Habitual action has been an important concept in sociological theory insofar as it allows for a conceptualization of action that does not rely on paradigmatic loyalty to a rational decision-making subject. One insight from theories of habit that is of particular importance for understanding how habit structures experience is the idea that habits are always habits in a world: we act in a material environment that is itself constitutive of action. Relatively little attention, however, has been paid to the ways in which the material environment is preconfigured for action by particular forms of embodiment. Drawing on disability studies as well as an empirical consideration of the experiences of people with physical disabilities and the attendant service providers who work with them, we develop a model of habit that accounts for the variability in habit formation and maintenance that characterizes lived experience.
AllenChris. 2004. “Bourdieu’s Habitus, Social Class and the Spatial Worlds of Visually Impaired Children.” Urban Studies41(3):487–506.
2.
AngusJanKontosPiaDyckIsabelMcKeeverPatriciaPolandBlake. 2005. “The Personal Significance of Home: Habitus and the Experience of Receiving Long-term Home Care.” Sociology of Health and Illness27(2):161–87.
3.
AtkinsonWill. 2010. “Phenomenological Additions to the Bourdieusian Toolbox: Two Problems for Bourdieu, Two Solutions from Schutz.” Sociological Theory28(1):1–19.
4.
BergerPeterLuckmannThomas. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Random House.
5.
BernsteinRichard J.2010. The Pragmatic Turn. Malden, MA: Wiley.
6.
BourdieuPierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BourdieuPierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
BourdieuPierre. 2001. Masculine Domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
BourdieuPierreWacquantLoïc. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
CamicCharles. 1986. “The Matter of Habit.” American Journal of Sociology91(5):1039–87.
11.
ChappellAnn L.1992. “Towards a Sociological Critique of the Normalisation Principle.” Disability, Handicap and Society7(1):35–51.
12.
CharmazKathy. 1995. “The Body, Identity, and Self.” The Sociological Quarterly36(4):657–80.
13.
CoyMaddy. 2009. “This Body Which Is Not Mine: The Notion of the Habit Body, Prostitution and (Dis)embodiment.” Feminist Theory10(1):61–75.
14.
CranfordCynthia J., 2005. “Networks of Exploitation: Immigrant Labor and the Restructuring of the Los Angeles Janitorial Industry.” Social Problems52(3):379–97.
15.
CranfordCynthia J.MillerDiana. 2013. “Emotion Management from the Client’s Perspective: The Case of Personal Home Care.” Work, Employment and Society27(5):785–801.
16.
CrossleyNick. 1995. “Merleau-Ponty, the Elusive Body and Carnal Sociology.” Body & Society1:43–63.
17.
CrossleyNick. 2001. “The Phenomenological Habitus and Its Construction.” Theory and Society30(1):81–120.
18.
CrossleyNick. 2013. “Habit and Habitus.” Body & Society19(2–3):136–61.
19.
DaltonBenjamin. 2004. “Creativity, Habit, and the Social Products of Creative Action: Revising Joas, Incorporating Bourdieu.” Sociological Theory22(4):603–22.
20.
D’AndradeRoy. 1995. The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
DeweyJohn. 1930. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: Modern Library.
22.
DeweyJohn. [1925] 1958. Experience and Nature. New York: Dover Publications.
23.
DiedrichLisa. 2001. “Breaking Down: A Phenomenology of Disability.” Literature and Medicine20(2):209–30.
24.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W.1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review48(2):147–60.
25.
FinkelsteinVic. 1988. “To Deny or Not to Deny Disability.” Physiotherapy74(12):650–52.
26.
FrankArthur W.1990. “Bringing Bodies Back in: A Decade Review.” Theory, Culture and Society7(1):131–62.
27.
GibsonBarbara E.YoungNancy L.UpshurRoss E. G.McKeeverPatricia. 2007. “Men on the Margin: A Bourdieusian Examination of Living into Adulthood with Muscular Dystrophy.” Social Science and Medicine65(3):505–17.
28.
GiddensAnthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
GoodleyDan. 2004. “Who Is Disabled? Exploring the Scope of the Social Model of Disability.” Pp. 118–33 in Disabling Barriers, Enabling Environments, edited by SwainJ.FrenchS.BarnesC.ThomasC.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
GrossNeil. 2009. “A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms.” American Sociological Review74(3):358–79.
31.
HoffmanMichael. 2012. “Bodies Completed: On the Physical Rehabilitation of Lower Limb Amputees.” Health17(3):229–45.
32.
HughesBillPattersonKevin. 1997. “The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Toward a Sociology of Impairment.” Disability & Society12(3):325–40.
33.
IgnatowGabriel. 2007. “Theories of Embodied Knowledge: New Directions for Cultural and Cognitive Sociology?” Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior37:115–35.
34.
ImrieRob. 2012. “Universalism, Universal Design, and Equitable Access to the Built Environment.” Disability and Rehabilitation34(10):873–82.
35.
JamesWilliam. [1890] 1981. Principles of Psychology, Vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
JamesWilliam. 1967. “Habit.” Pp. 9–20 in The Writings of William James, edited by McDermottJ. J.New York: Random House.
37.
JoasHans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
KellyChristine. 2014. “Re/Moving Care from the Ontario Direct Funding Program: Altering Conversations among Disability and Feminist Scholars.” Social Politics21(1):1–24.
39.
KontosPia C.NaglieGary. 2009. “Tacit Knowledge of Caring and Embodied Selfhood.” Sociology of Health and Illness31(5):688–704.
40.
LeschzinerVaninaGreenAdam I.2013. “Thinking about Food and Sex: Deliberate Cognition in the Routine Practices of a Field.” Sociological Theory31(2):116–44.
41.
LizardoOmar. 2004. “The Cognitive Origins of Bourdieu’s Habitus.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour34(4):375–401.
42.
MartinJohn L.2011. The Explanation of Social Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
MeadGeorge H.[1934] 1962. Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Merleau-PontyMaurice. [1945] 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge.
45.
Merleau-PontyMaurice. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
46.
MeyerMichelleDonellyMichelleWeerakoonPatricia. 2007. “‘They’re Taking the Place of My Hands’: Perspectives of People Using Personal Care.” Disability and Society22(6):595–608.
47.
MurryCraig D.2005. “The Social Meaning of Prosthesis Use.” Journal of Health Psychology10:425–41.
48.
OliverMichael. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. London: McMillian Palgrave.
49.
PadillaRené. 2003. “Clara: A Phenomenology of Disability.” American Journal of Occupational Therapy57(4):413–23.
50.
SchneiderhanErik. 2011. “Pragmatism and Empirical Sociology: The Case of Jane Addams and Hull-House, 1889–1895” Theory and Society40(6):589–617.
51.
ScullyJackie L.2012. “Disability and the Thinking Body.” Pp. 139–59 in Embodied Selves, edited by Gonzalez-ArnalS.LennonK.New York: Palgrave McMillan.
52.
SeymourWendy. 1998. Remaking the Body: Rehabilitation and Change. New York: Routledge.
53.
ShakespeareTom. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. New York: Routledge.
54.
ShillingChris. 1993. The Body and Social Theory. London: SAGE.
55.
TomasiniFloris. 2008. “Embodying Loss and the Puzzle of Existence.” The Sociological Review. 56(s2):249–63.
56.
TurnerBryan S.1984. The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. London: SAGE.
57.
TurnerBryan S.2001. “Disability and the Sociology of the Body.” Pp. 252–66 in Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by AlbrechtG. L.SteelmanK. D.BuryM.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
58.
VaiseyStephen. 2009. “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-process Model of Culture in Action.” American Journal of Sociology114(6):1675–715.
59.
WacquantLoïc. 2004. Body and Soul: Notebooks of an Apprentice Boxer. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
WacquantLoïc. 2014. “Habitus as Topic and Tool: Reflections on Becoming a Prizefighter.” Qualitative Research in Psychology8(1):81–92.
61.
WeberMax. [1905] 1958. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
62.
WhitfordJosh. 2002. “Pragmatism and the Untenable Dualism of Means and Ends: Why Rational Choice Theory Does Not Deserve Paradigmatic Privilege.” Theory and Society31(3):325–63.
63.
YamakiChikako K.YamazakiYoshihiko. 2004. “‘Instruments’, ‘Employees’, ‘Companions’, ‘Social Assets’: Understanding Relationships between Persons with Disabilities and Their Assistants in Japan.” Disability and Society19(1):31–46.
