In this article, I discuss how network-analytic exploitations of the duality of agents and social object enable the study of fields from two analytical vantage points. Such an approach entails: (1) the discovery of field positions through identification of cultural holes within a network of agents’ tastes and (2) the measurement of interobject competition to identify social objects contributing most to the organization of field positions. Characterizing this approach as a mutual-alignment framework, I discuss its analytical advantages. At the level of the agent, I suggest that positions within fields retrieve their value by virtue of their relational style, or their relationship to the field’s cultural holes. At the level of the social object, I provide an analytical framework for identifying structurally important social objects through relationships of asymmetrical competition and incommensurability, or a lack of substitutability. I provide an empirical application to a population of film critics.
AbbottAndrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AlexanderJeffrey C.SmithPhilip. 2003. “The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Elements of a Structural Hermeneutics.” Pp. 11–26 in The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology, edited by Alexander.J.C.New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
AlexanderJeffrey C.SmithPhilip. 1993. “The discourse of American civil society: A new proposal for cultural studies.” Theory and Society22:151–207.
4.
AllenMichael PatrickLincolnAnne E.. 2004. “Critical Discourse and the Cultural Consecration of American Films.” Social Forces82(3):871–94.
5.
BakerWayne E.FaulknerRobert R.. 1991. “Role as Resource in the Hollywood Film Industry.” American Journal of Sociology97(2):279–309.
6.
BaumannShyon. 2001. “Intellectualization and Art World Development: Film in the United States.” American Sociological Review66(3):404–26.
7.
BaumannShyon. 2007a. “A general theory of artistic legitimation.” Poetics35:47–65.
8.
BaumannShyon. 2007b. Hollywood Highbrow: From Entertainment to Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BourdieuPierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BourdieuPierre. 1985. “The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups.” Theory and Society14(6):723–44.
11.
BourdieuPierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
BourdieuPierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
BourdieuPierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
BourdieuPierre. 1996a. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
BourdieuPierre. 1996b. The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
BourdieuPierre. 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
BourdieuPierre. 2005. The Social Structures of the Economy. New York: Polity.
18.
BourdieuPierreWacquantLoïc J. D.. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
BreigerRonald L.1974. “The Duality of Persons and Groups.” Social Forces53(2):181–90.
20.
BreigerRonald L.2000. “A Tool Kit for Practice Theory.” Poetics27(2–3):91–115.
21.
BrubakerRogers. 1985. “Rethinking Classical Theory.” Theory and Society14(6):745–75.
22.
BrysonBethany. 1996. “‘Anything but Heavy Metal’: Symbolic Exclusion and Musical Dislikes.” American Sociological Review61(5):884–99.
23.
BurtRonald S.1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
CarrollGlenn R.1985. “Concentration and Specialization: Dynamics of Niche Width in Populations of Organizations.” American Journal of Sociology90(6):1262–83.
25.
CarrollGlenn R.SwaminathanAnand. 2000. “Why the Microbrewery Movement? Organizational Dynamics of Resource Partitioning in the U.S. Brewing Industry.” American Journal of Sociology106(3):715–62.
26.
ColemanJames S.1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology94:S95–120.
27.
DiMaggioPaul. 1987. “Classification in Art.” American Sociological Review52(4):440–55.
28.
DiMaggioPaulPowellWalter W.. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Collective Rationality and Institutional Isomorphism in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review48(2):147–60.
29.
EmirbayerMustafaJohnsonVictoria. 2008. “Bourdieu and Organizational Analysis.” Theory and Society37(1):1–44.
30.
FishStanley. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
FriedlandRoger. 2009. “The Endless Fields of Pierre Bourdieu.” Organization16(6):887–917.
32.
GansHerbert. 1974. Popular Culture and High Culture. New York: Basic Books.
33.
GodartFrédéric C.WhiteHarrison C.. “Switchings under Uncertainty: The Coming and Becoming of Meanings.” Poetics38(6):567–86.
34.
GoldbergAmir. 2011. “Mapping Shared Understandings Using Relational Class Analysis: The Case of the Cultural Omnivore Reexamined.” American Journal of Sociology116(5):1397–436.
35.
GriswoldWendy. 1987. “The Fabrication of Meaning: Literary Interpretation in the United States, Great Britain, and the West Indies.” American Journal of Sociology92(5):1077–117.
36.
KaufmanJason. 2004. “Endogenous Explanation in the Sociology of Culture.” Annual Review of Sociology30:335–57.
LakoffGeorge. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
LeiferEric M.1988. “Interaction Preludes to Role Setting: Exploratory Local Action.” American Sociological Review53(6):865–78.
40.
LenaJennifer C.2012. Banding Together: How Communities Create Genres in Popular Music. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
LizardoOmar. 2006. “How Cultural Tastes Shape Personal Networks.” American Sociological Review71(5):778–807.
42.
LizardoOmar. 2009. “The Comparative Analysis of Organizational Forms: Considering Field and Ecological Approaches.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations26:117–51.
43.
LizardoOmar. 2010. “Beyond the Antinomies of Structure: Levi-Strauss, Giddens, Bourdieu, and Sewell.” Theory and Society39(6):651–88.
44.
LizardoOmar. 2014. “Omnivorousness as the Bridging of Cultural Holes: A Measurement Strategy.” Theory and Society43(3):395–419.
45.
LizardoOmarSkilesSara. 2012. “Reconceptualizing and Theorizing ‘Omnivorousness’: Genetic and Relational Mechanisms.” Sociological Theory30(4):263–82.
46.
LizardoOmarStrandMichael. 2010. “Skills, Toolkits, Contexts and Institutions: Clarifying the Relationship between Different Approaches to Cognition in Cultural Sociology.” Poetics38(2):205–28.
47.
MarkNoah. 1998. “Birds of a Feather Sing Together.” Social Forces77(2):453–85.
48.
MartinJohn Levi. 2003. “What Is Field Theory?”American Journal of Sociology109(1):1–49.
49.
MartinJohn Levi. 2011. The Explanation of Social Action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
MartinJohn Levi. 2014. “Action and Reaction: Response to Bradford.” Pp. 231–58 in Mediations of Social Life in the 21st Century, edited by DahmsH. F.. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
51.
McDonnellTerence E.2010. “Cultural Objects as Objects: Materiality, Urban Space, and the Interpretation of AIDS Campaigns in Accra, Ghana.” American Journal of Sociology115(6):1800–52.
52.
McPhersonMiller. 1983. “An Ecology of Affiliation.” American Sociological Review48(4):519–32.
53.
MohrJohn W.DuquenneVincent. 1997. “The Duality of Culture and Practice: Poverty Relief in New York City, 1888–1917.” Theory and Society26(2):305–56.
54.
MohrJohn W.Guerra-PearsonFrancesca. 2010. “The Duality of Niche and Form: The Differentiation of Institutional Space in New York City, 1888–1917.” Pp. 321–368 in Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution, (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 31), edited by HsuG.KocakO.NegroG.. Bingley, UK: Emerald Books.
55.
MurphyRaymond. 1988. Social Closure: The Theory of Monopolization and Exclusion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
56.
PachuckiMark A.BreigerRonald L.. 2010. “Cultural Holes: Beyond Relationality in Social Networks and Culture.” Annual Review of Sociology36:205–24.
57.
PadgettJohn F.AnsellChristopher K.. 1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology98(6):1259–319.
58.
PetersonRichard. 1992. “Understanding Audience Segmentation: From Elite and Mass to Omnivore and Univore.” Poetics21(4):243–58.
59.
PetersonRichard A.KernRoger M.. 1996. “Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore.” American Sociological Review61(5):900–07.
60.
RaoHayagreevaMoninPhilippeDurandRodolphe. 2003. “Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy.” American Journal of Sociology108(4):795–843.
SchudsonMichael. 1989. “How Culture Works.” Theory and Society18(2):153–80.
63.
SimmelGeorg. 1955. Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. New York: Free Press.
64.
SimmelGeorg. 1971. Georg Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65.
StarSusan LeighGriesemerJames R.. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science19(3):387–420.
66.
StovelKatherineShawLynette. 2012. “Brokerage.” Annual Review of Sociology38:139–58.
67.
SwartzDavid. 1997. Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
SwidlerAnn. 2001. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
TverskyAmos. 1977. “Features of Similarity.” Psychological Review84(4):327–52.
70.
WassermanStanleyFaustKatherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71.
WhiteHarrison C.BoormanScott A.BreigerRonald L.. 1976. “Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions.” American Journal of Sociology81(4):730–80.
72.
WohlHannah. 2015. “Community Sense: The Cohesive Power of Aesthetic Judgment.” Sociological Theory33(4):299–326.
