Although public budgeting is considered one of governments’ most crucial policy statements for economic development outcomes, scholarly works that explain the linkages between the two are scant. Drawing on the budgeting system for theoretical context, this article examines the perception of local administrators on the effects of three budgeting practices—planning, budgeting, and evaluation —on economic development outcomes. It utilizes survey data from the ICMA’s 2014 Economic Development Survey and U.S. Census Bureau and logistic regressions to examine the determinants of four economic development outcomes—tax base, job creation, quality of life, and environmental sustainability. The results show that planning impacts sustainability, budgeting influences tax base, environmental sustainability, and job creation. Lastly, evaluation has consequences for the quality of life, tax base, and job creation. The study emphasizes how differing perceptions of budgetary practices shape economic development outcomes, highlighting the necessity of a system approach. It identifies critical leverage points within the budgeting system, where targeted actions can significantly influence multiple economic development outcomes. The study contributes to the Government Finance Officers Association’s (GFOA) Best Practices for economic development.
AbutabenjehS.NukpezahJ. A.AzharA. (2022). Do smart cities technologies contribute to local economic development?Economic Development Quarterly, 36(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424211053599
2.
AhmaduA. S.NukpezahJ. A. (2022). Disasters, jurisdictional vulnerability, and local tax revenues. Public Administration Quarterly, 46(2), 129–154.
3.
Al-AliJ. (2012). Government budgeting and economic development in Iraq. International Journal of Contemporary Iraqi Studies, 6(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcis.6.2.181_1
4.
BarriosS.BarriosD. (2004). Reconsidering economic development: The prospects for economic gardening. Public Administration Quarterly, 28, 70–101.
5.
BartikT. J. (1990). The market failure approach to regional economic development policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 4(4), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242490004004
6.
BeauregardR. A. (1999). The employment fulcrum: Evaluating local economic performance. Economic Development Quarterly, 13(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124249901300102
BevanR. G. (1983). The systems approach in government? Two case studies of programme budgeting. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34, 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1983.167
9.
BlandR. L.OvertonM. (2019). A budgeting guide for local government (4th ed.). ICMA.
10.
BlairR. (2004). Public participation and community development: The role of strategic planning. Public Administration Quarterly, 28, 102–147.
11.
BlanksonC.NukpezahJ. A. (2019). Market orientation and poverty reduction: A study of rural microentrepreneurs in Ghana. Africa Journal of Management, 5(4), 332–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2019.1676101
12.
BoyneG. A. (2003). Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/mug027
13.
BradshawT. K.BlakelyE. J. (2002). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.
14.
BrantR. (1990). Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 46, 1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532457
15.
BrugmannJ. (1996). Planning for sustainability at the local government level. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(4–6), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(97)81658-7
16.
CaidenN.WildavskyA. B. (1980). Planning and budgeting in poor countries. Transaction Publishers.
17.
CarrJ. B. (2015). What have we learned about the performance of council-manager government? A review and synthesis of the research. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 673–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12415
18.
ChugunovI.MakohonV.PasichnyiM.NikitishinA.AdamenkoI.KrykunT.KanevaT.KozarezenkoL.SobchukS. (2018). Budget policy of social development. Scientific Route. https://doi.org/10.21303/978-9949-7316-1-9.
19.
CatalanD. (2018). What is a systems approach? (pp. 1–3). The OECD Observer. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
20.
DamartS.RoyB. (2009). The uses of cost–benefit analysis in public transportation decision-making in France. Transport Policy, 16(4), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.06.002
21.
De GuimarãesJ. C. F.SeveroE. A.JúniorL. A. F.Da CostaW. P. L. B.SalmoriaF. T. (2020). Governance and quality of life in smart cities: Towards sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119926
22.
Dimitrijevska-MarkoskiT.NukpezahJ. A. (2023). COVID-19 Risk perception and support for COVID-19 mitigation measures among local government officials in the US: A test of a cultural theory of risk. Administration & Society, 55(3), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539972211472
23.
DonVitoP. A. (1969). The essentials of a planning-programming-budgeting system (p. 0021). Rand Corporation.
24.
DyerJ. S. (1970). The use of PPBS in a public system of higher education: “Is it cost-effective?”Academy of Management Journal, 13(3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.5465/254965
EnthovenA. (2019). How systems analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, or benefit-cost analysis first became influential in federal government program decision-making. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 10(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2019.23
27.
FeldmanM.HadjimichaelT.LanahanL.KemenyT. (2016). The logic of economic development: A definition and model for investment. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X156146
28.
FleischmannA.GreenG. P. (1991). Organizing local agencies to promote economic development. The American Review of Public Administration, 21(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409102100101
29.
FranklinA. L.RaadscheldersJ. C. (2003). Ethics in local government budgeting: Is there a gap between theory and practice?Public Administration Quarterly, 27, 456–490.
GFOA. (n.d.-c). Distinguished budget presentation award program. Retrieved February 28, 2024, from https://www.gfoa.org/budget-award
34.
GilmourR. S. (1967). A planning-programming budgeting system. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 28(3), 183–191.
35.
GreenhouseS. M. (1966). The planning-programming-budgeting system: Rationale, language, and idea-relationships. Public Administration Review, 26(4), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/973298
36.
GrossB. M. (1969). The new systems budgeting. Public Administration Review, 35, 113–137.
37.
HannaK. S. (2005). Planning for sustainability: Experiences in two contrasting communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976403
38.
HarmanH. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press.
39.
HatcherW.HammondA. (2018). Nonprofit economic development organizations and the institutional arrangement of local economic development. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 4(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.4.1.21-40
40.
HawkinsC. V.KwonS. W.BaeJ. (2016). Balance between local economic development and environmental sustainability: A multi-level governance perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(11), 803–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1035787
ImperativesS. (1987). Report of the World Commission on environment and development: Our common future (pp. 1–300). United Nations.
43.
KhanA. (2019). Budget systems, underlying structures and characteristics. In:Fundamentals of public budgeting and finance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19226-6_6
44.
KovenS. G.LyonsT. S. (2003). Economic development: Strategies for state and local practice. International City/County Management Association (ICMA).
LeeR. D.JohnsonR. W.JoyceP. G. (2013). Public budgeting systems (9th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
47.
LeighN. G.BlakelyE. J. (2016). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice. SAGE publications.
48.
LongJ. S. (2014). Regression models for nominal and ordinal outcomes. In H. Best & C. Wolf (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of regression analysis and causal inference (pp. 173–204).
49.
LynchT. D. (1989). Budget system approach. Public Administration Quarterly, 13, 321–341.
MaransR.W.StimsonR. (2011). An overview of quality of urban life. In MaransR.StimsonR. (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life (Vol. 45). Social Indicators Research Series. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1742-8_1
McKinneyJ. B.HowardL. C. (1998). Public administration: Balancing power and accountability. ABC-CLIO.
54.
MeadowsD. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
55.
MeyerD. F.MasehlaT. M.KotS. (2017). The relationship between economic growth and economic development: A regional assessment in South Africa. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8, 1377.
MitchellD.LarsonS. E.HenleyT.SprangerA.MyserS. (2022). A reflection of changing priorities? The reallocative impact of priority-based budgeting in US municipalities. Public Budgeting & Finance, 42(3), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12310
MorganJ. Q.HoymanM. M.McCallJ. R. (2019). Everything but the kitchen sink? Factors associated with local economic development strategy use. Economic Development Quarterly, 33(4), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242419857152
60.
MorganD.RobinsonK. S.StrachotaD.HoughJ. A. (2017). Budgeting for local governments and communities. Routledge.
61.
MorrisM. H.SantosS. C.NeumeyerX. (2020). Entrepreneurship as a solution to poverty in developed economies. Business Horizons, 63(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.01.010
62.
MunasingheM. (1993). Environmental economics and sustainable development (Vol. 3). World Bank Publications.
63.
NelE.RogersonC. M. (2005). Local economic development in the developing world. Transaction Publishers.
64.
NelsonW. C. (1970). Program, planning, budgeting systems for educators (Vol. IV: A Research Bibliography. Final Report). Center for Vocational and Technical Education, Ohio State University.
65.
NijakiL. K. (2015). Justifying and juxtaposing environmental justice and sustainability: Towards an inter-generational and intra-generational analysis of environmental equity in public administration. Public Administration Quarterly, 39, 85–116.
66.
NorrisD. F.ReddickC. G. (2013). E-democracy at the American grassroots: Not now. . . not likely?Information Polity, 18(3), 201–216.
67.
NukpezahJ. A.AhmaduA. S.UkwandiK.AduE. P.AbrahamR. (2023). Public budgeting in developed and developing countries. In HildrethB.DzigbedeK. D. (Eds.), Research handbook on public financial management (pp. 136–153). Edward Elgar Publishing.
68.
NukpezahJ. A. (2019). Local governments and the property tax. In FarazmandA. (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. (Chapter 3874, pp. 1–8). Springer.
69.
NukpezahJ.AbutabenjehS.AzharA. (2022). Do smart cities technologies contribute to revenue performance? Evidence from US local governments. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(5), 1155–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2076248
70.
OppS. M.OsgoodJ. L.Jr.RugeleyC. R. (2014). Explaining the adoption and implementation of local environmental policies in the United States. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(5), 854–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12072
71.
OsgoodJ. L.Jr.OppS. M.BernotskyR. L. (2012). Yesterday’s gains versus today’s realties: Lessons from 10 years of economic development practice. Economic Development Quarterly, 26(4), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242412465002
72.
ParkinsS. J. N. (2008). Budgeting in times of fiscal stress: Explaining strategies for reducing agency expenditures. Auburn University.
73.
PetersA.FisherP. (2004). The failures of economic development incentives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976336
74.
PorterM. E. (1997). New strategies for inner-city economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 11(1), 11–27.
75.
PremchandA. (2001). Public budgeting and economic development: Evolution and practice of an idea. International Journal of Public Administration, 24(10), 1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-100105100
76.
RabinJ. (Ed.). (1992). Handbook of public budgeting (Vol. 46). CRC Press.
77.
Ramos-QuintanaF.Sotelo-NavaH.Saldarriaga-NoreñaH.Tovar-SánchezE. (2019). Assessing the environmental quality resulting from damages to human-nature interactions caused by population increase: A systems thinking approach. Sustainability, 11(7), 1957.
78.
ReeseL. A.FasenfestD. (1997). What works best?: Values and the evaluation of local economic development policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 11(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424970110030
ReeseL. A.YeM. (2011). Policy versus place luck: Achieving local economic prosperity. Economic Development Quarterly, 25(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242411408292
81.
ReddickC. G. (2007). State resource allocation and budget formats: Towards a hybrid model. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 19(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-19-02-2007-B005
82.
ReitanoV.JonesP. A. (2023). Local government forecast practices: Time horizon and budgetary influence. Public Administration Quarterly, 47(1), 26–50.
83.
RobichauR. W. (2010). The effects of economic development strategies in local municipalities. Perspectives in Public Affairs, 7(1), 26–41.
84.
RobinsonM.BrumbyJ. (2005). Does performance budgeting work. An Analytical Review of the Empirical Literature, 5, 210–215.
85.
RoxasF. M. Y.RiveraJ. P. R.GutierrezE. L. M. (2019). Locating potential leverage points in a systems thinking causal loop diagram toward policy intervention. World Futures, 75(8), 609–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2019.1654784
86.
RubinB. M.ZornC. K. (1985). Sensible state and local economic development. Public Administration Review, 45(2), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/976155
87.
RupasinghaA.GoetzS. J. (2013). Self-employment and local economic performance: Evidence from US counties. Papers in Regional Science, 92(1), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00396.x
88.
SantosL. D.MartinsI.BritoP. (2007). Measuring subjective quality of life: A survey to Porto’s residents. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-007-9029-z
89.
SäynäjokiE. S.HeinonenJ.JunnilaS. (2014). The power of urban planning on environmental sustainability: A focus group study in Finland. Sustainability, 6(10), 6622–6643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6106622
90.
SchickA. (1966). The road to PPB: The stages of budget reform. Public Administration Review, 26, 243–258. https://doi.org/10.2307/973296
91.
SchickA. (1969). Systems politics and systems budgeting. Public Administration Review, 29(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/973694
SenlierN.YildizR.AktaşE. D. (2009). A perception survey for the evaluation of urban quality of life in Kocaeli and a comparison of the life satisfaction with the European cities. Social Indicators Research, 94, 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9361-1
94.
ShafferR.DellerS.MarcouillerD. (2006). Rethinking community economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 20(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424052831
95.
SharpE. B.MullinixK. (2012). Holding their feet to the fire: Explaining variation in city governments’ use of controls on economic development subsidies. Economic Development Quarterly, 26(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242411431959
96.
StimsonR. J.StoughR. R.RobertsB. H. (2006). Regional economic development: Analysis and planning strategy. Springer Science & Business Media.
97.
StokanE. (2013). Testing Rubin’s model 25 years later: A multilevel approach to local economic development incentive adoption. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242413491315
98.
SmithH. J. M. (2010). Fiscal decentralization: Explaining successful local economic development in Latin America. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1726068
99.
VogelR.KeenW. H. (2010). Public higher education and New York State’s economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 24(4), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242410370681
WarnerM. E.ZhengL. (2013). Business incentive adoption in the recession. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242413479140
Yi HsiehJ. (2011). A multilevel growth assessment of the diffusion of management innovation nested in state levels: The case of US local economic development programs. Innovation, 13(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2011.13.1.2
104.
ZhangX.WarnerM. E.HomsyG. C. (2017). Environment, equity, and economic development goals: Understanding differences in local economic development strategies. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(3), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242417712003
105.
ZhengL.WarnerM. (2010). Business incentive use among US local governments: A story of accountability and policy learning. Economic Development Quarterly, 24(4), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124241037623
