With the community of inquiry framework, this study seeks to explore the relationship among forms of presence, self-efficacy, and training effectiveness. A total of 210 working professionals participated to the study via online survey and email communication with a valid response rate of 29.53%. The technique of partial least square was used to estimate the measurement and the structural models. The results show that the teaching presence has positive prediction on social presence, self-efficacy, and cognitive presence. Self-efficacy is a full mediator between social presence and cognitive presence. Cognitive presence predicts training effectiveness in the context of Small and Medium Enterprise E-learning School. The practical implications of these findings for small and medium enterprise training in general are discussed.
AesaertK.van BraakJ. (2015) Gender and socioeconomic related differences in performance based ICT competences. Computers & Education84(0): 8–25. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.017.
2.
AkyolZ.GarrisonD. R. (2011) Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education14(3): 183–190.
3.
AlaviM.LeidnerD. E. (2001) Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning-a call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information Systems Research12(1): 1–10.
4.
AlvarezK.SalasE.GarofanoC. M. (2004) An integrated model of training evaluation and effectiveness. Human Resource Development Review3(4): 385–416.
5.
AnagnostopoulosD.BasmadjianK. G.McCroryR. S. (2005) The decentered teacher and the construction of social space in the virtual classroom. Teachers College Record107: 1699–1729.
6.
AndersonT.RourkeL.GarrisonD. R.ArcherW. (2001) Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks5(2): 1–17.
7.
ArbaughJ. B. (2005) How much does “subject matter” matter? A study of disciplinary effects in on-line MBA courses. Academy of Management Learning & Education4: 57–73.
8.
ArbaughJ. B.BangertA.Cleveland-InnesM. (2010) Subject matter effects and the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education13(1–2): 37–44.
9.
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003.
10.
ArchibaldD. (2010) Fostering the development of cognitive presence: Initial findings using the community of inquiry survey instrument. The Internet and Higher Education13(1–2): 73–74. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.001.
11.
ArtW. B. (2009) Building a validity argument for the community of inquiry survey instrument. The Internet and Higher Education12(2): 104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.001.
12.
ArthurW. J.BennettW. J.EdensP. S.BellS. T. (2003) Effectiveness training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology88(2): 234–245.
13.
BakerJ. D. (2004) An investigation of relationships among instructor immediacy and affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom. The Internet and Higher Education7: 1–13.
14.
BanduraA. (1989) Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology25(5): 729–735. doi: 0022-3514/89/$00.75. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.729.
15.
BaoY.XiongT.HuZ.KibellohM. (2013) Exploring gender differences on general and specific computer self-efficacy in mobile learning adoption. Journal of Educational Computing Research49(1): 111–132. doi: 10.2190/EC.49.1.e.
16.
BiggsJ. (1993) From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research & Development12(1): 73–85.
17.
CelaniM. A. A.CollinsH. (2005) Critical thinking in reflective sessions and in online interactions. AILA Review18: 41–57.
18.
CelentinP. (2007) Online training: Analysis of interaction and knowledge building patterns among foreign language teachers. Journal of Distance Education21(3): 39–58.
19.
ChamberlainS.TaylorR. (2011) Online or face-to-face? An experimental study of examiner training. British Journal of Educational Technology42(4): 665–675. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01062.x.
20.
ChenN. S.KinshukC. W.LiuC. C. (2011) Effects of matching teaching strategy to thinking style on learner’s quality of reflection in an online learning environment. Computers & Education56(1): 53–64.
21.
ChoM.-H. (2004) The effects of design strategies for promoting students’ self-regulated learning skills on students’ self-regulation and achievements in online learning environments. Association for Educational Communications and Technology27: 19–23.
22.
CombsG. M.LuthansF. (2007) Diversity training: Analysis of the impact of self-efficacy. Human Resource Development Quarterly18(1): 91–120. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1193.
23.
CrippenK. J.EarlB. L. (2007) The impact of web-based worked examples and self-explanation on performance, problem solving, and self-efficacy. Computers & Education49(3): 809–882.
24.
DeweyJ. (1959) My pedagogic creed, New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
25.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
26.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT. (2003) E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice, London, England: Routledge Falmer.
27.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT.ArcherW. (2000) Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education2(2–3): 87–105.
28.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT.ArcherW. (2001) Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education15: 7–23.
29.
GarrisonD. R.Cleveland-InnesM. (2005) Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education19(3): 133–148.
30.
GarrisonD. R.Cleveland-InnesM.FungT. S. (2010) Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education13(1–2): 31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002.
31.
GunawardenaC. N. (1995) Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications1(2/3): 147–166.
32.
HairJ. F.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2011) PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice19(2): 139–152. doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
33.
HaraN.KlingR. (2000) Student’s distress with a web-based distance education course: An ethnographic study of participants’ experiences. Information, Communication and Society3(4): 557–579.
34.
HoffmanB.SpatariuA. (2008) The influence of self-efficacy and metacognitive prompting on math problem-solving efficiency. Contemporary Educational Psychology33(4): 875–893.
35.
JooY. J.LimK. Y.KimE. K. (2011) Online university students’ satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & Education57: 1654–1664.
36.
KirkpatrickD. (1994) Evaluating training programs: The four levels, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
37.
KlineR. B. (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
KraigerK. (2014) Looking back and looking forward: Trends in training and development research. Human Resource Development Quarterly25(4): 401–408. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21203.
39.
LeeS.-C. (2001) Development of instructional strategy of computer application software for group instruction. Computers & Education37(1): 1–9. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00020-3.
40.
LehmannT.HähnleinI.IfenthalerD. (2014) Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior32: 313–323. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.051.
41.
LimH.LeeS.-G.NamK. (2007) Validating E-learning factors affecting training effectiveness. International Journal of Information Management27(1): 22–35. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.08.002.
42.
LinnenbrinkE. A.PintrichP. R. (2003) The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Journal of Reading & Writing Quarterly19(2): 119–137.
43.
LipmanM. (1991) Thinking in education, London, England: Cambridge University Press.
44.
PaceA. (2013) Learning technology trends in 2013. T+D67(2): 18–18.
45.
PiccianoA. (2002) Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks6(1): 21–40.
46.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
47.
PodsakoffP. M.OrganD. W. (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management12(4): 531–544. doi: 10.1177/014920638601200408.
48.
RobinsonK. (2013) The interrelationship of emotion and cognition when students undertake collaborative group work online: An interdisciplinary approach. Computers & Education62(0): 298–307. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.003.
49.
RosenbergJ. M. (2001) E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
50.
RungtusanathamM.EllramL. M.SiferdS. P.SalikS. (2004) Toward a typology of business education in the internet age. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education for Information2: 101–120.
51.
SáinzM.EcclesJ. (2012) Self-concept of computer and math ability: Gender implications across time and within ICT studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior80(2): 486–499. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.005.
52.
SaitoH.MiwaK. (2007) Construction of a learning environment supporting learners’ reflection: A case of information seeking on the web. Computers & Education49(2): 214–229.
53.
SheaP.BidjeranoT. (2008) Measures of quality in online education: An investigation of the community of inquiry model and the net generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research39(4): 339–361.
54.
SheaP.BidjeranoT. (2009) Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education52(3): 543–553. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007.
55.
SheaP.BidjeranoT. (2010) Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education55(4): 1721–1731.
56.
SheaP.HayesS.SmithS. U.VickersJ.BidjeranoT.PickettA., & Jian, S. (2012) Learning presence: Additional research on a new conceptual element within the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. The Internet and Higher Education15(2): 85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.002.
57.
SheaP.HayesS.UznerS.VickersJ.WildeJ.Gozza-CohenM., & Jian, S. (2012) Learning presence: A new conceptual element within the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. Internet and Higher Education15(2): 89–95.
58.
SheaP.PickettA.PelzW. (2003) A follow-up investigation of teaching presence in the SUNY learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks7(2): 61–80.
59.
ShihH.-P. (2008) Using a cognition-motivation-control view to assess the adoption intention for web-based learning. Computers & Education50(1): 327–337. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.06.001.
60.
SiaC. L.TanB. C. Y.WeiK. K. (2002) Group polarization and computer-mediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity. Information Systems Research13(1): 70–90.
61.
SpectorJ. M. (2008) Cognition and learning in the digital age: Promising research and practice. Computers in Human Behavior24(2): 249–262. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.016.
62.
SteinD. S.WanstreetC. E.CalvinJ.OvertoomC.WheatonJ. E. (2003) Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. American Journal of Distance Education19(2): 105–118.
63.
SteinD. S.WanstreetC. E.GlazerH. R.EngleC. L.HarrisR. A.JohnstonS. M.TrinkoL. A. (2007) Creating shared understanding through chats in a community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education10(2): 103–115. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.02.002.
64.
StoyanoyS.PaulK. (2007) Effect of problem solving support and cognitive styles on idea generation: Implications for technology-enhanced learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education40(1): 49–63.
65.
SwanK.ShihL. F. (2005) On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal Asynchronous Learning Network9(3): 115–136.
66.
TeoT. (2011) Considering common method variance in educational technology research. British Journal of Educational Technology42(5): E94–E96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01202.x.
67.
TømteC.HatlevikO. E. (2011) Gender-differences in self-efficacy ICT related to various ICT-user profiles in Finland and Norway. How do self-efficacy, gender and ICT-user profiles relate to findings from PISA 2006. Computers & Education57(1): 1416–1424. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.011.
68.
Vogel-WalcuttJ. J.FiorellaL.MaloneN. (2013) Instructional strategies framework for military training systems. Computers in Human Behavior29(4): 1490–1498. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.038.
69.
YamnillS.McLeanG. N. (2001) Theories supporting transfer of training. Human Resource Development Quarterly12(2): 195–208. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.7.
70.
ZimmermanB. J. (2002) Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice41: 64–70.
