Previous studies argue that the cumulation of mediations generally decreases uncertainty and ultimately helps to solve a conflict peacefully. Yet the empirical evidence for this is inconclusive, suggesting that existent theoretical accounts might be incomplete. For addressing this shortcoming, the paper develops an argument for a curvilinear relationship between the cumulation of mediations and mediation effectiveness. Based upon this rationale, it is less likely that initial mediation attempts succeed, but—after a turning point has been reached—subsequent mediations are more likely to induce an effective resolution of a dispute. The author also argues that this effect should be stronger if the same actors mediate over the course of a conflict. The empirical implications of this theoretical revision are tested in a quantitative framework employing data for 1816–2001. The results provide strong support for the theory.
AlleeTHuthP (2006) Legitimizing dispute settlement: International legal rulings as domestic political cover. American Political Science Review100(2): 219–234.
2.
BeardsleyK (2008) Agreement without peace? International mediation and time inconsistency problems. American Journal of Political Science52(4): 723–740.
3.
BeardsleyK (2011) The Mediation Dilemma. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4.
BeardsleyKQuinnDBiswasBWilkenfeldJ (2006) Mediation style and crisis outcomes. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(1): 58–86.
5.
BeberB (2012) International mediation, selection effects, and the question of bias. Conflict Management and Peace Science49(4): 397–424.
6.
BeckNKatzJTuckerR (1998) Taking time seriously: Time-series cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science42(4): 1260–1288.
7.
BennettA (1999) Condemned to Repetition? The Rise, Fall, and Reprise of Soviet–Russian Military Interventionism, 1973–1996. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
BennettSStamA (1996) The duration of interstate wars, 1816–1985. American Political Science Review90(2): 1260–1288.
9.
BercovitchJ (2011) Theory and Practice of International Mediation: Selected Essays. New York: Routledge.
10.
BercovitchJ (2002) Introduction: Putting mediation in context. In: BercovitchJ (ed.) Studies in International Mediation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–24.
11.
BercovitchJ (2004) International mediation and intractable conflict. In: BurgessGBurgessH (eds) Beyond Intractability. University of Colorado, BO: Conflict Information Consortium.
12.
BercovitchJGartnerS (2006) Is there method in the madness of mediation? Some lessons for mediators from quantitative studies of mediation. International Interactions32(4): 329–354.
13.
BercovitchJHoustonA (2000) Why do they do it like this? An analysis of the factors influencing mediation behavior in international conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution44(2): 170–202.
14.
BercovitchJAnagnosonJTWilleD (1991) Some conceptual issues and empirical trends in the study of successful mediation in international relations. Journal of Peace Research28(1): 7–17.
15.
BlaineyG (1988) The Causes of War. New York: The Free Press.
16.
BöhmeltT (2009) International mediation and social networks: The importance of indirect ties. International Interactions35(3): 298–319.
17.
BöhmeltT (2010) The effectiveness of tracks of diplomacy strategies in third-party interventions. Journal of Peace Research47(2): 167–178.
18.
BöhmeltT (2011) Disaggregating mediations: The impact of multiparty mediation. British Journal of Political Science41(4): 859–881.
19.
BöhmeltT (2012) Why many cooks if they can spoil the broth? The determinants of multiparty mediation. Journal of Peace Research49(5): 701–715.
20.
ClarkeK (2005) The phantom menace: Omitted variable bias in econometric research. Conflict Management and Peace Science22(4): 341–352.
21.
DixonW (1993) Democracy and the management of international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution37(1): 42–68.
22.
DixonW (1994) Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review88(1): 14–32.
23.
DixonW (1996) Third-party techniques for preventing conflict escalation and promoting peaceful settlement. International Organization50(4): 653–681.
24.
DorussenHWardH (2008) Intergovernmental organizations and the Kantian peace—A network perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution52(2): 189–212.
25.
EllisGMitchellSMPrinsB (2010) How democracies keep peace: Contextual factors that influence conflict management strategies. Foreign Policy Analysis6(4): 373–398.
26.
FearonJ (1995) Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49(3): 379–414.
27.
FearonJ (2004) Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others?Journal of Peace Research41(3): 275—301.
28.
GartnerSBercovitchJ (2006) Overcoming obstacles to peace: The contribution of mediation to short lived conflict settlements. International Studies Quarterly50(4): 819–840.
29.
GentSShannonM (2011) Decision control and the pursuit of binding conflict management: Choosing the ties that bind. Journal of Conflict Resolution55(5): 710–734.
30.
GreigM (2005) Stepping into the fray: When do mediators mediate?American Journal of Political Science49(2): 249–266.
31.
GreigMDiehlP (2006) Softening up: Making conflicts more amenable to diplomacy. International Interactions32(4): 355–384.
32.
GreigMReganP (2008) When do they say yes? An analysis of the willingness to offer and accept mediation in civil wars. International Studies Quarterly52(4): 759–781.
33.
Hafner-BurtonEMontgomeryA (2006) Power positions—International organizations, social networks, and conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(1): 3–27.
34.
HeckmanJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica47(1): 153–161.
35.
HeldtB (2009) Sequencing of Peacemaking in Emerging Conflicts. In: AggestamKBjörkdahlA (eds) War and Peace in Transition. Changing Roles of External Actors. Lund: Nordic Academic Press, pp. 128–146.
36.
HenselP (2001) Contentious issues and world politics: The management of territorial claims in the Americas, 1816–1992. International Studies Quarterly45(1): 81–109.
37.
HenselPMitchellSM (2007) Issues Correlates of War Project: User Manual for ICOW Data, Version 1.1. Available at: http://www.icow.org
38.
HenselPMitchellSMSowersTThyneC (2008) Bones of contention: Comparing territorial, maritime, and river issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution52(1): 117–143.
39.
HuthPRussettB (1984) What makes deterrence work? Cases from 1900 to 1980. World Politics36(4): 496–526.
40.
JervisR (1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
KelmanH (1996) The interactive problem-solving approach. In: CrockerCHampsonFOAallP (eds) Managing Global Chaos: Sources of and Responses to International Conflict, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, pp. 501–519.
42.
KleiboerM (1996) Understanding success and failure of international mediation. Journal of Conflict Resolution40(2): 360–389.
43.
KresselKPruittD (1989) Conclusion: A research perspective on the mediation of social conflict. In: KresselKPruittDG (eds) Mediation Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 241–262.
44.
KyddA (2003) Which side are you on? Bias, credibility, and mediation. American Journal of Political Science47(4): 597–611.
45.
KyddA (2006) When can mediators build trust?American Political Science Review100(3): 449–462.
46.
LederachJP (1997) Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
47.
LengR (1983) When will they ever learn? Coercive bargaining in recurrent crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution27(3): 379–419.
48.
LengR (1998) Reciprocity in recurring crises. International Negotiation3: 197–226.
49.
LeviteAJentlesonBBermanL (eds) (1992) Foreign Military Intervention: The Dynamics of Protracted Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
50.
LevyJ (1994) Learning and foreign policy: Sweeping a conceptual minefield. International Organization48(2): 279–312.
51.
MarshallMJaggersK (2002) POLITY IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002. Dataset User’s Manual. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
52.
MasonDFettP (1996) How civil wars end: A rational choice approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution40(4): 546–568.
53.
MelinM (2011) The impact of state relationships on if, when and how conflict management occurs. International Studies Quarterly55(3): 691–715.
54.
MorganC (1995) Untying the Knot of War: A Bargaining Theory of International Crises. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
55.
PickeringJ (2002) War-weariness and cumulative effects: Victors, vanquished, and subsequent interstate intervention. Journal of Peace Research39(3): 313–337.
56.
PillarPR (1983) Negotiating Peace: War Termination as a Bargaining Process. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
PowellR (1999) In the Shadow of Power: States and Strategies in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
Powell (2004) Bargaining and learning while fighting. American Journal of Political Science48(2): 344–361.
59.
PrincenT (1992) Intermediaries in International Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
PruittDCarnevaleP (1993) Negotiation in Social Conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
61.
QuinnDWilkenfeldJSmarickKAsalV (2006) Power play: Mediation in symmetric and asymmetric international crises. International Interactions32(40): 442–470.
62.
RauchhausR (2006) Asymmetric information, mediation, and conflict management. World Politics58(2): 207–241.
63.
ReganPAydinA (2006) Diplomacy and other forms of intervention in civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(5): 736–756.
64.
ReganPStamA (2000) In the nick of time: Conflict management, mediation timing, and the duration of interstate disputes. International Studies Quarterly44(2): 239–260.
65.
ReiterD (1996) Crucible of Beliefs: Learning, Alliances, and World Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
66.
RubinJ (1992) Conclusion: International mediation in context. In: BercovitchJRubinJ (eds) Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management. New York: St Martin’s Press, pp. 249–272.
67.
SavunB (2008) Information, bias, and mediation success. International Studies Quarterly52(1): 25–47.
68.
SingerDBremerSStuckeyJ (1972) Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820–1965. In: RussettB (ed.) Peace, War, and Numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 19–48.
69.
SmithAStamA (2003) Mediation and peacekeeping in a random walk model of civil and interstate war. International Studies Review5(4): 115–135.
70.
SteinJGr (1996) Image identity and conflict resolution. In: CrockerCHampsonFOAallP (eds) Managing Global Chaos: Sources of and Responses to International Conflict. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, pp. 93–101.
71.
SvenssonI (2007) Bias, bargaining, and peace brokers: How rebels commit to peace. Journal of Peace Research44(2): 177–194.
72.
SvenssonI (2009) Who brings which peace: Biased versus neutral mediation and institutional peace arrangements in civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution53(3): 446–469.
73.
TetlockP (1991) Learning in US and Soviet foreign policy: In search of an elusive concept. In: BreslauerGTetlockP (eds) Learning in US and Soviet Foreign Policy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 20–61.
74.
TetlockPMcGuireC (1985) Cognitive perspectives on foreign policy. In: LongS (ed.) Political Behavior Annual. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 255–273.
75.
TouvalSZartmanW (1985) Introduction: Mediation in theory. In: TouvalSZartmanW (eds) International Mediation in Theory and Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 7–17.
76.
UN (2011) Summary Report—United Nations Mediation: Experiences and Reflections from the Field. New York: United Nations.
77.
WilkenfeldJYoungKAsalVQuinnD (2003) Mediating international crises: Cross-national and experimental perspectives. Journal of Conflict Resolution47(3): 279–301.
78.
ZartmanW (1989) Ripe for Resolution: Conflict and Intervention in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79.
ZartmanW (2001) The timing of peace initiatives: Hurting stalemates and ripe moments. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics1(1): 8–18.
80.
ZubekJPruittDPeirceRMcGillicuddyNSynaH (1992) Disputant and mediator behavior affecting short term success in mediation. Journal of Conflict Resolution36(3): 546–572.
