International mediation of violent conflicts is commonplace in today’s world, and so is academic research on its features and effectiveness. But research that speaks to both the initiation and implementation of mediation remains relatively rare. This article outlines a theoretical and empirical argument that contributes to filling this gap and suggests a counterintuitive selection effect: potential mediators that are likely to resolve a dispute are unlikely to select into mediation. The argument hinges on the claim that mediation by biased third parties is relatively ineffective, and I provide qualitative evidence to suggest that this claim is plausible.
BallingerPamela. 1999. The politics of the past: Redefining insecurity along the “world’s most open border”. In Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of Danger, ed. WeldesJutta, pp. 63–90. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
2.
BartoliAndrea. 1999. Mediating peace in Mozambique: The role of the community of Sant’ Egidio. In Herding Cats: Multiparty Mediation in a Complex World, eds CrockerChester A.HampsonFen OslerAallPamela, pp. 247–273. New York: United States Institute of Peace Press.
3.
BeberBernd. 2010. International mediation of military conflicts: Causes and consequences. PhD dissertation, Columbia University.
4.
BeberBernd. 2011. The effect of international mediation on war settlement: An instrumental variables approach. Working paper.
5.
BercovitchJacob. 1996. Introduction: Thinking about mediation. In Resolving International Conflicts: The Theory and Practice of Mediation, ed. BercovitchJacob, pp. 1–10. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
6.
BercovitchJacob. 2002. Introduction: Putting mediation in context. In Studies in International Mediation: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Z. Rubin, ed. BercovitchJacob, pp. 3–24. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BercovitchJacobDiehlPaul. 1997. Conflict management of enduring rivalries: The frequency, timing, and short-term impact of mediation. International Interactions22(3): 299–320.
8.
BercovitchJacobGartnerScott Sigmund. 2006. Is there method in the madness of mediation? Some lessons for mediators from quantitative studies of mediation. International Interactions32(4): 329–354.
9.
BercovitchJacobGartnerScott S.2009. New approaches, methods, and findings in the study of mediation. In International Conflict Mediation: New Approaches and Findings, eds BercovitchJacobGartnerScott S., pp. 1–15. New York: Routledge.
10.
BercovitchJacobSchneiderGerald. 2000. Who mediates? The political economy of international conflict management. Journal of Peace Research37(2): 387–404.
11.
BettsRichard K.1994. The delusion of impartial intervention. Foreign Affairs73(6): 20–33.
12.
BowdenMark. 2006. Guests of the Ayatollah: The First Battle in America’s War with Militant Islam. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.
13.
CalvertRandall L.1985. The value of biased information: A rational choice model of political advice. Journal of Politics47(2): 530–555.
14.
CampbellJohn C., ed. 1976. Successful Negotiation, Trieste 1954: An Appraisal by the Five Participants. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
CarnevalePeter J.2002. Mediating from strength. In Studies in International Mediation: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Z. Rubin, ed. BercovitchJacob, pp. 25–40. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
CarnevalePeter J.AradSharon. 1996. Bias and impartiality in international mediation. In Resolving International Conflicts: The Theory and Practice of Mediation, ed. BercovitchJacob, pp. 39–53. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
17.
CarnevalePeter J.PruittDean G.1992. Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology43: 531–582.
18.
CarterJimmy. 1982. Keeping Faith: Memoirs of a President. New York: Bantam.
19.
CrockerChester A.HampsonFen OslerAallPamela. 2005. Introduction: Mapping the nettle field. In Grasping the Nettle: Analyzing Cases of Intractable Conflict, eds CrockerChester A.HampsonFen OslerAallPamela, pp. 3–30. New York: United States Institute of Peace Press.
20.
CrockerChester A.HampsonFen OslerAallPamela. 2009. Why mediation matters: Ending intractable conflicts. In The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, eds BercovitchJacobKremenyukVictorZartmanI. William, pp. 492–505. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
De MaioJennifer L.2009. Confronting Ethnic Conflict: The Role of Third Parties in Managing Africa’s Civil Wars. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
23.
de SotoAlvaro. 1999. Ending violent conflict in El Salvador. In Herding Cats: Multiparty Mediation in a Complex World, eds CrockerChester A.HampsonFen OslerAallPamela, pp. 349–386. New York: United States Institute of Peace Press.
24.
DixitJyotindra N.2002. India–Pakistan in War and Peace. New York: Routledge.
25.
DixonJeffrey. 2009. Emerging consensus: Results from the second wave of statistical studies on civil war termination. Civil Wars11(2): 121–136.
26.
DixonWilliam J.1996. Third-party techniques for preventing conflict escalation and promoting peaceful settlement. International Organization50(4): 653–681.
27.
El-AffendiAbdelwahab. 2001. The impasse in the IGAD peace process for Sudan: The limits of regional peacemaking?African Affairs100(401): 581–599.
28.
EsmanMilton J.TelhamiShibley, eds. 1995. International Organizations and Ethnic Conflict. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
FarberDavid. 2005. Taken Hostage: The Iran Hostage Crisis and America’s First Encounter with Radical Islam. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
FavrettoKatja. 2009. Should peacemakers take sides: Major power mediation, coercion, and bias. American Political Science Review103(2): 248–263.
31.
FearonJames D.1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49(3): 379–414.
32.
FisherRonald J.1995. Pacific, impartial third-party intervention in international conflict: A review and an analysis. In Beyond Confrontation: Learning Conflict Resolution in the Post-Cold War Era, eds VasquezJohn A.JohnsonJames T.JaffeSanfordStamatoLinda, pp. 39–59. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
33.
FrazierDerrick V.DixonWilliam J.2006. Third-party intermediaries and negotiated settlements, 1946–2000. International Interactions32(4): 385–408.
34.
GartnerScott SigmundBercovitchJacob. 2006. Overcoming obstacles to peace: The contribution of mediation to short-lived conflict settlements. International Studies Quarterly50(4): 819–840.
35.
GentStephen E.ShannonMegan. 2011. Bias and effectiveness of third-party conflict management mechanisms. Conflict Management and Peace Science28(2): 124–144.
36.
GerringJohnSeawrightJason. 2007. Techniques for choosing cases. In Case Study Research: Principles and Practices, ed. GerringJohn, pp. 86–150. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
GurrTed. 2000. Peoples versus States. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
38.
HaasErnst B.1993. Collective conflict management: Evidence for a new world order? In Collective Security in a Changing World, ed. WeissThomas G., pp. 63–119. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
39.
HeuserBeatrice. 1989. Western Containment Policies in the Cold War: The Yugoslav Case, 1948–53. New York: Routledge.
40.
HoughtonDavid Patrick. 2001. U.S. Foreign Policy and the Iran Hostage Crisis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
JabriVivienne. 1990. Mediating Conflict: Decision-Making and Western Intervention in Namibia. New York: St Martin’s.
42.
KleiboerMarieke. 1996. Understanding success and failure of international mediation. Journal of Conflict Resolution40(2): 360–389.
43.
KleiboerMarieke. 1998. The Multiple Realities of International Mediation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
44.
KuxDennis. 2006. India-Pakistan Negotiations: Is Past Still Prologue?Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
45.
KyddAndrew. 2003. Which side are you on? Bias, credibility and mediation. American Journal of Political Science47(4): 597–611.
46.
KyddAndrew. 2006. When can mediators build trust?American Political Science Review100(3): 449–462.
47.
LevyJack S.2009. Case studies and conflict resolution. In The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, eds BercovitchJacobKremenyukVictorZartmanI. William, pp. 72–85. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
MartinHarriet. 2006. Kings of Peace, Pawns of War: The Untold Story of Peace-Making. New York: Continuum.
49.
MitchellRonaldBernauerThomas. 2004. Beyond story-telling: Designing case study research in international environmental policy. In Models, Numbers, and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations, eds SprinzDetlef F.Wolinsky-NahmiasYael, pp. 81–106. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
50.
MorrisonJ. Stephende WaalAlex. 2005. Can Sudan escape its intractability? In Grasping the Nettle: Analyzing Cases of Intractable Conflict, eds CrockerChester A.HampsonFen OslerAallPamela, pp. 161–182. New York: United States Institute of Peace Press.
51.
MosheDayan. 1981. Breakthrough: A Personal Account of the Egypt–Israel Peace Negotiations. New York: Albert A. Knopf.
52.
NayarKuldip. 1969. Between the Lines. Bombay: Allied.
53.
PrendergastJohnThomas-JensenColin. 2007. Blowing the horn. Foreign Affairs86(2): 59–74.
54.
PrincenThomas. 1992. Intermediaries in International Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
RabelRoberto. 1988. Between East and West: Trieste, the United States, and the Cold War, 1943–54. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
57.
RauchhausRobert W.2006. Asymmetric information, mediation, and conflict management. World Politics58(2): 207–241.
58.
ReganPatrick M.2002. Third-party interventions and the duration of interstate conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution46(1): 55–73.
59.
RifkinJanetMillenJonathanCobbSara. 1991. Toward a new discourse for mediation: A critique of neutrality. Mediation Quarterly9(2): 151–164.
60.
SavunBurcu. 2008. Information, bias, and mediation success. International Studies Quarterly52(1): 25–47.
61.
SeawrightJasonGerringJohn. 2008. Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly61(2): 294–308.
62.
ShermanFrank L.1994. SHERFACS: A cross-paradigm, hierarchical and contextually sensitive conflict management data set. International Interactions20(1–2): 79–100.
63.
SickGary. 1985. The partial negotiator: Algeria and the U.S. hostages in Iran. In International Mediation in Theory and Practice, eds TouvalSaadiaZartmanI. William, pp. 21–66. Boulder, CO: Westview.
64.
SiskTimothy D.2009. International Mediation in Civil Wars: Bargaining with Bullets. New York: Routledge.
65.
SkjelsbækKjellFermannGunnar. 1996. The UN Secretary-General and the mediation of international disputes. In Resolving International Conflicts: The Theory and Practice of Mediation, ed. BercovitchJacob, pp. 75–104. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
66.
SlimRanda M.1992. Small-state mediation in international relations: The Algerian mediation of the Iranian hostage crisis. In Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management, eds BercovitchJacobRubinJeffrey Z., pp. 206–231. New York: St Martin’s.
67.
SmithAlastairStamAllan C.2003. Mediation and peacekeeping in a random walk model of civil and interstate war. International Studies Review5(4): 115–135.
68.
SmithWilliam P.1985. Effectiveness of the biased mediator. Negotiation Journal1(4): 363–372.
69.
SteinKenneth W.1999. Heroic Diplomacy: Sadat, Kissinger, Carter, Begin, and the Quest for Arab–Israeli Peace. New York: Routledge.
70.
SvenssonIsak. 2007. Bargaining, bias and peace brokers: How rebels commit to peace. Journal of Peace Research44(2): 177–194.
71.
TelhamiShibley. 1990. Power and Leadership in International Bargaining: The Path to the Camp David Accords. New York: Columbia University Press.
72.
TelhamiShibley. 1992. The Camp David Accords: A case of international bargaining. Pew Case Studies in International Affairs, Case 445. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Diplomacy.
73.
TerrisLesley G.MaozZeev. 2005. Rational mediation: A theory and a test. Journal of Peace Research42(5): 563–583.
74.
ThorntonThomas Perry. 1985. The Indo-Pakistan conflict: Soviet mediation at Tashkent, 1966. In International Mediation in Theory and Practice, eds TouvalSaadiaZartmanI. William, pp. 141–171. Boulder, CO: Westview.
75.
TouvalSaadia. 1982. The Peace Brokers: Mediators in the Arab–Israeli Conflict, 1948–1979. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
76.
TouvalSaadia. 1985. The context of mediation. Negotiation Journal1(4): 373–378.
77.
TouvalSaadiaZartmanI. William. 1985. Introduction: Mediation in theory. In International Mediation in Theory and Practice, eds TouvalSaadiaZartmanI. William, pp. 7–17. Boulder, CO: Westview.
78.
TouvalSaadiaZartmanI. William. 1989. Mediation in international conflicts. In Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Third-Party Intervention, eds KresselKennethPruittDean C., pp. 115–137. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
79.
United Nations. 1992. Handbook on the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes between States. New York: United Nations.
80.
United Nations. 2009. Peacemaking. New York: UN Department of Political Affairs.
81.
WeizmanEzer. 1981. The Battle for Peace. Toronto: Bantam.
82.
WilkenfeldJonathanYoungKathleenAsalVictorQuinnDavid. 2003. Mediating international crises: Cross-national and experimental perspectives. Journal of Conflict Resolution47(3): 279–301.
83.
WoodwardPeter. 2006. Peacemaking in Sudan. In Ending Africa’s Wars: Progressing to Peace, eds FurleyOliverMayRoy, pp. 167–178. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
84.
YoungJohn. 2003. Sudan: Liberation movements, regional armies, ethnic militias & peace. Review of African Political Economy30(97): 423–434.
85.
YoungOran R.1967. The Intermediaries: Third Parties in International Crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
86.
YoungOran R.1992. The effectiveness of international institutions: Hard cases and critical variables. In Governance Without Government: Change and Order in World Politics, eds RosenauJames N.CzempielErnst-Otto, pp. 160–194. New York: Cambridge University Press.
87.
ZartmanI. WilliamBermanMaureen R.1982. The Practical Negotiator. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
88.
ZartmanI. WilliamTouvalSaadia. 2007. International mediation. In Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World, eds CrockerChester A.HampsonFen OslerAallPamela, pp. 437–454. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
