U.S. educational institutions have been exploring ways to diversify leadership. Using an intersectional approach and a dataset compiled by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), we examine factors associated with racial/ethnic diversity among women and men employed as principals in 613 multiethnic public school districts. Specifically, using the school district as unit of analysis, we evaluate the patterns of significance for coefficients across six multivariate regression models. Findings indicate that the most commonly used contextual variables associated with educational workforce composition are not consistent determinants of principal positions across the six intersectional groups. The internal factors, especially gender composition of teachers and racial/ethnic composition of teachers, assistant principals, and administrators appear to be more accurate predictors of principalships, suggesting that findings for workforce and leadership factors support the intersectional perspective. We observe that the significance of explanatory variables differs across models for women and men representing different racial/ethnic groups.
AllenK., JacobsonS., & LomoteyK. (1995). African American women in educational administration: The importance of mentors and sponsors. The Journal of Negro Education, 64(4), 409–422.
BearfieldD. A. (2009). Equity at the intersection: Public administration and the study of gender. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 383–386.
4.
BreslinR. A., PandeyS., & RiccucciN. M. (2017). Intersectionality in public leadership research: A review and future research agenda. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 160–182.
5.
BrittonD. M., & LoganL. (2008). Gendered Organizations: Progress and Prospects. Sociology Compass, 2(1), 107–121.
6.
BrownF. (2005). African Americans and school leadership: An introduction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(4), 585–590.
7.
BrownN. E. (2012). Representing Black Women: African-American Women State Legislators' Political Agendas. Paper presented at the NCOBPS 44th Meeting Paper, November 29. Las Vegas, NV. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2182785.
8.
BrownN. E. (2014). Political participation of women of color: An intersectional analysis. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 35(4), 315–348.
9.
BrowneI., & MisraJ. (2003). The Intersection of gender and race in the labor market. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 487–513.
10.
ChoS., CrenshawK., & McCallL. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–810.
11.
ChooH. Y., & FerreeM. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149.
12.
CollinsP. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
13.
CollinsP. H. (1993). Toward a new vision: Race, class, and gender as categories of analysis and connection. Race, Sex & Class, 1(1), 25–45.
14.
CollinsP. H. (2007). Pushing the boundaries or business as usual?: Race, class, and gender studies and sociological inquiry. In CalhounC. J. (Ed.), Sociology in America: A history (pp. 572–604). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
CorrellShelley J., BenardS., & PaikI. (2007). Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1339.
16.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
17.
DaleyD. M. (1996). Paths of glory and the glass ceiling: Differing patterns of career advancement among women and minority federal employees. Public Administration Quarterly, 20(2), 143–162.
18.
DarcyR., & HadleyC. D. (1988). Black women in politics: The puzzle of success. Social Science Quarterly, 69(3), 629–645.
19.
EssedP. (1991). Understanding everyday racism: An interdisciplinary theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
20.
EsterchildE. M. (2010). Membership in state legislatures: intersections of race, ethnicity, and gender. In SegalM. (Ed.), Interactions and intersections of gendered bodies at work, at home, and at play, Volume 14 (pp. 121–146). Emerald.
FragaL. R., Martinez-EbersV., LopezL., & RicardoR. (2005). Strategic intersectionality: Gender, ethnicity, and political incorporation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Augst 31–September 4, Washington, DC.
23.
FultzM. (2004). The displacement of Black educators post-Brown: An overview and analysis. History of Education Quarterly, 44(1), 11–45.
24.
GallantM. P., & DornG. P. (2001). Gender and race differences in the predictors of daily health practices among older adults. Health Education Research, 16(1), 21–31.
25.
GatesS. M., RingelJ. S., SantibanezL., ChungC. H., & RossK. E. (2003). Who is leading our schools?: An overview of school administrators and their careers (0833033530). Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1679.html.
26.
GrissomJ. A., KernE. C., & RodriguezL. A. (2015). The “representative bureaucracy” in education: Educator workforce diversity, policy outputs, and outcomes for disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(3), 185–192.
27.
GroganM. (1999). Equity/equality issues of gender, race, and class. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(4), 518–536.
28.
GuyM. E., & SchumacherK. (2009). A Retrospective Analysis of Scholarship on Gender and Diversity in Public Administration. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Canada, September 3–6. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1450768.
29.
HancockA.-M. (2007). When Multiplication Doesn't Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79.
30.
HankivskyO., & CormierR. (2011). Intersectionality and Public Policy: Some Lessons from Existing Models. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 217–229.
31.
Hardy-FantaC., LienP.-t., PinderhughesD. M., & SierraC. M. (2007). Gender, race, and descriptive representation in the United States: Findings from the gender and multicultural leadership project. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 28(3–4), 7–41.
32.
HsiehC.-W., & WinslowE. (2006). Gender representation in the federal workforce a comparison among groups. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26(3), 276–295.
33.
KeiserL. R., WilkinsV. M., MeierK. J., & HollandC. A. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96(3), 553–564.
34.
KerrB., KerrG.R., & MillerW. (2014). Bureaucratic, leadership, and workforce representation among female administrators, principals, assistant principals, and classroom teachers in US school districts, 2002–2008. Public Administration Quarterly38 (3) 371–404.
35.
KerrB., MillerW., KerrG.R. & DeshommesR. (2016). Interethnic Competition for Classroom Teacher, Assistant Principal, Principal, and Administrator Jobs in Multiethnic US School Districts, 2002–2008. The American Review of Public Administration.46(4): 459–477.
36.
LandryB. (2007). The theory of intersectional analysis: Introduction. In LandryB. (Ed.), Race, gender and class: Theory and methods of analysis (pp. 1–15). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
37.
LealD. L., Martinez-EbersV., & MeierK. J. (2004). The politics of Latino education: The biases of at-large elections. The Journal of Politics, 66(4), 1224–1244.
38.
LordeA. (1984). Sister Outsider. Freedom, CA: The Crossing Press.
39.
MahitivanichchaK., & RorrerA. K. (2006). Women's Choices Within Market Constraints: Re-Visioning Access to and Participation in the Superintendency. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(4), 483–517.
40.
ManuelT. (2006). Envisioning the possibilities for a good life: Exploring the public policy implications of intersectionality theory. Journal of Women Politics & Policy, 28(3–4), 173–203.
41.
McCallL. (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.
42.
McGuireG. M. (2000). Gender, race, ethnicity, and networks: The factors affecting the status of employees' network members. Work and Occupations, 27(4), 501–524.
43.
McGuireG. M. (2002). Gender, race, and the shadow structure -A stud of informal networks and inequality in a work organization. Gender & Society, 16(3), 303–322.
44.
McGuireG. M., & ReskinB. F. (1993). Authority hierarchies at work: The impacts of race and sex. Gender & Society, 7(4), 487–506.
45.
MeierK. J. (1993). Representative bureaucracy: A theoretical and empirical exposition. Research in Public Administration, 2(1), 1–35.
46.
MeierK. J., McClainP. D., PolinardJ., & WrinkleR. D. (2004). Divided or together? Conflict and cooperation between African Americans and Latinos. Political Research Quarterly, 57(3), 399–409.
47.
MeierK. J., & StewartJ. (1992). The impact of representative bureaucracies: Educational systems and public policies. The American Review of Public Administration, 22(3), 157–171.
48.
MeierK. J., StewartJ., & EnglandR. E. (1989). Race, class, and education: the politics of second-generation discrimination. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
49.
Méndez-MorseS., MurakamiE. T., Byrne-JiménezM., & HernandezF. (2015). Mujeres in the principal's office: Latina school leaders. Journal of Latinos and Education, 14(3), 171–187.
50.
MillerW., KerrB., & ReidM. (2010). Descriptive representation by gender and race/ethnicity in municipal bureaucracies: Change in US multiethnic cities, 1987–2001. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 31 (3) 217–242.
51.
MillerW., KerrB., & ReidM. & EdwardsP.R. (2008). An unconventional application of the glass ceiling concept: African American and Latino administrators in municipal government bureaucracies, 1987–1997. Public Administration Quarterly32(4): 490–527.
52.
MontoyaL. J. (2002). Gender and citizenship in Latino political participation. In Suárez-OrozcoM. M. & PáezM. (Eds.), Latinos: Remaking America (pp. 410–429). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
53.
MurphyY., HuntV. H., ZajicekA., NorrisA., & HamiltonL.Capturing the Breadth and Depth of Human Experiences: Incorporating Intersectionality in Social Work Practice Research, Policy, and Education, Washington, DC: National Association of Social Work Press, 2009.
54.
NashJ. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, (89), 1–15.
55.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005–2006). Common Core of Data. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
56.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Common Core of Data. Retrieved from Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
57.
PapaF. C., LankfordH., & WyckoffJ. (2002). The attributes and career paths of principals: Implications for improving policy. Teacher Policy Research Center.
58.
PapaF.Jr, & BaxterI. A. (2005). Dispelling the myths and confirming the truths of the imminent shortage of principals: The case of New York state. Planning and Changing, 36 (3/4), 217–234.
59.
PitkinH. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
60.
Price-GlynnK., & RakovskiC. (2012). Who rides the glass escalator? Gender, race and nationality in the national nursing assistant study. Work, Employment & Society, 26(5), 699–715.
61.
ReidM. F., KerrJ. B., & MillerW. (2000). A study of the advancement of women in municipal government bureaucracies: Persistence of glass ceilings?Women and Politics, 21(1), 35–53.
62.
ReyesP., WagstaffL., & FuserelliL. (1999). Delta gorces: The changing fabric of American society and education. In MurphyJ. & Seashore LewisK. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 183–201). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
63.
RiccucciN. M. (2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled?Public Administration Review, 69(3), 373–382.
64.
RiveraM. A., & WardJ.D. (2015). Institutional racism, diversity and public administration. In Diversity and Public Administration. (pp. 89–103). New York: Routledge.
65.
RochaR. R., & HawesD. P. (2009). Racial diversity, representative bureaucracy, and equity in multiracial school districts. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 326–344.
66.
RosetteA. S., KovalC. Z., MaA., & LivingstonR. (2016). Race matters for women leaders: Intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 429–445.
67.
RosetteA. S., & LivingstonR. W. (2012). Failure is not an option for Black women: Effects of organizational performance on leaders with single versus dual-subordinate identities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1162–1167.
68.
RussellR. J., & WrightR. L. (1990). Visible minorities and women in educational leadership: A report of research in progress. Paper presented at the 4th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Council for Multicultural and Intercultural Education, November 3–5, Ottawa, Ontario.
69.
RyanM. K., & HaslamS. A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 549–572.
70.
SanchezJ. E., ThorntonB., & UsingerJ. (2009). Increasing the ranks of minority principals. Developing School Leaders, 67(2).
71.
Sanchez-HuclesJ. V., & DavisD. D. (2010). Women and women of color in leadership: Complexity, identity, and intersectionality. American Psychologist, 65(3), 171.
72.
SimienE. M., & HancockA.-M. (2011). Mini-xymposium: Intersectionality research. Political Research Quarterly, 64 (1), 185–186.
73.
SinclairS., HardinC. D., & LoweryB. S. (2006). Self-stereotyping in the context of multiple social identities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 529–542.
74.
SmithR. A. (2005). Do the determinants of promotion differ for white men versus women and minorities? An exploration of intersectionalism through sponsored and contest mobility processes. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(9), 1157–1181.
75.
SokoloffN. J. (2014). Black women and white women in the professions: Occupational segregation by race and gender, 1960–1980. New York: Routledge.
76.
SowaJ. E., & SeldenS. C. (2003). Administrative discretion and active representation: An expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700–710.
77.
TillmanL. C. (2004). African-American principals and the legacy of Brown. Review of Research in Education, 28, 101–146.
78.
Townsend-BellE. (2011). What is relevance? Defining intersectional praxis in Uruguay. Political Research Quarterly, 64 (1), 187–199.
79.
United States Census Bureau. (2008a). American Community Survey.
80.
United States Census Bureau. (2008b). School Districts: Demographic and Geographic Estimates.
81.
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (1996). EEOC Form 168A, Elementary-Secondary Staff Information (EEO-5).
82.
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Committee (EEOC). (Various years). EEOC Form 164 EEO-4 reports, Job Patterns for Minorities and Women in State and Local Governments.
83.
VinzD., & DörenM. (2007). Diversity policies and practices: A new perspective for health care. Journal of Public Health, 15(5), 369–376.
84.
WadsworthN. D. (2011). Intersectionality in California's same-sex marriage battles: A complex proposition. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 200–216.
85.
WeberL. (2001). Understanding race, class, gender, and sexuality : a conceptual framework. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
86.
WegenkeG. L., & ShenJ. (2005). Gender, racial, and ethnic diversity among principals. In ShenJ. (Ed.), School principals (pp. 14–29). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
87.
WilliamsC. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “Female” professions. Social Problems, 39(3), 253–267.
