This study aimed to investigate the impact of Learning Trajectories (LT2)-based games on the mathematical learning of four-year-old kindergarteners. The research employed the ADDIE paradigm, incorporating a pre-test, post-test, and a control group experimental design. The sample group comprised 30 children—15 in the experimental group and 15 in the control group—enrolled in an independent kindergarten in the center of Muğla. The research initially adhered to the five fundamental stages of the ADDIE model: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation, in a comprehensive manner. We created twelve games grounded in the learning trajectories and, in the concluding phase, administered a pre-test and post-test to assess the model’s efficacy. The experimental group’s TEMA-3 post-test results markedly surpassed those of the control group, demonstrating a substantial influence. This indicates that digital games designed around learning trajectories are an excellent means of enhancing mathematical abilities.
AbasM. S.DavidA. D. (2019). Teachers’ self-assessment towards technology integration in teaching mathematics. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 10(2), 4068–4079. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2019.0496
2.
AllenW. C. (2006). Overview and evolution of the ADDIE training system. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8(4), 430–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422306292942
3.
AsareB.WelcomeN. B.ArthurY. D. (2024). The effect of using technology in teaching and learning mathematics on student’s mathematics performance: The mediation effect of students’ mathematics interest. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14309
4.
AttehE.Assan-DonkohI.AyikuF.NkansahE.AdamsA. K. (2020). The use of technology among school mathematics teachers and students: The New wave of recommended instructions instructions. Asian Research Journal of Mathematics, 16(5), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.9734/arjom/2020/v16i530189
5.
BaroodyA. J.ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2019). Teaching and learning mathematics in early childhood programs. In Handbook of Early Childhood Care and Education (pp. 329–353). Wiley Blackwell Publishing.
6.
BranchR. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
7.
BuraC.MyakalaP. K. (2024). Advancing transformative education: Generative AI as a catalyst for equity and innovation. arXiv:2411.15971. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.15971
8.
CeylanM.AslanD. (2023). Erken çocukluk dönemi matematik eğitiminde öğrenme rotaları yaklaşımı ve MEB okul öncesi eğitim programının karşılaştırılması. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 10(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.17278/ijesim.1141506
9.
CeylanM.AslanD. (2024). The effect of learning trajectories-based coding education program on preschoolers’ mathematical measurement skills. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 7737–7757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12107-7
10.
ClaessensA.EngelM. (2013). How important is where you start? Early mathematics knowledge and later school success. Teachers College Record, 115(6), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500603
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2004). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81–89.
13.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2013). Rethinking early mathematics: What is research-based curriculum for young children? In EnglishL. D.MulliganJ. T. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 121–147). Springer.
14.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2014). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach (2nd ed.). Routledge.
15.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2021). Learning and teaching early math. The learning trajectories approach (3rd ed.). Routledge.
16.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
17.
ConfreyJ.MaloneyA. P.CorleyA. K. (2014). Learning trajectories: A framework for connecting standards with curriculum. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(5), 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0598-7
18.
DaroP.MosherF.A.CorcoranT. (2011). Learning trajectories in mathematics: A foundation for standards, curriculum, assessment, and instruction (Consortium for Policy Research in Education Report #RR-68). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
19.
DebeerD.VanbecelaereS.Van Den NoortgateW.ReynvoetB.DepaepeF. (2021). The effect of adaptivity in digital learning technologies. modelling learning efficiency using data from an educational game. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), 1881–1897. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13103
20.
DerbovenJ.ZamanB.GeertsD.De GrooffD. (2016). Playing educational math games at home: The Monkey Tales case. Entertainment Computing, 16, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2016.03.001
21.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.PaganiL. S.FeinsteinL.EngelM.Brooks-GunnJ.SextonH.DuckworthK.JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
FlewittR.MesserD.KucirkovaN. (2015). New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798414533560
25.
GagneR. M.WagerW. W.GolasK. C.KellerJ. M.RussellJ. D. (2005). Principles of instructional design. Perform Improv, 44(2), 44–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140440211
26.
GozenG.CirikI. (2017). Dijital öykülemenin okul öncesi çocukların sosyal-duygusal davranışlarına etkisi. Ilköğretim Online, 16(4), 1882–1896. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.342972
27.
HungC.-M.HuangI.HwangG.-J. (2014). Effects of digital game-based learning on students’ self-efficacy, motivation, anxiety, and achievements in learning mathematics. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(2-3), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0008-8
KimS. J.KastbergS. E.XinY. P.LeiQ.LiuB.WeiS.ChenY. (2022). Counting strategies of students struggling in mathematics in a computer-based learning environment. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 68, Article 101007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.101007
30.
KosterR. (2005). Theory of fun for game design. O’Reilly Media.
31.
KucirkovaN. (2017). iRPD—a framework for guiding design-based research for iPad apps. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 598–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12389
32.
LaiM. Y.KinnearV.FungC. I. (2019). Teaching mathematics for understanding in primary schools: Could teaching for mathematising be a solution?International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 20(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4256/ijmtl.v20i1.111
33.
LiebermanD. A.BatesC. H.SoJ. (2009). Young children’s learning with digital media. Computers in the Schools, 26(4), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560903360194
34.
MaboyaM. J.JitaL. C.ChimbiG. T. (2020). South African teachers’ beliefs and the use of manipulatives to resolve the concept-symbol schism in mathematics learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5414–5424. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081144
35.
MahayantiN. W. S.KusumaI. P. I.AshadiA.RachmanD. (2024). The impact of digital game-based learning on children’s self-efficacy and reading success. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(1), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.25325
36.
MaloneyA. P.ConfreyJ.NguyenK. H. (Eds.), (2014). Learning over time: Learning trajectories in mathematics education. IAP.
37.
ManessisD. (2014). The importance of future kindergarten teachers' beliefs about the usefulness of games based learning. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 4(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgbl.2014010105
38.
MarishaneM. A.MarishaneR. N.MahloF. D. (2015). Teacher capacity for curriculum differentiation in teaching foundation phase mathematics. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(3), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2015.11890396
39.
MeraC.CasasC. D.MendizábalE. A.JiménezI. M.LópezM.delC. C.GuzmánJ. I. N. (2022). Contributions of the psychology of mathematical cognition in early childhood education using apps. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913970
40.
MutaqinE. J.AsyariL.TetepT.HamdaniN. A. (2021). Mathematical learning trajectory in primary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1987(1), Article 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1987/1/012032
National Research Council (NRC). (2009). Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. The National Academies Press.
43.
NiuW.LiC.DuanD.ZhangQ. (2022). Impact of perceived supportive learning environment on mathematical achievement: The mediating roles of autonomous self-regulation and creative thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781594
44.
Ni WayanM. O. S.Putu AyuS. D.I KomangS. (2023). Pengembangan APE rare hat untuk meningkatkan konsentrasi belajar pada anak usia dini: Development of rare hat APE to increase learning concentration in early childhood. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood: Jurnal Dunia Anak Usia Dini, 5(2), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.35473/ijec.v5i1.2374
45.
NolanJ.McBrideM. (2013). Beyond gamification: Reconceptualizing game-based learning in early childhood environments. Information, Communication & Society, 17(5), 594–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2013.808365
46.
OwusuR.BonyahE.ArthurY. D. (2023). The effect of GeoGebra on university students’ understanding of polar coordinates. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2177050
47.
ParlakB. (2017). Dijital çağda eğitim: Olanaklar ve uygulamalar üzerine bir analiz. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(Special Issue on Kayfor15), 1741–1759.
PrahmanaR. C. I. (2017). The role of research-based learning to enhance students’ research and academic writing skills. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i3.5871
50.
PyleA.et al. (2017). A scoping review of research on play‐based pedagogies in kindergarten education.Review of Education, 5(3), 311–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3097
51.
RandelJ. M.MorrisB. A.WetzelC. D.WhitehillB. V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878192233001
52.
ReiserR. A.DempseyJ. V. (2007). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed.). Pearson.
53.
Santos-TrigoM.Barrera-MoraF.y Camacho-Machín, M. (2021). Teachers’ use of technology affordances to contextualize and dynamically enrich and extend athematical problem-solving strategies. Mathematics, 9(8), 793. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9080793
SaramaJ.ClementsD. H.BarrettJ. E.CullenC. J.HudymaA.VanegasY. (2021). Length measurement in the early years: Teaching and learning with learning trajectories. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 24(4), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1858245
56.
SaramaJ.ClementsH. D. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Routledge.
57.
SariyasaB. (2017). Creating dynamic learning environment to enhance students’ engagement in learning geometry. Journal of Physics, 824, 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/824/1/012057
58.
SerinH. (2017). Technology-integrated mathematics education: A facilitating factor to enrich learning. International Journal of Learning and Development, 7(4), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v7i4.12082
59.
ShokriH.Abdolmanafi-RokniS. J. (2014). The impact of computer games on efl learners’ spelling: A qualitative study. Study in English Language Teaching, 2(3), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v2n3p266
60.
SimonM. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.26.2.0114
61.
SmetsW. (2017). High quality differentiated instruction - a checklist for teacher professional development on handling differences in the general education classroom. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(11), 2074–2080. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051124
62.
SmithG. G.LiM.DrobiszJ.ParkH. R.KimD.SmithS. D. (2013). Play games or study? Computer games in ebooks to learn English vocabulary. Computers & Education, 69, 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.015
63.
SousaC.OliveiraA. (2023). The dark side of fun: Understanding dark patterns and literacy needs in early childhood mobile gaming. European Conference on Games Based Learning, 17(1), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecgbl.17.1.1656
64.
SztajnP.ConfreyJ.WilsonP. H.EdgingtonC. (2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41(5), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x12442801
65.
WattsT. W.DuncanG. J.SieglerR. S.Davis-KeanP. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14553660
66.
WickstromM. H.LangrallC. W. (2020). The case of Mrs. Purl: Using a learning trajectory as a tool for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(1), 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9412-8
67.
WilsonP. H.MojicaG.ConfreyJ. (2013). Learning trajectories in teacher education: Supporting teachers’ understandings of students’ mathematical thinking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.12.003
68.
YılmazN. (2019). The effect of the hypothetical learning trajectories and the contribution of the eye-tracking technology in understanding the young children’s mathematical patterning recognition and generalization. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].
