An Investigation of School Psychologists' Assessment Practices of Language Proficiency With Bilingual and Limited-English-Proficient Students

Abstract

This study identified school psychologists' language proficiency assessment practices with bilingual and/or limited-English-proficient students. The sample consisted of 859 school psychologists who had prior experience conducting bilingual psychoeducational evaluations. The results of the survey indicated that 62% of school psychologists usually conduct their own language proficiency assessment, while 38% primarily or only use other district or outside sources in this area. The Language Assessment Scale (LAS) was the most frequently used instrument by outside sources. Approximately 46% of the school psychologists reported that the language proficiency information they obtained from outside sources was more than six months old. Several concerns pertaining to primarily or only using outside sources to obtain language proficiency data are discussed. With respect to school psychologists who conduct their own language proficiency assessment, the Test de Vocabulario en Imágenes Peabody and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised were the instruments most frequently used in Spanish and English, respectively. Fifty percent of the school psychologists who have conducted bilingual psychoeducational assessments reported that they had used non-standardized means to assess language proficiency. The most frequently cited method of informal language proficiency assessment was obtaining a language sample or conducting a student interview. An evaluation of school psychologists' language proficiency is provided.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Anderson, T.K. , Cancelli, A.A. , & Kratochwill, T.R. (1984). Self-reported assessment practices of school psychologists: Implications for training and practice . Journal of School Psychology, 22, 17-29.

Bruno, R.M. , & Walker, S.C. (1995). Critical knowledge and skill for educational diagnosticians: The development of a policy statement by the Council for Educational Diagnostic Services. Diagnostique, 20 (1-4), 5-16.

Carrasquillo, A.L. (1991). Hispanic children and youth in the United States: A resource guide. New York: Garland Publishing Co.

Caterino, L.C. (1990). Step-by-step procedure for the assessment of language minority children. In A. Barona & E.E. Garcia (Eds.), Children at risk: Poverty, minority status, and other issues in educational equity (pp. 269-282). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists .

Chamberlain, P. , & Medeiros-Landurand, P. (1991). Practical considerations in the assessment of LEP students with special needs. In E.V. Hamayan & J.S. Damico (Eds.), Limiting bias in the assessment of bilingual students (pp. 111-156). Austin, TX: Pro-ed .

Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. San Diego: College Hill Press.

Damico, J.S. (1991). Descriptive assessment of communicative ability in limited English proficient students. In E.V. Hamayan & J.S. Damico (Eds.), Limiting bias in the assessment of bilingual students (pp. 157-217). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.

Esquivel, G.B. (1988). Best practices in the assessment of limited English proficient and bilingual children. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 113-123). Washington, DC: The National Association of School Psychologists .

10.

Figueroa, R.A. (1990). Best practices in the assessment of bilingual children. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-II (pp. 93-106). Washington, DC: The National Association of School Psychologists.

11.

McLeod, B. (1994). Introduction. In B. McLeod (Ed.) Language and learning: Educating linguistically diverse students (pp. xiii-xxii). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

12.

Morris, J. (1977). What tests do schools use with Spanish-speaking students? Integrated Education, 15(2), 21-37.

13.

Nuttall, E.V. (1987). Survey of current practices in the psychological assessment of limited-English-proficiency handicapped children. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 53-61.

14.

Ochoa, A.M. , Pacheco, R. , & Omark, D.R. (1983). Addressing the learning disability needs of limited-English proficient students: Beyond language and race issues. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 416-423.

15.

Ochoa, S.H. , Powell, M.P. , & Robles-Piña, R. (in press). School psychologists' assessment practices with bilingual and limited-English-proficient students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment.

16.

Ochoa, S.H. , Rivera, B. , & Ford, L. (in press). An investigation of school psychology training pertaining to bilingual psycho-educational assessment of primarily Hispanic students: Twenty-five years after Diana v. California. Journal of School Psychology.

17.

Ortiz, A. , & Polyzoi, E. (1986). Characteristics of limited English proficient Hispanic students in programs for the learning disabled: Implications for policy, practice and research. Part I. Report Summary. (Eric Reproduction No. ED 267578).

18.

Stinnett, T.A. , Havey, J.M. , & Oehler-Stinnett, J. (1994). Current test usage by practicing school psychologists: A national survey. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 331-350.

19.

Willig, A. (1986). Special education and the culturally and linguistically different child: An overview of issues and challenges. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 2, 161-173.

20.

Woodcock, R. , & Muñoz-Sandoval, A. (1993). Woodcock-Muñoz Language Survey. Chicago: The Riverside Publishing Company.