The Effects of Virtual Reality Infused Instruction on Elementary School Students’ English-Speaking Performance,Willingness to Communicate,and Learning Autonomy

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) has been used to enhance EFL learners’ speaking skills due to its immersive and interactive features. This study thus investigated the effects of VR on elementary school students' English-speaking performance and such affective variables as their willingness to communicate (WTC) and learning autonomy. Fifty-six EFL sixth graders participated in a tour in a museum. When learning and practicing dialogues and vocabulary related to the museum, students in the experimental group (n = 28) were guided with Cospaces, a VR software package, with VR headsets, while their counterparts (n = 28) were guided with pictures only. Instruments included a validated speaking test on (1) pronunciation, fluency, and intonation and (2) grammar and lexical use, adopted questionnaires on WTC and learning autonomy, and semi-structured interviews. Results demonstrated that VR significantly increased students’ grammar and lexical use in their speaking performance, but not their pronunciation, fluency and intonation, WTC, or learning autonomy.

Keywords

virtual reality learner autonomy willingness to communicate english-speaking performance elementary school students

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abd Majid

S. N.

Ismail

Kassim

Hanum

(2018). Students’ perception in using virtual reality device in English classroom. The 12th Malaysia international Conference on English language teaching, Octomber (2018),.

Aldrich

(2004). Simulation and the future of learning. Pfeiffer.

Alemi

Khatoony

(2020). Virtual reality assisted pronunciation training for young EFL learners. Teaching English with Technology, 20(4), 59–81. https://tewtjournal.org

Alfadil

(2020). Effectiveness of virtual reality game in foreign language vocabulary acquisition. Computers & Education, 153, 103893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103893

Benson

(2013). Learner autonomy. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.134

Berns

Gonzalez-Pardo

Camacho

(2013). Game - like language learning in 3 - D virtual environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.001

Buckingham

Alpaslan

R. S.

(2017). Promoting speaking proficiency and willingness to communicate in Turkish young learners of English through asynchronous computer - mediated practice. System, 65, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2016.12.016

Buttussi

Chittaro

(2018). Effects of different types of virtual reality display on presence and learning in a safety training scenario. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(2), 1063–1076. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2653117

Chang

Goswami

J. S.

(2011). Factors affecting the implementation of communicative language teaching in Taiwanese college English classes. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.5539/ELT.V4N2P3

10.

Cheng

K. H.

Tsai

C. C.

(2019). A case study of immersive virtual field trips in an elementary classroom: Students’ learning experience and teacher - student interaction behaviors. Computers and Education, 140, 103600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103600

11.

Chen

J. C.

Kent

(2019). Task engagement, learner motivation and avatar identities of struggling English language learners in the 3D virtual world. System, 88, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102168

12.

Chien

S. Y.

Hwang

G. J.

Jong

M. S. Y.

(2020). Effects of peer assessment within the content of spherical video - based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-speaking performance and learning perception. Computers & Education, 146(3), 103751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751

13.

Collentine

(2011). Learner autonomy in a task - based 3D world and production. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.125/44262

14.

Ebadi

Ebadijalal

(2020). The effect of Google expeditions virtual reality on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate and oral proficiency. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1854311

15.

Falloon

(2010). Using avatars and virtual environments in learning: What do they have to offer? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8535.2009.00991.X

16.

Fouz-González

(2019). Podcast - based pronunciation training: Enhancing FL learners’ perception and production of fossilized segmental features. ReCALL, 31(2), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344018000174

17.

Giguere

Parks

(2018). Child - to - child interaction during eTandem ESL – FSL chat exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.125/44663

18.

Han

(2020). Immersive virtual field trips in education: A mixed ‐ methods study on elementary students’ presence and perceived learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 420–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12842

19.

Han

(2021). Immersive virtual field trips and elementary students’ perception. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12946

20.

Holec

(1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. On behalf of the Council of Europe.

21.

Kartal

Balçikanli

(2018). Willingness to communicate and communication anxiety of EFL learners in a virtual world. I - Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.15.3.14549

22.

Kim

(2014). Developing autonomous learning for oral proficiency using digital storytelling. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.125/44364

23.

Lan

Y. J.

(2015). Contextual EFL learning in a 3D virtual environment. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.125/44412

24.

Lan

Y. J.

(2020). Immersion, interaction, and experience - oriented learning: Bring virtual reality into FL learning. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.125/4470410.1016/bs.plm.2020.03.001

25.

Lan

Y. J.

Kan

Y. H.

Sung

Y. T.

Chang

K. E.

(2016). Oral - performance language tasks for CSL beginners in second life Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.125/44482

26.

Lan

Y. J.

Lyu

B.-N.

Chin

C. K.

(2019). Does a 3D immersive experience enhance mandarin writing by CSL students?. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.125/44686

27.

Lee

(2016). Autonomous learning through task - based instruction in fully online language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.125/44462

28.

Lee

J. S.

Chen Hsieh

(2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in - class, out - of - class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2019.03.002

29.

Lee

J. S.

Lee

Chen Hsieh

J.S.

(2019). Understanding willingness to communicate in L2 between Korean and Taiwanese students. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819890825

30.

Liaw

M. L.

(2019). EFL learners’ intercultural communication in an open social virtual environment. Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 38–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/e26819610

31.

Lin

T. J.

Lan

Y. J.

(2015). Language learning in virtual reality environments: Past, present, and future. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 486–497. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.4.486

32.

Little

(1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions. Issues and problems. Swets and Zeitlinger.

33.

Lowell

V. L.

Alshammari

(2019). Experiential learning experiences in an online 3D virtual environment for mental health interviewing and diagnosis role-playing: A comparison of perceived learning across learning activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 825–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11423-018-9632-8

34.

Macintyre

P. D.

Dörnyei

Clément

Noels

K. A.

(1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-4781.1998.TB05543.X

35.

McCroskey

J. C.

Baer

J. E.

(1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the annual convention of the speech, Fersno, CA, February 16-19, 1985

36.

Metz

(2017). Finally, a useful application for VR:Training employees. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609473/finally-a-useful-application-for-vr-training-employees/

37.

Nobrega

F. A.

Rozenfeld

C. C. D. F.

(2019). Virtual reality in the teaching of FLE in a Brazilian public school. Languages, 4(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020036

38.

Parmaxi

(2020). Virtual reality in language learning: A systematic review and implications for research and practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1765392

39.

Peterson

(2005). Learning in an avatar-based virtual environment: A preliminary study. PacCALL Journal, 1(1), 29–40.

40.

Reinders

Wattana

(2014). Affect and willingness to communicate in digital game-based learning. ReCall, 27(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000226

41.

Reisoglu

Topu

Yilmaz

T. K.

Göktas

(2017). 3D virtual learning environments in education: A meta-review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(1), 81–100. https//doi.org/10.1007/S12564-016-9467-0

42.

Rogerson-Revell

P. M.

(2021). Computer - assisted pronunciation training (CAPT): Current issues and future directions. RELC Journal, 52(1), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220977406

43.

Smart

Cascio

Paffendof

(2007). Metaverse roadmap: Pathway to the 3D web.Metaverse: A Cross-industry public foresight project. http://www.metaverseroadmap.org/MetaverseRoadmapOverview.pdf

44.

Snodin

N. S.

(2013). The effects of blended learning with a CMS on the development of autonomous learning: A case study of different degrees of autonomy achieved by individual learners. Computers & Education, 61(1), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.004

45.

Sun

Lin

C. H.

You

Shen

H. J.

Luo

(2017). Improving the English - speaking skills of young learners through mobile social networking. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 304–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1308384

46.

Sun

Y. C.

Yang

F. Y.

(2015). I help, therefore, I learn: Service learning on web 2.0 in an EFL speaking class. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(3), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.818555

47.

Tai

T. Y.

Chen

H. H. J.

Todd

(2020). The impact of a virtual reality app on adolescent EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1752735

48.

Tanner

M. W.

Landon

M. M.

(2009). The effects of computer - assisted pronunciation readings on ESL learners’ use of pausing, stress, intonation and overall comprehensibility. Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.125/44191.

49.

Thomas

D. R.

(2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

50.

Tussyadiah

I. P.

Wang

Jung

T. H.

tom Dieck

M. C.

(2018). Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: Empirical evidence from tourism. Tourism Management, 66, 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.003

51.

Vongsila

Reinders

(2016). Making asian learners talk: Encouraging willingness to communicate. RELC Journal, 47(3), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216645641

52.

Wang

Y. H.

Young

S. C.

(2015). Effectiveness of feedback for enhancing English pronunciation in an ASR‐based CALL system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12079

53.

Wehner

A. K.

Gump

A. W.

Downey

(2011). The effects of second life on the motivation of undergraduate students learning a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.551757

54.

Wickström

Bendix

(2000). The “Hawthorne effect” — what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show? Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 26(4), 363–367. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40967074

55.

Y. J. A.

Lan

Y. J.

Huang

S. B. P.

Lin

Y. T. R.

(2019). Enhancing medical students’ communication skills in a 3D virtual world. Educational Technology & Society, 22(4), 18–32. https://scholar.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/en/publications/enhancing-medical-students-communicative-skills-in-a-3d-virtual-w

56.

(2020). Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality using head-mounted displays on learning performance: A meta - analysis. British Journal of Education Technology, 51(6), 1991–2005. https://doi.org/10.111/bjet.13023

57.

Xie

Chen

Ryder

L. H.

(2019). Effects of using mobile - assisted virtual reality on Chinese L2 students’ oral proficiency. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1604551

58.

Yan

Carger

C. L.

Smith

T. J.

(2017). Mobile - assisted narrative writing practice for young English language learners from a funds of knowledge approach. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.125/44594

59.

Yeh

Y. L.

Lan

Y. J.

(2018). Fostering student autonomy in English learning through creations in 3D virtual world. Education Tech Research Dev, 66(3), 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11423-017-9566-6

60.

Zheng

Young

M. F.

Brewer

R. A.

Wagner

(2009). Attitude and self-efficacy change: English language learning in virtual worlds. CALICO Journal, 27(1), 205–231. https://doi.org/10.11139/CJ.27.1.205-231