Exploring Intersectional Diversity: Representation of Gender,Ethnicity,and Disability in the US Federal Government

Abstract

This study explores the current status of intersectional diversity in the United States (U.S.) federal government over a decade (2009–2023). Significant efforts have been made to enhance representation in bureaucracy, ensuring it reflects society’s preferences in policymaking and embodies a wide range of values related to public services. Scholars have also examined various dimensions of representative bureaucracy through an intersectional lens, with a particular focus on the interplay of gender and ethnicity in shaping our understanding of diversity. However, substantial inequality persists among women based on their racial and ethnic backgrounds, especially at the leadership level. We expand this critical discussion by incorporating another essential, yet less frequently addressed, aspect of diversity: disability. Using FedScope data along with additional data from the OPM, we measured representation and intersectionality across gender, ethnicity, and disability at both employee and leadership levels. Our findings show that although passive representation has improved across some individual dimensions, minorities continue to face underrepresentation at the leadership level. Furthermore, minorities with intersectional identities encounter even greater disparities.

Keywords

intersectionality DEI gender ethnicity disability representative bureaucracy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadie

Diamond

Hainmueller

(2010). Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746

Abadie

Diamond

Hainmueller

(2015). Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science, 59(2), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12116

B. Y.

Barboza-Wilkes

C. J.

Resh

W. G.

(2024). Applying an intersectional understanding of extra work behavior and emotional exhaustion in local public service. Public Administration, 102(4), 1578–1603. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12989

Andrews

Ashworth

Meier

K. J.

(2014). Representative bureaucracy and fire service performance. International Public Management Journal, 17(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.874253

Anestaki

Sabharwal

Connelly

Cayer

N. J.

(2019). Race and gender representation in presidential appointments, SES, and GS levels, during Clinton, Bush, and Obama administrations. Administration & Society, 51(2), 197–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716655376

Assouline

Gilad

(2022). The intersectionality of deservingness for state support. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13466

Atkins

D. N.

Wilkins

V. M.

(2013). Going beyond reading, writing, and arithmetic: The effects of teacher representation on teen pregnancy rates. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 771–790. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut001

Bearfield

D. A.

(2009). Equity at the intersection: Public administration and the study of gender. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01985.x

Bharath

D. M. N.

Sweeting

K. D.

Samms Brown

(2024). Keeping up with the human in HRM: Exploration of transgender rights in public sector human resource management. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 30(1), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2023.2281021

10.

Bishu

S. G.

Kennedy

A. R.

(2020). Trends and gaps: A meta-review of representative bureaucracy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(4), 559–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x19830154

11.

Bove

F. M.

Uttermark

M. J.

Dula

L. A.

(2025). Gender, race, and (un)ethical behavior: Perceptions from within the federal bureaucracy. Journal of Social Equity and Public Administration, 3(1), 28–53. https://doi.org/10.24926/jsepa.v3i1.5639

12.

Bradbury

Kellough

J. E.

(2011). Representative bureaucracy: Assessing the evidence on active representation. American Review of Public Administration, 41(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010367823

13.

Bradbury

M. D.

Kellough

J. E.

(2007). Representative bureaucracy: Exploring the potential for active representation in local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 697–714. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum033

14.

Breslin

R. A.

Pandey

Riccucci

N. M.

(2017). Intersectionality in public leadership research: A review and future research agenda. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 160–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x17697118

15.

Carrizales

Gaynor

T. S.

(2013). Diversity in public administration research: A review of journal publications. Public Administration Quarterly, 37(3), 306–330.

16.

Cayer

N. J.

Sigelman

(2015). Minorities and women in state and local government: 1973–1975. In N. M. Riccucci (Ed.), Public Personnel Administration and labor relations (pp. 120–132). Routledge.

17.

Chordiya

(2022). Organizational inclusion and turnover intentions of federal employees with disabilities. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x20942305

18.

Chordiya

Protonentis

(2024). Disability-affirming diversity, equity, and inclusion. In Sabharwal

McCandless

S. A.

Viswanath

(Eds.), Handbook on Diversity, Equity, and inclusion in Public Administration (pp. 78–107). Edward Elgar Publishing.

19.

Chordiya

Sabharwal

(2024). Managing Diversity, equity, and inclusion in Public Service Organizations: A Liberatory Justice Approach. Routledge.

20.

Cornwell

Kellough

J. E.

(1994). Women and minorities in federal government agencies: Examining new evidence from panel data. Public Administration Review, 54(3), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/976730

21.

Crenshaw

(1991). Race, gender, and sexual harassment. Southern California Law Review, 65, 1467.

22.

Ding

Riccucci

N. M.

(2021). How bureaucratic representation affects public organizational performance: A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review, 81(6), 1003–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13361

23.

Ding

Riccucci

N. M.

(2024). DEI and representative bureaucracy. In Sabharwal

McCandless

S. A.

Viswanath

(Eds.), Handbook on Diversity, Equity, and inclusion in Public Administration (pp. 11–25). Edward Elgar Publishing.

24.

Emidy

M. B.

Lewis

G. B.

Pizarro-Bore

(2024). US federal employees with disabilities: How perceptions of diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility affect differences in job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and job involvement. Public Personnel Management, 53(4), 649–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260241253577

25.

Fay

D. L.

Hicklin Fryar

Meier

K. J.

Wilkins

(2021). Intersectionality and equity: Dynamic bureaucratic representation in higher education. Public Administration, 99(2), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12691

26.

Fernandez

Koma

Lee

(2018). Establishing the link between representative bureaucracy and performance: The South African case. Governance, 31(3), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12319

27.

Fortner

M. J.

(2023). Public administration, racial capitalism, and the problem of “interest convergence:” A commentary on critical race theory. Public Integrity, 25(3), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2113294

28.

Gooden

S. T.

(2025). Diversity, equity, and inclusion—Essentials of Democracy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 45, 252–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x251341656

29.

Groeneveld

Van de Walle

(2010). A contingency approach to representative bureaucracy: Power, equal opportunities and diversity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309365670

30.

Guul

T. S.

(2018). The individual-level effect of gender matching in representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12907

31.

Hindera

J. J.

Young

C. D.

(1998). Representative bureaucracy: The theoretical implications of statistical interaction. Political Research Quarterly, 51(3), 655–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299805100305

32.

Hoang

Suh

Sabharwal

(2022). Beyond a numbers game? Impact of diversity and inclusion on the perception of organizational justice. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13463

33.

Hsieh

C. W.

Winslow

(2006). Gender representation in the federal workforce: A comparison among groups. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26(3), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x05281785

34.

Irizarry

J. L.

Berry-James

R. M.

Humphrey

D. D.

Emas

McDonald

B. D.

III Nordin

Lee

Evans

L. L.

Starke

A. M.

Jr Grosflam

J. M.

(2025). Threats to democracy: A danger to social justice for all. Journal of Social Equity and Public Administration, 3(2), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.24926/jsepa.v3i2.6796

35.

Kanter

R. M.

(1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990. https://doi.org/10.1086/226425

36.

Keiser

L. R.

Wilkins

V. M.

Meier

K. J.

Holland

C. A.

(2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96(3), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055402000321

37.

Kellough

J. E.

(1990). Integration in the public workplace: Determinants of minority and female employment in federal agencies. Public Administration Review, 50(5), 557–566.

38.

Kennedy

A. R.

Bishu

S. G.

Heckler

(2020). Feminism, masculinity, and active representation: A gender analysis of representative bureaucracy. Administration & Society, 52(7), 1101–1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719888470

39.

Kennedy

(2014). Unraveling representative bureaucracy: A systematic analysis of the literature. Administration & Society, 46(4), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712459724

40.

Kennedy

Bishu

Kennedy

(2025). Expanding the boundaries of Representative Bureaucracy. American Review of Public Administration, 55(3), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241309902

41.

Kingsley

J. D.

(1944). Representative bureaucracy: An interpretation of the British Civil Service. Antioch Press.

42.

Lewis

G. B.

Emidy

M. B.

(2022). Sexual orientation and organizational justice in the federal service: Exploring differences through an intersectional lens. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(3), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab041

43.

Liang

Park

Zhao

(2020). Representative bureaucracy, distributional equity, and environmental justice. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13160

44.

Kim

(2024). Representation, nonprofit leaders of color, and job attraction: A survey experiment. Review of Public Personnel Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x241302514

45.

(2021). Spillover effects of minority representation on majority bureaucrats’ behavioral change. Public Administration Review, 81(6), 1071–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13428

46.

(2024). Critical mass condition of majority bureaucratic behavioral change in representative bureaucracy: A theoretical clarification and a nonparametric exploration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(3), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muae002

47.

McCrea

A. M.

(2021). The cost of representation: Insurance status, gender, and cardiac outcomes in emergency department care. Public Administration Review, 81(6), 1092–1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13354

48.

Meier

K. J.

(1993). Latinos and representative bureaucracy testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(4), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037178

49.

Meier

K. J.

(2019). Theoretical frontiers in representative bureaucracy: New directions for research. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvy004

50.

Meier

K. J.

Bohte

(2001). Structure and discretion: Missing links in representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003511

51.

Meier

K. J.

Nicholson-Crotty

(2006). Gender, representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 850–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00653.x

52.

Meier

K. J.

Nigro

L. G.

(1976). Representative bureaucracy and policy preferences: A study in the attitudes of federal executives. Public Administration Review, 36(4), 458–469.

53.

Meier

K. J.

Stewart

Jr. (1992). The impact of representative bureaucracies: Educational systems and public policies. American Review of Public Administration, 22(3), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409202200301

54.

Mosher

F. C.

(1982). Democracy and the public service. Oxford University Press.

55.

Nachmias

Rosenbloom

D. H.

(2018). Measuring bureaucratic representation and integration. In Broadnax

W. D.

(Ed.), Diversity and affirmative action in Public Service (pp. 39–50). Routledge.

56.

Naff

K. C.

(1994). Through the glass ceiling: Prospects for the advancement of women in the federal civil service. Public Administration Review, 54(6), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.2307/976669

57.

Nelson

Piatak

(2021). Intersectionality, leadership, and inclusion: How do racially underrepresented women fare in the federal government? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(2), 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x19881681

58.

Nickels

A. E.

Heckler

(2025). Theory in a time of unpredictability. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 47(2), 99–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2025.2504814

59.

Nielsen

V. L.

Madsen

M. B.

(2019). Token status and management aspirations among male and female employees in public sector workplaces. Public Personnel Management, 48(2), 226–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026018808822

60.

Pati

G. C.

Bailey

E. K.

(1995). Empowering people with disabilities: Strategy and human resource issues in implementing the ADA. Organizational Dynamics, 23(3), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(95)90025-x

61.

Piatak

McDonald

Portillo

Mohr

(2025). Race, gender, and rules: How intersectionality and congruence shape leadership perceptions. International Public Management Journal, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2025.2510630

62.

Pitts

D. W.

(2005). Diversity, representation, and performance: Evidence about race and ethnicity in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui033

63.

Pitts

D. W.

Recascino Wise

(2010). Workforce diversity in the new millennium: Prospects for research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30(1), 44–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x09351823

64.

Portillo

Humphrey

Bearfield

D. A.

(2022). Representative bureaucracy theory and the implicit embrace of whiteness and masculinity. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 594–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13477

65.

Riccucci

N. M.

(2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled? Public Administration Review, 69(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01984.x

66.

Riccucci

N. M.

(2021). Managing diversity in public sector workforces. Routledge.

67.

Riccucci

N. M.

Meyers

M. K.

(2004). Linking passive and active representation: The case of frontline workers in welfare agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4), 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh038

68.

Riccucci

N. M.

Saidel

J. R.

(2001). The demographics of gubernatorial appointees: Toward an explanation of variation. Policy Studies Journal, 29(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2001.tb02071.x

69.

Riccucci

N. M.

Van Ryzin

G. G.

(2017). Representative bureaucracy: A lever to enhance social equity, coproduction, and democracy. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12649

70.

Riccucci

N. M.

Van Ryzin

G. G.

Lavena

C. F.

(2014). Representative bureaucracy in policing: Does it increase perceived legitimacy? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu006

71.

Riccucci

N. M.

Van Ryzin

G. G.

(2016). Representative bureaucracy and the willingness to coproduce: An experimental study. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12401

72.

Rice

M. F.

(2004). Organizational culture, social equity, and diversity: Teaching public administration education in the postmodern era. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2004.12001354

73.

Rodriguez

Freeman

K. J.

(2016). “Your focus on race is narrow and exclusive”: The derailment of anti-racist work through discourses of intersectionality and diversity. Whiteness and Education, 1(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/23793406.2016.1162193

74.

Rodriguez-Plesa

(2025). Representative bureaucracy and local government contracting: Examining supplier diversity programs. Public Administration Review, 85(3), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13867

75.

Sabharwal

(2015). From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut030

76.

Sabharwal

Chordiya

(2025). Doing equity work “equitably”: How an intersectional approach helps. In Guy

M. E.

McCandless

S. A.

(Eds.), Achieving social equity: From problems to solutions (2nd ed., pp. 24–34). Melvin & Leigh.

77.

Sabharwal

Hijal-Moghrabi

Royster

(2014). Preparing future public servants: Role of diversity in public administration. Public Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 206–245.

78.

Selden

S. C.

(1997). Representative bureaucracy: Examining the linkage between passive and active representation in the Farmers Home Administration. American Review of Public Administration, 27(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409702700103

79.

Sessler Bernstein

Fredette

. (2024). Decomposing the impact of leadership diversity among nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(1), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221145119

80.

Sowa

J. E.

Selden

S. C.

(2003). Administrative discretion and active representation: An expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00333

81.

Starke

A. M.

(2020). Poverty, policy, and federal administrative discourse: Are bureaucrats speaking equitable antipoverty policy designs into existence? Public Administration Review, 80(6), 1087–1099. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13191

82.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2021). 2020 Census results: United States population data. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census/decade/2020/2020-census-main.html

83.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2023). 2022 American community survey 1-year estimates. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/technical-documentation/table-and-geography-changes/2022/1-year.html

84.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2025). Performance and Accountability Report. Author. https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-25-900570

85.

Wilkins

V. M.

(2006). Exploring the causal story: Gender, active representation, and bureaucratic priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muj012

86.

Wilkins

V. M.

Keiser

L. R.

(2004). Linking passive and active representation by gender: The case of child support agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui023

87.

Wilkins

V. M.

Williams

B. N.

(2008). Black or blue: Racial profiling and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 654–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00905.x

88.

H. H.

(2022). Intersectionality and non-reporting behavior: Perceptions from women of color in federal law enforcement. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(3), 574–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x211006189

89.

Yun

(2020). Politics of active representation: The trade-off between organizational role and active representation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(1), 132–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x18792977