This study represents a beginning step in research that may ultimately show that the multitudes of human behavior that educators currently encounter may be reduced to three broad human attributes: arousal, affect, and cognition. The resulting simplicity should lead to improved understanding and better decision making by practitioners. Four measures were selected to represent each of the three attributes and data were collected for four age groups. In each case, when the data were submitted to principal axis factor analysis, three factors emerged in which the 12 variables were clearly aligned with their hypothesized factors. In each analysis more than 70% of the total variance was recovered (M=75.39%). Across four analyses, each variable had only one salient pattern coefficient, and none of its remaining pattern coefficients approached saliency. Following oblique rotation, factor one (arousal) accounted for an average of 50.00% of the explained variance; factor two (cognition) accounted for an average of 28.25% of the explained variance; and factor three (affect) accounted for an average of 21.75% of the explained variance. The implications of these findings and limitations of the research design are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achenbach, T.M., & Edelbrock, C. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Child Behavior Profile. Burlington, VT: Queen City Printers.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author .
4.
Audette, B., & Algozzine, B. (1997). Re-inventing government. Let's re-invent special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 378-383
5.
Bell, N.L., Rucker, M., & Finch, A.J., Jr. (2002). Concurrent validity of the Slosson Full-Range Intelligence Test: Comparison with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition and the Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement-Revised . Psychology in the Schools, 39, 31-38.
6.
Candland, D.K. (1993). Feral children and clever animals. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Cliff, N. (1970). The relation between sample and population characteristic vectors. Psychometrika, 35, 163-178.
8.
Davis, K. (1947). Extreme social isolation of a child. American Journal of Sociology, 45, 554-565.
9.
Durost, WN, Gardner, E.F., Madden, R., & Prescott, G.A. (1970). Analysis of Learning Potential . New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich .
10.
Eaves, R.C. (1984-85). Educational assessment in the United States . In J. Poteet & R.C. Eaves (Eds.), Exceptional Child Assessment [Monograph]. Diagnostique, 10, 5-39.
11.
Eaves, R.C. (1987). CLT reliability and validity studies: Part 1. CLT technical reports. Norristown, PA: Arete, Inc.
12.
Eaves, R.C. (1988). CLT reliability and validity studies: Part 2. CLT technical reports. Norristown, PA: Arete, Inc.
13.
Eaves, R.C. (1992). The Visual Similes Test. Unpublished manuscript.
14.
Eaves, R.C. (1993). A theory of human behavior. In R.C. Eaves & P.J. McLaughlin (Eds.), Recent advances in special education and rehabilitation (pp. 3-29). Andover, MA: Andover Medical Publishers.
15.
Eaves, R.C. (1995). The Visual Similes Test II - Affective and Cognitive Forms. Unpublished manuscript.
16.
Eaves, R.C., & Cutchen, M. (1990). The construct validity of the Cognitive Levels Test and the Academic Levels Test when compared with the WISC-R and PIAT for a group of adjudicated delinquents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 61-73.
17.
Eaves, R.C., & Darch, C. (2003). Attention to novelty, fear-anxiety, and age: Their effects on conduct problems. Submitted for publication.
18.
Eaves, R.C., & Glen, R. (1996). Novelty, age, and IQ: A theoretical look at human preference for novelty. Diagnostique, 22, 1-20.
19.
Eaves, R.C., & Subotnik, R. (1989). A longitudinal, criterion-related validity study of the Cognitive Levels Test for a group of highly gifted students. Diagnostique, 14, 79-88.
20.
Fagan, J.F., Jr. (1984). The intelligent infant: Theoretical implications . Intelligence, 8, 1-9.
21.
Fomess, S.R., & Knitzer, J. (1992). A new proposed definition and terminology to replace "serious emotional disturbance" in Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. School Psychology Review, 21, 12-20.
22.
Gold, M.W. (1980). Try another way: Training manual. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
Hinshaw, S.P., Morrison, D.C., Carte, E.T., & Comsweet, C. (1987). Factorial dimensions of the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist: Replication and validation with a kindergarten sample. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 309-327.
25.
Holden, C. (1996). Small refugees suffer the effects of early neglect . Science, 274, 1076-1077.
26.
Itard, J.M.G. (1962). The wild boy of Aveyron ( G. Humphrey & H. Humphrey, Eds. and Trans.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts . (Originally published 1894)
27.
Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
28.
Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I.Q. (1990). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (3rd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
29.
Koluchov, J. (1972). Severe deprivation in twins: A case study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 13, 107-114.
30.
Krashen, S.D. (1973). Lateralization, language learning, and the critical period: Some new evidence. Language Learning, 23, 63-74.
31.
LeDoux, J.E., Sakaguchi, A., Iwata, J., & Reis, D.J. (1986). Interruption of projections from the medial geniculate body to an archi-neostriatal field disrupts the classical conditioning of emotional responses to acoustic stimuli in the rat. Neuroscience,17, 615-627.
32.
Lee, S.W., Unruh, L., Ford, L., & Mace, W. (1991). The reliability and validity of the Cognitive Levels Test (CLT) for preschool children. Diagnostique, 16, 94-100.
33.
Lindsley, D.B., Bowden, J., & Magoun, H.W. (1949). Effect upon the EEG of acute injury to the brain stem activating system. EEG ClinicalNeurophysiology, 1, 475-486.
34.
Luria, A.R. (1979). The making of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
MacLean, P.D. (1970). The triune brain, emotion, and scientific bias . In F.O. Schmitt (Ed.), The neuro-sciences: Second study program (pp. 336-349). New York: Rockefeller University Press.
36.
Malmo, R.B. (1975). On emotions, needs, and our archaic brain. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
37.
Moruzzi, G., & Magoun, H.W. (1949). Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG. EEG ClinicalNeurophysiology, 1, 455-473.
38.
Otis, A.S., & Lennon, R.T. (1989). Otis-Lennon School Ability Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
39.
Papez, J.W. (1937). A proposed mechanism of emotion. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 38, 725-743.
40.
Parker-Bohannon, A. (1990). Criterion-related validity of the Cognitive Levels Test/Academic Levels Test as compared with the Stanford Achievement Test/Otis-Lennon School Ability Test. Unpublished master's thesis. Auburn University, AL.
41.
Polloway, E.A., Patton, J.R., Smith, T.E.C., & Buck, G.H. (1997). Mental retardation and learning disabilities: Conceptual and applied issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 30, 297-308, 345.
42.
Quay, H.C., & Peterson, D.R. (1987). Manual for the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Coral Gables, FL: Authors.
43.
Reynolds, F.L., & Humphreys, S. (1989). A comparison of the Cognitive Levels Test and the Academic Levels Test with the WISC-R. In H.R. Vance (Chairperson), A comparison of the Cognitive Levels Test and the Academic Levels Test with the WISC-R, K-ABC, and Woodcock-Johnson. Symposium presented at the 67th Annual Convention of theCouncil for Exceptional Children, San Francisco, CA.
44.
Rush, T. (1990). Correlation between the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children and the Cognitive Levels Test. Unpublished manuscript.
45.
Scruggs, T.E., & Matropieri, M.A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 155-168.
46.
Skiba, R., & Grizzle, K. (1991). The social maladjustment exclusion. School Psychology Review, 20, 508-518.
47.
Sperry, R.W. (1952). Neurology and the mind-brain problem. American Scientist, 40, 291-312.
Strauss, C.C., Smith, K., Frame, C., & Forehand, R. (1985). Personal and interpersonal characteristics associated with childhood obesity. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 10, 337-343.
Tucker, L.R., Koopman, R.F., & Linn, R.L. (1969). Evaluation of factor analytic research procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices. Psychometrika , 34, 421-460.
53.
Vance, B., Mayes, L., Eaves, R.C., & Homos, N.A. (1991). The concurrent validity of the Cognitive Levels Test with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised for a sample of referred children and youth. Psychology in the Schools , 28, 100-105.
54.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised . San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
55.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Third Edition. San Antonio, TX : Psychological Corporation.
56.
Williams, Jr., T.O., Cox, C., & Eaves, R.C. (2000). The construct validity of the Visual Similes Test . Diagnostique, 25, 111-128.
57.
Williams, Jr., T.O., Eaves, R.C., & Cox, C. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of an instrument designed to measure affective and cognitive arousal. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 264-283.
