Poliheuristic (PH) theory models foreign policy decisions using a two-stage process. The first step eliminates alternatives on the basis of a simplifying heuristic. The second step involves a selection from amongthe remaining alternatives and can employ a more rational and compensatory means of processing information. The PH model posits that strategic/realist factors are more important in the second step of the process. The model is tested for the years 1918 to 1994, using crisis actors from the International Crisis Behavior data set. Results show that domestic political loss has a negative impact on the use of violence in response to a crisis trigger. Contiguity, joint democracy, and trigger are also significant in the expected directions. Relative capabilities have a positive impact, and enduring rivals do not appear more likely to use violence against each other as a first response in a crisis.
Astorino-Courtois, Allison , and Brittani Trusty. 2000.Degrees of difficulty: The effect of Israeli policy shifts on Syrian peace decisions. Journal of Conflict Resolution44:359-377.
2.
Bercovitch, Jacob , and Paul Diehl. 1997.Conflict management of enduring rivalries: The frequency, timing and short-term impact of mediation. International Interactions22:299-320.
3.
Bernstein, Eugene , and Michael Berbaum. 1983. Stages in group decision making: The decomposition of historical narratives. Political Psychology4:531-561.
4.
Billings, Robert , and S. Marcus. 1983.Measures of compensatory and noncompensatory models of decision behavior: Process tracing versus policy capturing. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance31:331-352.
5.
Billings, Robert , and Charles Hermann. 1998. Problem identification in sequential policy decision making: The re-representation of problems. In Problem representation in foreign policy decision making, edited by James Voss and Donald Sylvan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Blainey, Geoffrey . 1988. The causes of war. 3d ed.New York: The Free Press.
7.
Brannick, M. , and J. Brannick. 1989.Nonlinear and noncompensatory processes in performance evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance44:97-122.
8.
Brecher, Michael , and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 1997. A study of crisis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9.
Bremer, Stuart . 1982. The contagiousness of coercion: The spread of serious international disputes, 1900-1976. International Interactions9:29-55.
10.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce . 1981. The war trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
Danilovic, Vesna . 2003. The rational-cognitive debate and poliheuristic theory. In Integrating cognitive and rational theories of foreign policy decision making, edited by Alex Mintz. New York: St. Martin’s/ Palgrave.
12.
DeRouen, Karl, Jr.2003. The decision not to use force in Dien Bien Phu: Apoliheuristic perspective. In Integrating cognitive and rational theories of foreign policy decision making, edited by Alex Mintz. New York: St. Martin’s/Palgrave.
13.
Diehl, Paul , ed. 1998. The dynamics of enduring rivalries. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
14.
Diehl, Paul , and Gary Goertz. 2000. War and peace in international rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15.
Einhorn, H.1971.Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance6:1-27.
16.
Fearon, James . 1995.Rationalist expectations for war. International Organization49:379-414.
17.
Gartzke, Eric , and Michael Simon. 1999.“Hot hand”: A critical analysis of enduring rivalries. Journal of Politics61:777-798.
18.
Gelpi, Christopher , and Michael Griesdorf. 2001.Winners or Losers? Democracies in international crisis, 1918-1994. American Political Science Review95:633-648.
19.
Geva, Nehemia , Alex Mintz, and Karl DeRouen Jr.1993.The political incentive explanation of the “ democratic peace” phenomenon. International Interactions18:215-229.
20.
Geva, Nehemia , and Mark Skorick. 2001. The cognitive calculus of responsiveness to positive and negative feedback in sequential decisions. Paper presented at the Symposium on Responding to Negative Feedback in Foreign Policy Decision Making, May, Texas A&M University.
21.
Goldstein, Joshua , and John Freeman. 1990. Three-way street: Strategic reciprocity in world politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Hagan, Joe . 2001.Does decision making matter? Systemic assumptions vs. historical reality in international relations theory. International Studies Review3:5-46.
23.
Hampson, Fen . 1988. The divided decision maker: American domestic politics and the Cuban crises. In The domestic sources of American foreign policy, edited by CharlesKegley and EugeneWittkopf.NewYork: St. Martin’s.
24.
James, Patrick , and John Oneal. 1991. The influence of domestic and international politics on the president’s use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution35:307-332.
25.
Johnson, E. , and R. Meyer. 1984.Compensatory choice models of noncompensatory processes: The effect of varying context. Journal of Consumer Research11:528-541.
26.
Liu, Xinsheng . 2003. Comparing the poliheuristic theory with cybernetic decision theory. In Integrating cognitive and rational theories of foreign policy decision making, edited by Alex Mintz.New York: St. Martin’s/Palgrave.
27.
Maoz, Zeev , and Bruce Russett. 1993.Normative and structural causes of democratic peace: 1946-1986. American Political Science Review87:624-638.
28.
Mintz, Alex . 1993. The decision to attack Iraq: A non-compensatory theory of decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution37:595-618.
29.
Mintz, Alex . 2003. Integrating cognitive and rational theories of foreign policy decision making: The poliheuristic theory of decision. In Integrating cognitive and rational theories of foreign policy decision making, edited by Alex Mintz.New York: St. Martin’s/Palgrave.
30.
Mintz, Alex , and Nehemia Geva. 1997. The poliheuristic theory of foreign policy decision making. In Decision-making on war and peace, edited by Nehemia Geva and Alex Mintz.Boulder, CO: LynneRienner.
31.
Mintz, Alex , Nehemia Geva, and Karl DeRouen Jr.1994. Mathematical models of foreign policy decision making: Compensatory vs. noncompensatory. Synthese100:441-460.
32.
Mintz, Alex , Nehemia Geva, Steve Redd, and Amy Carnes. 1997.The effect of dynamic and static choice sets on political decision making: An analysis using the decision board platform. American Political Science Review91:553-566.
33.
Oneal, John , Bruce Russett, and Michael Berbaum. 2003. Causes of peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations, 1885-1992. International Studies Quarterly47:371-394.
34.
Ostrom, Charles , and Brian Job. 1986. The president and the political use of force. American Political Science Review80:541-566.
35.
Payne, J.1976. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance16:366-387.
36.
Payne, J. , J. Bettman, and E. Johnson. 1988. Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology14:534-552.
37.
Reed, William . 2000. Aunified statistical model of conflict onset and escalation. American Journal of Political Science44:84-93.
38.
Rosati, Jerel . 2001. The power of human cognition in the study of world politics. International Studies Review2:45-75.
39.
Rousseau, David , Christopher Gelpi, Dan Reiter, and Paul Huth. 1996. Assessing the dyadic nature of the democratic peace, 1918-1988. American Political Science Review90:512-533.
40.
Sathasivam, Kani . 2003. No other choice: Pakistan’s decision to test the bomb. In Integrating cognitive and rational theories of foreign policy decision making, edited by Alex Mintz. New York: St. Martin’s/ Palgrave.
41.
Simon, Herbert . 1959. Theories of decision making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review49:253-283.
42.
Simon, Herbert . 1985. Humannature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. AmericanPolitical Science Review79:293-304.
43.
Singer, J. DavidStuart Bremer , and John Stuckey. 1972. Capability distribution, uncertainty and major powerwar, 1820-1965. In Peace, war and numbers, edited by Bruce Russett. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
Steinbruner, John . 1974. The cybernetic theory of decision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
Steiner, Miriam . 1983. The search for order in a disorderlyworld: Worldviews and prescriptive decision paradigms. International Organization37:373-413.
46.
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle , and StevenB. Redd. 2003. Framing and the poliheuristic theory of decision: The United Fruit Company and the 1954 U.S.-led coup in Guatemala. In Integrating cognitive and rational theories of foreign policy decision making, edited by Alex Mintz. New York: St. Martin’s/Palgrave.
47.
Tversky, Amos . 1972. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review79:281-299.
48.
Vasquez, John . 1993. The war puzzle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Waltz, Kenneth . 1979. Theory of international politics. New York: Random House.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
