Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Treaty-making involves the constitutional struggle for policy control. Both the Executive and Senate are defined as official actors in establishing international commitments and both closely guard their constitutionally defined roles.Yet most research concludes that Congress rarely matters when defining US commitments abroad.We explore the Senate's role in treaty-making during the administrations of Theodore Roosevelt (1901—1909) and the first term of George W. Bush (2001— 2005). Our evidence confirms that even recent studies showing greater Senate influence on treaty-making significantly underestimate the upper chamber's role in defining US commitments abroad. Rather than killing treaties with a formal floor vote, the Senate exerts influence at the committee stage by refusing to act on controversial agreements negotiated by presidential administrations. President Bush has responded to such congressional oversight by establishing more international commitments through executive agreements rather than treaties, particularly when it comes to issues of security.

Keywords

executive agreements executive—legislative relations international commitments unilateral presidential power US treaty process

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auerswald, David P. 2006. Senate reservations to security treaties. Foreign Policy Analysis 2(1): 83-100.

Auerswald, David , and Forrest Maltzman . 2003. Policymaking through advice and consent: Treaty considerations by the United States Senate. Journal of Politics 65(4): 1097-1110.

Chayes, Abram , and Antonia Handler Chayes. 2006. On compliance. In International law and international relations, eds Beth A. Simmons and Richard H. Steinberg , pp. 65-91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Church, Frank. 1969. Of presidents and Caesars: The decline of constitutional government in the conduct of American foreign policy. Idaho Law Review, Fall, 6(1): 1-15.

Farrand, Max , ed. 1967. The records of the Federal Convention of 1787. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Holt, W. Stull. 1933. Treaties defeated by the Senate: A study of the struggle between President and Senate over the conduct of foreign relations . Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

Howell, William G. 2005. Unilateral powers: A brief overview. Presidential Studies Quarterly 35(3): 417-438.

Johnson, Loch K. 1984. The making of international agreements: Congress confronts the executive. New York: New York University Press.

Johnson, Loch , and James M. McCormick . 1977. Foreign policy by executive fiat. Foreign Policy 28(Autumn): 117-138.

10.

Library of Congress, THOMAS, CRS Bill Summaries: http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/abt_dgst. html.

11.

Malloy, William M. 1910. Treaties, conventions, international acts, protocols, and agreements between the United States of America and other powers, 1776-1909 . Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

12.

Margolis, Lawrence. 1986. Executive agreements and presidential power in foreign policy. New York: Praeger .

13.

Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

14.

McClure, Wallace. 1941. International executive agreements. New York: Columbia University Press.

15.

Moe,Terry M. 1985. The politicized presidency. In The new direction inAmerican politics, eds John Chubb and Paul Peterson. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

16.

Moe, Terry M , and William G. Howell . 1999. Unilateral action and presidential power: A theory. Presidential Studies Quarterly 29(4): 850-873.

17.

Murphy, Sean D. 2006. Principles of international law. St Paul, MN: Thomson/West.

18.

Slomanson, William R. 2007. Fundamental perspectives on international law, 5th edn. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

19.

Smith, Steven S. 1994. Congressional party leaders. In The President, the Congress, and the making of foreign policy, ed. Paul E. Peterson. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

20.

CRS. 2001.Treaties and other international agreements:The role of the United States Senate. A study prepared for the Committee on Foreign Relations by the Congressional Research Service, January. Washington, DC : US Government Printing Office.

21.

US Department of State: http://www.state.gov/s/l/treaty/.

22.

US Senate: http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Treaties.htm#5.

23.

Wiktor, Christian L. 1979. Unperfected treaties of the United States of America, 1776-1976. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana .

Senate Influence or Presidential Unilateralism?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References