This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of using educational games for learning basic programing skills. For this, we designed the game “Aladdin and his flying carpet” with all pedagogical consideration in mind. We conducted the experiment with 107 sixth grade pupils with no prior knowledge of programing. The game was applied at the beginning of the course in a naturalistic classroom environment. The progress was monitored and evaluated with validated pre- and posttests. The knowledge gain was observed according to the set of learning objectives from the general curricula, and minimum knowledge standards were pursued within those. The result demonstrated that most of the pupils achieved all of the observed learning objectives. The biggest progress was observed with the “complete a program” objective. The least progress was observed with the tasks where “create a program” and “divide a problem” objectives were combined. Strong correlation was found between the final results of the posttest and the scores from playing the game, especially with the more challenging “divide a problem” learning objective. Finally, no significant difference was observed in the results between girls and boys.
Bobrow, D. G., Feurzeig, W., Papert, S., & Solomon, C. (2016). Logo (programming language). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logo_(programming_language).
4.
CarrollJ. (1998) Minimalism beyond the nurnberg funnel, Cambridge, England: MIT Press.
CunniffN.TaylorR. (1987) An empirical study of novices’ program comprehension – Graphical vs. textual representation, Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
Elliott Tew, A. (2010). Assessing fundamental introductory computing concept knowledge in a language independent manner. A dissertation presented to the academic faculty. School of Interactive Computing Georgia Institute of Technology.
18.
FeliciaP. (2009) Digital games in schools: A handbook for teachers, Brussels, Belgium: European Schoolnet.
19.
FletcherG.LuJ. (2009) Education: Human computing skills: Rethinking the K-12 experience. Communications of the ACM - Inspiring Women in Computing52: 23–25.
20.
FreitasS. d. (2007) Learning in Immersive worlds – A review of game-based learning, LOnon, England: JISC.
21.
GeeJ. (2005a) Good video games and good learning. Phi Kappa Phi Forum85(2): 33.
22.
GeeJ. (2005b) What would a state of the art instructional video game look like?Innovate: Journal of Online Education1, 6),Article 1.
23.
GeeJ. (2008) “Learning and Games.” The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games, and learning. In: SalenK.JohnD.CatherineT. (eds) MacArthur foundation series on digital media and learning, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 21–40.
24.
Goldman, K., Gross, P., Heeren, C., Herman, G., Kaczmarczyk, L., Loui, M., & Zilles, C. (2010). Setting the scope of concept inventories for introductory computing subjects. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10, 1–29.
Lode, H., Franchi, G., & Frederiksen, N. (2012). Learning games for programming. (Master thesis). Copenhagen, Denmark: IT University Copenhagen.
34.
MaragosK.GrigoriadouM. (2007) Designing an educational online multiplayer. Proceedings of the Informatics Education Europe II Conference IEEII. 322–331.
35.
Meerbaum-SalantO.ArmoniM.Ben-AriM. (2010) Learning computer science concepts with scratch. Proceedings of the Sixth international workshop on Computing education research. 69–76.
36.
Meerbaum-SalantO.ArmoniM.Ben-AriM. (2011) Habits of programming in scratch. Proceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. 168–172.
37.
Members of the R Development Core Team. (2016). The R project for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org.
PapertS. (1998) Does easy do it? Children, games, and learning. Game Developer magazine,. p. 88.
50.
Parker, M., Guzdial, M., & Engleman, S. (2016). Replication, validation, and use of a language independent CS1 knowledge assessment. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference on international computing education research (pp. 93–101). New York: ACM.
Programming Education Tools Group, U. o. (2015). greenfoot.org. Retrieved from greenfoot.org.
53.
RicoM.Martínez-MuñozG.AlamanX.CamachoD.PulidoE. (2011) Improving the programming experience of high school students by means of virtual worlds. International Journal of Engineering Education27(1): 52–60.
54.
RobinsA.RountreeJ.RountreeN. (2002) Identifying the danger zones: Predictors of success and failure in a CS1 course. Inroads (the SIGCSE Bulletin)34: 121–124.
Sedighian, K., & Sedighian, A. (1996). Can educational computer games help educators learn about the psychology of learning mathematics in children? In 18th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education – The North American Chapter, Florida, USA (1996).
59.
ShafferD.SquireK.HalversonR.GeeJ. (2005) Video games and the future of learning. Phi Delta Kappan87: 104–111.
60.
SharpL. (2012) Stealth learning: Unexpected learning opportunities through games. Journal of Instructional Research87: 42–48.
WastiauP.KearneyC.BergheW. (2009) How are digital games used in schools?, Brussels, Belgium: European Schoolnet.
69.
WeintropD.WilenskyU. (2015) Using commutative assessments to compare conceptual. Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research. 101–110.
WilsonA. K.BedwellW. L.LazzaraH. E.SalasE.BurkeC. S.EstockL. J.ConkeyC. (2009) Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes. Simulation and Gaming40: 217–266.
72.
WinslowL. E. (1996) Programming pedagogy – A psychological overview. SIGCSE Bulletin28: 17–22.
73.
ZagamiJ. (2008) Seeing is understanding: The effect of visualisation in understanding programming concepts, Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Tehnology.
