How do term limits affect international conflict behavior? We revisit this question using new quarter-year-level data on presidential political ambition in the US from 1816 to 2010. Multi-country research finds that the re-election motive decreases the likelihood of conflict initiation. We argue that there are good reasons to expect that the US is different. We find that politically ambitious US presidents are more likely to initiate international conflicts. Consistent with previous research, however, we find that political ambition appears to be unrelated to a president’s chances of becoming the target of a militarized dispute.
BakDPalmerG (2010) Testing the Biden hypotheses: Leader tenure, age, and international conict. Foreign Policy Analysis6(3): 257–273.
3.
BlackD (1958) The Theory of Government and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BruleDJMarshallBWPrinsBC (2010) Opportunities and presidential uses of force: A selection model of crisis decision-making. Conflict Management and Peace Science27(5): 486–510.
5.
BuenodeMesquitaBMorrowJSiversonRSmithA (1999) An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review93(4): 791–807.
6.
BuenodeMesquitaBMorrowJSiversonRSmithA (2003) The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
ChiozzaGGoemansHE (2003) Peace through insecurity: Tenure and international conict. Journal of Conflict Resolution47(4): 443–467.
8.
ChiozzaGGoemansHE (2011) Leaders and International Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ClarkDH (2003) Can strategic interaction divert diversionary behavior? A model of U.S. conict propensity. Journal of Politics65(4): 1013–1039.
10.
ConconiPSahuguetNZanardiM (2014) Democratic peace and electoral accountability. Journal of the European Economic Association12(4): 997–1028.
11.
DeRouenKPeakeJ (2002) The dynamics of diversion: The domestic implications of presidential use of force. International Interactions28(2): 191–211.
12.
DomkeW (1988) War and the Changing Global System. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harpers and Collins.
14.
DownsGWRockeDM (1994) Conflict, agency, and gambling for resurrection: The principal–agent problem goes to war. American Journal of Political Science38(2): 362–380.
15.
EarpBDTrafimowD (2015) Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology6(May): 1–11.
16.
EdwardsGC (1980) Presidential Influence in Congress. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
17.
FearonJD (1994) Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review88(3): 577–592.
18.
FiorinaM (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
FordhamBO (2002) Another look at “Parties, voters, and the use of force abroad”. The Journal of Conflict Resolution46(4): 572–596.
20.
GelpiCGriecoJM (2001) Attracting trouble: Democracy, leadership tenure, and the targeting of militarized challenges. Journal of Conflict Resolution45(6): 794–817.
21.
GowaJ (1998) Politics at the water’s edge: Parties, voters, and the use of force abroad. International Organization52(02): 307–324.
HaynesK (2012) Lame ducks and coercive diplomacy: Do executive term limits reduce the effectiveness of democratic threats?Journal of Conflict Resolution56(5): 771–798.
24.
HessGDOrphanidesA (1995) War politics: An economic, rational-voter framework. The American Economic Review85(4): 828–846.
25.
HoogenboomA (1995) Rutherford Hayes: Warrior and President. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
26.
HorowitzMMcDermottRStamAC (2005) Leader age, regime type, and violent international relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution49(5): 661–685.
27.
“How Science Goes Wrong” (2013) The Economist, 19October, p. 13.
28.
HowellWGJackmanSPRogowskiJC (2013) The Wartime President: Executive Influence and the Nationalizing Politics of Threat. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
JacksonMOMorelliM (2007) Political bias and war. American Economic Review97(4): 1353–1373.
30.
JamesPHristoulasA (1994) Domestic politics and foreign policy: Evaluating a model of crisis activity for the United States. The Journal of Politics56(2): 327–348.
31.
JamesPOnealJR (1991) The influence of domestic and international politics on the president’s use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution35(2): 307–322.
32.
JonesDMBremerSASingerJD (1996) Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science15(2): 163–212; doi: 10.1177/073889429601500203
33.
LeedsBADavisDR (1997) Domestic political vulnerability and international disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution41(6): 814–834.
34.
LeitesN (1951) The Operational Code of the Politburo. New York: McGraw-Hill.
35.
MilkisSNelsonM (2012) The American Presidency: Origins and Development, 1776–2011, 6th edn.Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
36.
MilnerHV (1997) Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
ModelskiG (1964) Kautilya: Foreign policy and international system in the ancient Hindu world. The American Political Science Review58(3): 549–560.
38.
MorganTCBickersKN (1992) Domestic discontent and the external use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution36(1): 25–52.
39.
MorgenthauHJ (1967) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 4th edn.New York: Knopf.
NelsonM (2008) CQ Press Guide to the Presidency. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
42.
OnealJRBryanAL (1995) The rally ‘round the flag effect in U.S. foreign policy crises, 1950–1985. Political Behavior17(4): 370–401.
43.
OnealJRTirJ (2006) Does the diversionary use of force threaten the democratic peace? Assessing the effect of economic growth on interstate conict, 1921–2001. International Studies Quarterly50(4): 755–779.
44.
OstromCWJobBL (1986) The president and the political uses of force. American Political Science Review80(2): 541–566.
45.
PalmerG. (2015) The MID4 data set: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science32(2): 222–242; doi: 10.1177/0738894214559680
46.
ParmetHSHechtMB (1968) Never Again: A President Runs for a Third Term. New York: Macmillan.
47.
PeabodyBG (2001) George Washington, presidential term limits, and the problem of reluctant political leadership. Presidential Studies Quarterly31: 439–453.
PotterPBK (2007) Does experience matter? American presidential experience, age, and international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution51(3): 351–378.
50.
RussettB (1990a) Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
RussettB (1990b) Economic decline, electoral pressure, and the initiation of interstate conflict. In: GochmanCSSabroskyAN (eds), Prisoners of War. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
52.
SingerJDBremerSJohn Stuckey (1972) Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820–1965. In: RussettB (ed.), Peace, War, and Numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 19–48.
53.
SnyderRBruckHSapinsB (eds) (1962) Foreign Policy Decision Making: An Approach to the Study of International Politics. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
54.
StollRJ (1984) The guns of November: Presidential reelections and the use of force, 1947–1982. Journal of Conflict Resolution28(2): 231–246.
55.
StollRJ (1987) The sound of the guns: Is there a Congressional rally effect after U.S. military action?American Politics Research15(2): 223–237.
56.
ThompsonWDreyerD (2011) The Handbook of Interstate Rivalries, 1494–2010. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
57.
WangKH (1996) Presidential responses to foreign policy crises: Rational choice and domestic politics. Journal of Conflict Resolution40(1): 68–97.
58.
WillisPWillisG (1952) The politics of the Twenty-Second Amendment. Western Political Quarterly5: 469–482.
59.
WintrobeR (1998) The Political Economy of Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60.
WolfordS (2007) The turnover trap: New leaders, reputation, and international conict. American Journal of Political Science51(4): 772–788.
61.
ZeiglerSPierskallaJHMazumderS (2014) War and the reelection motive: Examining the effect of term limits. Journal of Conflict Resolution58: 658–684.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
