Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-10
Developing Elementary Students’ Digital Literacy Through Augmented Reality Creation: Insights From a Longitudinal Analysis of Questionnaires,Interviews,and Projects
This mixed-method case study investigated digital literacy (DL) development among 32 elementary-level students who created multimodal, contextual, and interactive augmented reality (AR) artifacts in a 20-week after-school program in Northern Taiwan. The instructional design combined situated and spiral learning experiences with AR, implemented through a blended learning environment. Data sources included pre- and post-program digital learning student surveys, student and teacher interviews, classroom observations, and AR artifact assessments. Results indicated statistically significant increases with moderate effect sizes in five areas of students’ DL practices: information management; collaboration; communication and sharing; creation; and evaluation and problem-solving. Students did not increase DL in one area: ethics and responsibility. The situated and spiral learning-by-design approach offered increasingly complex AR creation projects in which students developed and transferred their DL. The face-to-face and online learning settings offered multiple ways to collaborate and facilitated the development of students’ DL. The AR technology enabled students to develop DL through designing AR using three types of representation features: multimodal, interactive, and contextual. Practical and theoretical implications for adapting or enhancing this instructional design in future DL programs and for future research are discussed.
AkcaogluM.KoehlerM. J. (2014) Cognitive outcomes from the Game-Design and Learning (GDL) after-school program. Computers & Education75: 72–81.
2.
AkçayırM.AkçayırG. (2017) Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review20: 1–11.
3.
AnY.-J. (2016) A case study of educational computer game design by middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development64(4): 555–571.
4.
AzumaR. T. (1997) A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments6(4): 355–385.
BawdenD.RobinsonL. (2002) Promoting literacy in a digital age: Approaches to training for information literacy. Learned Publishing15(4): 297–301.
7.
BaytakA.LandS. M. (2011) An investigation of the artifacts and process of constructing computers games about environmental science in a fifth grade classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development59(6): 765–782.
8.
BennettS.MatonK. (2010) Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning26(5): 321–331.
9.
BennettS.MatonK.KervinL. (2008) The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology39(5): 775–786.
10.
Bonnardel, N., & Zenasni, F. (2010). The impact of technology on creativity in design: an enhancement? Creativity and innovation management, 19(2), 180–191.
11.
Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented reality in education – Cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International, 51(1), 1–15.
12.
BrownJ. S.CollinsA.DuguidP. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher18(1): 32–42.
13.
BrunerJ. (1960) The process of education, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
BurnettR. E.FrazeeA.HanggiK.MaddenA. (2014) A programmatic ecology of assessment: Using a common rubric to evaluate multimodal processes and artifacts. Computers and Composition31: 53–66.
15.
ChengK.-H.TsaiC.-C. (2013) Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology22(4): 449–462.
16.
ChiangT. H. C.YangS. J. H.HwangG.-J. (2014a) An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Educational Technology & Society17(4): 352–365.
17.
ChiangT. H. C.YangS. J. H.HwangG.-J. (2014b) Students’ online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities. Computers & Education78: 97–108.
18.
ChouC.BlockL.JesnessR. (2012) A case study of mobile learning pilot project in K-12 schools. Journal of Educational Technology Development & Exchange5(2): 11–26.
19.
CopeB.KalantzisM. (2015) The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In: CopeB.KalantzisM. (eds) A pedagogy of multiliteracies, London, England: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–36.
20.
CreswellJ. W. (2013) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21.
DeCuir-GunbyJ. T.MarshallP. L.McCullochA. W. (2011) Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Methods23(2): 136–155.
22.
DiBiasioD.CompariniL.DixonA. G.ClarkW. M. (2001) A project-based spiral curriculum for introductory courses in ChE: Part 3. Evaluation. Chemical Engineering Education35(2): 140–147.
23.
DunleavyM.DedeC. (2014) Augmented reality teaching and learning. In: SpectorJ. M.MerrillM. D.ElenJ.BishopM. J. (eds) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 735–745.
GagneR. M. (1968) Contributions of learning to human development. Psychological Review75(3): 177.
26.
HafnerC. A. (2014) Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students’ digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly48(4): 655–685.
27.
Hagerman, M. S., & Spires, H. (2017, April). A systematic review of qualitative, classroom-based digital literacies research 2006-2016. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.
28.
HillA. E. (2014) Using interdisciplinary, project-based, multimodal activities to facilitate literacy across the content areas. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy57(6): 450–460.
29.
HsiaoH. S.ChangC. S.LinC. Y.HuP. M. (2014) Development of children’s creativity and manual skills within digital game-based learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning30(4): 377–395.
30.
Hsu, H. P., Zou, W., Hughes, J., & Wang, C. T. (2018, April). Develop elementary students’ digital literacy by creating augmented reality artifacts in a situated and cumulative way. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association (AERA), New York City, NY.
JacobsG. E.CastekJ.PizzolatoA.RederS.PendellK. (2014) Production and consumption: A closer look at adult digital literacy acquisition. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy57(8): 624–627.
33.
JaimeA.BlancoJ. M.DomínguezC.SánchezA.HerasJ.UsandizagaI. (2016) Spiral and project-based learning with peer assessment in a computer science project management course. Journal of Science Education & Technology25(3): 439–449.
34.
JengJ. H.TangT. I. (2004) A model of knowledge integration capability. Journal of Information, Technology and Society4(1): 13–45.
35.
KafaiY. B. (2006) Playing and making games for learning. Games and Culture1(1): 36–40.
36.
Ke, F., & Hsu, Y. C. (2015). Mobile augmented-reality artifact creation as a component of mobile computer-supported collaborative learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 33–41.
37.
Kern, A. L., Moore, T. J., & Akillioglu, F. C. (2007, October). Cooperative learning: Developing an observation instrument for student interactions. Paper presented at the 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI.
38.
Kimbell-LopezK.CumminsC.ManningE. (2016) Developing digital literacy in the middle school classroom. Computers in the Schools33(4): 211–226.
39.
KlopferE.SquireK. (2008) Environmental detectives—The development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development56(2): 203–228.
40.
KolschM.BaneR.HollererT.TurkM. (2006) Multimodal interaction with a wearable augmented reality system. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications26(3): 62–71.
41.
LaiC. L.HwangG. J. (2014) Effects of mobile learning time on students’ conception of collaboration, communication, complex problem-solving, meta-cognitive awareness and creativity. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation8(3–4): 276–291.
42.
LaineT. H.NygrenE.DirinA.SukH.-J. (2016) Science Spots AR: A platform for science learning games with augmented reality. Educational Technology Research and Development64(3): 507–531.
LotheringtonH.JensonJ. (2011) Teaching multimodal and digital literacy in L2 settings: New literacies, new basics, new pedagogies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics31: 226–246.
46.
LuoY. (2015) Design fixation and cooperative learning in elementary engineering design project: A case study. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education8(1): 133–146.
47.
MartinA.GrudzieckiJ. (2006) DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences5(4): 1–19.
48.
MathewsJ. (2010) Using a studio-based pedagogy to engage students in the design of mobile-based media. English Teaching: Practice and Critique9(1): 87–102.
49.
MooreD. C. (2013) Bringing the world to school: Integrating news and media literacy in elementary classrooms. Journal of Media Literacy Education5(1): 326–336.
50.
NgW. (2012) Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?Computers & Education59(3): 1065–1078.
51.
PapertS. (1980) Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas, New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.
52.
PrenskyM. (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon9(5): 1–6.
53.
Price-DennisD.HolmesK. A.SmithE. (2015) Exploring digital literacy practices in an inclusive classroom. The Reading Teacher69(2): 195–205.
54.
RaphaelC.BachenC. M.Hernández-RamosP. F. (2012) Flow and cooperative learning in civic game play. New Media & Society14(8): 1321–1338.
55.
ReynoldsR. (2016) Defining, designing for, and measuring “social constructivist digital literacy” development in learners: A proposed framework. Educational Technology Research and Development64(4): 735–762.
56.
Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational technology research and development, 56(4), 487–506.
57.
SaidinN. F.HalimN. D. A.YahayaN. (2015) A review of research on augmented reality in education: Advantages and applications. International Education Studies8(13): 1.
58.
SalehizadehM. R.Behin-AeinN. (2014) Effects of cooperative learning plus inquiry method on student learning and attitudes: A comparative study for engineering economic classrooms. European Journal of Engineering Education39(2): 188–200.
59.
SantosM. E. C.ChenA.TaketomiT.YamamotoG.MiyazakiJ.KatoH. (2014) Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies7(1): 38–56.
60.
ShuteV. J.BeckerB. J. (2010) Innovative assessment for the 21st century, New York, NY: Springer.
The New London Group (1996) A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review66(1): 60–93.
63.
ThibautP. (2015) Social network sites with learning purposes: Exploring new spaces for literacy and learning in the primary classroom. Australian Journal of Language & Literacy38(2): 83–94.
64.
Vemuru, S., Khorbotly, S., & Hassan, F. (2013, May). A spiral learning approach to hardware description languages. Paper presented at IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS2013), Beijing, China.
WangH.-Y.HuangI.HwangG.-J. (2016) Effects of a question prompt-based concept mapping approach on students’ learning achievements, attitudes and 5C competences in project-based computer course activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society19(3): 351–364.
67.
WuH.-K.LeeS. W.-Y.ChangH.-Y.LiangJ.-C. (2013) Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education62: 41–49.
68.
YinR. K. (2009) Case study research design and methods, 4th ed. London, England: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
