This paper provides a formal assessment of the effectiveness of the use of fear and anger on the decision to initiate a crisis. The formalization employs the finding that fearful decision-makers are risk-averting across frames and make pessimistic risk assessments, and that angry decision-makers are risk-seeking across frames and make optimistic risk assessments. The work presented here employs a sequential decision analysis based on the two-sided incomplete information version of the Traditional Deterrence Game. The analysis shows when the use of the emotions of fear and anger is effective, ineffective, and counterproductive in altering the decision to initiate or not initiate a crisis.
AllisonGT (1969) Conceptual models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. American Political Science Review63(3): 689–718.
2.
AngieADConnellySWaplesEPKligyteV (2011) The influence of discrete emotions on judgment and decision-making: A meta-analytic review. Cognition and Emotion25(8): 1393–1422.
3.
BagneuxVBollonTDantzerC (2012) Do (un)certainty appraisal tendencies reverse the influence of emotions on risk taking in sequential tasks?Cognition and Emotion26(3): 568–576.
4.
BramsSJ (1997) Game theory and emotions. Rationality and Society9(1): 91–124.
5.
BramsSJ (2011) Game Theory and the Humanities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
BuenodeMesquitaBMcDermottR (2004) Crossing no man’s land: Cooperation from the trenches. Political Psychology25(2): 271–287.
7.
CarlsonLJDaceyR (2004) Traditional decision analysis and the poliheuristic theory of foreign policy decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution48(1): 38–55.
8.
CarlsonLJDaceyR (2006) Sequential analysis of deterrence games with a declining status quo. Conflict Management and Peace Science23(2): 181–198.
9.
CarlsonLJDaceyR (2010) A note on second order probabilities in the Traditional Deterrence Game. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy15(1): Article 8.
10.
CarlsonLJDaceyR (2011) International and domestic uncertainties in the Traditional Deterrence Game. In: ChatterjiM (ed.) Frontiers of Peace Economics and Peace Science. Derby: Emerald Books, pp. 37–58.
11.
ClemenRTReillyT (2001) Making Hard Decisions. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.
12.
CrawfordNC (2000) The passion of world politics: Propositions on emotion and emotional relationships. International Security24(4): 116–156.
13.
DaalderIHStavridisJG (2012) NATO’s victory in Libya. Foreign Affairs91(2): 2–7.
14.
DaceyR (1978) A theory of conclusions. Philosophy of Science45(4): 563–574.
15.
DaceyR (1998) Risk attitude, punishment, and the Intifada. Conflict Management and Peace Science16(1): 77–88.
16.
de SousaR (1987) The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
DruckmanJMcDermottR (2008) Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior30(3): 297–321.
18.
EllisRD (2000) Curious Emotions: Roots of Modern Consciousness and Personality in Motivated Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19.
FearonJD (1994) Signaling versus the balance of power and interests: An empirical test of a crisis bargaining model. Journal of Conflict Resolution38(2): 236–269.
20.
FearonJD (1995) Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49(3): 379–414.
21.
FischhoffBGonzalezRMLernerJSSmallDA (2005) Evolving judgments of terror risks: Foresight, hindsight, and emotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied11(2): 124–139.
22.
FrankRH (1988) Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W.W. Norton.
23.
GottliebG (1975/1976) Palestine: An Algerian solution. Foreign Policy21: 198–211.
24.
HertelGNeuhofJTheierTKerrNL (2000) Mood effects on cooperation in small groups: Does positive mood simply lead to more cooperation?Cognition and Emotion14(4): 441–472.
25.
HewitsonM (2000) Germany and France before the First World War: A reassessment of Wilhelmine foreign policy. The English Historical Review115(462): 570–606.
26.
HowardN (1993) The role of emotions in multi-organizational decision-making. Journal of the Operational Research Society44(6): 613–623.
27.
HymansJEC (2006) The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
JervisR (2004) The implications of prospect theory for human nature and values. Political Psychology25(2): 163–177.
29.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica47(2): 263–291.
30.
KahnemanDTverskyA (2000) Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
LebowRNSteinJG (1995) Deterrence and the Cold War. Political Science Quarterly110(2): 157–181.
32.
LernerJSKeltnerD (2000) Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion14(4): 473–493.
33.
LernerJSKeltnerD (2001) Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81(1): 146–159.
34.
LepgoldJLambornAC (2001) Locating bridges: Connecting research agendas on cognition and strategic choice. International Studies Review3(3): 3–29.
35.
LeviASWhyteG (1997) A cross-cultural exploration of the reference dependence of crucial group decisions. Journal of Conflict Resolution41(6): 792–813.
36.
LevyJS (1987) Declining power and the preventive motivation for war. World Politics40(1): 82–107.
37.
LevyJS (1996) Loss aversion, framing, and bargaining: The implications of prospect theory for international conflict. International Political Science Review17(2): 179–195.
38.
LevyJS (1997) Prospect theory, rational choice and international relations. International Studies Quarterly41(1): 87–112.
39.
LevyJS (2008) Deterrence and coercive diplomacy: The contributions of Alexander George. Political Psychology29(4): 537–552.
40.
LevyJSThompsonWR (2010) Causes of War. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
41.
LoomesGSugdenR (1982) Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal92(368): 805–824.
42.
LupiaAMenningJ (2007) Politics and the equilibrium of fear: Can strategies and emotions interact? In: CriglerACMacKuenMMarcusGENeumanWR (eds) The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Motion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–23.
43.
LupiaAMenningJ (2009) When can politicians scare citizens into supporting bad policies?American Journal of Political Science53(1): 90–106.
44.
MarcusGE (2000) Emotions and politics. Annual Review of Political Science3(1): 221–250.
45.
McDermottR (2004) Prospect theory in political science: Gains and losses from the first decade. Political Psychology25(2): 289–312.
46.
MellersBSchwartzARitovI (1999) Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General128(3): 332–345.
47.
MercerJ (2006) Human nature and the first image: Emotion in international politics. Journal of International Relations and Development9(3): 288–303.
48.
MillerRAÖzlemE (2011) Diversion and political survival in Latin America. Journal of Conflict Resolution55(2): 192–219.
49.
MorrowJD (1994) Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
ParkSLeeJ-H (2011) How cognitive reappraisal of anger influences risk-taking behavior. Social Behavior and Personality39(3): 411–418.
51.
PearlmanW (2013) Emotions and the microfoundations of the Arab uprisings. Perspectives on Politics11(2): 387–409.
52.
PetersenRD (2011) Western Intervention in the Balkans: The Strategic Use of Emotion in Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
PowellR (1999) In the Shadow of Power: States and Strategies in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
RayJL (2008) American Foreign Policy and Political Ambition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
55.
ReiterD (2003) Exploring the bargaining model of war. Perspectives on Politics1(1): 27–43.
56.
SasleyBE (2010) Affective attachments and foreign policy: Israel and the 1993 Oslo Accords. European Journal of International Relations16(4): 687–709.
57.
SchellingTC (1966) Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58.
SchwarzN (2000) Emotion, cognition, and decision making. Cognition and Emotion14(4): 433–440.
59.
SteinbergBS (1991) Shame and humiliation in the Cuban Missile Crisis: A psychoanalytic perspective. Political Psychology12(4): 653–690.
60.
StudorBClarkL (2011) Place your bets: Psychophysiological correlates of decision-making under risk. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience11(2): 144–158.
61.
TingleyDH (2011) The dark side of the future: An experimental test of commitment problems in bargaining. International Studies Quarterly55(2): 1–24.
62.
TirJ (2010) Territorial diversion: Diversionary theory of war and territorial conflict. Journal of Politics72(2): 413-425.
63.
TsaiM-HYoungMJ (2010) Fear, anger and the escalation of commitment. Cognition and Emotion24(6): 962–973.
64.
TukeyJW (1960) Conclusions vs. decisions. Technimetrics2(4): 423–433.
65.
TverskyAKahnemanD (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty5(4): 297–323.
66.
Van KleefGADe DreuCKWMansteadASR (2004) The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87(4): 510–528.
67.
Van KleefGADe DreuCKWMansteadASR (2006) Supplication and appeasement in conflict and negotiation: The interpersonal effects of disappointment, worry, guilt and regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology91(1): 124–142.
68.
WakkerPP (2010) Prospect Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
WubbenMJJde CremerDVan DijkE (2008) When emotions of others affect decisions in public good dilemmas: An instrumental view. European Journal of Social Psychology38(5): 823–835.
70.
YoungMDSchaferM (1998) Is there method in our madness? Ways of assessing cognition in international relations. Mershon International Studies Review42(1): 63–96.
71.
ZagareFCKilgourDM (1993) Asymmetric deterrence. International Studies Quarterly37(1): 1–27.
72.
ZagareFCKilgourDM (2000) Perfect Deterrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73.
ZakariaF (2013) With or without us. Time13May, pp. 18–19.
