This article reviews problems associated with the current movement to use National Standards and Performance Assessment to reform education. The characteristics of standards, as they are currently being employed, are discussed. In addition, issues related to measurement, reliability and validity are reviewed. The impact of the Standards on students with disabilities is also discussed. The article ends with an expression of concern that the emphasis on performance accountability may spawn a new wave of speculation about the potential of some students to learn.
Berliner, D.C. (1993). Educational reform in an era of disinformation . Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol. 1, 2.
3.
Clark, C., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-298). New York: Macmillan.
4.
Cohen, D. (1995). What standards for national standards? Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 751-757.
5.
Davidson, M.R., Howell, K.W., & Hoekema, P. (1996, April). The effects of ethnicity and violent content on the assignment of rubric scores in writing samples. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
6.
Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative . Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232..
Emerling, F. (1991). Identifying ethnicity and gender of anonymous essays. Community College Review, 10, 29-33.
9.
Epstein, M.H., Patton, J.R., Polloway, E.A., & Foley, R. (1992). Educational services for students with behavior disorders: A review of Individualized Education programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 41-48.
10.
Fiedler, J.F., & Knight, R.R. (1986). Congruence between assessed needs and IEP goals of identified behaviorally disabled students. Behavioral Disorders , 12(1), 22-27.
11.
Gandal, M. (1995). Not all standards are created equal. Educational Leadership, 52, 16-21.
12.
Howell, K.W., Fox, S.L., & Morehead, M.K. (1993). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
13.
Howell, K.W., & Rueda, R. (1996). Achievement testing with culturally and linguistically diverse students. In L.A. Suzuki, P.J. Meller, & J.G. Ponterotto (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications, (pp. 253-290). San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
14.
Howell, K.W., Moore, E., Bigelow, S., & Evoy, A.M. (1993). Validity of authentic assessment. Diagnostique, 19, 387-400,
15.
Kane, M. (1994). Validating the performance standards associated with passing scores. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 425-461.
16.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco : Chandler .
17.
Kraiger, K., & Ford, J.K.A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 56-85.
18.
Linn, R.L., Baker, E.L., & Dunbar, S.B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20, 15-21.
19.
Linn, R.L., & Baker, E.L. (1996). Can performance-based student assessments be psychometrically sound? In J.B. Baron & D.P. Wolf (Eds.), Performance-based student assessment: Challenges and possibilities, (pp. 84-103), Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
20.
Lynch, E.C., & Beare, P.L. (1990). The quality of IEP objectives and their relevance to instruction for students with mental retardation and behavioral disorders . Remedial and Special Education, 11, 48-55.
21.
Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher , 23, 13-23.
22.
Missouri State Board of Education (1997-June) Show-me Standards. Http://services.dese.state.mo.us./standards/index.html
23.
Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress ( 1992). Testing in American Schools-asking the right questions . Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24.
Popham, W.J. (1995). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know . Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
25.
Sabers, D.I., & Sabers, D.S. (1996). Conceptualizing, measuring, and implementing higher (high and hire) standards. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 19-21.
26.
Shinn, M.R., & Hubbard, D.D. (1993). Curriculum-based measurement and problem-solving assessment: Basic procedures and outcomes. In E.L. Meyen, G.A. Vergason, & R.J. Whelan (Eds.), Challenges facing special education (pp. 193-226). Denver: Love.
27.
Smith, S.W. (1990). Individualized education programs (IEPs) in special education - from intent to acquiescence. Exceptional Children , 57, 6-14.
28.
Stodolsky, S.S., & Grossman, P.L. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subjects. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 227-249.
29.
Thurlow, M. (1995). National and state perspectives on performance assessment. ERIC Digest. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
30.
Washington State Commission on Student Learning: Essential Academic Learning Requirements (1996). Olympia, WA: Author.
31.
Weinstein, R.S. (1996). High standards in a tracked system of schooling: for which students and with what educational support? Educational Researcher, 25(8), 16-19.
32.
Ysseldyke, J.E., Algozzine, B., & Thurlow, M.L. (Eds.), (1992). Critical issues in special education. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
