This study examines the effectiveness of a collaborative support method in enhancing programming learning outcomes in a serious game. The game Code Hasp was developed to facilitate the comparison between two support methods, worked examples and a collaborative peer support approach. A total of 111 elementary school students participated, divided into two groups. The experimental group received collaborative support from teammates alongside worked examples, while the control group relied solely on worked examples. Pre- and post-test results and in-game data revealed that the collaborative support method improved learning efficiency and problem-solving skills. A notable effect of the process was the emergence of a leadership role in most collaborative groups. The game’s support design and shared goal structure mitigate potential problems associated with unbalanced participation. These findings suggest that collaborative support systems in serious games are a promising strategy for promoting engagement and improving learning outcomes in programming education.
AkhuseyinogluK.HardtR.Barria-PinedaJ.BrusilovskyP.Pollari-MalmiK.SirkiäT.MalmiL. (2022). A study of worked examples for SQL programming. Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 1(4), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/3502718.352481
2.
ChanE. K. (2022). Response format. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1–3). Springer International Publishing.
CuiP.ZhengL.LiX. (2017). A co-citation network analysis of computer-supported collaborative learning from 2006 to 2016. 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 196–198). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.44
5.
DillenbourgP.FischerF. (2007). Computer-supported collaborative learning: The basics. Zeitschrift für Berufs-und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 21, 111–130.
6.
Dionne MerlinM.LavoieS.GallagherF. (2020). Elements of group dynamics that influence learning in small groups in undergraduate students: A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 87(4), 104362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104362
7.
GiannakoulasA.XinogalosS. (2023). Studying the effects of educational games on cultivating computational thinking skills in primary school students: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computers in Education, 8, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00300-z
8.
GoodyearP.JonesC.ThompsonK. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative learning: Instructional approaches, group processes, and educational designs. In SpectorJ. M.MerrillM. D.ElenJ.BishopM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 439–451). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_35
9.
HaahrM. (1999) Random.org: Introduction to randomness and random numbers. Statistics, 1–4.
10.
HareR.TangY. (2022). Player modeling and adaptation methods within adaptive serious games. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 10(4), 1939–1950. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcss.2022.3203926
11.
HassanG. (2023). Technology and the transformation of educational practices: A future perspective. International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS), 3(1), 1596–1603. https://doi.org/10.54443/ijebas.v3i1.1136
12.
HosseiniR.AkhuseyinogluK.PetersenA.SchunnC. D.BrusilovskyP. (2018). Pcex: Interactive program construction examples for learning programming. In Proceedings of the 18th Koli calling international conference on computing education research (pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.1145/3279720.3279726
13.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (2002). Learning together and alone: Overview and meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220110
14.
KarimH. A.MohammedA. A. (2018). Implementing peer teaching to enhance English students’ language learning: Kurdish EFL teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Journal of Garmian University, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.24271/garmian.300
15.
KnutasA.IkonenJ.PorrasJ. (2015). Computer-supported collaborative learning in software engineering education: A systematic mapping study. Journal on Information Technologies & Security, 7(4), 6. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.10710
16.
LaamartiF.EidM.SaddikA. E. (2014). An overview of serious games. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 2014, 11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/358152
17.
McCauleyR.FitzgeraldS.LewandowskiG.MurphyL.SimonB.ThomasL.ZanderC. (2008). Debugging: A review of the literature from an educational perspective. Computer Science Education, 18(2), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993400802114581
OksanenK.HämäläinenR. (2013). Perceived sociability and social presence in a collaborative serious game. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 3(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2013010103
20.
OksanenK.HämäläinenR. (2014). Game mechanics in the design of a collaborative 3D serious game. Simulation & Gaming, 45(2), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114530799
21.
RamadhanD. G.BudiyantoC. W.YuanaR. A. (2023). The role of game-based learning in developing students' computational thinking skills: A review of the literature. In AIP Conference Proceedings (2540(1), p. Article 110019). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0105705
22.
ReyesE. P.BlancoR. M. F. L.DoroonD. R. L.LimanaJ. L. B.TorcendeA. M. A. (2021). Feynman technique as a heutagogical learning strategy for independent and remote learning. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2109.02.06
23.
RiopelM.NencioviciL.PotvinP.ChastenayP.CharlandP.SarrasinJ. B.MassonS. (2019). Impact of serious games on science learning achievement compared with more conventional instruction: An overview and a meta-analysis. Studies in Science Education, 55(2), 169–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1722420
Screeps. (nd). MMO sandbox game for programmers. Retrieved March 11, 2024, from: https://screeps.com/
26.
ShiJ.ShahA.HedmanG.O’RourkeE. (2019). Pyrus: Designing a collaborative programming game to promote problem-solving behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–12). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300886
27.
SkinnerV. J.Braunack-MayerA.WinningT. A. (2016). Another piece of the “Silence in PBL” puzzle: Students’ explanations of dominance and quietness as complementary group roles. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1607
28.
SteinmaurerA.EckhardD.DrevenyJ.GütlC. (2022). Developing and evaluating a multiplayer game mode in a programming learning environment. 2022 8th international conference of the immersive learning research Network (iLRN) (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.23919/iLRN55037.2022.9815973
29.
StreicherA.SmeddinckJ. D. (2016). Personalized and adaptive serious games. In Entertainment computing and serious Games: International GI-Dagstuhl Seminar 15283, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, july 5-10, 2015, revised selected papers (pp. 332–377). Springer International Publishing.
30.
ToukiloglouP.XinogalosS. (2022). Ingame worked examples support as an alternative to textual instructions in serious games about programming. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(7), 1615–1636. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211073655
31.
TroussasC.VirvouM. (2020). Computer-supported collaborative learning: A novel framework. In Advances in social Networking-based learning: Machine learning-based user Modelling and Sentiment analysis (pp. 59–68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39130-0_4
WangC.HuangL. (2021). A systematic review of serious games for collaborative learning: Theoretical framework, game mechanic, and efficiency assessment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(06), 88. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i06.18495
34.
WynnA.WangJ.HanR.HsuT. C. (2023). Multiplayer serious games supporting programming learning. European Conference on Games Based Learning, 17(1), 721–729. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecgbl.17.1.1621
ZeaN. P.SánchezJ. L. G.GutiérrezF. L.CabreraM. J.PaderewskiP. (2009). Design of educational multiplayer videogames: A vision from collaborative learning. Advances in Engineering Software, 40(12), 1251–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.01.023
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
