This article describes the development of a computer-based assessment system for children in early childhood programs, The Indiana Assessment System of Educational Proficiencies: Early Childhood (IASEP: EC). Skills in five developmental domains (i.e., cognitive, communication, social, sensory motor, and self-help) were selected and content validated using a representative stakeholder and expert panel process. Resulting indicators were included in assessment software and piloted with 40 teachers and 128 children between the ages of 3 ½ and 6 ½ years. Analysis of core ratings yielded four separate factors: language development, social development, sensory motor development, and self-help skills. The rotated factor structure was largely consistent with the initial domain structure. Correlations between IASEP: EC domain ratings and the Speed DIAL and Picture Naming Task suggest a strong positive relationship between the developmental constructs measured by each. Initial results would lend support for the reliability and validity of the IASEP: EC rating system. Implications for using teacher ratings with portfolio evidence as a means of providing comprehensive documentation of child growth are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
2.
Behrmann, M., & Lahm, E. (1994). Computer applications in early childhood special education. In J. L. Wright & D. D. Shade (Eds.), Young children: Active learners in a technological age (pp. 105-120). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Bennett, D.E., Arvidson, H.H., & Cunningham, J.N. (2001). Indiana Assessment System of Educational Proficiencies: Early Childhood (IASEP:EC) [Computer software, manual, training videos, training manual, case studies]. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation, Purdue University.
5.
Bennett, D.E., & Davis, M.A. (2001). The development of a computer-based alternate assessment system. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26, 15-34.
6.
Bennett, D.E., Davis, M.A., Cunningham, J.N., & Arvidson, H.H. (1999). Indiana Assessment System of Education Proficiencies: Computer-Based Rating and Documentation System (IASEP) [Computer software, manual, training videos, training manual, case studies]. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation, Purdue University.
7.
Bennett, D.E., Davis, M.A., & French, B. (2002). Concurrent and construct validation of an alternate assessment. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8.
Bennett, R.E. (2002). Using electronic assessment to measure student performance (Issue Brief: Center for Best Practices). Washington, DC: National Governors Association. Retrieved February 22, 2002, from http://www.nga.org/center/divisions/1,1188,C_ISSUE_BRIEF^D_3126,00.html
9.
Bracken, B.A. (1987). Limitations of preschool instruments and standards for minimal levels of technical adequacy. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 313-326.
10.
Clements, D.H. (1998). Young children and technology (Report No. PS026268) . New York: Elementary and Childhood Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 416 991)
11.
Clements, D.H., Nastasi, B.K., & Swaminathan, S. (1993). Young children and computers: Crossroads and directions from research. Young Children, 48, 56-64.
12.
Denham, A., Bennett, D.E., Edybum, D., Lahm, E.A., & Kleinert, H.L. (2001). Alternate assessment and technology. In H. Kleinert & J. Kearns (Eds.), Putting alternate educational assessments into practice (pp. 135-164). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
13.
Early Childhood Research Institute on Measuring Growth and Development. (1999). Format and stimulus materials for picture naming assessment. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota at Minneapolis.
Hutlinger, P.L., & Johanson, J. (2000). Implementing and maintaining an effective early childhood comprehensive technology system. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 159-173.
16.
Judge, S. L., & Parette, H. P. (Eds.). (1998). Assistive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide to providing family-centered services. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
17.
Kelley, M.F., & Surbeck, E. (1991). History of preschool assessment. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), The psychoeducational assessment of preschool children (2nd ed., pp. 1-17). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
18.
Lukens, D.A., & Bennett, D.E. (2002). Cooperative assessment using electronic portfolios: The impact on social and academic outcomes of students in alternative school placements. Unpublished manuscript, W. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
19.
Mardell-Czudnowski, C., & Goldenberg, D.S. (1998). DIAL-3: Developmental indicators for the assessment of learning (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
20.
McConnell, S., Priest, J.S., Davis, S.D., & McEvoy, M.A. (2000). Best practices in measuring growth and development for preschool children. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology (4th ed., pp. 1231-1246). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists .
21.
McEvoy, M., Kaminski, R., & Priest, J. (2000). Early Childhood Research Institute on Measuring Growth and Development: A decision-making process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
22.
Meisels, S.J. (1987). Uses and abuses of developmental screening and school readiness testing. Young Children, 42, 4-9.
23.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1988). NAEYC position statement on standardized testing of young children 3 through 8 years of age. Young Children , 43, 42-47.
24.
National Education Goals Panel. (1998). Principles and recommendations for early childhood assessments. Washington, DC: Author.
25.
Oates, E.A. (2001). Early childhood assessment: Developing instruments with evidence of validity. Unpublished master's thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
26.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-17, §, Stat. (1997).
27.
Shepard, L.A., Taylor, G.A., & Kagan, S.L. (1996). Trends in early childhood assessment policies and practices. (Report No. PS029268). New York: Elementary and Childhood Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED ED450926). Retrieved February 25, 2002, from http://www.negp.gov/Reports/ecms2.pdf
28.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multi-variate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
29.
Tymms, P. (2001). The development of a computer-adaptive assessment in the early years. Educational and Child Psychology, 18, 20-30.
30.
Tzuriel, D., & Shamir, A. (2002). The effects of mediation in computer assisted dynamic assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 18, 21-32.
31.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Twenty-second annual report to congress. Washington, DC : Author.
32.
Wagner, R. (1993). HyperStudio [Computer software]. El Cajon, CA: Roger Wagner Publishing.
