This article reports a mixed-method research probing the effect of utilizing a blog-buddy system on English for academic purposes learners’ writing performance. Sixty Iranian undergraduate engineering students at Iran University of Science and Technology Virtual Campus participated in this study. Our analysis of the students’ writings indicated that blog-integrated writing instruction accompanied with the implementation of a blog-buddy system resulted in a significant improvement in students’ writing performance. Further, the results of an attitudinal survey revealed that students who received feedback from blog-buddies showed higher positive attitudes toward utilizing blogs for their writing classes. For further investigation, data were gathered through comments the participants left on the weblog and the forums, semistructured interviews, and teacher observations. Four themes emerged, which were used to come up with a framework based on the learner-centred approach. The framework integrates web-based trainings and learners’ learning styles and fosters the learners’ control of their learning experiences.
AlexanderP.MurphyP. (2000) The research base for APA’s leaner-centered psychological principles. In: LambertN.McCombsB. (eds) How students learn, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 25–60.
2.
ArslanR. S.Sahin-KizilA. (2010) How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners?Computer Assisted Language Learning23(3): 183–197.
3.
Asoodar, M., Marandi, S. S., Atai, M. R., & Vaezi, S. (2014). Learner reflections in virtual vs. Blended eap classes. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 533--543.
4.
Asoodar, M., Marandi, S. S., Vaezi, S., & Desmet, P. (2014). Podcasting in a virtual english for academic purposes course: Learner motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 1--22. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2014.937344.
5.
Augar, N., Raitman, R., & Zhou, W. (2004, December 5–8). Teaching and learning online with wikis. Paper presented at the Beyond the Comfort Zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference, Perth.
6.
AzmitiaM. (1996) Peer interactive minds: Developmental, theoretical, and methodological issues. In: BaltesP. B.StaudingerU. M. (eds) Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–162.
7.
BarrR. B.TaggJ. (1995) From teaching to learning—A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning27(6): 12–26.
8.
BlackstoneB.SpiriJ.NaganumaN. (2007) Blogging in English language teaching and learning. Reflections on English Language Teaching6(2): 1–20.
9.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10.
BrunerJ. (1966) Toward a theory of instruction, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Bruns, A., & Humphreys, S. (2005). Wikis in teaching and assessment: The M/Cyclopedia project. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Wikis, Helsinki.
12.
ByronM. (2005) Teaching with tiki. Teaching Philosophy28(2): 105–113.
CarsonJ. G.NelsonG. L. (1996) Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing5(1): 1–19.
15.
CarsonJ. G.NelsonG. L. (1998) ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing7(2): 113–131.
16.
ChiddoD. A. (2006) Student-centered educational technology in the language classroom, Williamsburg, VA: The College of William and Mary School of Education.
17.
CiekanskiM.ChanierT. (2008) Developing online multimodal verbal communication to enhance the writing process in an audio-graphic conferencing environment. ReCALL20(2): 162–182.
18.
Collins, J. W., III, & O'Brien, N. P. (Eds.). (2003). Greenwood dictionary of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
19.
EllisonN.WuY. (2008) Blogging in the classroom: A preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia17(1): 99–122.
20.
Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2006). From Wikipedia to the classroom: Exploring online publication and learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences, Bloomington, IN.
21.
Fountain, R. (2007). Conceptual enhancement via textual plurality: A pedagogical wiki bow towards collaborative structuration. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Wikis, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
22.
FrancoC. D. P. (2008) Using wiki-based peer-correction to develop writing skills of Brazilian EFL learners. Novitas-Royal2(1): 49–59.
23.
GeriN.Naor-ElaizaO. (2008) Beyond adoption: Barriers to an online assignment submission system continued use. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects4(1): 225–241.
HalicO.LeeD.PaulusT.SpenceM. (2010) To blog or not to blog: Student perceptions of blog effectiveness for learning in a college-level course. Internet and Higher Education13: 206–213.
26.
Hampel, T., Selke, H., & Vitt, S. (2005). Deployment of simple user-centered collaborative technologies in educational institutions-experiences and requirements. Paper presented at the Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprise, 2005. 14th IEEE International Workshops on, Linköping Universität, Schweden.
27.
HoM.SavignonS. J. (2007) Face-to-face and computer mediated peer review in EFL writing. CALICO Journal24(2): 269–290.
28.
HsuH. Y.WangS. K.ComacL. (2008) Using audioblogs to assist English language learning: An investigation into student perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning21(2): 181–198.
29.
Huang, S. (1998). A comparison between Chinese EFL students’ peer response sessions held on networked computers and those held in a face-to-face setting. Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the International NELLE Conference, Bielefeld, Germany. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 423685).
30.
HugheyJ. B.WormuthD. R.HartfielF.JacobsH. L. (1983) Teaching ESL composition: Principles and techniques, New York, NY: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
31.
JohnsonW. D. (1991) Student-student interaction: The neglected variable in education. Educational Research10(1): 5–10.
32.
KafaiY.ResnickL. M. (1996) Constructionism in practice, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33.
LambertN.McCombsB. (2000) Introduction: Learner-centered schools and classrooms as a direction for school reform. In: LambertN.McCombsB. (eds) How students learn, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 1–15.
LiuJ.SadlerR. W. (2003) The effects and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. English for Academic Purposes2: 193–227.
36.
LundA.SmørdalO. (2006) Is there a space for the teacher in a wiki? Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Wikis (WikiSym ‘06), Odense, Denmark: ACM Press, pp. 37–46.
37.
MakB.ConiamD. (2008) Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in hong kong. System36(3): 437–455.
38.
MaxwellW. (1998) Supplemental instruction, learning communities, and students studying together. Community College Review26: 1–18.
39.
McManusS. E.RussellJ. E. A. (1997) New directions for mentoring research: An examination of related constructs. Journal of Vocational Behavior51(1): 145–161.
NairS. S.TayL. Y.KohJ. H. L. (2013) Students’ motivation and teachers’ teaching practices towards the use of blogs for writing of online journals. Educational Media International50(2): 108–119.
42.
National Commission on Writing. (2004, September). Writing: A ticket to work … or a ticket out: A survey of business leaders. Retrieved from www.collegeboard.com.
43.
OblingerD.OblingerJ. (2005) Is it age or it: First steps toward understanding the net generation. Educating the Net Generation2(1–2): 20.
44.
OkitaS. Y. (2014) Learning from the folly of others: Learning to self-correct by monitoring the reasoning of virtual characters in a computer-supported mathematics learning environment. Computers & Education71(1): 257–278.
45.
PiagetJ. (1963) Origins of intelligence in children, New York, NY: Norton.
46.
PinkmanK. (2005) Using blogs in the foreign language classroom: Encouraging learner independence. The JALT CALL Journal1(1): 12–24.
47.
Rick, J., Guzdial, M., Holloway-Attaway, K. C. L., & Walker, B. (2002). Collaborative learning at low cost: Coweb use in english composition. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, Boulder, CO.
48.
Schaffert, S., Bischof, D., Bürger, T., Gruber, A., Hilzensauer, W., & Schaffert, S. (2006). Learning with semantic wikis. Paper presented at the SemWiki. First Workshop “SemWiki2006 - From Wiki to Semantics,” co-located with the 3rd Annual European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Budva, Montenegro.
49.
ShangH. F. (2007) An exploratory study of e-mail application on FL writing performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning20(1): 79–96.
50.
SlavinR. E. (1990) Cooperative learning theory, research and practice, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
51.
SpringerL.StanneM. E.DonovanS. S. (1999) Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research69(1): 21–51.
52.
Turgut, Y. (2009). Efl learners’ experience of online writing by PBwiki. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Chesapeake, VA.
53.
VygotskyL. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher mental process, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
WangH. C. (2007) Using weblogs as peer review platform in an EFL writing class. Proceedings of the 24th Conference on English Teaching and Learning, Taipei: Taiwan ELT Publishing Co., Ltd, pp. 400–413.
55.
WarschauerM. (1996) Computer assisted language learning: An introduction. In: FotosS. (ed.) Multimedia language teaching, Tokyo, Japan: Logos International, pp. 3–20.
56.
WarschauerM. (2010) Invited commentary: New tools for teaching writing. Language Learning & Technology14(1): 3–8.
57.
WarschauerM.WareP. (2006) Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research10(1): 157–180.
58.
WarshauerM.WhittakerP. F. (2002) The internet for English language teaching: Guidelines for teachers. In: RichardsJ. C.RenandyaW. A. (eds) Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 368–373.
59.
WellsP. J.CoffeyD. C. (2005) Are they wrong? Or did they just answer a different question? Teaching children. Mathematics12(4): 202–207.
60.
WengerE. (2000) Communities of practice, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
61.
WilliamsJ.JacobsJ. (2004) Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australian Journal of Educational Technology20(2): 232–247.
62.
ZimmermanB.KitsantasA. (1999) Acquiring writing revision skill: Shifting from process to outcome self-regulatory goals. Journal of Educational Psychology91: 241–250.
63.
ZimmermanB.KitsantasA. (2002) Acquiring writing revision and self regulatory skill through observation and evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology94: 660–668.
64.
ZimmermanB.RisembergR. (1997) Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology22: 73–101.
