This study uses a visualization technique, systemism, to integrate ICB Project findings about crisis, escalation and war in particular. The domain of the analysis, 1999–2017, is the period following the authoritative review of research in Michael Brecher (1999; International studies in the twentieth century and beyond: Flawed dichotomies, syntheses, cumulation, International Studies Quarterly 43: 213–264) up to the present. Systemism is used to combine, in graphic form, substantively significant results from ICB Project research. Insights about cause and effect for escalation processes are obtained that would not readily be available in the absence of graphic representation. This learning is made possible through application of systemism, a visualization technique, to convey a network of variables leading into war.
Andersen-RogersD (2015) No table necessary? Foreign policy crisis management techniques in non-state actor triggered crises. Conflict Management and Peace Science32: 200–221.
2.
AsalVBeardsleyK (2007) Proliferation and international crisis behavior. Journal of Peace Research44: 139–155.
3.
Ben-YehudaH (1999) Opportunity crises, framework and findings, 1918–1994. Conflict Management and Peace Science17: 69–102.
4.
Ben-YehudaH (2003) The “clash of civilizations” thesis: Findings from international crises, 1918–1994. Comparative Civilizations Review49: 4.
5.
Ben-YehudaH (2004) Territoriality and war in international crises: Theory and findings, 1918–2001. International Studies Review6: 85–105.
6.
Ben-YehudaHLevin-BanchikL (2010) The dangers of terror in world politics: International terror crises, 1918–2006. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism34: 31–46.
7.
Ben-YehudaHMishali-RamM (2003) The ethnic-state perspective in international crises: A theoretical framework applied to the Arab–Israel conflict, 1947–2000. International Interactions29: 1–26.
8.
Ben-YehudaHMishali-RamM (2006) Ethnic actors and international crises: Theory and findings, 1918–2001. International Interactions32: 49–78.
9.
BertucciM (2017) Habits and policy: The social construction of foreign policymaking processes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Baltimore, MD.
10.
BlagdenD (2016) Induction and deduction in international relations: Squaring the circle between theory and evidence. International Studies Review18: 195–213.
11.
BramsSJ (1993. Theory of Moves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BrecherM (1999) International studies in the twentieth century and beyond: Flawed dichotomies, syntheses, cumulation. International Studies Quarterly43: 213–264.
13.
BrecherMWilkenfeldJ (2000 [1997]) A Study of Crisis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
14.
BrecherMJamesPWilkenfeldJ (2000) Crisis escalation to war: Findings from the International Crisis Behavior Project. In: VasquezJA (ed.), What Do We Know About War?New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
BungeM (1996) Finding Philosophy in Social Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
CaprioliMBoyerMA (2001) Gender, violence, and international crisis. Journal of Conflict Resolution45: 503–518.
18.
ColaresiMPThompsonWR (2002a) Hot spots or hot hands? Serial crisis behavior, escalating risks, and rivalry. Journal of Politics64: 1175–1198.
19.
ColaresiMPThompsonWR (2002b) Strategic rivalries, protracted conflict, and crisis escalation. Journal of Peace Research39: 263–287.
20.
GartzkeEHewittJ (2010) International crises and the capitalist peace. International Interactions36(2): 115–145.
21.
HolstiOR (1972) Crisis, Escalation, War. Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press.
22.
JamesP (1988) Crisis and War. Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press.
23.
JamesP (2004) Systemism, social mechanisms, and scientific progress: A case study of the International Crisis Behavior Project. Philosophy of the Social Sciences34: 352–370.
24.
JamesP (2012) Deterrence and systemism: A diagrammatic exposition of deterrence-related processes leading to the war in Iraq. St. Antony’s International Review7: 139–163.
25.
KirschnerPKirschnerFPaasF (2016) Cognitive load theory. Available from: www.education.com.
26.
LaiB (2004) The effects of different types of military mobilization on the outcome of international crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution48: 211–229.
27.
LemkeD (2002) Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
LengRJ (2004) Escalation: Competing perspectives and empirical evidence. International Studies Review6: 51–64.
29.
LevyJSThompsonWR (2010) Causes of War. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
30.
MaozZ (ed.) (2012) Network analysis in international relations. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 29(3, special issue).
31.
MayerRE (2010) Applying the Science of Learning. Boston, MA: Pearson.
32.
MidlarskyMI (2009) Handbook of War Studies III: The Intrastate Dimension. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
33.
Mishali-RamM (2006) Ethnic diversity, issues, and international crisis dynamics, 1918–2002. Journal of Peace Research43: 583–600.
34.
Mishali-RamMBen-YehudaH (2013) Revisiting the democratic peace practice: Interstate violence in multi-actor crises, 1918–2005. International Politics50: 706–732.
35.
MorganSLWinshipC (2015) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
PalmerGMorganTC (2010) A Theory of Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
SenesePDVasquezJA (2008) The Steps to War: An Empirical Study. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
SilRKatzensteinPJ (2010) Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
SingerJDSmallM (1972) The Wages of War: A Statistical Handbook, 1816–1965. New York: Wiley.
40.
SjobergL (2013) Gendering Global Conflict: Toward a Feminist Theory of War. New York: Columbia University Press.
41.
TrumborePFBoyerMA (2000) International crisis decisionmaking as a two-level process source. Journal of Peace Research37: 679–697.
42.
VasquezJA (1993) The War Puzzle. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
VasquezJA (1999) Cumulating knowledge on crisis escalation. International Studies Review1: 126–128.
44.
VasquezJA (2009) The War Puzzle Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
VasquezJAHenehanMT (2010) Territory, War, and Peace. New York: Routledge.
46.
WilkenfeldJBrecherM (2000) Interstate crises and violence: Twentieth-century findings. In: MidlarskyMI (ed.), Handbook of War Studies II. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 271–300.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
