The aim of the study was to examine the effect of an activity with an educational electronic storybook with math content on the emergent math of kindergarteners at risk for learning disabilities (LD) compared with kindergarteners with typical development (TD). The study included 107 kindergarteners aged 4.6 to 7. Both the participants at risk for LD (n = 51) and those with TD (n = 56) were randomly divided into two groups: an experimental group that received an intervention with the electronic book and a control group that participated in the regular kindergarten activity during that time. The findings indicated greater improvement in the intervention groups compared with the control groups in the measures “essence of addition” and “ordinal numbers.” Both the group at risk for LD and the group with TD showed significant improvement following the intervention. The implications of these results for young children in general, and for kindergarteners at risk for LD in particular, are discussed.
American Psychological Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR, Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychological Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-V, 5th ed. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
AntonenkoP. D.NiederhauserD. S. (2010) The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext environment. Computers in Human Behavior26(2): 140–150. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.014.
4.
BirshJ. R. (2005) Multisensory teaching of basic language skills, Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
5.
BoonenA. J.de KoningB. B.JollesJ.van der SchootM. (2016) Word problem solving in contemporary math education: A plea for reading comprehension skills training. Frontiers in Psychology7: 191. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00191.
6.
BouckE.FlanaganS.MillerB.BassetteL. (2012) Technology in action. Journal of Special Education Technology27(4): 47–57. doi: 10.1177/016264341202700404.
7.
BowmanB. T.DonovenM. S.BurnsS. B. (2001) Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
8.
BreznitzZ. (1997) Effects of accelerated reading rate on memory for text among dyslexic readers. Journal of Educational Psychology89(2): 289–297. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.289.
9.
BrownL.SherbenouR. J.JohnsenS. K. (1997) Test of nonverbal intelligence, 3rd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
10.
BuckinghamD.ScanlonM. (2003) Education, entertainment, and learning in the home, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
11.
BulgrenJ. A.CartaJ. J. (1992) Examining the instructional contexts of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children59(3): 182–191. doi: 10.1177/001440299305900302.
12.
ClarkR. C.MayerR. E. (2003) E-learning and the science of instruction, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.
13.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2008) Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics. Teaching Children Mathematics14(6): 361–369.
14.
CordovaD. I.LepperM. R. (1996) Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology88(4): 715–730. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715.
15.
CottonK. (1991) Computer-assisted instruction, Portland, OR: School Improvement Program of the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
16.
de JongM. T.BusA. G. (2003) How well suited are electronic books to supporting literacy?. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy3(2): 147–164. doi: 10.1177/14687984030032002.
17.
de JongM. T.BusA. G. (2004) The efficacy of electronic books fostering kindergarten children's emergent story understanding. Reading Research Quarterly39(4): 378–393. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.39.4.2.
18.
DesoteA. (2008) Co-morbidity in mathematical learning disabilities: Rule or exception?. The Open Rehabilitation Journal1(1): 15–26. doi: 10.2174/1874943700801010015.
19.
ElliotA.HallN. (1997) The impact of self-regulatory teaching strategies on “at-risk” preschoolers' mathematical learning in a computer environment. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education8(2–3): 187–198.
20.
Erkut, S. (2003, April). Multicultural adventure stories as medium for teaching math in the early elementary grades: An evaluation. Paper presented at Wellesley Centers for Women Board of Overseers meeting, Wellesley, MA.
21.
Fletcher-FlinnC. M.GravattB. (1995) The efficacy of computer assisted instruction (CAI): A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Computing Research12(3): 219–242. doi: 10.2190/51D4-F6L3-JQHU-9M31.
22.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamletC.PowellS. R.CapizziA. M.SeethalerP. M. (2006) The effects of computer-assisted instruction on number combination skill in at-risk first graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities39(5): 467–475. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390050701.
23.
GearyD. C. (2004) Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities37(1): 4–15. doi: 10.1177/00222194040370010201.
24.
GearyD. C. (2009) Mathematical disabilities: Reflections on cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Learning and Individual Differences20(2): 130–133. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.008.
25.
GerstenR.JordanC. N.FlojoJ. R. (2005) Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities38(4): 293–304. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380040301.
26.
GillinghamA.StillmanB. (1997) Gillingham manual: Remedial training for children with specific disability in reading, spelling and penmanship, 8th ed. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.
27.
GraesserA. C.Hauft-SmithK.CohenA. D.PylesL. D. (1980) Advanced outlines, familiarity, text genre, and retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Education48(4): 209−220. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1980.11011745.
28.
HetzroniO. E. (2004) Literacy and assistive technology for children with special needs. Script7(8): 195–218. (Hebrew).
29.
JohnsonB. (2017) Learning disabilities in children: Epidemiology, risk factors and importance of early intervention. BMH Medical Journal4(1): 31–37.
30.
JohnsonE. O.BreslauN. (2000) Increased risk of learning disabilities in low birth weight boys at age 11 years. Biological Psychiatry47(6): 490–500. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00223-1.
31.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.RamineniC.LocuniakM. N. (2009) Early math matters: Kindergarteners' number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology45(3): 850–867. doi: 10.1037/a0014939.
32.
KimM. K.McKennaJ. W.ParkY. (2017) The use of computer-assisted instruction to improve the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities: An evaluation of the evidence base according to the what works clearinghouse standards. Remedial and Special Education38(4): 233–245. doi: 10.1177/0741932517693396.
33.
KirkS. A.KirkW. D. (1971) Psycholinguistic learning disabilities: Diagnosis and remediation, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
34.
KiruE. W.DoablerC. T.SorrellsA. M.CoocN. A. (2017) A synthesis of technology-mediated mathematics interventions for students with or at risk for mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 1–13. doi: 10.1177/0162643417745835.
35.
KoratO.Segal-DroriO. (2016) E-book reading in different contexts as a literacy facilitator. Early Education and Development27(4): 532–550. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2016.1095613.
36.
KoratO.ShamirO. (2004) Do Hebrew electronic books differ from Dutch electronic books? A replication of a Dutch content analysis. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning20(4): 257–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00078.x.
37.
KoratO.ShamirA.Segal-DroriO. (2014) E-books as a support for young children's language and literacy: the case of Hebrew-speaking children. Early Child Development and Care184(7): 998–1016. doi:10.1080/03004430.2013.833195.
38.
LightJ. G.DeFriesJ. C. (1995) Comorbidity of reading and mathematics disabilities: Genetic and environmental etiologies. Journal of Learning Disabilities28(2): 96–106. doi: 10.1177/002221949502800204.
39.
LipkaO.LesauxN. K.SiegelL. S. (2006) Retrospective analyses of the reading development of grade 4 students with reading disabilities: Risk status and profiles over 5 years. Journal of Learning Disabilities39(4): 364–378. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390040901.
40.
MaorD.CurrieJ.DrewryR. (2011) The effectiveness of assistive technologies for children with special needs: A review of research-based studies. European Journal of Special Needs Education26(3): 283–298. doi: 10.1080/08856257.2011.593821.
41.
MargalitM. (2000) Doch HaVaada LeB'hinat Yesum Hok Hinuch Meyuchad (Doch Margalit) [Report of the committee for the examination of implementation of the special education law (Margalit Report)], Jerusalem, Israel: Ministry of Education (Hebrew).
42.
MargalitM. (2014) Designing policy principles for the treatment of students with learning disabilities, Jerusalem, Israel: Ministry of Education and Culture (Hebrew).
43.
MayerR. E. (2003) The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction13(2): 125–139. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00016-6.
44.
MioduserD.Tur-KaspaH.LeitnerL. (2000) The learning value of computer-based instruction of early reading skills. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning16(1): 54–63. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00115.x.
45.
MishraA. (2003) Age- and school-related differences in recall of verbal items in a story context. Social Science International19: 12–18.
46.
MorenoR.DuranR. (2004) Do multiple representations need explanations? The role of verbal guidance and individual differences in multimedia mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology96(3): 492–503. doi: org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.492.
47.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000) Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: Author.
48.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities (2007) Learning disabilities and young children: Identification and intervention. A report from the National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities, October, 2006. Learning Disability Quarterly30(1): 63–72. doi:10.2307/30035516.
49.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008) Foundation for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
50.
NeumanS. B. (2009) The case for multi-media presentation in learning: A theory of synergy. In: BusA. G.NeumanS. B. (eds) Multimedia and literacy development: Improving achievement for young learners, New York, NY: Taylor & Francis, pp. 44–56.
51.
NiederhauserD. (2008) Educational hypertext research. In: SpectorJ. M.MerrillM. D.van MerrienboerJ.DriscollM. P. (eds) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Erlbaum, pp. 199–210.
52.
Paciga, K. A. (2011). Preschoolers' listening comprehension of digital storybooks. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Graduate College of the University of Illinois, Chicago.
53.
ParaskevopoulosJ. M.KirkS. A. (1969) The development and psychometric characteristics of the revised ITPA, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
54.
ReeceJ. E.CummingsG. (1996) Evaluating speech-based composition methods: Planning, dictation, and the listening word processor. In: LevyC. M.RansdellS. (eds) The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 361–380.
55.
RoskosK.BrueckJ.WidmanS. (2009) Investigating analytic tools for e-book design in early literacy learning. Journal of Interactive Online Learning8(3): 218–240.
56.
ScheiterK.GerjetsP. (2007) Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review19(3): 285–307. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3.
57.
SeoY. J.WooH. (2010) The identification, implementation, and evaluation of critical user interface design features of computer-assisted instruction programs in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Computers and Education55(1): 363–377. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.002.
58.
ShamirA.BaruchD. (2012) Educational e-books: A support for vocabulary and early math for children at risk for learning disabilities. Educational Media International49(1): 33–47. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2012.662623.
59.
ShamirA.KoratO. (2006) How to select CD-ROM storybooks for young children: The teacher's role. The Reading Teacher59(6): 532–543. doi: 10.1598/RT.59.6.3.
60.
ShamirA.KoratO. (2007) Developing an educational e-book for fostering kindergarten children's emergent literacy. Computers in the Schools24(1–2): 125–145. doi:10.1300/J025v24n01_09.
61.
ShamirA.KoratO.FellahR. (2012) Promoting emergent literacy of children at risk for learning disabilities: Do e-books make a difference?. In: ShamirA.KoratO.FellahR. (eds) Technology as a support for literacy achievements for children at risk, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 173–185.
62.
ShamirA.KoratO.ShlaferI. (2011) The effect of activity with e-book on vocabulary and story comprehension: A comparison between kindergarteners at risk of learning disabilities and typically developing kindergarteners. European Journal of Special Needs Education26(3): 311–322. doi: 10.1080/08856257.2011.593824.
63.
ShamirA.LifshitzI. (2013) E-Books for supporting the emergent literacy and emergent math of children at risk for learning disabilities: Can metacognitive guidance make a difference?. European Journal of Special Needs Education28(1): 33–48. doi:10.1080/08856257.2012.742746.
64.
ShamirA.MargalitM. (2011) Technology and students with special educational needs: New opportunities and future directions. European Journal of Special Needs Education26(3): 279–282. doi: 10.1080/08856257.2011.593816.
65.
ShamirA.ShlaferI. (2011) E-books effectiveness in promoting phonological awareness and concept about print: A comparison between children at risk for learning disabilities and typically developing kindergarteners. Computers and Education57(3): 1989–1997. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.001.
66.
SieglerR. S.BoothJ. L. (2004) Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child development75(2): 428–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00684.x.
67.
StanovichK. E. (1986) Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly21(4): 360–407.
68.
StockP.DesoeteA.RoeyersH. (2010) Detecting children with arithmetic disabilities from kindergarten: Evidence from a 3 year longitudinal study on the role of preparatory arithmetic abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities43(3): 250–268. doi: 10.1177/0022219409345011.
69.
SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (2003) Handbook of learning disabilities, New York, NY: Guilford.
70.
TakacsZ. K.SwartE. K.BusA. G. (2014) Can the computer replace the adult for storybook reading? A meta-analysis on the effects of multimedia stories as compared to sharing print stories with an adult. Frontiers in Psychology5: 1366. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01366.
71.
TakacsZ. K.SwartE. K.BusA. G. (2015) Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research85(4): 698–739. doi: 10.3102/0034654314566989.
72.
UnderwoodG.UnderwoodJ. D. M. (1998) Children's interactions and learning outcomes with interactive talking books. Computers and Education30(1–2): 95–102. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(97)00084-5.
73.
Van LuitJ. E. H. (2011) Difficulties with preparatory skills in kindergarteners. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education58(1): 89–95. 10.1080/1034912X.2011.547355.
74.
VaughnS.FuchsD. (2003) Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice18(3): 137–146. doi: 10.1111/1540-5826.00070.
75.
WachobR. (1993) Young minds soar with technology. Computing Teacher20: 53–55.
76.
WolfM. (1991) Naming speed and reading: The contribution of cognitive neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly26(2): 123–141. doi: 10.2307/747978.
77.
WoodC. (2005) Beginning readers’ use of ‘talking books’ software can affect their reading strategies. Journal of Research in Reading28(2): 170–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00261.x.
78.
XinJ. F. (1999) Computer-assisted cooperative learning in integrated classrooms for students with and without disabilities. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual1999(1): 61–78.
79.
XinY. P.JitendraA. K. (2006) Teaching problem-solving skills to middle school students with learning difficulties. In: MontagueM.JitendraA. K. (eds) Teaching mathematics to middle school students with learning difficulties, New York, NY: Guilford, pp. 52–66.
80.
Zilber, D. (2005). The linkage between pre-first grade knowledge of math and cognitive change in analogic thinking (Unpublished master'ss thesis). School of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
81.
ZuckerT. A.MoodyA. K.McKennaM. C. (2009) The effects of electronic books on pre-kindergarten-to-grade 5 students' literacy and language outcomes: A research synthesis. Journal of Educational Computing Research40(1): 47–87. doi: 10.2190/EC.40.1.c.
82.
ZumbachJ.SchwartzN. (2014) Hyperaudio learning for non-linear auditory knowledge acquisition. Computers in Human Behavior41: 365–373. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.024.
