In this research, we sought to better understand important trends and developments in the teaching of quantitative and research methods courses in graduate public affairs programs. We were specifically interested in the following areas related to the teaching of quantitative and research methods: the impact of new technologies on curriculum delivery; the content of courses related to statistical analysis and research design; and the importance of numeracy, ethics, and data visualization. We surveyed quantitative and research methods instructors in graduate public affairs programs using the same survey instrument at two intervals 8 years apart and analyzed results from each period side-by-side. Findings indicate some stark differences in the content and delivery of these courses. Given the timing of the second survey—Spring 2021—findings are considered within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
AmmonsD. N.WilliamsW. A. (2003). Developing and applying analytic capabilities in major American cities. Public Administration Quarterly, 27(3/4), 392–409.
2.
AristiguetaM. P.RaffelJ. A. (2001). Teaching techniques of analysis in the MPA curriculum: Research methods, management science, and “the third path”. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 7(3), 161–169.
3.
CaulkinsJ. P. (1999). The revolution in management science instruction: Implications for teaching public affairs students. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(2), 107–117.
4.
ChangC.FangM. (2020). E-Learning and online instructions of higher education during the 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) epidemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1574, 012166.
5.
ClarkT.FosterL. (2017). ‘I’m not a natural mathematician’ Inquiry-based learning, constructive alignment and introductory quantitative social science. Teaching Public Administration, 35(3), 260–279.
6.
EngbersT. A. (2016). Comparative research: An approach to teaching research methods in political science and public administration. Teaching Public Administration, 34(3), 270–283.
7.
FitzpatrickJ. (2000). What are our goals in teaching research methods to public administrators?Journal of Public Affairs Education, 6(3), 173–181.
8.
FrankR. H. (2007). The economic naturalist: In search of explanations for everyday enigmas. Basic Books.
9.
GigliottiR. A. (2016). Institutional identification and sense of community: Analysis of a new online graduate public administration program. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(3), 399–414.
10.
GoodmanD. (2020). Curriculum and instructional design. In McDonaldB. DHatcherW. (Eds.), The public affairs faculty manual: A guide to the effective management of public affairs programs (pp. 139–161) Routledge.
11.
GunnA. (2017). Critical debates in teaching research methods in social sciences. Teaching Public Administration, 35(2), 241–259.
12.
GuyM. E. (2020). To catch the sparrow that has flown. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 26(3), 264–275.
13.
GuyM. E.StillmanR. (2016). On NASPAA accreditation: Fred was right. . .but for the wrong reason, Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(2), 303–312.
14.
HarrisR. A.NikitenkoG. O. (2014). Comparing online with brick and mortar course learning outcomes: An analysis of quantitative methods curriculum in public administration. Teaching Public Administration, 32(1), 95–107.
15.
HorneC. S. (2008). Teaching what we know: Describing and challenging the neglect of management science methods in MPA programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14(3), 427–438.
16.
HyR. J.WaughW. L.NelsonP. B. (1987). The future public administrator and quantitative skills. Public Administration Quarterly, 11(2) 134–149.
17.
KasdanD. O. (2015) Cruel to be kind: A neopragmatist approach to teaching statistics for public administration students. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 21(3), 435–448.
LoweryD. (2007) Community-based quality of life indicators: A service-learning exercise in a graduate statistics class. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(2), 425–438.
20.
MamedovaS.PawlowskiE. (2020). Adult numeracy in the United States (NCES 2020-025). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
21.
MamedovaS.PawlowskiE. (2021). International comparisons of adult literacy and numeracy skills over time (NCES 2022-005). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
McDonaldB. D. (2021). Teaching in uncertain times: The future of public administration education. Teaching Public Administration, 39(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420963154
24.
McLarenC. H. (2004). A comparison of student persistence and performance in online and classroom business statistics experiences. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2(1), 1–10.
25.
MoodyJ. (2004). Distance education: Why are the attrition rates so high?Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(3), 205.
26.
NiA. Y. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199–215.
27.
NollenbergerK. (2015). Comparing alternative teaching modes in a master’s program: Student preferences and perceptions. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 21(1), 101–114.
28.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en
29.
OvertonM.KleinschmitS. (2021). Data science literacy: Toward a philosophy of accessible and adaptable data science skill development in public administration programs. Teaching Public Administration, 40, 014473942110049.
RubaiiN. (2019). Why research methods matter: Essential skills for decision-making. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 25(2), 277–279.
32.
SarterE. K. (2020). The power of collaboration: Reflections on a collaborative approach to teaching research methods in public administration. Teaching Public Administration, 38(2), 101–112.
33.
SelvanathanM.HussinN. A. M.AzaziN. A. N. (2023). Students learning experiences during COVID-19: Work from home period in Malaysian higher learning institutions. Teaching Public Administration, 41, 3–22.
34.
SmithA. E.Martinez-MoyanoI. J. (2012) Techniques in teaching statistics: Linking research production and research use. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(1), 107–136.
35.
Snow AndradeM. (2015). Teaching online: A theory-based approach to student success. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 1–9.
36.
VogelM. (2021). A pandemic’s reminder: The public service vocation is at the heart of our field. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 28, 1–11.
37.
WaughW. L.HyR. J.BrudneyJ. L. (1994). Quantitative analysis and skill building in public administration graduate education. Public Administration Quarterly, 18(2), 204–222.
38.
WheelerD. A.WaiteB. C. (2023). Internship alternatives: Solutions for the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Teaching Public Administration, 41, 32–40.
39.
YaghiA. (2021). Impact of online education on anxiety and stress among undergraduate public affairs students: A longitudinal study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 28, 1–18.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
