Effects of Virtual Reality Based Microteaching Training on Pre-Service Teachers’ Teaching Skills from a Multi-Dimensional Perspective

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) shows the potential to tackle the limitations and deficiencies of traditional microteaching training by offering an intricate and lifelike environment that helps pre-service teachers to develop their teaching skills. However, the effects of VR training on each teaching skill sub-dimension remain inconclusive. This study identified nine sub-dimensions of teaching skills through a literature review. Moreover, a VR-based microteaching training system was developed, and the effects of VR on these sub-dimensions of teaching skills were explored by conducting a comparative experiment between virtual and traditional microteaching training. The results showed that virtual microteaching considerably enhanced pre-service teachers' teacher efficacy compared to traditional training, especially the efficacy of instructional strategies and classroom management. Furthermore, more significant improvements were noted in the questioning skill and the language and posture skills after virtual microteaching training, although there was no significant difference in teaching skills overall. Moreover, pre-service teachers reported a highly immersive experience during the virtual microteaching.

Keywords

virtual reality pre-service teacher microteaching teaching skills

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

D. W.

Cooper

J. M.

Poliakoff

(1972). Microteaching. Office of Education, US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Badilla Quintana

M. G.

Vera Sagredo

Lytras

M. D.

(2017). Pre-service teachers’ skills and perceptions about the use of virtual learning environments to improve teaching and learning. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(6), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1266388

Barab

A. A.

Barab

Borden

(2016). Gaming up the practice of teacher education: Quest2teach. In Educational technologies: Challenges, applications and learning outcomes (pp. 95–114). Nova Science Publishers.

Chang

Kim

H. T.

Yoo

(2020). Virtual reality sickness: A review of causes and measurements. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(17), 1658–1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351

Chen

C.-Y.

(2022). Immersive virtual reality to train preservice teachers in managing students' challenging behaviours: A pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 998–1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13181

Dalgarno

Gregory

Knox

Reiners

(2016). Practising teaching using virtual classroom role plays. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 126–154. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n1.8

Dalinger

Thomas

K. B.

Stansberry

Xiu

(2020). A mixed reality simulation offers strategic practice for pre-service teachers. Computers & education, 144(1), 103696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103696

Dawson

M. R.

Lignugaris/Kraft

(2017). Meaningful practice: Generalizing foundation teaching skills from TLE TeachLivE™ to the classroom. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 40(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416664184

Deale

Pastore

(2014). Evaluation of simSchool: An instructional simulation for pre-service teachers. Computers in the Schools, 31(3), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2014.932650

10.

Dieker

L. A.

Rodriguez

J. A.

Lignugaris/Kraft

Hynes

M. C.

Hughes

C. E.

(2013). The potential of simulated environments in teacher education: Current and future possibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 37(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413512683

11.

Feng

González

V. A.

Amor

Lovreglio

Cabrera-Guerrero

(2018). Immersive virtual reality serious games for evacuation training and research: A systematic literature review. Computers & education, 127(5), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.002

12.

Fischetti

Ledger

Lynch

Donnelly

(2022). -Practice before practicum: Simulation in initial teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 57(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2021.1973167

13.

Gregory

Masters

(2012). Real thinking with virtual hats: A role-playing activity for pre-service teachers in second life. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(3), 420–440. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.843

14.

Hally

Randolph

(2018). A game of ideas: The effectiveness of role-playing games in the political theory classroom. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 29(2), 5–17.

15.

Yan

(2011). Exploring authenticity of microteaching in pre-service teacher education programmes. Teaching Education, 22(3), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2011.590588

16.

Hofstein

Lunetta

V. N.

(2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106

17.

Huang

Richter

Kleickmann

Richter

(2022a). Class size affects preservice teachers’ physiological and psychological stress reactions: An experiment in a virtual reality classroom. Computers & education, 184(1), 104503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104503

18.

Huang

Richter

Kleickmann

Richter

(2022b). Comparing video and virtual reality as tools for fostering interest and self-efficacy in classroom management: Results of a pre-registered experiment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(2), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13254

19.

Huang

Richter

Kleickmann

Richter

(2023). Virtual reality in teacher education from 2010 to 2020. In Scheiter

Gogolin

(eds.), Bildung für eine digitale Zukunft (pp. 399–441). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37895-0_16

20.

Huang

Richter

Kleickmann

Wiepke

Richter

(2021). Classroom complexity affects student teachers’ behavior in a VR classroom. Computers & education, 163(1), 104100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104100

21.

Hugerat

Basheer

Kortam

Hofstein

(2017). The effectiveness of teachers' use of demonstrations for enhancing students' understanding of and attitudes to learning the oxidation-reduction concept. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 555–570. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00632a

22.

Jackson

S. A.

Marsh

H. W.

(1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.18.1.17

23.

Jensen

Konradsen

(2018). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1515–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0

24.

Pachman

Dai

(2020). Investigating educational affordances of virtual reality for simulation-based teaching training with graduate teaching assistants. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(3), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09249-9

25.

(2020). Virtual reality simulation-based learning of teaching with alternative perspectives taking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2544–2557. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12936

26.

Kim

Raza

Seidman

(2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214

27.

Klassen

R. M.

Tze

V. M.

(2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001

28.

König

Santagata

Scheiner

Adleff

A.-K.

Yang

Kaiser

(2022). Teacher noticing: A systematic literature review of conceptualizations, research designs, and findings on learning to notice. Educational Research Review, 36, 100453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100453

29.

Krokos

Plaisant

Varshney

(2019). Virtual memory palaces: Immersion aids recall. Virtual Reality, 23, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0346-3

30.

Kyriacou

(2018). Essential teaching skills (5th ed.). Oxford University Press-Children.

31.

Ledger

(2020). Resilience building for pre-service teachers: BRiTE, micro-teaching and augmented reality/simulation (BRiTE-AR). In Mansfield

C. F.

(Ed.), Cultivating teacher resilience: International approaches, applications and impact (pp. 245–262). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5963-1_15

32.

Ledger

Fischetti

(2020). Micro-teaching 2.0: Technology as the classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4561

33.

Lee

V. W.

Hodgson

Chan

C. S.

Fong

Cheung

S. W.

(2020). Optimising the learning process with immersive virtual reality and non-immersive virtual reality in an educational environment. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 14(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2020.103908

34.

Makransky

Petersen

G. B.

(2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2

35.

McGarr

(2021). The use of virtual simulations in teacher education to develop pre-service teachers’ behaviour and classroom management skills: Implications for reflective practice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(2), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1733398

36.

McGarr

O’Grady

Guilfoyle

(2017). Exploring the theory-practice gap in initial teacher education: Moving beyond questions of relevance to issues of power and authority. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1256040

37.

Meng

(1992). Basic tutorial for micro-teaching. Beijing Normal University Press.

38.

Mergler

A. G.

Tangen

(2010). Using microteaching to enhance teacher efficacy in pre-service teachers. Teaching Education, 21(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210902998466

39.

Mikropoulos

T. A.

Natsis

(2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers & education, 56(3), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020

40.

Moffett

Weissman

Weiland

McCormick

Hsueh

Snow

Sachs

(2021). Unpacking pre-K classroom organization: Types, variation, and links to school readiness gains. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 77, 101346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101346

41.

Moore

K. D.

(2007). Classroom teaching skills. McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.

42.

Morell

(2018). Multimodal competence and effective interactive lecturing. System, 77, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.12.006

43.

Morris

D. B.

Usher

E. L.

Chen

J. A.

(2017). Reconceptualizing the sources of teaching self-efficacy: A critical review of emerging literature. Educational Psychology Review, 29(4), 795–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9378-y

44.

Niemeyer

Johnson

Monroe

A. E.

(2014). Role play for classroom management: Providing a lodestar for alternate-route teachers. The Educational Forum, 78(3), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2014.912373

45.

Oberhauser

Dreyer

Braunstingl

Koglbauer

(2018). What’s real about virtual reality flight simulation? Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 8(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000134

46.

Pallavicini

Argenton

Toniazzi

Aceti

Mantovani

(2016). Virtual reality applications for stress management training in the military. Aerospace medicine and human performance, 87(12), 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.4596.2016

47.

Pan

Yan

J. X.

Zhang

(2022). From blended to virtual learning: Insights from a language enhancement workshop programme. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 16(3), 349–376. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2022.124179

48.

Peercy

M. M.

Troyan

F. J.

(2017). Making transparent the challenges of developing a practice-based pedagogy of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.005

49.

Peker

(2009). The use of expanded microteaching for reducing pre-service teachers’ teaching anxiety about mathematics. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(9), 872–880. https://academicjournals.org/journal/SRE/article-full-text-pdf/9D5095016215.pdf

50.

Peng

J.-E.

Zhang

Chen

(2017). The mediation of multimodal affordances on willingness to communicate in the English as a foreign language classroom. Tesol Quarterly, 51(2), 302–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.298

51.

Petersen

G. B.

Petkakis

Makransky

(2022). A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning. Computers & education, 179, 104429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429

52.

Pianta

R. C.

Hamre

B. K.

(2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374

53.

Ragnemalm

E. L.

Samuelsson

(2016). Simulating variation in order to learn classroom management. Educational Media International, 53(4), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2016.1254882

54.

Rayner

Fluck

(2014). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of simSchool as preparation for inclusive education: A pilot study. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.927825

55.

Rehder

Abd-El-Barr

Hooten

Weinstock

Madsen

J. R.

Cohen

A. R.

(2016). The role of simulation in neurosurgery. Child's nervous system: ChNS: official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 32(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2923-z

56.

Saredakis

Szpak

Birckhead

Keage

H. A. D.

Rizzo

Loetscher

(2020). Factors associated with virtual reality sickness in head-mounted displays: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00096

57.

Scherzinger

Wettstein

(2019). Classroom disruptions, the teacher–student relationship and classroom management from the perspective of teachers, students and external observers: A multimethod approach. Learning Environments Research, 22(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9269-x

58.

Seufert

Oberdörfer

Roth

Grafe

Lugrin

J.-L.

Latoschik

M. E.

(2022). Classroom management competency enhancement for student teachers using a fully immersive virtual classroom. Computers & education, 179, 104410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104410

59.

Seymour

Yuan

L. I.

Dennis

A. R.

Riemer

(2021). Have we crossed the uncanny valley? Understanding affinity, trustworthiness, and preference for realistic digital humans in immersive environments. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(3), 591–617. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00674

60.

Shaughnessy

Boerst

T. A.

(2018). Uncovering the skills that preservice teachers bring to teacher education: The practice of eliciting a student’s thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702574

61.

Spencer

Drescher

Sears

Scruggs

A. F.

Schreffler

(2019). Comparing the efficacy of virtual simulation to traditional classroom role-play. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1772–1785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119855613

62.

Stolz

S. A.

(2015). Embodied learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(5), 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.879694

63.

Theelen

van den Beemt

Brok

P. d.

(2019). Classroom simulations in teacher education to support preservice teachers’ interpersonal competence: A systematic literature review. Computers & education, 129, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.015

64.

Tout

Magnuson

Lipscomb

Karoly

Starr

Quick

Early

Epstein

Joseph

Maxwell

Roberts

Swanson

Wenner

(2017). Validation of the quality ratings used in quality rating and improvement systems (QRIS): A synthesis of state studies (OPRE Report #2017-92). Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

65.

Tschannen-Moran

Hoy

A. W.

(2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

66.

Turney

Cairns

(1976). Sydney micro skills: Handbook. Sydney University Press.

67.

Walshe

Driver

(2019). Developing reflective trainee teacher practice with 360-degree video. Teaching and Teacher Education, 78, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.009

68.

Wilhelm

A. G.

Berebitsky

(2019). Validation of the mathematics teachers’ sense of efficacy scale. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2017.1375359

69.

Wong

Giacaman

(2021). Scaffolding spatial ability with augmented reality and virtual reality. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 15(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2021.111597

70.

Wragg

E. C.

(1989). Classroom teaching skills: The research findings of the teacher education project. Psychology Press.

71.

Liu

P.-F.

Lee

X.-Z.

Zhang

Y.-Q.

Chiu

C.-K.

(2021). Classroom misbehaviour management: An SVVR-based training system for preservice teachers. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1579235

72.

Zee

Koomen

H. M. Y.

(2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801