This article provides empirical evidence showing that when a multilevel government is well coordinated, organized crime can be more effectively controlled. Using a time-variant data set of Mexico’s cocaine markets at the subnational level and Cox proportional-hazards regressions, I show that when Mexico’s democratization decreased the probability of government coordination—the same party governing a municipality at every level of government—drug traffickers were more likely to violate the long-standing informal prohibition on selling cocaine within the country. It was this decrease in government coordination that would set the conditions for a violent war between drug cartels to erupt in the mid-2000s.
AguilarRubénCastañedaJorge. 2010. El Narco: La Guerra Fallida. México: Punto De Lectura.
2.
AndreasPeter. 1998. “The Political Economy of Narco-corruption in Mexico.” Current History97:160.
3.
AstorgaLuis. 2001. “The Limits of Anti-drug Policy in Mexico.” International Social Science Journal53 (169): 427–34.
4.
AstorgaLuisShirkDavid. . 2010. Drug Trafficking Organizations and Counter-drug Strategies in the U.S.–Mexican Context. San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California. Accessed May 21, 2015. Retrieved fromhttp://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8j647429
5.
AxelrodRobertKeohaneRobert O.. 1985. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics38 (1): 226–54.
6.
BaileyJohnTaylorMatthew M.. 2009. “Evade, Corrupt, or Confront? Organized Crime and the State in Brazil and Mexico?” Journal of Politics in Latin America1 (2): 3–29.
7.
BesleyTimothyPerssonTorsten. 2008. The Incidence of Civil War: Theory and Evidence. Technical Report. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
BlancornelasJesús. 2002. El Cártel: Los Arellano Félix, la Mafia más Poderosa en la Historia de América Latina. Bogotá, Colombia: Plaza y Janés.
9.
BlattmanChristopherMiguelEdward. 2010. “Civil War.” Journal of Economic Literature48 (1): 3–57.
10.
Carvajal-DávilaRogelio. 1998. Todo lo que Usted Debería Saber Sobre el Crimen Organizado en México. México: Editorial Océano.
11.
ChandVikram. 2000. Mexico’s Political Awakening. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
12.
CIDAC (El Centro de Investigación para el Desarrollo, A.C.). 2011. Desafíos de la Implementación de la Reforma Penal en México. Mexico City, Mexico: CIDAC INACIPE.
13.
CowenTylerSutterDaniel. 2005. “Conflict, Cooperation and Competition in Anarchy.” The Review of Austrian Economics18 (1): 109–15.
14.
CruzFrancisco. 2009. El Cártel de Juárez. México: Editorial Planeta.
15.
DellMellissa. 2011. “Trafficking Networks and the Mexican Drug War.” Job Market Paper. Economics Department. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
16.
EisenstadtTodd. 1999. “Electoral Federalism or Abdication of Presidential Authority? Gubernatorial Elections in Tabasco.” In Subnational Politics and Democratization in Mexico, edited by CorneliusW. A.EisenstadtT. A.HindleyJ., 269–93. San Diego: Centre for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California.
17.
EisenstadtTodd. 2004. Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and Electoral Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
EvansWilliamGarthwaiteCraigMooreTimothy J.. 2012. The White/Black Educational Gap, Stalled Progress, and the Long Term Consequences of the Emergence of Crack Cocaine Markets. Technical Report. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
21.
FearonJames D.LaitinDavid. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review97 (1): 75–90.
22.
Flores-PérezCarlos Antonio. 2009. El Estado en Crisis: Crimen Organizado y Política: Desafíos para la Consolidación Democrática. México: CIESAS-Publicaciones de la Casa Chata.
23.
Flores-PérezCarlos Antonio. 2010. A War that Can’t Be Won: A Journey through the War on Drugs. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
24.
García-CabreraJosé Luis. 2012. 1920-2000, El Pastel Parte Dos. México City: Palibrio.
25.
GarfinkelASA Michelle. 2004. “On the Stability of Group Formation: Managing the Conflict within.” Conflict Management and Peace Science21 (1): 43–68.
26.
GómezLeónidas. 1991. Cartel. Historia de la Guerra. Colombia: Grupo Editorial Investigación y Concepto LTDA.
27.
GómezMaría IdaliaFritzDarío. 2005. Con la Muerte en el Bolsillo: Seis Desaforadas Historias del Narcotráfico. Mexico: Planeta Publishing.
GuerreroEduardo. 2010. “Pandillas y Cárteles: La Gran Alianza.” Revista Nexos, June 1. Accessed May 10, 2015. http://www.nexos.com.mx/?p=13690.
33.
HernándezAnabel. 2012. Los señores del narco. México: Grijalbo.
34.
HernándezRogelio. 2008. El Centro Dividido. La Nueva Autonomía de los Gobernadores. Mexico: El Colegio de México.
35.
INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía). 2009. Estadísticas de Mortalidad (1990—2009). Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. México: Aguascalientes.
36.
INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía). 2010. Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. México: Aguascalientes.
37.
LeesonPeterCoyneChristopher J.. 2012. “Conflict-inhibiting Norms.” In Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Peace and Conflict, edited by GarfinkelM.SkaperdasS., 840–60. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38.
LessingBenjamin. 2012. The Logic of Violence in Criminal War. Stanford, CA: Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.
39.
LujambioAlonsoSeglHoracio V.. 2000. El Poder Compartido: Un Ensayo Sobre la Democratización Mexicana. Océano.
40.
MagaloniAna Laura. 2009. “El Ministerio Público desde Adentro. Rutinas y Métodos de Trabajo en las Agencias del MP”. Documentos de trabajo del CIDE (42). México: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas.
MenendezJorgeSalazarAna. 2008. “El enemigo en casa: Drogas y nar-comenudeo en Mexico.” México: Aguilar Editor.
43.
MizrahiYemile. 2003. From Martyrdom to Power: The Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
44.
MolzahnCoryRiosViridianaShirkDavid. 2012. Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis through. San Diego, CA: Trans-border Institute.
45.
MolzahnCoryRodriguezOctavioShirkDavid. 2013. Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis through 2011. San Diego, CA: Trans-Border Institute.
46.
MorrisStephen. 2013. “Drug Trafficking, Corruption, and Violence in Mexico: Mapping the Linkages.” Trends in Organized Crime16:195–220.
47.
OsornoDiego. 2009. El Cartel de Sinaloa. México: Grijalbo, Random House.
48.
OstromElinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
PatenostroSilvana. 1995. “Mexico as a Narco-democracy.” World Policy Journal12 (1): 41–47.
50.
PowellRobert. 2006. “War as a Commitment Problem.” International Organization60 (1): 169–203.
51.
RaveloRicardo. 2007. Herencia Maldita: el Reto de Calderón y el Nuevo Mapa del Narcotráfico. México: Grijalbo.
52.
RaveloRicardo. 2009. Osiel: Vida y Tragedia de un Capo. México: Grijalbo.
53.
ReuterPeter. 2009. “Systemic Violence in Drug Markets.” Crime, Law and Social Change52 (3): 275–84.
54.
RevelesJosé. 2011. El Cártel Incómodo: el Fin de los Beltrán Leyva. México: Grijalbo.
55.
RiosViridiana. 2012a. “Why Did Mexico Become So Violent? A Self-Reinforcing Violent Equilibrium Caused by Competition and Enforcement.”Trends in Organized Crime16 (2): 138–55.
56.
RiosViridiana. 2012b. “How Government Structure Encourages Criminal Violence: The Causes of Mexico’s Drug War.” PhD diss., Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
57.
RiosViridiana. 2014. “The Role of Drug-related Violence and Extortion in Promoting Mexican Migration: Unexpected Consequences of a Drug War.” Latin American Research Review49:199–217.
ShirkDavid. 2005. Mexico’s New Politics: The PAN and Democratic Change. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
60.
SINAIS (Sistema Nacional de Información en Salud de la Secretaría de Salud Federal). 2009. Base de Datos de Egresos Hospitalarios por Morbilidad en Instituciones Públicas 2004-2007. Accessed November 20, 2014. http://www.sinais.salud.gob.mx.
61.
SkaperdasStergios. 2008. “An Economic Approach to Analyzing Civil Wars.” Economics of Governance9 (1): 25–44.
62.
SnyderRichard. 1999. “After the State Withdraws: Neoliberalism and Subnational Authoritarian Regimes in Mexico.” In Subnational Politics and Democratization in Mexico, edited by EisenstadtCorneliusHindley, 295–341. CA: San Diego.
63.
SnyderRichardDuran-MartinezAngelica. 2009. “Does Illegality Breed Violence? Drug Trafficking and State-sponsored Protection Rackets.” Crime, Law and Social Change52 (3): 253–73.
64.
TaylorMichael. 1982. Community, Anarchy and Liberty. New York: Cambridge University Press.
65.
ValleEduardo. 1995. El Segundo Disparo: la Narcodemocracia Mexicana. Mexico: Océano.
66.
WeldonJeffrey. 1997. “The Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, edited by EditorScott M.EditorMatthew S. , 225–58. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67.
WooldridgeJeffrey. 2001. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
