Painting too “Rosie” a picture: The impact of external threat on women’s economic welfare

Abstract

Why is the economic status of women better in one country than another? We maintain that the answer lies in part in the extent of external threat to the homeland territory a country faces. To respond to the threat, states centralize their decision-making, invest more in the military and decrease citizens’ liberties. Associated restrictions and emphases on more “masculine” values create an environment where women’s welfare takes a back seat to the ostensible priority of defending the homeland. Utilizing measures of women’s unemployment from across the world, 1981–2001, we demonstrate that higher levels of territorial threat decrease women’s economic welfare.

Keywords

Discrimination economic status gender territory threat unemployment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashford

Huet-Vaughn

(2000) The impact of war on women. In: Levy

Sidel

(eds), War and Public Health. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, pp. 186–196.

Branisa

Klasen

Ziegler

(2013) Gender inequality in social institutions and gendered development outcomes. World Development 45: 252–268.

Burgess

Borgida

(1999) Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 5(3): 665–692.

Cable (1944) Women work in mines during crisis in India. New York Times, 21 January. Available from: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9401E4D81238E33BBC4951DFB766838F659EDE&legacy=true

Caprioli

(2000) Gendered conflict. Journal of Peace Research 37(1): 53–68.

Caprioli

Hudson

McDermott

Ballif-Spanvill

Emmett

Stearmer

(2009) The Womanstats Project database: Advancing an empirical research agenda. Journal of Peace Research 46(6): 839–851.

Carli

(1999) Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues 55(1): 81–99.

Carli

(2001) Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues 57(4): 725–741.

Carter

(1996) Women, military service and citizenship. In: Sullivan

Whitehouse

(eds), Gender, Politics and Citizenship in the 1990s. Sydney: UNSW Press, pp. 100–119.

10.

Cingranelli

Richards

(2013) The Cingranelli–Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project Coding Manual Version 7.27.13. Available from: http://www.humanrightsdata.org/documentation/ciri_coding_guide.pdf

11.

Clements

(2011) ‘Hawks’ and ‘doves’: Public opinion in Britain towards overseas military interventions. Political Insight 2(3): 12–15.

12.

Dollar

Gatti

(1999) Gender Inequality, Income, and Growth: Are Good Times Good for Women? (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Development Research Group, The World Bank.

13.

Fukuyama

(1998) Women and the evolution of world politics. Foreign Affairs 77: 24–40.

14.

Gibler

(2010) Outside-in: The effects of external threat on state centralization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 54(4): 519–542.

15.

Gibler

(2012) The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development, and International Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Gibler

Tir

(2010) Settled borders and regime type: Democratic transitions as consequences of peaceful territorial transfers. American Journal of Political Science 54(4): 951–968.

17.

Gibler

Tir

(2014) Territorial peace and democratic clustering. The Journal of Politics 76(1): 27–40.

18.

Goldstein

(2001) The importance of war in the gendered socialization of aggression. Presented at G. Stanley Hall Symposium on Gender and Aggression, Williams College.

19.

Hill

King

(1995) Women’s education and economic well-being. Feminist Economics 1(2): 21–46.

20.

Hutchison

(2014) Tolerating threat? The independent effects of civil conflict on domestic political tolerance. Journal of Conflict Resolution 58(5): 796–824.

21.

Hutchison

Gibler

(2007) Political tolerance and territorial threat: A cross-national study. Journal of Politics 69(1): 128–142.

22.

Hynes

(2004) On the battlefield of women’s bodies: An overview of the harm of war to women. Women’s Studies International Forum 27(5): 431–445.

23.

Klasen

(2002) Low schooling for girls, slower growth for all? Cross-country evidence on the effect of gender inequality. The World Bank Economic Review 16(3): 345–373.

24.

Melander

(2005) Gender equality and intrastate armed conflict. International Studies Quarterly 49(4): 695–714.

25.

Menon

van der Meulen-Rodgers

(2013) War and women’s work: Evidence from the conflict in Nepal. Journal of Conflict Resolution 59(1): 51–73.

26.

Milkman

(1987) Gender at Work: The Dynamics of Job Segregation by Sex During World War II. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

27.

Mitchell

(2012) Norms and the democratic peace. In: Vasquez

(ed.) What Do We Know About War?, 2nd edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 167–188.

28.

Mitchel

Thyne

(2010) Contentious issues as opportunities for diversionary behavior. Conflict Management and Peace Science 27(5): 461–485.

29.

Morris

(1996) By force of arms: Rape, war, and military culture. Duke Law Journal 45: 651–781.

30.

Mueller

(1986) Nurturance and mastery: Competing qualifications for women’s access to high public Office? In: Women and Politics: Activism, Attitudes, and Office-Holding. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

31.

Nussbaum

(1995) Introduction. In: Women, Culture, and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities: A Study of Human Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–36.

32.

Okereke

(2006) Violence against women in Africa. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies 2(1): 1–35.

33.

Plümper

Neumayer

(2006) The unequal burden of war: The effect of armed conflict on the gender gap in life expectancy. International Organization 60(3): 723–754.

34.

Polity IV Project (2013) Polity IV data set and codebook. Available from: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/inscr.html

35.

Ridgeway

Berger

(1986) Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review 51: 603–617.

36.

Ruane

(2000) Murder in the name of honor: Violence against women in Jordan and Pakistan. Emory International Law Review 14: 1523.

37.

Security Council (2000). Resolution 1325(2000), S/RES/1325(2000) (31 October 2000). Available from: un.org/womenwatch/ods/S-RES-1325(2000)-E.pdf.

38.

Segal

(1995) Women’s military roles cross-nationally: Past, present, and future. Gender & Society 9(6): 757–775.

39.

Siegel

(1997) Why equal protection no longer protects: The evolving forms of status-enforcing state action. Stanford Law Review 49: 1111–1148.

40.

Smith

(1984) The polls: Gender and attitudes toward violence. Public Opinion Quarterly 48: 384–396.

41.

Stojsavljevic

(1995) Women, conflict, and culture in former Yugoslavia. Gender & Development 3(1): 36–41.

42.

Tir

(2010) Territorial diversion: Diversionary theory of war and territorial conflict. Journal of Politics 72(2): 413–425.

43.

Tir

Singh

(2013) Is it the economy or foreign policy, stupid? A comparative analysis of the impact of foreign crises on leader support. Comparative Politics 46(1): 83–101.

44.

Tir

Singh

(2015) Get off my lawn: Territorial civil wars and subsequent social intolerance in the public. Journal of Peace Research 52(4): 478–491.

45.

United Nations Statistics Division (2015) Gender Information Database: Unemployment Rate. Available from: http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?q=unemployment&d=GenderStat&f=inID%3a121 (accessed 15 May 2014).

46.

Watts

Zimmerman

(2002). Violence against women: Global scope and magnitude. The Lancet 359(9313): 1232–1237.

47.

Wood

(2006) Variation in sexual violence during war. Politics and Society 34(3): 307–342.

48.

World Bank (2014) Unemployment, female and male (modeled ILO estimate). Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators (accessed 15 May 2014).

49.

Yellin

(2010) Our Mothers’ War: American Women at Home and at the Front During World War II. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.21 MB

0.00 MB