There are increasing concerns about student’s possibility of becoming victim of negative online experiences, including cyberbullying victimization (CV). The outcome of these experiences on student’s psychological and mental health is not well understood. This study used stimulus–organism–response paradigm to inspect the antecedents of social media fatigue and how social media attachment (SMA) is related to internalizing disorders (depression and anxiety). We also examined the moderating role of moral disengagement in the positive association between SMA and CV. The distinctive stimulus–organism–response paradigm in the suggested model is empirically examined through a sample of 305 college students. SMA was related to more CV and greater symptoms of internalizing disorders. CV and internalizing disorders were positively associated with social media fatigue. Moral disengagement moderated the relationship between SMA and CV. Implications for online awareness struggles are discussed.
AkbulutY.DönmezO.DursunÖ. Ö. (2017) Cyberloafing and social desirability bias among students and employees. Computers in Human Behavior72: 87–95. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.043.
2.
AllisonK. R.BusseyK. (2017) Individual and collective moral influences on intervention in cyberbullying. Computers in Human Behavior74: 7–15. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.019.
3.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin103(3): 411–423.
4.
AyyagariR.GroverV.PurvisR. (2011) Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly35(4): 831–858.
5.
BagozziR. P. (1986) Attitude formation under the theory of reasoned action and a purposeful behaviour reformulation. British Journal of Social Psychology25(2): 95–107. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00708.x.
6.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
7.
BarofskyI.LegroM. W. (1991) Definition and measurement of fatigue. Clinical Infectious Diseases13: S94–S97. doi:10.1093/clinids/13.Supplement_1.S94.
8.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
9.
BeattyS. E.FerrellM. E. (1998) Impulse buying: Modeling its precursors. Journal of Retailing74(2): 169–191.
10.
BentlerP. M. (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin107(2): 238–246.
11.
BerneS.FrisénA.Schultze-KrumbholzA.ScheithauerH.NaruskovK.LuikP.ZukauskieneR. (2012) Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior18: 320–334. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.022.
12.
BrightL. F.KleiserS. B.GrauS. L. (2015) Too much Facebook? An exploratory examination of social media fatigue. Computers in Human Behavior44: 148–155. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.048.
13.
BusseyK.FitzpatrickS.RamanA. (2015) The role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy in cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence14(1): 30–46. doi:10.1080/15388220.2014.954045.
14.
CambreM. A.CookD. L. (1985) Computer anxiety: Definition, measurement, and correlates. Journal of Educational Computing Research1(1): 37–54. doi:10.2190/FK5L-092H-T6YB-PYBA.
15.
CarminesE. G.McIverJ. P. (1981) Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of Covariance structures. In: BohrnstedtG. W.BorgattaE. F. (eds) Social measurement: Current issues, Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
16.
CénatJ. M.HébertM.BlaisM.LavoieF.GuerrierM.DerivoisD. (2014) Cyberbullying, psychological distress and self-esteem among youth in Quebec schools. Journal of Affective Disorders169: 7–9. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.07.019.
17.
Chang, F.-C., Chiu, C.-H., Miao, N.-F., Chen, P.-H., Lee, C.-M., Huang, T.-F., & Pan, Y.-C. (2015). Online gaming and risks predict cyberbullying perpetration and victimization in adolescents. International Journal of Public Health, 60(2), 257–266.
18.
Cherubini, M., Gutierrez, A., De Oliveira, R., & Oliver, N. (2010). Social tagging revamped: Supporting the users’ need of self-promotion through persuasive techniques. Paper presented at the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753473.
19.
ChinW. W. (1998) Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly22: vii–xvi. doi:10.2307/249674.
20.
ChoS. M.SungM. J.ShinK. M.LimK. Y.ShinY. M. (2013) Does psychopathology in childhood predict internet addiction in male adolescents?Child Psychiatry and Human Development44(4): 549–555. doi:10.1007/s10578-012-0348-4.
21.
ChoiS.-O.KimS.-H.LeeD.-Y.ParkJ.-K. (2016) Factors influencing the state anxiety of nursing students before initial clinical experience. Indian Journal of Science and Technology9(41): 1–8. doi:10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i41/103902.
22.
CummingsC. M.CaporinoN. E.KendallP. C. (2014) Comorbidity of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: 20 years after. Psychological Bulletin140(3): 816–845. doi:10.1037/a0034733.
23.
ErogluS. A.MachleitK. A.DavisbL. M. (2001) Atmospherics qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications. Journal of Business Research54(2): 177–184.
24.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39.
25.
Gámez-GuadixM.BorrajoE.AlmendrosC. (2016) Risky online behaviors among adolescents: Longitudinal relations among problematic Internet use, cyberbullying perpetration, and meeting strangers online. Journal of Behavioral Addictions5(1): 100–107. doi:10.1556/2006.5.2016.013.
26.
Gámez-GuadixM.OrueI.SmithP. K.CalveteE. (2013) Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic Internet use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health53(4): 446–452.
27.
Garaigordobil, M. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Cyberbullying Test, a screening instrument to measure cybervictimization, cyberaggression, and cyberobservation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. pii:0886260515600165.
GiniG.PozzoliT.HymelS. (2014) Moral disengagement among children and youth: A meta-analytic review of links to aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior40(1): 56–68. doi:10.1002/ab.21502.
30.
Gonzalez-CabreraJ.CalveteE.Leon-MejiaA.Perez-SanchoC.PeinadoJ. M. (2017) Relationship between cyberbullying roles, cortisol secretion and psychological stress. Computers in Human Behavior70: 153–160. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.054.
31.
GraceD.RossM.ShaoW. (2015) Examining the relationship between social media characteristics and psychological dispositions. European Journal of Marketing49(9/10): 1366–1390. doi:10.1108/EJM-06-2014-0347.
32.
HanB. (2018) Social media burnout: Definition, measurement instrument, and why we care. Journal of Computer Information Systems58: 122–130.
33.
HarmanH. (1976) Modern factor analysis, 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
34.
HemphillS. A.KotevskiA.HeerdeJ. A. (2015) Longitudinal associations between cyber-bullying perpetration and victimization and problem behavior and mental health problems in young Australians. International Journal of Public Health60(2): 227–237. doi:10.1007/s00038-014-0644-9.
35.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2010) Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research14(3): 206–221. doi:10.1080/13811118.2010.494133.
36.
HolfeldB.LeadbeaterB. J. (2015) The nature and frequency of cyber bullying behaviors and victimization experiences in young Canadian children. Canadian Journal of School Psychology30(2): 116–135. doi:10.1177/0829573514556853.
37.
HolfeldB.SukhawathanakulP. (2017) Associations between Internet attachment, cyber victimization, and internalizing symptoms among adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking20(2): 91–96. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0194.
38.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
39.
JacobyJ. (2002) Stimulus-organism-response reconsidered: An evolutionary step in modeling (consumer) behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology12(1): 51–57. doi:10.1207/S15327663JCP1201_05.
40.
KelleciM.İnalS. (2010) Psychiatric symptoms in adolescents with Internet use: Comparison without Internet use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking13(2): 191–194. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0026.
41.
KowalskiR. M.GiumettiG. W.SchroederA. N.LattannerM. R. (2014) Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin140(4): 1073–1137. doi:10.1037/a0035618.
42.
LimM. S.ChoiS. B. (2017) Stress caused by social media network applications and user responses. Multimedia Tools and Applications76: 17685–17698.
43.
LocatelliS. M.KluweK.BryantF. B. (2012) Facebook use and the tendency to ruminate among college students: Testing mediational hypotheses. Journal of Educational Computing Research46(4): 377–394. doi:10.2190/EC.46.4.d.
44.
LuoY.JiangH.KulemekaO. (2015) Strategic social media management and public relations leadership: Insights from industry leaders. International Journal of Strategic Communication9(3): 167–196.
45.
LuqmanA.CaoX.AliA.MasoodA.YuL. (2017) Empirical investigation of Facebook discontinues usage intentions based on SOR paradigm. Computers in Human Behavior70: 544–555. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.020.
46.
Maier, C., Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2012). When social networking turns to social overload: Explaining the stress, emotional exhaustion, and quitting behavior from social network sites’ users. European conference on informatin systems (ECIS), Barcelona, Spain, 2012, AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). pp. 1–12.
47.
MaierC.LaumerS.WeinertC.WeitzelT. (2015) The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services: A study of Facebook use. Information Systems Journal25(3): 275–308.
48.
McInerneyV.McInerneyD. M.SinclairK. E. (1994) Student teachers, computer anxiety and computer experience. Journal of Educational Computing Research11(1): 27–50. doi:10.2190/94D0-B0AF-NLAX-7RYR.
49.
MeerkerkG.-J.Van Den EijndenR. J. J. M.VermulstA. A.GarretsenH. F. L. (2009) The Compulsive Internet use scale (CIUS): Some psychometric properties. CyberPsychology & Behavior12(1): 1–6. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0181.
50.
MehrabianA.RussellJ. A. (1974) An approach to environmental psychology, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
51.
MooreC.DetertJ. R.Klebe TrevinoL. K.BakerV.MayerD. M. (2012) Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology65(1): 1–48. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01237.x.
52.
ObermannM.-L. (2011) Moral disengagement in self-reported and peer-nominated school bullying. Aggressive Behavior37(2): 133–144. doi:10.1002/ab.20378.
53.
OdacıH.ÇelikÇ. B. (2013) Who are problematic internet users? An investigation of the correlations between problematic internet use and shyness, loneliness, narcissism, aggression and self-perception. Computers in Human Behavior29(6): 2382–2387.
54.
PabianS.VandeboschH. (2015) An investigation of short-term longitudinal associations between social anxiety and victimization and perpetration of traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence45(2): 328–339. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0259-3.
55.
ParkS. M.ParkY. A.LeeH. W.JungH. Y.LeeJ.-Y.ChoiJ.-S. (2013) The effects of behavioral inhibition/approach system as predictors of Internet addiction in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences54(1): 7–11. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.033.
56.
PavlouP. A.El SawyO. A. (2006) From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research17(3): 198–227. doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0094.
57.
PilkonisP. A.ChoiS. W.ReiseS. P.StoverA. M.RileyW. T.CellaD. (2011) Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment18(3): 263–283. doi:10.1177/1073191111411667.
58.
PornariC. D.WoodJ. (2010) Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior36(2): 81–94. doi:10.1002/ab.20336.
59.
PozzoliT.GiniG.VienoA. (2012) Individual and class moral disengagement in bullying among elementary school children. Aggressive Behavior38(5): 378–388. doi:10.1002/ab.21442.
60.
PresnoC. (1998) Taking the byte out of Internet anxiety: Instructional techniques that reduce computer/Internet anxiety in the classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research18(2): 147–161. doi:10.2190/UY72-5TG8-0LT5-AU4L.
61.
RavindranT.KuanA. C. Y.LianD. G. H. L. (2014) Antecedents and effects of social network fatigue. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology65(11): 2306–2320. doi:10.1002/asi.
62.
ReedK. P.CooperR. L.NugentW. R.RussellK. (2016) Cyberbullying: A literature review of its relationship to adolescent depression and current intervention strategies. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment26(1): 37–45.
63.
RoseC. A.TynesB. M. (2015) Longitudinal associations between cybervictimization and mental health among U.S. adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health57(3): 305–312. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.05.002.
64.
RunionsK. C.BakM. (2015) Online moral disengagement, cyberbullying, and cyber-aggression. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking18(7): 400–405. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0670.
65.
Salmans, S. (1997). Depression: Questions you have. Answers you need. London: Thorsons.
66.
Sampasa-KanyingaH.HamiltonH. A. (2015) Social networking sites and mental health problems in adolescents: The mediating role of cyberbullying victimization. European Psychiatry30(8): 1021–1027. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.09.011.
67.
SansoneR. A.SansoneL. A. (2008) Bully victims: Psychological and somatic aftermaths. Psychiatry (Edgmont)5(6): 62–64.
68.
SchneiderS. K.O’DonnellL.StueveA.CoulterR. W. S. (2012) Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. American Journal of Public Health102(1): 171–177.
69.
SeligmanM. E. P.WalkerE. F.RosenhanD. L. (2001) Abnormal psychology, 4th ed. New York, NY: Norton.
70.
StewartR. W.DrescherC. F.MaackD. J.EbesutaniC.YoungJ. (2014) The development and psychometric investigation of the cyberbullying scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence29(12): 2218–2238. doi:10.1177/0886260513517552.
71.
TokunagaR. S. (2010) Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior26: 277–287.
72.
TurelO. (2015) Quitting the use of a habituated hedonic information system: A theoretical model and empirical examination of Facebook users. European Journal of Information Systems24(4): 431–446. doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.19.
73.
VandeboschH.Van CleemputK. (2009) Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society11(8): 69–94. doi:10.1177/1461444809341263.
74.
van den EijndenR. J. J. M.MeerkerkG.-J.VermulstA. A.SpijkermanR.EngelsR. C. M. E. (2008) Online communication, compulsive internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology44(3): 655–665. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.655.
75.
VerhagenT.van DolenW. (2011) The influence of online store beliefs on consumer online impulse buying: A model and empirical application. Information & Management48(8): 320–327. doi:10.1016/j.im.2011.08.001.
76.
WangC.ZhangP. (2012) The Evolution of Social Commerce: The People, Management, Technology, and Information Dimensions. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS)31: Article 5.
77.
WangX.LeiL.YangJ.GaoL.ZhaoF. (2017) Moral disengagement as mediator and moderator of the relation between empathy and aggression among Chinese male juvenile delinquents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development48(2): 316–326. doi:10.1007/s10578-016-0643-6.
78.
WangY. J.MinorM. S.WeiJ. (2011) Aesthetics and the online shopping environment: Understanding consumer responses. Journal of Retailing87(1): 46–58. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2010.09.002.
79.
WinterS.NeubaumG. (2016) Examining characteristics of opinon leaders in social media. Social Media + Society2(3): 2056305116665858.
80.
YangS. C. (2012) Paths to bullying in online gaming: The effects of gender, preference for playing violent games, hostility, and aggressive behavior on bullying. Journal of Educational Computing Research47(3): 235–249. doi:10.2190/EC.47.3.a.
81.
YangS. C.LinC.-Y. (2014) A study of Taiwanese teens’ traditional and cyberbullying behaviors. Journal of Educational Computing Research50(4): 525–552. doi:10.2190/EC.50.4.e.
82.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J.WolakJ.FinkelhorD. (2006) Examining characteristics and associated distress related to Internet harassment: Findings from the second youth Internet safety survey. Pediatrics118(4): e1169–e1177. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-0815.
83.
Zhang, B., & Xu, H. (2016). Privacy nudges for mobile applications: Effects on the creepiness emotion and privacy attitudes. Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing—CSCW ’16 (pp. 1674–1688). New York, NY: ACM Press.
84.
ZhangH.LuY.GuptaS.ZhaoL. (2014) What motivates customers to participate in social commerce? The impact of technological environments and virtual customer experiences. Information & Management51(8): 1017–1030. doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.07.005.
85.
ZhangS.ZhaoL.LuY.YangJ. (2016) Do you get tired of socializing? An empirical explanation of discontinuous usage behaviour in social network services. Information and Management53(7): 904–914. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.03.006.
