Regional and global intergovernmental organizations have grown both in number and scope, yet their role and effectiveness as conflict managers is not fully understood. Previous research efforts tend to categorize organizations solely by the scope of their membership, which obscures important sources of variation in institutional design at both the regional and global levels. International organizations will be more successful conflict managers if they are highly institutionalized, if they have members with homogeneous preferences, and if they have more established democratic members. These hypotheses are evaluated with data on territorial (1816-2001), maritime (1900-2001), and river (1900-2001) claims from the Issue Correlates of War (ICOW) project in the Western Hemisphere, Europe, and the Middle East. Empirical analysis suggests that international organizations are more likely to help disputing parties reach an agreement if they have more democratic members, if they are highly institutionalized, and when they use binding management techniques.
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal.1998. Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (1): 3-32.
2.
Bercovitch, Jacob, J. Theodore Anagnoson, and Donnette L. Wille .1991. Some conceptual issues and empirical trends in the study of successful mediation in international relations . Journal of Peace Research28 (1): 7-17.
3.
Bercovitch, Jacob, and Gerald Schneider.2000. Who mediates? The political economy of international conflict management. Journal of Peace Research37 (2): 145-65.
4.
Boehmer, Charles, Erik Gartzke, and Timothy Nordstrom.2004. Do intergovernmental organizations promote peace? World Politics57 (1): 1-38.
5.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow .2003. The logic of political survival . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Burton, John.1962. Peace theory. New York: Knopf.
7.
Chigas, Diana, Elizabeth McClintock, and Christophe Kamp .1996. Preventive diplomacy and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe: Creating incentives for dialogue and cooperation. In Preventing conflict in the post-Communist world: Mobilizing international and regional organizations , edited by Abram Chayes and Antonia Handler Chayes, 25-95. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution.
8.
Dixon, William J.1993. Democracy and the management of international conflict . Journal of Conflict Resolution37 (1): 42-68.
9.
———. 1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review88 (1): 14-32.
10.
———. 1998. Dyads, disputes, and the democratic peace. In The political economy of war and peace, edited by Murray Wolfson.Boston: Kluwer .
11.
Dixon, William J., and Paul D. Senese .2002. Democracy, disputes, and negotiated settlements. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (4): 547-71.
12.
Dorussen, Han, and Hugh Ward.2008. Intergovernmental organizations and the Kantian Peace: A network perspective [this issue]. Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (2):189-212.
13.
Fearon, James D.1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49 (3): 379-414.
14.
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink.1998. International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization52 (4): 887-917.
15.
Fisher, Roger.1964. Fractionating conflict. In International conflict and behavioral science: The Craigville papers, edited by Roger Fisher.New York: Basic Books.
16.
Fortna, Virginia Page.2003. Scraps of paper? Agreements and the durability of peace . International Organization57 (2): 337-72.
17.
Gartzke, Erik, and Dong-Joon Jo .2002. United Nations General Assembly Voting, 1946—1996. Version 3.0. http://www.columbia.edu/∼eg589/datasets (accessed July 3, 2007).
18.
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor.1996. Democratic states and commitment in international relations . International Organization50 (1): 109-39.
19.
Haas, Ernst B.1983. Regime decay: Conflict management and international organizations, 1945-1981. International Organization37 (2): 189-256.
20.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Alexander H. Montgomery .2008. Power or plenty: How do international trade institutions affect economic sanctions?Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (2):213-242.
21.
Heckman, James J.1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica47 (1): 153-62.
22.
Hensel, Paul R.2000. Territory: Theory and evidence on geography and conflict . In What do we know about war? edited by John A. Vasquez, 57-84. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
23.
———. 2001. Contentious issues and world politics: The management of territorial claims in the Americas, 1816-1992. International Studies Quarterly45 (1): 81-109.
24.
Hensel, Paul R., and Sara McLaughlin Mitchell.2005. Issue indivisibility and territorial claims. Geo-Journal64 (4): 275-85.
25.
Hensel, Paul R., Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, and Thomas E. Sowers II.2006. Conflict management of riparian disputes. Political Geography25:383-411.
26.
Hensel, Paul R., Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, Thomas E. Sowers II , and Clayton L. Thyne.2008. Bones of contention: Comparing territorial, maritime, and river issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (1): 117-43.
27.
Ikenberry, G. John.2001. After victory: Institution, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
James, Patrick, Johann Park, and Seung-Whan Choi .2006. Democracy and conflict management: Territorial claims in the Western Hemisphere revisited. International Studies Quarterly50 (4): 803-18.
29.
Kadera, Kelly M., and Sara McLaughlin Mitchell.2005. Heeding Ray's Advice: An exegesis on control variables in systemic democratic peace research. Conflict Management and Peace Science22 (4): 311-26.
30.
Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal.2001. The rational design of international institutions. International Organization55 (4): 761-799.
31.
Kydd, Andrew.2003. Which side are you on? Bias, credibility, and mediation . American Journal of Political Science47 (4): 597-611.
32.
Leeds, Brett Ashley.1999. Domestic political institutions, credible commitments, and international cooperation. American Journal of Political Science43 (4): 979-1002.
33.
Leeds, Brett Ashley, and David R. Davis .1999. Beneath the surface: Regime type and international interaction, 1953—78. Journal of Peace Research36 (1): 5-21.
34.
Lipson, Charles.2003. Reliable partners: How democracies have made a separate peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Jon C. Pevehouse .2008. Democratization and the varieties of international organizations [this issue]. Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (2):269-294.
36.
Maoz, Zeev, and Bruce Russett.1993. Normative and structural causes of democratic peace. American Political Science Review87 (3): 624-38.
37.
Marshall, Monty G., and Keith Jaggers.2005. Polity IV dataset, version p4v2002.2e. Computer File. Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland, College Park.
38.
Meyers, B. David.1974. Interregional conflict management by the Organization of African Unity. International Organization28 (3): 345-73.
39.
Miller, David Hunter.1919. The international regime of ports, waterways and railways . American Journal of International Law13 (4): 669-86.
40.
Mitchell, Ronald.2002. A quantitative approach to evaluating international environmental regimes. Global environmental politics2 (4): 58-83.
41.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Paul R. Hensel .2007. International institutions and compliance with agreements. American Journal of Political Science51 (4): 721-737.
42.
Moore, Christopher W.1987. The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
43.
Morgan, T. Clifton, and Sally Howard Campbell .1991. Domestic structure, decisional constraints, and war: So why Kant democracies fight?Journal of Conflict Resolution35 (2): 187-211.
44.
Murdock, James Oliver.1929. Arbitration and conciliation in pan America. The American Journal of International Law23 (2): 273-91.
45.
Nye, Joseph.1971. Peace in parts: Integration and conflict in regional organization . Boston: Little, Brown.
46.
Peck, Connie.1998. Sustainable peace: The role of the UN and regional organizations . Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield .
47.
———. 2001. The role of regional organizations in preventing and resolving conflict. In Turbulent peace: The challenges of managing International Conflict, edited by Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, 561-83. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
48.
Pennock, James Roland.1979. Democratic political theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
Pevehouse, Jon C.2002. With a little help from my friends? Regional organizations and the consolidation of democracy. American Journal of Political Science46 (3): 611-26.
50.
Pevehouse, Jon, and Bruce Russett.2006. Democratic international governmental organizations promote peace. International Organization60 (4): 969-1000.
51.
Pinder, John.1996. Community against conflict: The European Community's contribution to ethno-National peace in Europe. In Preventing conflict in the post-Communist world: Mobilizing international and regional organizations , edited by Abram Chayes and Antonia Handler Chayes, 147-96. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution.
52.
Powers, Kathy L.2004. Regional trade agreements as military alliances. International Interactions30 (4): 373-95.
53.
Raymond, Gregory A.1994. Democracies, disputes, and third-party intermediaries . Journal of Conflict Resolution38 (1): 24-42.
54.
Reed, William.2000. A unified statistical model of conflict onset and escalation . American Journal of Political Science44 (1): 84-93.
55.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas.1996. Collective identity in a democratic community: The case of NATO. In The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics, edited by Peter J. Katzenstein , 357-99. New York: Columbia University Press.
56.
Russett, Bruce, and John R. Oneal .2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence and international organizations. New York : Norton.
57.
Sabur, A. K. M. Abdus, and Mohammad Humayun Kabir.2000. Conflict management and sub-regional co-operation in ASEAN: Relevance for SAARC. Dhaka, India: Academic Press and Publishers, in association with Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies.
58.
Signorino, Curtis S., and Jeffrey M. Ritter .1999. Tau-b or not Tau-b: Measuring the similarity of foreign policy positions. International Studies Quarterly43 (1): 115-44.
59.
Simmons, Beth. 1999. See you in court? The appeal to quasi-judicial legal processes in the settlement of territorial disputes. In A road map to war: Territorial dimensions of international conflict, edited by Paul F. Diehl, 205-37. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
60.
Singer, J. David, Stuart Bremer, and John Stuckey, 1972. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820—1965. In Peace, war, and numbers, edited by Bruce Russett, 19-48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61.
Thompson, Alexander.2006. Coercion through IOs: The Security Council and the logic of information transmission. International Organization60 (1): 1-34.
62.
Touval, Saadia.1982. Biased intermediaries: Theoretical and historical considerations . Jerusalem Journal of International Relations1 (1): 51-69.
63.
Towle, Philip.2000. Democracy and peacemaking: Negotiations and debates 1815—1973 . New York: Routledge.
64.
Treves, Tullio.2002. International organizations as parties to contentious cases: Selected aspects. In International organizations and international dispute settlement: Trends and prospects, edited by Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, Cesare Romano, and Ruth Mackenzie Ardsley.New York: Trans-national Publishers .
65.
von Stein, Jana. 2008. The international law and politics of climate change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol [this issue]. Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (2): 243-268.
66.
Wall, James A. Jr. , and Ann Lynn.1993. Mediation: A current review. Journal of Conflict Resolution37 (1): 160-94.
67.
Wehr, Paul, and John Paul Lederach .1991. Mediating conflict in Central America. Journal of Peace Research28 (1): 85-98.
68.
Weinstein, Franklin B.1969. The concept of a commitment in international relations . Journal of Conflict Resolution13 (1): 39-56.
69.
Woolsey, L.H.1929. Editorial: The Bolivia-Paraguay dispute. American Journal of International Law23 (1): 110-12.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
