This article argues that wars caused by commitment problems are more likely to experience outside military intervention than are wars with other causes. Wars caused by commitment problems are more likely to draw in outside states because they tend to be more severe and produce larger war aims. These larger stakes create both threats and opportunities for non-belligerent states thereby prompting military intervention. The greater stakes also generate incentives for belligerent states to seek outside aid. This relationship between commitment problems and intervention implies that while certain types of wars may be more likely to experience intervention, the same causes can explain both intervention and war initiation. The argument is tested on the Correlates of War Interstate War dataset using logit-based generalized linear models. The findings support the commitment problem hypothesis and have implications for the bargaining framework and for theories about the causes of multilateral and general wars.
AltfeldMFBueno de MesquitaB (1979) Choosing sides in war. International Studies Quarterly23(1): 87–112.
2.
BellSRJohnsonJC (2015) Shifting power, commitment problems, and preventive war. International Studies Quarterly59(1): 124–132.
3.
BettsRK (1992) Systems for peace or causes of war? Collective security, arms control and the new Europe. International Security17(1): 5–43.
4.
BlaineyG (1973) The Causes of War. New York: Free Press.
5.
BremerSA (1995) Advancing the scientific study of war. In: BremerS (ed.) The Process of War: Advancing the Scientific Study of War. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach, pp. 1–34.
6.
Bueno de MesquitaB (1990) Big wars, little wars: Avoiding selection bias. International Interactions16(3): 159–169.
7.
Bueno de MesquitaBMorrowJDSiversonRMSmithA (1999) An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review93(4): 791–807.
8.
ColaresiMRaslerKThompsonWR (2007) Strategic Rivalry: Space, Position and Conflict Escalation in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CopelandD (2000) The Origins of Major War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
Correlates of War Project (2011) State system membership list, v2011. Available from: correlatesofwar.org.
11.
DiehlP (1995) Avoiding detours and dead ends on the road to war. In: BremerS (ed.) The Process of War: Advancing the Scientific Study of War. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach, pp. 203–210.
12.
DreyerD (2010) Issue conflict accumulation and the dynamics of strategic rivalry. International Studies Quarterly54(3): 779–795.
13.
FearonJ (1995) Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49(3): 379–414.
14.
GartnerSSSiversonRM (1996) War expansion and war outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution40(1): 4–15.
15.
GellerDS (1992) Capability concentration, power transition, and war. International Interactions17(3): 269–284.
16.
GiblerDM (2009) International Military Alliances, 1648–2008. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
17.
GilpinR (1981) War & Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HaldiS (2003) Why Wars Widen: A Theory of Predation and Balancing. Portland, OR: Frank Cass.
19.
JoyceKAGhosnFBayerR (2014) When and whom to join: The expansion of ongoing violent interstate conflicts. British Journal of Political Science44(1): 205–238.
20.
KennedyP (1987) The Rise and Fall of Great Powers. New York: Random House.
21.
KleinJPGoertzGDiehlPF (2006) The New Rivalry Dataset: Procedures and patterns. Journal of Peace Research43(3): 331–348.
22.
KuglerJ (1990) The war phenomenon: A working distinction. International Interactions16(3): 201–213.
23.
LeedsBA (2005) Alliances and the expansion and escalation of militarized interstate disputes. In: MintzARussettB (eds) New Directions in International Relations. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 117–134.
24.
LemkeD (1996) Small states and war: An expansion of power transition theory. In: KuglerJLemkeD (eds) Parity and War. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 77–92.
25.
LeventogluBSlantchevBL (2007) The armed peace: A punctuated equilibrium theory of war. American Journal of Political Science51(4): 755–771.
26.
LevyJS (1982) Contagion of great power war, 1495–1975. American Journal of Political Science26(3): 562–584.
27.
LevyJS (1990) Big wars, little wars, and theory construction. International Interactions16(3): 215–224.
28.
LevyJS (2011) The Initiation and spread of the First World War: Interdependent decisions. Foreign Policy Analysis7(2): 183–188.
29.
KimC-H (1991) Third party participation in wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution35(4): 659–677.
30.
MarshallMGJaggersKGurrTR (2011) Polity IV Project: Dataset Users’ Manual. Center for Systemic Peace: Polity IV Project.
31.
MelinMMKochMT (2010) Jumping into the fray: Alliances, power, institutions, and the timing of conflict expansion. International Interactions36(1): 1–27.
32.
MidlarskyM (1990) Systemic wars and dyadic wars: No single theory. International Interactions16(3): 171–181.
33.
OrganskiAFKKuglerJ (1980) The War Ledger. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
PowellR (2006) War as a commitment problem. International Organization60(1): 169–203.
35.
PowellR (2012) Persistent fighting and shifting power. American Journal of Political Science56(3): 620–637.
36.
RaslerKThompsonWR (1985) War and the economic growth of major powers. American Journal of Political Science29(3): 513–538.
37.
ReiterD (1995) Exploding the powder keg myth: Preemptive wars almost never happen. International Security20(2): 5–34.
38.
ReiterD (2009) How Wars End. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
RichardsonL (1960) Statistics of Deadly Quarrels. Chicago, IL: Quadrangle.
40.
SabroskyAN (1985) Alliance aggregation, capability distribution, and the expansion of interstate war. In: SabroskyAN (ed.) Polarity and War. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 145–189.
41.
SarkeesMRWaymanF (2010) Resort to War: 1816–2007. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
42.
ShirkeyZC (2009) Is This a Private Fight or Can Anybody Join? The Spread of Interstate War. Aldershot: Ashgate.
43.
ShirkeyZC (2012a) Joining the Fray: Outside Military Intervention in Civil Wars. Aldershot: Ashgate.
44.
ShirkeyZC (2012b) When and how many: The effects of third party joining on casualties and duration in interstate wars. Journal of Peace Research49(2): 321–334.
45.
SingerJD (1987) Reconstructing the Correlates of War Dataset on material capabilities of states, 1816–1985. International Interactions14: 115–132.
46.
SiversonRMStarrH (1991) The Diffusion of War: A Study of Opportunity and Willingness. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
47.
SlantchevB (2004) How initiators end their wars: The duration of warfare and the terms of peace. American Journal of Political Science48(4): 813–829.
48.
StanleyEA (2009) Paths to Peace: Domestic Coalition Shifts, War Termination and the Korean War. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
49.
StevensonD (2011) From Balkan conflict to global conflict: The spread of the First World War, 1914–1918. Foreign Policy Analysis7(2): 169–182.
50.
StreichPLevyJS (2016) Information, commitment, and the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–1905. Foreign Policy Analysis12(4): 489–511.
51.
ThompsonWR (1988) On Global War: Historical-structural Approaches to World Politics. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
52.
ThompsonWR (1990) The size of war, structural and geopolitical contexts, and theory building/testing. International Interactions16(3): 183–199.
53.
ValerianoBVasquezJ (2010) Identifying and classifying complex interstate war. International Studies Quarterly54(2): 561–582.
54.
VasquezJ (1995) Developing a strategy for achieving greater cumulation in peace research. In: BremerS (ed.) The Process of War: Advancing the Scientific Study of War. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach, pp. 241–250.
55.
VasquezJ (2009) The War Puzzle Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
VasquezJRundlettA (2016) Alliances as a necessary condition of multiparty wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution60(8): 1395–1418.
57.
VasquezJDiehlPFlintCScheffranJChiS-HRiderT (2011) The conflictspace of cataclysm: The international system and the spread of war 1914–1917. Foreign Policy Analysis7(2): 143–168.
58.
WagnerRH (2007) War and the State: The Theory of International Politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
59.
WaymanFW (1996) Power shifts and the onset of war. In: KuglerJLemkeD (eds) Parity and War. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 145–162.
60.
WeisigerA (2013) Logics of War: Explanations for Limited and Unlimited Conflicts. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
61.
WolfordS (2014a) Power, preferences, and balancing: The durability of coalitions and the expansion of conflict. International Studies Quarterly58(1): 146–157.
62.
WolfordS (2014b) A theory of neutrality rights in war. University of Texas. Working Paper.
63.
ZacherMW (2001) The territorial integrity norm: International boundaries and the use of force. International Organization55(2): 215–250.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
