The scholarly literature has shown that population growth affects not only local and national economies, but also the quality of community life. Using the most recent 2014/2015 to 2017/2018 local government satisfaction data, we empirically examine the impact of population growth on overall community satisfaction, as well as some other sub-dimensions of resident satisfaction, in the Victorian state local government system in Australia and then investigate the differential effects of population growth on community satisfaction in urban and regional councils. Our findings show that population growth negatively influenced overall community satisfaction and some other sub-dimensions of local resident satisfaction. Moreover, population growth generated greater dissatisfaction in regional councils compared to urban councils. We conclude by considering the public policy implications of these findings.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2016a). Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): Volume 3 – Non ABS Structures. Retrieved from https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/allprimarymainfeatures/68D3ABB051DCC591CA25816B00136D9F?opendocument
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2016b). Census of population and housing: Reflecting Australia - Stories from the Census, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/2071.0main+features22016
3.
AdamL.JonesT.te BrömmelstroetM. (2018). Planning for cycling in the dispersed city: Establishing a hierarchy of effectiveness of municipal cycling policies. Transportation, 47, 503–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9878-3
4.
AfonsoA.FernandesS. (2008). Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 1946–1979.
5.
AndrewsR.BoyneG. A. (2009). Size, structure and administrative overheads: An empirical analysis of English local authorities. Urban Studies, 46, 739–759.
6.
AndrewsR.Van de WalleS. (2013). New public management and citizens’ perceptions of local service efficiency, responsiveness, equity and effectiveness. Public Managment Review, 15, 762–783.
7.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2016. Retrieved September 28, 2019, from https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/2033.0.55.001~2016~Main%20Features~IRSD~19U33T
BaldassareM.ProtashW. (1982). Growth controls, population growth, and community satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 47(3), 339–346.
10.
Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre. (2019, November). A place to call home: Immigration in Australia. Focus on the States Series, No.7/19.
11.
BellB.DolleryB. E.DrewJ. (2016). Learning from Experience in NSW?Economic Papers, 35(2), 99–111.
12.
CarmonN. (Ed.). (2016). Immigration and integration in post-industrial societies: Theoretical analysis and policy-related research. Springer.
13.
ChenJ.DavisD. S.WuK.DaiH. (2015). Life satisfaction in urbanizing China: The effect of city size and pathways to urban residency. Cities, 49, 88–97.
14.
ClarkeA.CheshireL. (2018). The post-political state? The role of administrative reform in managing tensions between urban growth and liveability in Brisbane, Australia. Urban Studies, 55(16), 3545–3562.
15.
DahlR. A.TufteE. (1973). Sizeand democracy. Stanford University Press.
16.
Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning. (2018). Annual Report 2018. Retrieved March 11, 2024, from https://www.deeca.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/392352/DELWP-Annual-Report-2017-18.pdf
17.
DolleryB.HallamG.WallisJ. (2008). Shared services in Australian local government: A case study of the Queensland local government association model. Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 27(4), 343–354.
18.
DolleryB.LinC.JoelB. (2006). Local government failure: Why does Australian local government experience permanent financial austerity?Australian Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 339–353.
19.
DolleryB.McQuestinD. (2017). No panacea: Rate-capping in South Australian local government. Economic Analysis and Policy, 56(1), 79–85.
20.
DolleryB. E.KitchenH.McMillanM.ShahA. (2020). Local public, fiscal and financial governance: An international perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
21.
DrewJ.DolleryB. (2014). Keeping it in-house: Households versus population as alternative proxies for local government output. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73, 235–246.
22.
DrewJ.DolleryB. (2016). Does size still matter? An empirical analysis of the effectiveness of Victorian local authorities. Local Government Studies, 42, 15–28.
23.
DrewJ.DolleryB.KorttM. A. (2016). Can’t get no satisfaction? The association between community satisfaction and population size for Victoria. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(1), 65–77.
24.
DrewJ.KorttM. A.DolleryB. (2014). Economies of scale and local government expenditure: Evidence from Australia. Administration and Society, 46, 632–653.
25.
DrewJ.KorttM. A.DolleryB. (2016). Did the big stick work? An empirical assessment of scale economies and the Queensland forced amalgamation program. Local Government Studies, 42(1), 1–14.
26.
GrantB.DrewJ. (2017). Community and community engagement in Australian local government. In: Local government in Australia. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3867-9_6
27.
GuimarãesM. H.NunesL. C.BarreiraA. P.PanagopoulosT. (2016). What makes people stay in or leave shrinking cities? An empirical study from Portugal. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1684–1708.
28.
HansenS. W. (2012). Polity size and local political trust: A quasi-experiment using municipal mergers in Denmark. Scandinavian Political Studies, 36(1), 43–66.
29.
HansenS. W. (2015). The democratic costs of size: How increasing size affects citizen satisfaction with local government. Political Studies, 63(2), 373–389.
30.
HoodC.DixonR. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less? Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central Government. Oxford University Press.
31.
HuangX.LiuC. Y. (2018). Welcoming cities: Immigration policy at the local government level. Urban Affairs Review, 54(1), 3–32.
32.
JacobsenR.SaultzK. (2016). Will performance management restore citizens’ faith in public education?Public Performance & Management Review, 39(2), 476–497.
33.
JamesO. (2009). Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 107–123.
34.
KellyJ. M.SwindellD. (2002). A multiple–indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: Correlating performance measurement and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 610–621.
35.
KuhlmannS.BouckaertG. (2016). Local public sector reforms in times of crisis. Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
KushnerJ.OgwangT. (2017). Why do per-household expenditures differ between municipalities?Public Finance and Management, 17, 303–324.
37.
Lago-PenasS.Martinez-VasquezJ. (Eds.). (2013). Challenge of local government size. Edward Elgar.
38.
LassenD. D.SerritzlewS. (2011). Jurisdiction size and local democracy: Evidence on internal political efficacy from large-scale municipal reform. American Political Science Review, 105(2), 238–258.
39.
LeeS. M.ConwayT. L.FrankL. D.SaelensB. E.CainK. L.SallisJ. F. (2017). The relation of perceived and objective environment attributes to neighbourhood satisfaction. Environment and Behaviour, 49(2), 136–160.
40.
Local Government Victoria. (2015). Local Government (General) Regulations 2015, S.R. No. 119/2015.
41.
Local Government Victoria. (2019). Victorian local government comparator groups: LGPRF (Practice Note No. 5).
42.
LowndesV.GardnerA. (2016). Local governance under the conservatives: Super-austerity, devolution and the ‘smarter state. Local Government Studies, 42(3), 357–375.
43.
MaL. (2017). Performance management and citizen satisfaction with the government: Evidence from Chinese municipalities. Public Administration, 95(1), 39–59.
44.
MandlU.DierxA.IlzkovitzF. (2008). The effectiveness and efficiency of public spending (Economic Papers 301). European Commission.
45.
MartinsM. R. (1995). Size of municipalities, efficiency, and citizen participation: A cross-European perspective. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 13(4), 441–458.
46.
MccarthyD.SaegertS. (1978). Residential density, social overload, and social withdrawal. Human Ecology, 6, 253–272.
47.
McNicollG. (1984). Consequences of rapid population growth: An overview and assessment. Population and Development Review, 10(2), 177–240.
48.
MouritzenP. E. (1989). City size and citizens’ satisfaction: Two competing theories revisited. European Journal of Political Research, 17, 661–688.
49.
Municipal Association of Victoria. (2019). Annual report 2017-18.
50.
Narbón-PerpiñáI.De WitteK. (2018a). Local governments’ efficiency: A systematic literature review—Part I. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(2), 431–468.
51.
Narbón-PerpiñáI.De WitteK. (2018b). Local governments’ efficiency: A systematic literature review—Part II. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(4), 1107–1136.
52.
NascholdF. (2017). New frontiers in the public sector management: Trends and issues in state and local government in Europe (Vol. 69). Walter de Gruyter GmbH and Co KG.
53.
OlsenA. L. (2015). Citizen (dis) satisfaction: An experimental equivalence framing study. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 469–478.
54.
OstromE. (1972). Metropolitan reform: Propositions derived from two traditions. Social Science Quarterly, 53(3), 474–493.
55.
ReddickC. G.PerlmanB. J.DemurT. (2022). Citizen satisfaction with public service delivery: A test of alternative theories. Canadian Journal of Public Administration, 65(2), 352–371.
56.
RoggeN.AgasistiT.De WitteK. (2017). Big data and the measurement of public organizations’ performance and efficiency: The state-of-the-art. Public Policy and Administration, 32(4), 263–281.
57.
SteccoliniI.JonesM. D. S.SalitererI. (Eds.). (2017). Governmental financial resilience: International perspectives on how local governments face austerity. Emerald Group Publishing.
58.
TranC.KorttM.DolleryB. (2019). Population size or population density? An empirical examination of scale economies in South Australian local government, 2015/16. Local Government Studies, 45, 632–653.
59.
TranC.-D. T. T.DolleryB. (2019). Council type and the determinants of municipal expenditure: A semiparametric analysis of South Australian local government. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 78(4), 631–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12399
60.
TranC. D. T. T.DolleryB. (2021). All in the mind: Citizen satisfaction and financial performance in the Victorian local government system. Australian Accounting Review, 31(1), 51–64.
61.
TranC.-D. T. T.DolleryB.LópezG. P. (2018). An empirical analysis of the determinants of per capita municipal expenditure in South Australian local government. Public Finance and Management, 18, 285–312.
62.
Victorian Auditor-General’s Office (VAGO). (2018). Results of 2017–18 audits: Local government, Victorian Auditor-General’s Office, Melbourne. Retrieved from https://www.audit.vic.gov.au/report/results-2017-18-audits-local-government?section=33085–local-government-dashboard
63.
Van RyzinG. G.MuzzioD.ImmerwahrS.GulickL.MartinezE. (2004). Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: An application of the American customer satisfaction index model to New York City. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 331–341.
64.
Wallis Consulting Group PTY, L., & Victoria Department of Planning and Community, D. (2019). 2019 Local government community satisfaction survey: State-wide Report. Department of Planning and Community Development. Retrieved March 11, 2024, from https://www.localgovernment.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0031/167566/Local-Government-Community-Satisfaction-Survey-2019.pdf
65.
ZolnikE. J. (2011). Growth management and resident satisfaction with local public services. Urban Geography, 32(5), 662–681.
