A broad “postpositivism” characterizes the epistemological basis of contemporary sociology. Nevertheless, sociology remains a multiparadigmatic discipline, home to approaches that differ greatly from each other in method. In this article, I examine questions of epistemology in sociological research by revisiting Adorno and Horkheimer’s critiques of positivism in German sociology. I argue that Adorno and Horkheimer’s articulation of an alternative critical theory provides four central features that remain novel in sociology today: (1) the refusal of a priori methodological or data protocol, (2) a strongly interpretive approach to theorization, (3) a necessarily totalizing approach to theorization, and (4) an active and overt political Marxism. I conclude by comparing implications of Adorno and Horkheimer’s critical sociology with Burawoy’s extended case method, with which it shares many features yet remains distinct.
AdornoTheodor W. [1969] 1976. “Introduction” Pp. 1–67 in The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. Translated AdeyG.FrisbyD.London: Heinemann.
2.
AdornoTheodor W. [1960] 1990. Mahler: A Musical Physiognomy. Translated by JephcottE.Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
3.
AdornoTheodor W. [1958] 1991. “The Essay as Form.” Pp. 3–23 in Notes to Literature: Volume One, edited by TiedermannR. Translated by NicholsenS. W.New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
4.
AdornoTheodor W. [1966] 1993. Negative Dialectics. Translated by AshtonE. B.New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
AndersonElijah. 2002. “The Ideologically Driven Critique.” American Journal of Sociology107(6):1533–50.
6.
BergerPeter L.LuckmannThomas. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York, NY: Penguin.
7.
BoltonDerek. 2008. “The Epistemology of Randomized Controlled Trials and Application in Psychiatry.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology15(2):159–65.
8.
BurawoyMichael. 1998. “The Extended Case Method.” Sociological Theory16(1):4–33.
9.
BurawoyMichael. 2009. The Extended Case Method: Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations, and One Theoretical Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
CharmazKathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
11.
CraneJames. 2024. “Recovering the Kernels of Early Critical Theory.” Margin Notes: A Journal of Critical Theory1:5–20. https://ctwgwebsite.github.io/.
12.
DavisWalter A.1989. Inwardness and Existence: Subjectivity in/and Hegel, Heidegger, Marx, and Freud. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
13.
FeenbergAndrew. 2013. “Marcuse’s Phenomenology: Reading Chapter Six of One-Dimensional Man.” Constellations20(4):604–14.
14.
FeenbergAndrew. 2023. The Ruthless Critique of Everything Existing: Nature and Revolution in Marcuse’s Philosophy of Praxis. New York, NY: Verso Books.
15.
FinkBruce. 1995. The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
FreudSigmund. [1915] 1957. “Répression.” Pp. 141–58 in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume 14. Translated by StracheyJ.London: Hogarth.
17.
FrisbyDavid. 1976. “Introduction to the English Translation” Pp. ix–xliv in The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. London: Heinemann.
18.
GenovNikolai. 2020. “Towards a Paradigmatic Enhancement of Sociology.” International Review of Sociology30(2):311–31.
19.
GiddensAnthony. 1974. Positivism and Sociology. London: Heinemann.
20.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
21.
GoldmannLucien. 1977. Lukács and Heidegger: Towards a New Philosophy. Translated by BoelhowerW. Q.New York, NY: Routledge Revivals.
22.
GordonPeter E.2016. Adorno and Existence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
GouldnerAlvin W.1970. The Coming Crisis in Western Sociology. London: Heinemann.
24.
HalfpennyPeter. 1987. “Laws, Causality, and Statistics: Positivism, Interpretivism, and Realism.” Sociological Theory5(1):33–36.
25.
HeywoodPaolo. 2017. “The Ontological Turn.” In The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by SteinF.
26.
HeideggerMartin. [1927] 1996. Being and Time. Translated by StambaughJ.Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
HonnethAxel. 2000. “The Possibility of a Disclosing Critique of Society: The Dialectic of Enlightenment in Light of Current Debates in Social Criticism.” Constellations7(1):116–27.
28.
HorkheimerMax. [1937] 1972. “Traditional and Critical Theory.” Pp. 188–243 in Critical Theory: Selected Essays, edited and translated by O’ConnellM. J.New York, NY: Continuum.
29.
HouseJames S.2019. “The Culminating Crisis of American Sociology and Its Role in Social Science and Public Policy: An Autobiographical, Multimethod, Reflexive Perspective.” Annual Review of Sociology45:1–26.
30.
Hullot-KentorRobert. 1997. “Translator’s Introduction.” Pp. xi–xxi in Aesthetic Theory, edited by AdornoG.TiedermannR.New York, NY: Continuum.
31.
KimHwansuk. 2019. “Decolonization and the Ontological Turn of Sociology.” Journal of Asian Sociology48(4):443–54.
32.
KompridisNikolas. 2006. Critique and Disclosure: Critical Theory between Past and Future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
KristevaJulia. 1987. In the Beginning Was Love: Psychoanalysis and Faith. Translated by GoldhammerA.New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
34.
KuhnThomas S.1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
LatourBruno. 1988. Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
LatourBruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
37.
MarcuseHerbert. [1928] 2005. “Contributions to a Phenomenology of Historical Materialism.” Pp. 1–33 in Heidegerrian Marxism, edited by WolinR.AbromeitJ.Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
38.
LöwyMichaelSayreRobert. 2002. Romanticism against the Tide of Modernity. Translated by PorterC.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39.
LukácsGyörgy. [1923] 1971. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Translated by LivingstoneR.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
MacKenzieDonald. 2007. Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
MeleVincenzo. 2015. “At the Crossroad of Magic and Positivism: Roots of an Evidential Paradigm through Benjamin and Adorno.” Journal of Classical Sociology15(2):139–53.
42.
PedersonMorten Axel. 2020. “Anthropological Epochés: Phenomenology and the Ontological Turn.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences50(6):610–46.
43.
PopperKarl. [1934] 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.
44.
PopperKarl. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
45.
ReedIsaac A.2010. “Epistemology Contextualized: Social-Scientific Knowledge in a Postpositivist Era.” Sociological Theory28(1):20–39.
46.
RoseGillian. 1991. Dialectic of Nihilism: Post-structuralism and Law. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
WacquantLoïc.2002. “Scrutinizing the Street: Poverty, Morality, and the Pitfalls of Urban Ethnography.” American Journal of Sociology107(6):1468–1532.
49.
WolinRichard. 2005. “Introduction: What Is Heideggerian Marxism?” Pp. xi–xxx in Heidegerrian Marxism, edited by WolinR.AbromeitJ.Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
