership turnover as a commitment problem. Journal of Peace Research49(4): 517–530.
66.
WolfordS (2014) Power, preferences, and balancing: The durability of coalitions and the expansion of conflict. International Studies Quarterly58(1): 146–157.
67.
WrightTMDiehlPF (2016) Unpacking territorial disputes: Domestic political influences and war. Journal of Conflict Resolution60(4): 645–669.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
