This study describes the use of a parent report Preschool Development Inventory (PDI) in preschool screening. The PDI obtains the parent's report of the child's present development and possible problems. PDI results for three and four-year-olds seen for screening at public schools (N = 220) were analyzed to determine (a) the occurrence of low General Development Scale scores and various symptoms and behavior problems, and (b) the relationship of PDI results indicating problems to subsequent placement in early childhood/special education. Eleven percent of children obtained a low General Development Scale score on the PDI, while fourteen percent had one or more symptoms or behavior problems that could constitute a major obstacle to learning reported. Validity of the PDI for predicting early childhood/special education placement was determined via a sensitivity/specificity analysis: Sensitivity was .68; positive predictive power was .41.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Colligan, R.C. (1976). Prediction of kindergarten reading success from preschool report of parents. Psychology in Schools, 13, 304-308.
2.
Colligan, R.C. (1981). Prediction of reading difficulty from parental preschool report: A 3-year follow-up. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 31-37.
3.
Dunn, J., & Kendrick, C. (1980). Studying temperament and parent-child interaction: Comparison of interview and direct observation. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 22, 484-496.
4.
Eisert, D.C., Spector, S., Shankaran, S., Faigenbaum, D., & Szego, E. (1980). Mothers' reports of their low birth weight infants' subsequent development on the Minnesota Child Development Inventory. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 5, 353-364.
5.
Frankenburg, W.K., van Doominck, W.J., Liddel, T., & Dick, N.P. (1976). The Denver prescreening developmental questionnaire (PDQ). Pediatrics, 57, 744-753.
6.
Glascoe, F.P., MacLean, W.E., & Stone, W.L. (1991). The importance of parents' concerns about their child's behavior. Clinical Pediatrics, 30, 8-11.
7.
Gradel, K., Thompson, M.S., & Sheehan, R. (1981). Parental and professional agreement in early childhood assessment. Topics in Early Childhood Education, 1(1), 31-40.
8.
Guerin, D., & Gottfried, A.W. (1987). Minnesota child development inventories: Predictors of intelligence, achievement, and adaptability. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 12, 4, 595-608.
9.
Hagekull, B., Bohlin, G., & Lindhagen, K. (1984). Validity of parental reports. Infant Behavior and Development, 6, 77-92.
10.
Harrison, P., Kaufman, A., Kaufman, N., Bruininks, R., Rynders, J., Ilmer, S., Sparrow, S., & Cicchetti, D. (1990). Early Screening Profiles. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN.
11.
Ireton, H.R. (1984). The Preschool Development Inventory. Minneapolis: Behavior Science Systems.
12.
Ireton, H.R. (1988). The Early Child Development Inventory. Minneapolis: Behavior Science Systems.
13.
Ireton, H.R. (1990). Developmental screening measures: Parent report and direct testing. In Johnson, J., & Goldman, J., (Eds.). Developmental assessment in clinical child psychology: A handbook. New York: Pergamon Press.
14.
Ireton, H.R. (1992). Child Development Inventory. Minneapolis: Behavior Science Systems.
15.
Ireton, H.R., Lun, K.S., & Kampen, M. (1981). Minnesota preschool inventory identification of children at risk for kindergarten failure. Psychology in the Schools, 18, 394-401.
Ireton, H.R., Thwing, E.J., & Currier, W. (1977). Minnesota child development inventory: Identification of children with developmental disorders. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 2(1), 18-22.
20.
Knobloch, H., Stevens, F., Malone, A., Ellison, P., & Risenberg, H. (1979). The validity of parental reporting of infant development . Pediatrics, 63, 873-878.
21.
Lewis, G.A. (1986). Predicting kindergarten performance: A comparison of the Minnesota Preschool Inventory and the early prevention of school failure. Unpublished master's thesis. The Fielding Institute, Santa Barbara, California.
22.
Lichtenstein, R. (1980). Minneapolis Preschool Screening Instrument. Minneapolis: Minneapolis Public Schools .
23.
Lichtenstein, R. (1981). Comparative validity of two preschool screening tests: Correlational and classificational approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 68-73.
24.
Lichtenstein, R. (1982). New instrument, old problem for early identification . Exceptional Children, 49, 70-72.
25.
Lichtenstein, R., & Ireton, H.R. (1984). Preschool screening: Identifying young children with developmental and educational problems. Orlando, FL : Grune & Stratton.
26.
Mardell-Czudnowski, C., & Goldenberg, D. (1975). DIAL (Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning) Manual. Edison, NJ: Childcraft Education.
27.
Mardell-Czudnowski, C., & Goldenberg, D. (1988). Development Indicators for the Assessment of Learning Revised. Circle Pines, MN : American Guidance Service.
28.
Mardell-Czudnowski, C., Goldenberg, D., Fries, R.K., & Suen, H. (1988). Concurrent and predictive validity of DIAL-R. Unpublished manuscript. Paper presented at the 66th Annual Council for Exceptional Children Convention, Washington, D.C..
29.
Meisels, S.J. (1988). Development screening in early childhood: The interaction of research and social policy. Annual Review of Public Health, 9, 527-550.
