Is there a trend toward the regionalization of peacekeeping? Does regionalization undermine the United Nations (UN) system of collective security? To answer these questions, we present an innovative dataset of peace operations. Covering the 1947–2016 period, the dataset captures every UN and non-UN peace operation, information on mission type, the existence of target state consent and UN authorization. The unit of analysis is the mission. The first analysis of the dataset yields three findings: (1) There is a significant regionalization of peace operations; (2) regions show distinct intervention patterns; and (3) regionalization does not directly challenge the UN authority.
AbassA (2004) Regional Organizations and the Development of Collective Security beyond Chapter VIII of the UN Charter. Oxford: Hart.
2.
AbassABaderinMA (2002) Towards effective collective security and human rights protection in Africa: An assessment of the consitutive act of the new African Union. Netherlands International Law Review49(1): 1–38.
3.
AlterKJMeunierS. (2009) The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics7(1): 13–24.
4.
ArisS (2011) Eurasian Regionalism: The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
5.
AttinàF (2012) Dataset of 205 Multilateral Peace/Security Operations, 1947–2008—Codebook Version 2.2008. Catania: University of Catania. Available from: http://www.fscpo.unict.it/adism/adism.htm (accessed 6 July 2017).
6.
BaevPK (2004) Regional peacekeepers: The paradox of Russian peacekeeping. Journal of Peace Research41(6): 761.
7.
BarnettM (1995) Partners in peace? The UN, regional organizations, and peace-keeping. Review of International Studies21(4): 411–433.
8.
BellamyAJWilliamsPD (2005) Who’s keeping the peace? Regionalization and contemporary peace operations. International Security29(4): 157–195.
9.
BellamyAJWilliamsPD (2015) Trends in peace operations, 1947–2013. In: KoopsJATardyTMacQueenN, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of United Nations Peacekeeping Operations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–46.
10.
BerdalM (2008) The Security Council and peacekeeping. In: LoweVRobertsAWelshJ, et al. (eds) The United Security Council and War. The Evolution of Thought and Practice since 1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 175–204.
11.
BergerC (2016) The unintended consequences of UN peacekeeping in post-war South Sudan. Why everyone wants a uniform. In: BannonBRO (ed.) Reassessing the Responsibility to Protect: Conceptual and Operational Challenges. London: Routledge, pp. 142–150.
12.
BinderM (2015) Paths to intervention: What explains the UN’s selective response to humanitarian crises?Journal of Peace Research52(6): 712–726.
13.
BoissondeChazournesL. (2017) Interactions Between Regional and Universal Organizations. A Legal Perspective. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
14.
CellamareG. (2018) The relationship between the UN Security Council and the AU Peace and Security Council in the field of peacekeeping. In: CellamareGIngravalloI (eds) Peace Maintenance in Africa: Open Legal Issues. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–33.
15.
CharbonneauB (2015) Peacekeeping in Africa: The evolving security architecture. International Peacekeeping22(3): 275–282.
16.
ColemanKP (2011) Innovations in “African solutions to African problems”: The evolving practice of regional peacekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Modern African Studies49(4): 517–545.
17.
CornellSJonssonM (2014) Conclusions and implications for conflict resolution and peacekeeping. In: CornellSJonssonM (eds) Conflict, Crime, and the State in Postcommunist Eurasia. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pensylvania Press, pp. 199–222.
18.
CotteyA (2008) Beyond humanitarian intervention: The new politics of peacekeeping and intervention. Contemporary Politics14(4): 429–446.
19.
De GuttryA (2011) Recent trends in peacekeeping operations run by regional organisations and the resulting interplay with the United Nations system. African Journal of Conflict Resolution11(3): 27–52.
20.
De WetE (2014) The evolving role of ECOWAS and SADC in peace operations: A challenge to the primacy of the United Nations Security Council in matters of peace and security?Leiden Journal of International Law27(2): 353–369.
21.
DiehlPF. (1993) Institutional alternatives to traditional U.N. peacekeeping: An assessment of regional and multinational options. Armed Forces & Society19(2): 209–230.
22.
FortnaVP (2008). Does Peacekeeping Work: Shaping Belligerents Choices after Civil War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
FortnaVPHowardLM (2012) Pitfalls and prospects in the peacekeeping literature. In: BrownGHLangerA (eds) Elgar Handbook of Civil War and Fragile States. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 310–326.
24.
FrazierDV (2006) Third party characteristics, territory and the mediation of militarized interstate disputes. Conflict Management and Peace Science23(4): 267–284.
25.
GriffinM (1999) Blue helmet blues: Assessing the trend towards “subcontracting” UN peace operations. International Peacekeeping30(1): 43–60.
26.
HaftelYZHofmannSC (2017) Institutional authority and security cooperation within regional economic organizations. Journal of Peace Research54(4): 484–498.
27.
HasslerS (2013) Reforming the UN Security Council membership. London: Routledge.
28.
HawkinsDGLakeDANielsonDL, et al. (2006) Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
HeldtBWallensteenP (2006) Peacekeeping Operations: Global Patterns of Intervention 1948–2004. Stockholm: Folke Bernadotte Academy.
30.
HettneBSöderbaumF (2006) UN and regional organizations in global security: Competing or complementary logics. Global Governance12: 227–232.
31.
HirshM (2000) Calling all regio-cops—Peacekeeping’s hybrid future. Foreign Affairs79(6): 2–8.
32.
HoefflerA. (2014) Can international interventions secure the peace?International Area Studies Review17(1): 75–91.
33.
HowardLMDayalAK (2018) The use of force in UN Peacekeeping. International Organization72(1): 71–103.
34.
HultmanLKathmanJDShannonM. (2016) United Nations peacekeeping dynamics and the duration of post-civil conflict peace. Conflict Management and Peace Science33(3): 231–249.
35.
KathmanJDWoodRM. (2016) Stopping the killing during the “peace”: Peacekeeping and the severity of postconflict civilian victimization. Foreign Policy Analysis12(2): 149–169.
36.
KirchnerEJDomínguezR (2011) Regional organizations and security governance. In: KirchnerEJDomínguezR (eds) The Security Governance of Regional Organizations. London: Routledge, pp. 1–22.
37.
KoopsJATardyT (2016) The United Nations’ inter-organizational relations in peacekeeping. In: KoopsJAMacQueenNTardyT, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of United Nations Peacekeeping Operations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
KoopsJAMacQueenNTardyT, et al. (2015) The Oxford Handbook of United Nations Peacekeeping Operations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
MaysTM. (2011) Historical Dictionary of Multinational Peacekeeping, 3rd edn.Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.
40.
MoradaNM (2009) The ASEAN Charter and the promotion of R2P in Southeast Asia: Challenges and constraints. Global Responsibility to Protect1: 185–207.
41.
MullenbachMJ (2005) Deciding to keep peace: An analysis of international influences on the establishment of third-party peacekeeping missions. International Studies Quarterly49(3): 529–555.
42.
MullenbachMJ (2013) Third-party peacekeeping in intrastate disputes, 1946–2012: A New Data Set. Midsouth Political Science Review14: 103–133.
43.
MurphyR (2016) UN Peacekeeping in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the protection of civilians. Journal of Conflict & Security Law21(2): 209–246.
44.
NolteG. (1993) Restoring peace by regional action: International legal aspects of the Liberian conflict. Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht53(3): 603–629.
45.
NolteG (2010) Intervention by invitation. In: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Max Planck Foundation for International Peace and the Rule of Law.
46.
NtahirajaB (2012) The global and the regional in the responsibility to protect: Where does authority lie. Journal Jurisprudence15: 419–442.
47.
OthienoTSamasuwoN (2007) A critical analysis of Africa’s experiments with hybrid missions and security collaboration. African Security Review16(3): 25–39.
48.
PaliwalS (2010) The primacy of regional organizations in international peacekeeping: The African example. Virginia Journal of International Law51(1): 185–230.
49.
PerkinsRNeumayerE (2008) Extra-territorial interventions in conflict spaces: Explaining the geographies of post-Cold War peacekeeping. Political Geography27(8): 895–914.
50.
PickeringJKisanganiE (2009) The International Military Intervention Dataset: An updated resource for conflict scholars. Journal of Peace Research46(4): 585–599.
51.
RodriguesGMA (2015) Regional implementation of peacekeeping: Notes and lessons from the Brazilian experience in the MINUSTAH. In: CuranDFraserTRoederLZuberR (eds) Perspectives on Peacekeeping and Atrocity Prevention: Expanding Stakeholders and Regional Arrangements. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 145–158.
52.
SabrowS. (2017) Local perceptions of the legitimacy of peace operations by the UN, regional organizations and individual states—A case study of the Mali conflict. International Peacekeeping24(1): 159–186.
53.
SimmaB (1999) NATO, the UN and the use of force: Legal aspects. European Journal of International Law10(1): 1–22.
54.
SöderbaumF (2007) African regionalism and EU-African interregionalism. In: TeloM (ed.) European Union and New Regionalism. Cornwall: Ashgate, pp. 185–221.
55.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2016) SIPRI Multilateral Peace Operations Database (unpublished). Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
56.
TavaresR (2011) The participation of SADC and ECOWAS in military operations: The weight of national interests in decision-making. African Studies Review54(2): 145–176.
57.
ThompsonWR (1973) The Regional Subsystem: A Conceptual Explication and a Propositional Inventory. International Studies Quarterly17(1): 89–117.
58.
TomuschatC (1998) The United Nations and Regional Organizations: A study of chapter VIII of the Charter of the United Nations. American Journal of International Law92(1): 155–156.
United Nations Security Council (2011) Working together for peace and security in Africa. The Security Council and the AU Peace and Security Council. Security Council Report (Special Research Report). Security Council Report. New York: UN Security Council.
US Department of State (1995) The General Framework Agreement. Bosnia Herzegovina. US Department of State.
64.
VictorJ (2010) African peacekeeping in Africa: Warlord politics, defense economics, and state legitimacy. Journal of Peace Research47(2): 217–229.
65.
VolgyTJBezerraPCramerJ, et al. (2017) The case for comparative regional analysis in international politics. International Studies Review19(3): 452–480.
66.
WallensteenPJohanssonP (2004) Security Council decisions in perspective. In: MaloneDM (ed.) The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 17–33.
67.
WalterC. (2012) Hybrid peacekeeping: Is UNAMID a new model for cooperation between the United Nations and regional organizations? In: HestermeyerHPKönigDMatz-LückN, et al. (eds) Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity: Liber Amicorum Rudiger Wolfrum, Vols 1 and 2. Leiden: Brill, pp. 1327–1340.
68.
WilliamsPD. (2009) The Peace and Security Council of the African Union: Evaluating an embryonic international institution. The Journal of Modern African Studies47(4): 603–626.
69.
WilliamsPD (2017) Global and regional peacekeepers: Trends, opportunities, risks and the way ahead. Global Policy8(1): 124–129.
70.
YamashitaH (2012) Peacekeeping cooperation between the United Nations and regional organisations. Review of International Studies38(1): 165–186.
71.
YamashitaH (2016) United Nations peacekeeping challenge: The importance of the integrated approach. International Peacekeeping23(2): 358–362.
72.
ZakopalovaD (2011) Effect of regionalization on the allocation third-party peace operations. Defence and Strategy11(1): 32–52.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
