How do autocracies structure their civil–military relations? We contend that personalist dictators are more strongly associated with counterbalancing than other authoritarian regime types. Personalists are characterized by weak institutions and narrow support bases, a lack of unifying ideologies and informal links to the ruler. They thus have strong incentives to coup-proof and, as we contend, counterbalancing seems particularly attractive. Quantitative analyses of autocratic regimes’ counterbalancing efforts since the 1960s provide support for this expectation. By showing that institutional coup-proofing significantly varies across autocratic forms of government, we contribute to the literature on comparative authoritarianism and civil–military relations.
AhramA (2011) Proxy Warriors: The Rise and Fall of State-sponsored Militias. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
AllanssonMMelanderEThemnérL (2017) Organized violence, 1989–2016. Journal of Peace Research54(4): 574–587.
3.
ArbatliCArbatliE (2016) External threats and political survival: Can dispute involvement deter coup attempts?Conflict Management and Peace Science33(2): 115–152.
4.
BaranyZ (1991) Civil–military relations in communist systems: Western models revisited. Journal of Political and Military Sociology19(1): 75–99.
5.
BelkinASchoferE (2003) Toward a structural understanding of coup risk. Journal of Conflict Resolution47(5): 594–620.
6.
BelkinASchoferE (2005) Coup risk, counterbalancing, and international conflict. Security Studies14(1): 140–177.
7.
BellCKoga-SudduthJ (2017) The causes and outcomes of coup during civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution61(7): 1432–1455.
8.
BellinE (2004) The robustness of authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics36(2): 139–157.
9.
BellinE (2012) Reconsidering the robustness of authoritarianism in the Middle East: Lessons from the Arab Spring. Comparative Politics44(2): 127–149.
10.
BiddleSZirkleR (1996) Technology, civil–military relations, and warfare in the developing world. Journal of Strategic Studies19(2): 171–212.
11.
BöhmeltTClaytonG (2018) Auxiliary force structure: Paramilitary forces and pro-government militias. Comparative Political Studies51(2): 197–237.
12.
BöhmeltTPilsterU (2016) The impact of institutional coup-proofing on coup attempts and coup outcomes. International Interactions41(1): 158–82.
13.
BöhmeltTRuggeriAPilsterU (2017) Counterbalancing, spatial dependence, and peer-group effects. Political Science Research and Methods5(2): 221–239.
14.
BrattonMvandeWalleN (1997) Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
BrooksR (2008) Shaping Strategy: The Civil–Military Politics of Strategic Assessment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
BrownCFarissCMcMahonRB (2016) Recouping after coup-proofing: Compromised military effectiveness and strategic substitution. International Interactions42(1): 1–30.
17.
CareySColaresiMMitchellN (2016) Risk mitigation, regime security, and militias: Beyond coup-proofing. International Studies Quarterly60(1): 59–72.
18.
CarterDBSignorinoCS (2010) Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis18(3): 271–292.
19.
ColganJWeeksJ (2015) Revolution, personalist dictatorships, and international conflict. International Organization69(1): 163–194.
20.
DahlM (2016) Military Defection. PRIO Policy Brief 18.
21.
De BruinE (2018) Preventing coups d’état: How counterbalancing works. Journal of Conflict Resolution62(7): 1433–1458.
22.
DowdleAJ (2007) Civil wars, international conflicts and other determinants of paramilitary strength in Sub-Saharan Africa. Small Wars & Insurgencies18(2): 161–174.
23.
EckK (2015) Repression by proxy: How military purges and insurgency impact the delegation of coercion. Journal of Conflict Resolution59(5): 924–946.
24.
FearonJLaitinD (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97(1): 75–90.
25.
FeaverP (1999) Civil–military relations. Annual Review of Political Science2(1): 211–241.
26.
FrantzEEzrowN (2011) The Politics of Dictatorship: Institutions and Outcomes in Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
27.
GandhiJ (2008) Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GeddesB (1999) What do we know about democratization after twenty years?Annual Review of Political Science2(1): 115–144.
29.
GeddesB (2003) Paradigms and Sand Castles. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
30.
GeddesBWrightJFrantzE (2014) Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set. Perspectives on Politics14(1): 313–331.
31.
GleditschNPWallensteenPErikssonMSollenbergMStrandH (2002) Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research39(5): 615–637.
32.
GlentworthGHancockI (1973) Obote and Amin: Change and continuity in modern Uganda politics. African Affairs72(288): 237–255.
33.
GoldsworthyD (1981) Civilian control of the military in Black Africa. African Affairs80(318): 49–74.
34.
GreitensSC (2016) Dictators and their Secret Police: Coercive Institutions and State Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
GursesMMasonD (2010) Weak states, regime types, and civil war. Civil Wars12(1–2): 140–155.
36.
HarknessK (2016) The ethnic army and the state: Explaining coup traps and the difficulties of democratization in Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution60(4): 587–616.
37.
HorowitzD (1985) Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
38.
HuntingtonS (1957) The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil–Military Relations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
39.
JacksonRRosbergC (1984) Personal rule: Theory and practice in Africa. Comparative Politics16(4): 421–42.
40.
JanowitzM (1977) Military Institutions and Coercion in the Developing Nations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
KamravaM (2000) Military professionalization and civil–military relations in the Middle East. Political Science Quarterly115(1): 67–92.
42.
KimNKKroegerAM (2008) Regime and leader instability under two forms of military rule. Comparative Political Studies51(1): 3–37.
43.
KingGTomzMWittenbergJ (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 347–361.
44.
KnightsM (2013) The military role in Yemen’s protests: Civil–military relations in the tribal republic. Journal of Strategic Studies36(2): 261–288.
45.
Koga-SudduthJ (2017a) Coup risk, coup-proofing and leader survival. Journal of Peace Research54(1): 3–15.
46.
Koga-SudduthJ (2017b) Strategic logic of elite purges in dictatorships. Comparative Political Studies50(13): 1768–1801.
47.
KorenO (2014) Military structure, civil disobedience, and military violence. Terrorism and Political Violence26(4): 688–712.
48.
LeonG (2014) Loyalty for sale? Military spending and coups d’état. Public Choice159(3–4): 363–383.
49.
LevitskySWayL (2013) The durability of revolutionary regimes. Journal of Democracy24(3): 5–17.
50.
LutscherP (2016) The more fragmented the better? The impact of armed forces structure on defection during nonviolent popular uprisings. International Interactions42(6): 350–75.
51.
LyallJWilsonI (2009) Rage against the machines: Explaining outcomes in counterinsurgency wars. International Organization63(1): 67–106.
52.
MagaloniB (2008) Credible power-sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies41(4–5): 715–741.
53.
MakaraM (2013) Coup-proofing, military defection, and the Arab Spring. Democracy and Security9(4): 334–59.
54.
McLauchlinT (2010) Loyalty strategies and military defection in rebellion. Comparative Politics42(3): 333–350.
55.
McMahonRBSlantchevB (2015) The guardianship dilemma: Regime security through and from the armed forces. American Political Science Review109(2): 297–313.
56.
MenaldoV (2012) The Middle East and North Africa’s resilient monarchs. Journal of Politics74(3): 707–722.
57.
NarangVTalmadgeC (2017) Civil–military pathologies and defeat in war: Tests using new data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, in press.
58.
NepstadSE (2013) Mutiny and nonviolence in the Arab Spring: Exploring military defections and loyalty in Egypt, Bahrain, and Syria. Journal of Peace Research50(3): 337–349.
59.
NordlingerE (1977) Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
60.
PachterE (1982) Contra-coup: Civilian control of the military in Guinea, Tanzania, and Mozambique. Journal of Modern African Studies20(4): 595–612.
61.
PalmerGD’OrazioVKenwickMLaneM (2015) The MID4 Dataset, 2002–2010: Procedures, coding rules and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science32(2): 222–242.
62.
PecenyMBeerC (2003) Peaceful parties and puzzling personalists. American Political Science Review97(2): 339–342.
63.
PecenyMBeerCSanchez-TerryS (2002) Dictatorial peace?American Political Science Review96(1): 15–26.
64.
PerlmutterALeoGrandeW (1982) The party in uniform: Toward a theory of civil–military relations in communist political systems. American Political Science Review76(4): 778–789.
65.
PilsterUBöhmeltT (2011) Coup-proofing and military effectiveness in interstate wars, 1967–1999. Conflict Management and Peace Science28(4): 331–350.
66.
PilsterUBöhmeltT (2012) Do democracies engage less in coup-proofing? On the relationship between regime type and civil–military relations. Foreign Policy Analysis8(4): 355–72.
67.
PilsterUBöhmeltTTagoA (2016) The differentiation of security forces and the onset of genocidal violence. Armed Forces & Society42(1): 26–50.
68.
Pion-BerlinDEsparzaDGrishamK (2014) Staying quartered: Civilian uprisings and military disobedience in the twenty-first century. Comparative Political Studies47(2): 230–259.
69.
PiplaniVTalmadgeC (2016) When war helps civil–military relations: Prolonged interstate conflict and the reduced risk of coups. Journal of Conflict Resolution60(8): 1368–1394.
70.
PowellJ (2012) Determinants of attempting and outcome of coups d’état. Journal of Conflict Resolution56(6): 1017–1040.
71.
PowellJ (2014) Regime vulnerability and the diversionary threat of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution58(1): 169–96.
72.
PowellJ (2017) Leader survival strategies and the onset of civil conflict: A coup-proofing paradox. Armed Forces & Society, in press.
73.
QuinlivanJ (1999) Coup-proofing: Its practice and consequences in the Middle East. International Security24(2): 131–165.
74.
ReiterDStamA (2003) Identifying the culprit: Democracy, dictatorship, and dispute initiation. American Political Science Review97(2): 333–337.
75.
RemmerK (1989) Military Rule in Latin America. New York: Unwin Hymen.
76.
RiceC (1992) Problems of postcommunism: The military under democracy. Journal of Democracy3(2): 27–42.
77.
RoesslerP (2011) The enemy within: Personal rule, coups, and civil war in Africa. World Politics63(2): 300–346.
78.
RoesslerP (2016) Ethnic Politics and State Power in Africa. The Logic of the Coup-Civil War Trap. New York: Cambridge University Press.
79.
RudbeckJMukherjeeENelsonK (2016) When autocratic regimes are cheap and play dirty: The transaction costs of repression in South Africa, Kenya, and Egypt. Comparative Politics48(2): 147–166.
80.
SassoonJ (2012) Saddam Hussein’s Ba’th Party: Inside an Authoritarian Regime. New York: Cambridge University Press.
81.
SegalGPhippsJ (1990) Why communist armies defend their parties. Asian Survey30(10): 959–976.
82.
StearnsJ (2011) Dancing in the Glory of Monsters. New York: Public Affairs.
83.
StepanA (1971) The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
84.
StinnettDMTirJSchaferPDiehlPFGochmanC (2002) The Correlates of War Project Direct Contiguity Data, version 3. Conflict Management and Peace Science19(2): 58–66.
85.
SvolikM (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.
86.
TalmadgeC (2015) The Dictator’s Army: Battlefield Effectiveness in Authoritarian Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
87.
TalmadgeC (2016) Different threats, different militaries: Explaining organizational practices in authoritarian armies. Security Studies25(1): 111–141.
88.
ThompsonM (1998) The Marcos Regime in the Philippines. In: ChehabiHELinzJ (eds) Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 206–229.
89.
WangTY (1998) Arms transfers and coups d’état: A study on Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Peace Research35(6): 659–675.
90.
WayCWeeksJ (2014) Making it personal: Regime type and nuclear proliferation. American Journal of Political Science58(3): 705–719.
91.
WeeksJ (2008) Autocratic audience costs: Regime type and signaling resolve. International Organization62(1): 35–64.
92.
WeeksJ (2014) Dictators at War and Peace. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
93.
WrongM (2002) In the Footsteps of Mr. Kurtz. New York: Harper Collins.
94.
YoungC (1994) Democratization in Africa: The contradictions of a political imperative. In: WidnerJ (ed.) Economic Change and Political Liberalization in Sub-Saharan Africa. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 230–250.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
