The dominant approach to the public sphere is characterized by idealism and normativism. It overemphasizes civic-minded or civil discourse, envisions unrealistically egalitarian and widespread participation, has difficulty dealing with consequential public events, and neglects the spatial core of the public sphere and the effects of visibility. I propose a semiotic theory that approaches the public sphere through general sensory access. This approach enables a superior understanding of all public events, discursive or otherwise. It also captures the dialectical relationship between the public sphere and politics by (1) specifying the mechanisms through which visibility and publicity become resources or constraints for political actors, (2) explaining the political regulation of visibility, (3) showing the central role that struggles over the contents of public spaces play in political conflict, and (4) analyzing the links among social structure, social norms, and political action in the transformation of the public sphere.
AnechiaricoFrankJacobsJames B.1996. The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity: How Corruption Control Makes Government Ineffective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
ArendtHannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
ArièsPhilippe. 1976. Western Attitudes toward Death from the Middle Ages to the Present. London: Marion Boyars.
BaiocchiGianpaolo. 2003. “Emergent Public Spheres: Talking Politics in Participatory Governance.” American Sociological Review68:52–74.
11.
BakerKeith. 1990. Inventing the French Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BarthesRoland. 1967. Système de la mode [The System of Fashion]. Paris: Seuil.
13.
BeiselNicole. 1997. Imperiled Innocents: Anthony Comstock and Family Reproduction in Victorian American. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
BenhabibSeyla. 1992. “Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jurgen Habermas.” Pp. 73–98 in Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by CalhounC.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
BensonRodneySaguyAbigail. 2005. “Constructing Social Problems in an Age of Globalization: A French-American Comparison.” American Sociological Review70:233–59.
16.
BlackDonald. 1993. The Social Structure of Right and Wrong. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
BoltanskiLuc. 1990. L’Amour et la justice comme compétence [Love and Justice as Competences]. Paris: Métaillié.
18.
BoorstinDaniel J.1961. The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-events in America. New York: Harper and Row.
19.
BracePaulHinckelyBarbara. 1992. Follow the Leader: Opinion Polls and the Modern Presidents. New York: Basic Book.
20.
CalhounCraig. 1992. “Introduction: Habermas and the Public Sphere.” Pp. 1–50 in Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by CalhounC.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
CalhounCraig. 1993. “Civil Society and the Public Sphere.” Public Culture5:267–80.
22.
CentolaD.WillerR.MacyM.2005. “The Emperor’s Dilemma: A Computational Model of Self-Enforcing Norms.” American Journal of Sociology110:1009–40.
23.
ChweMichael. 2002. Rational Ritual. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
CohenJeanAratoAndrew. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
CollinsGail. 1998. Scorpion Tongues. New York: William Morrow.
26.
CollinsRandall. 2005. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
CorrellShelley J.RidgewayCecilia L.ZuckermanEzra W.BlochSaraJankSharon. 2012. “It’s the Conventional Thought that Counts: How Third-order Inference Produces Status Advantage.” Working paper.
28.
DahlgrenPeter. 1995. Television and the Public Sphere: Citizenship, Democracy and the Media. London: Sage Publications.
29.
D’EmilioJohnFreedmanEstelle B.1988. Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
DouglasMary. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Praeger.
31.
DrewElizabeth. 2006. “Power Grab.” The New York Review of Books53:10–5.
32.
EdwardsGeorge C.III.1996. “Frustration and Folly: Bill Clinton and the Public Presidency.” Pp 234–61 in The Clinton Presidency: First Appraisals, edited by CampbellC.RockmanB. A.London: Chatham House.
33.
EleyGeoff. 1992. “Nations, Publics, and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth Century.” Pp. 289–339 in Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by CalhounC.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
EliasNorbert. 1982. Power and Civility. New York: Pantheon.
35.
EliasophNina. 1998. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
ElshtainJean Bethke. 1981. Public Man, Private Woman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
EmirbayerMustafaShellerMimi. 1999. “Publics in History.” Theory and Society28:145–97.
38.
ErmakoffIvan. 2008. Ruling Oneself Out: A Theory of Collective Abdications. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39.
FargeArlette. 1992. Dire et mal dire, l’opinion publique au XVIIIe siècle [Subversive Words: Public Opinion in Eighteenth-Century France]. Paris: Seuil.
40.
FerreeMyra MarxGamsonWilliam A.GerhardsJürgenRuchtDieter. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
FinleyMoses. 1983. Politics in the Ancient World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
FisherClaude S.1981. “The Public and Private Worlds of City Life.” American Sociological Review46:306–16.
43.
FoucaultMichel. 1979. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books.
44.
FraserNancy. 1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Pp. 109–42 in Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by CalhounC.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
FrazerJames George. 1994. The Golden Bough. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
FriedlaenderSaul. 1997. Nazi Germany and the Jews, Vol. I. New York.
47.
GamsonJoshua. 1994. Claims to Fame. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
GarmentSuzanne. 1991. Scandal: The Culture of Mistrust in America. New York: Random House.
49.
GatrellV. A. C.1994. The Hanging Tree: Execution and the English People, 1770-1868. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
GlazerNathanLillaMark, eds. 1987. The Public Face of Architecture. New York: Free Press.
51.
GoffmanErving. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.
52.
GöleNilüfer. 1997. Forbidden Modern: Veiling and Civilization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
53.
GreenbergDavid. 1988. The Construction of Homosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
GriffithsRichard. 1991. The Use of Abuse: The Polemics of the Dreyfus Affair and its Aftermath. Oxford: Berg.
55.
GrossmanMichaelKumarMartha. 1981. Portraying the President: The White House and the News Media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
56.
HabermasJurgen. 1997. “The Public Sphere.” Pp. 105–08 in Contemporary Political Philosophy, edited by GoodinR. E.Petit.P.Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
57.
HabermasJurgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
HarveyAnna. 1999. “Partisanship as a Social Convention.” Working paper, New York University.
60.
HecloHugh. 1996. “Presidential Power and Public Prestige: A ‘Snarly Sort of Politics.’” Paper presented at the Presidential Power Revisited Conference, Washington, DC.
61.
HirschmanAlbert O.1982. Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
HuizingaJohan. 1954. The Waning of the Middle Ages. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
63.
IkegamiEiko. 2005. Bonds of Civility: Aesthetic Networks and the Political Origins of Japanese Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
JacobsJane. 1961. The Life and Death of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage.
65.
KatzJack. 2001. How Emotions Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66.
KernellSamuell. 1997. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
67.
KoopmansRuud. 2004. “Movements and Media: Selection Processes and Evolutionary Dynamics in the Public Sphere.” Theory and Society33:367–91.
68.
KoselleckReinhard. 1988. Critique and Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69.
KurtzHoward. 1998. Spin Cycle: Inside the Clinton Propaganda Machine. New York: Free Press.
70.
LandesJoan B.1988. Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
71.
LangGladysLangKurt. 1983. The Battle for Public Opinion: The President, the Press, and the Polls during Watergate. New York: Columbia University Press.
72.
LashChristopher. 1979. Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged. New York: Basic Books.
73.
LeckieBarbara. 1999. Culture and Adultery: The Novel, the Newspaper and the Law, 1857–1914. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
74.
LichterRobert S.RichterLinda S.RothmanStanley. 1994. Prime Time: How TV Portrays American Culture. Lanham, MD: Regnery Publications.
75.
LichtermanPaul. 1999. “Talking Identity in the Public Sphere: Broad Visions and Small Spaces in Sexual Identity Politics.” Theory and Society28:101–41.
76.
LoflandL.1973. A World of Strangers. New York: Basic Books.
77.
LowiTheodore. 1985. The Personal President: Power Invested, Promise Unfulfilled. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
78.
MacKinnonCatherine A.1987. Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79.
MalinowskiBronislaw. 1926. Crime and Custom in Savage Society. New York: Humanities Press.
80.
MalteseJohn Anthony. 1992. Spin Control. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
81.
MansbridgeJane. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
82.
MarcusSteven. 1975. The Other Victorians. New York: Basic Books.
83.
MasurLouis. 1989. Rites of Execution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
84.
MayhewDavid. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–2002. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
85.
MeyrowitzJoshua. 1985. No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
86.
MischeAnn. 2009. Partisan Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
87.
NegtOskarKlugeAlexander. 1993. The Public Sphere and Experience. Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletariat Public Sphere. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
88.
NeumanW. Russell. 1986. The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89.
NeustadtRichard. 1997. The Politics of Mistrust. In NyeJoseph S.ZelikowPhilip D.KingDavid C., editors. Why People Don’t Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
90.
OliverPamela E.MyersDaniel J.1999. “How Events Enter the Public Sphere: Conflict, Location, and Sponsorship in Local Newspaper Coverage of Public Events.” American Journal of Sociology105:38–87.
91.
PatemanCarol. “Feminist Critiques of Public/Private Dichotomy.” Pp. 282–303 in Public and Private Social Life, edited by BennS.GaussG.London: Croom Helm.
92.
PosnerRichard. 2006. Not a Suicide Pact: The Constitution in a Time of National Emergency. New York: Oxford University Press.
93.
PosnerRichard. 2001. “The Speech Market and the Legacy of Schenck.” Pp. 120–51 in Eternally Vigilant: Free Speech in the Modern Era, edited by BollingerL. C.StoneG. R.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
94.
PutnamRobert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
95.
RiesmanDavid. 1942. “Democracy and Defamation: Control of Group Libel.” Columbia Law Review42:727–1123.
96.
RozellMark J.2002. Executive Privilege: Presidential Power, Secrecy, and Accountability. Kansas City, KS: University Press of Kansas.
97.
RyanMary P.1990. Women in Public: Between Banners and Ballots, 1825-1880. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
98.
SabatoLarry. 1993. Feeding Frenzy: How Attack Journalism Has Transformed American Politics. New York: Free Press.
99.
SchlesingerArthur. 2004. The Imperial Presidency. Boston: Mariner Books.
100.
SchudsonMichael. 1998. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Free Press.
101.
SenArmatya K.1967. “Isolation, Assurance, and the Social Rate of Discount.” Quarterly Journal of Economics81:112–24.
102.
SennettRichard. 1977. The Fall of Public Man. New York: Knopf.
103.
SomersMargaret R.1993. “Citizenship and the Place of the Public Sphere: Law, Community, and Political Culture in the Transition to Democracy.” American Sociological Review58:587–620.
104.
SominIlya. 2004. “When Ignorance Isn’t Bliss: How Political Ignorance Threatens Democracy.” Policy Analysis525:1–27.
105.
SoysalYasemin Nuhoglu. 1997. “Changing Parameters of Citizenship and Claims-Making: Organized Islam in European Public Spheres.” Theory and Society26:509–27.
106.
SpierenburgPieter. 1984The Spectacle of Suffering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
107.
StarrPaul. 2004. The Creation of the Media. New York: Basic Books.
StoneGeoffrey. 2004. Perilous Times: Free Speech in Wartime from the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terrorism. New York: Norton.
110.
SummersJohn. 2000. “What Happened to Sex Scandals? Politics and Peccadilloes, Jefferson to Kennedy.” Journal of American History87:825–54.
111.
SunsteinCass. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
112.
SwidlerAnn. 2001. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
113.
TerrotCharles. 1979. The Maiden Tribute. London: Frederick Muller.
114.
ThompsonDenis F.1995. Ethics in Congress: From Individual to Institutional Corruption. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
115.
ThompsonJohn. 2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge: Polity.
116.
TullisJeffrey. 1988. The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
117.
WarnerMichael. 1990. Letters of the Republic: Publication and Public Sphere in Eighteenth-century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
118.
WickhamGary. 2010. “Sociology, the Public Sphere, and Modern Government: A Challenge to the Dominance of Habermas.” British Journal of Sociology. 61:155–75.
119.
WolfeAlan. 2007. “Social Skills: The Civil Sphere” The New RepublicApril23:56–60.
120.
YoungMichael. 2003. “Before the Shooting Started: Civic Engagement and Culture War in Tocqueville’s America.” Unpublished manuscript.
121.
ZaretDavid. 1999. Origins of Democratic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
122.
ZuckermanEzra. 2010. “What if We Had Been in Charge? The Sociologist as Builder of Rational Institutions.” Pp. 359 Social Skills: The Civil Sphere 78 in Markets on Trial, edited by LounsburyM.Hirsch.P. M.Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
