This paper presents Refactal, an online serious game developed to introduce software engineering students to design patterns, code smells, and SOLID principles. Structured as an escape room, the game features progressive levels and integrates refactoring-based problem solving. The game’s design and a pilot exploratory evaluation are reported. Over three iterative testing phases, involving 33, 16, and 10 computer science students, data were collected through user experience questionnaires, in-game performance metrics and, during the final phase, pre/post-tests assessing conceptual learning. Results indicate that students perceived Refactal positively, particularly regarding satisfaction, scenario relevance, and overall experience. Preliminary evidence of learning gains, especially among novices, suggests that Refactal may support the acquisition of advanced OOP principles. While the small sample size limits generalization, these findings highlight Refactal’s potential and motivate future controlled studies with larger and more diverse cohorts.
Abdul JabbarA. I.FeliciaP. (2015). Gameplay engagement and learning in game-based learning: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 740–779. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315577210
2.
AgrahariV.ChimalakondaS. (2020). Refactor4green: A game for novice programmers to learn code smells. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (pp. 324–325). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377812.3390792
3.
AljedaaniW.GhammamA.Wiem MkaouerM.KessentiniM. (2024). From boring to boarding: Transforming refactoring education with game-based learning. In IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Games and Software Engineering (GAS) (pp. 20–27). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3643658.3643924
4.
Al-TahatK. S. Y.Al-AhmadA. N.KallajoN. B.Al-JayyousiW. B. (2006). A design pattern management tool for educational purposes. In 2006 2nd International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies,Damascus, Syria (pp. 31–35). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTTA.2006.1684340
5.
AlvarezA. R. L.Cieza-MostaceroS. E. (2024). Serious video game to improve the learning of software design patterns. TEM Journal, 13(3), 2557–2567. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM133-81
6.
AndersonL. W.KrathwohlD. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. Longman.
7.
ArnabS.LimT.CarvalhoM. B.BellottiF.De FreitasS.LouchartS.SuttieN.BertaR.De GloriaA. (2014). Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12113
8.
AssafA. J.McCollumB.McMullanP. (2022). Finding the best approach for using serious games in teaching computer programming. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(7), 4373–4401.
9.
AzimullahZ.AnY. S.DennyP. (2020). Evaluating an interactive tool for teaching design patterns. In Proceedings of the twenty-second Australasian computing education conference (pp. 167–176). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373165.3373184
10.
BaltesS.RalphP. (2022). Sampling in software engineering research: A critical review and guidelines. Empirical Software Engineering, 27(4), Article 94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10072-8
11.
BeckerK. (2017). Choosing and using digital games in the classroom: A practical guide. Springer International Publishing. Advances in Game-Based Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12223-6
12.
BlackP.WiliamD. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
13.
Borrás-GenéO.Hijón-NeiraR.Paredes-BarragánP.Serrano-LujánL. (2024). A hybrid escape room to foster motivation and programming education for pre-service teachers. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.343525
14.
BranthômeM. (2024). Pyrates: Design and evaluation of a serious game aimed at introducing python programming and easing the transition from blocks. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 24(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3639061
15.
BranthômeM.LalléS. (2025). Impact of adaptive feedback on learning programming with a serious game in high schools’ classes. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP '25) (pp. 104–113). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3699682.3728326
16.
CaiZ.LiuC.YangY.LiB. (2026). The impact of learning supports in digital game-based learning on learners with different levels of prior knowledge. The Internet and Higher Education, 68, Article 101044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101044
17.
CallaghanM. J.McShaneN.Gomez-equiluzA.TeillèsT.RaspailP. (2016). Practical application of the Learning Mechanics–Game Mechanics (LM-GM) framework for serious games analysis in engineering education. In 2016 13th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), Madrid, Spain, 24-26 February 2016, pp. 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1109/REV.2016.7444510
18.
CallaghanM. J.Savin-BadenM.McShaneN.EguíluzA. G. (2017). Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis in engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 5(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2015.2504241
19.
ChoiW. C.ChoiI. C. (2024a). The influence of CodeCombat on computational thinking in Python programming learning at primary school. In Proceedings of the 2024 5th International Conference on Education Development and Studies (pp. 26–32). ACM.
20.
ChoiW. C.ChoiI. C. (2024b). Investigating the effect of the serious game CodeCombat on cognitive load in python programming education. In 2024 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
21.
DebabiW.BensebaaT. (2016). Using serious games to enhance algorithmic learning and teaching. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1125
22.
dos SantosH. M.DurelliV. H.SouzaM.FigueiredoE.da SilvaL. T.DurelliR. S. (2019). Cleangame: Gamifying the identification of code smells. In Proceedings of the XXXIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering (pp. 437–446). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3350768.3352490
23.
EleziL.SaliS.DemeyerS.MurgiaA.PérezJ. (2016). A game of refactoring: Studying the impact of gamification in software refactoring. In Proceedings of the Scientific Workshop Proceedings of XP2016 (pp. 1–6). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2962695.2962718
24.
FowlerM. (2002). Patterns of enterprise application architecture. Addison-Wesley.
25.
FowlerM.BeckK.BrantJ.OpdykeW.RobertsD. (1999). Refactoring: Improving the design of existing code. Addison-Wesley.
26.
GammaE.HelmR.JohnsonR.VlissidesJ. (1994). Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented software. Addison-Wesley professional computing series.
27.
GestwickiP.SunF. S. (2008). Teaching design patterns through computer game development. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), 8(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/1348713.134871
Gómez-MartínM. A.Jiménez-DíazG.ArroyoJ. (2009). Teaching design patterns using a family of games. In Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education(ITiCSE '09) (pp. 148–152). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1562877.1562960
30.
GreitzerF. L.KucharO. A.HustonK. (2007). Cognitive science implications for enhancing training effectiveness in a serious gaming context. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), 7(3), 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/1281320.1281322
31.
Gresse von WangenheimC.Araújo e Silva de MedeirosG.FilhoR.PetriG.PinheiroF.FerreiraM. N.HauckJ. (2019). SplashCode - A board game for learning an understanding of algorithms in middle school. Informatics in Education, 18(2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.12
32.
GrundC. K. (2015). How games and game elements facilitate learning and motivation: A literature review. INFORMATIK 2015, Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Gesellschaft für Informatik. https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/2112
HaendlerT.NeumannG. (2019). Ontology-based analysis of game designs for software refactoring. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU (Vol. 1, pp. 24–35). SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007878300240035
35.
HaineyT.BaxterG. (2024). A serious game for programming in higher education. Computers & Education: X Reality, 4(2), Article 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100061
36.
HuangY.LiC.ChangC.TarngW. (2025). Enhancing computational thinking and programming logic skills with app inventor 2 and robotics: Effects on learning outcomes, motivation, and cognitive load. Sensors, 25(22), Article 7059. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25227059
37.
Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, 25-29 July 2005, San Jose, California.
38.
JhaM.MakhijaA.RichardsD.BilginA. A. (2023). Game-based assessments for programming. EasyChair Preprints. https://doi.org/10.56198/ZH3JOCS4L
39.
Jiménez-DíazG.Gómez-AlbarránM.González-CaleroP. A. (2008). Teaching GoF design patterns through refactoring and role-play. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(4), 717–728.
40.
KalmpourtzisG.RomeroM. (2020). Constructive alignment of learning mechanics and game mechanics in serious game design in higher education. International Journal of Serious Games, 7(4), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v7i4.361
41.
KarramO. (2021). The role of computer games in teaching object-oriented programming in high schools-code combat as a game approach. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 18, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.37394/232010.2021.18.4
42.
KitchenhamB.MadeyskiL. (2024). Recommendations for analysing and meta-analysing small sample size software engineering experiments. Empirical Software Engineering, 29(6), Article 137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10504-1
43.
KulshresthaS.AgrawalS.GauravD.ChaturvediM.SharmaS.BoseR. (2021). Development and validation of serious games for teaching cybersecurity. In FletcherB.MaM.GöbelS.Baalsrud HaugeJ.MarshT. (Eds.), Serious games. JCSG 2021. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 12945, pp. 247–262). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88272-3_18
44.
LarmanC. (1997). Applying UML and patterns. Prentice Hall.
45.
LawE. L. C.SunX. (2012). Evaluating user experience of adaptive digital educational games with activity theory. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(7), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.007
46.
Lin GaoX. W.MurilloB.PazF. (2019). A systematic literature review of usability evaluation guidelines on Mobile educational games for primary school students. In MarcusA.WangW. (Eds.), Design, user experience, and usability. Practice and case studies. HCII 2019. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 11586, pp. 172–182). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23535-2_13
47.
López-PernasS.GordilloA.BarraE.QuemadaJ. (2019). Examining the use of an educational escape room for teaching programming in a higher education setting. IEEE Access, 7, 31723–31737. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902976
48.
LotfiE.MohammedB. (2018). Teaching object-oriented programming concepts through a mobile serious game. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Smart City Applications (pp. 1–6). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3286606.3286851
49.
ManeroB.TorrenteJ.Fernandez-VaraC.Fernandez-ManjonB. (2016). Investigating the impact of gaming habits, gender, and age on the effectiveness of an educational video game: An exploratory study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(2), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2016.2572702
50.
MartinR. C. (2003). Agile software development: Principles, patterns, and practices. Pearson Education.
51.
MartinezK.Menéndez-MenéndezM. I.BustilloA. (2022). A new measure for serious games evaluation: Gaming Educational Balanced (GEB) model. Applied Sciences, 12(22), Article 11757. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211757
MichaelD.ChenS. (2005). Serious Games: Games That Educate, Train, and Inform. Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade.
54.
MiljanovicM. A.BradburyJ. S. (2018). A review of serious games for programming. In Serious Games: 4th Joint International Conference, JCSG 2018, Proceedings4 (pp. 204–216). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02762-9_21
55.
MoizerJ.LeanJ.Dell’AquilaE.WalshP.KearyA. A.O’ByrneD.Di FerdinandoA.MiglinoO.FriedrichR.AspergesR.SicaL. S. (2019). An approach to evaluating the user experience of serious games. Computers & Education, 136, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.006
56.
Mousavi BaigiS. F.Norouzi AvalR.SarbazM.KimiafarK. (2022). Evaluation tools for digital educational games: A systematic review. Acta Medica Iranica, 60(8), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v60i8.10835
57.
NavarroE. (2006). SimSE: A software engineering simulation environment for software process education. Ph.D. thesis. University of California.
58.
Núñez-PachecoR.Espinoza-MontoyaC.Yucra-QuispeL. M.Turpo-GeberaO.AguadedI. (2023). Serious video games in engineering education: A scoping review. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(2), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1743
59.
OleksiukV.VerbovetskyiD. V.HrytsaiI. A. (2024). Design and development of a game application for learning Python. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop for Young Scientists in Computer Science & Software Engineering (CS&SE@ SW, 2023) (pp. 111–124). Virtual Event, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine. https://doi.org/10.17977/um047v26i22019p051
60.
ParkN.LeeK. M.JinS.-A. A.KangS. (2010). Effects of pre-game stories on feelings of presence and evaluation of computer games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(11), 822–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.07.002
61.
PetreM.van der HoekA. (2016). Software design decoded: 66 ways experts think. MIT Press.
62.
PetriG.von WangenheimC.BorgattoA. (2016). MEEGA+: An evolution of a model for the evaluation of educational games. Brazilian Institute for digital convergence. Technical Report, 1–40.
63.
PillaiK.LovasM. (2023). Games as a mode of instruction in object-oriented concepts. In V. M. ShelleyAkerson & M. Unal (Eds.), Proceedings of IConSES 2023– International Conference on Social and Education Sciences (pp. 89-108), October19-22, Vegas, NV, USA. ISTES Organization.
64.
Rojas-SalazarA.HaahrM. (2020). Learning binary search trees through serious games based on analogies. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 1–6). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3402942.3402999
65.
Romero RodríguezL.Sánchez‐AlzolaA.SalazarA. (2025). Serious games in engineering education: Assessing novelty effects and the influence of prior gaming experience. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 33(3), Article e70021. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70021
66.
SchönD. A. (1992). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (1st ed.). Routledge.
67.
SeguraR. J.del PinoF. J.OgáyarC. J.RuedaA. J. (2020). VR‐OCKS: A virtual reality game for learning the basic concepts of programming. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22172
68.
ShneidermanB. (1997). Designing the user interface (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
SilvaF. G. M. (2020). Practical methodology for the design of educational serious games. Information, 11(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11010014
71.
SuttieN.LimT.LouchartS.MacveanA.WesteraW.BrownD.DjaoutiD. (2012). Introducing the “Serious Games Mechanics”: A theoretical framework to analyse relationships between “game” and “pedagogical aspects” of serious games. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 314–315. In De GloriaA.de FreitasS. (Eds.), (2012 ed.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.091
TahirR.WangA. I. (2017). State of the art in game based learning: Dimensions for evaluating educational games. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Games Based Learning (pp. 641–650), Graz, Austria, 5–6 October 2017.
74.
TaliaT.LópezD. F.ValverdeP. E.CabezasN. I.VacacelaC.BellucciS. (2025). A systematic review of serious games as tools for STEM education. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1432982. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1432982
75.
ToukiloglouP.XinogalosS. (2023). A systematic literature review on adaptive supports in serious games for programming. Information, 14(5), Article 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14050277
76.
VeinottE. S.PerlemanB.PolanderE.LeonardJ.BerryG.CatramboneR.WhitakerE.EbyB.MayellS.TeodorescuK.HammackT.LemasterL. (2014). Is more information better? Examining the effects of visual and cognitive fidelity on learning in a serious video game (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GEM.2014.7048105
WalkW.GörlichD.BarrettM. (2017). Design, Dynamics, Experience (DDE): An advancement of the MDA framework for game design. In KornO.LeeN. (Éd.), Game dynamics: Best practices in procedural and dynamic game content generation (pp. 27–45). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53088-8_3
79.
WinnB. M. (2009). The design, play, and experience framework. In FerdigR. E. (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 1010–1024). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-808-6.ch058
80.
WongY. S.HayatiI. M.YatimM.HoeT. W. (2017). A propriety game based learning mobile game to learn object-oriented programming — Odyssey of Phoenix. In 2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 426–431). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2017.8252373
81.
XinogalosS.SatratzemiM. (2022). The use of educational games in programming assignments: SQL island as a case study. Applied Sciences, 12(13), Article 6563. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136563
82.
YassineA.ChenouniD.BerradaM.TahiriA. (2017). A serious game for learning C programming language concepts using solo taxonomy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(3), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i03.6476
ZhanZ.HeL.TongY.LiangX.GuoS.LanX. (2022). The effectiveness of gamification in programming education: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100096
85.
Zong-bingM. (2018). Research on programming teaching strategy based on gamified learning in primary school. US-China Education Review A, 8(9), 385–395.
